Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) talk as they arrive for a discussion about the potential benefits of a Civilian Climate Corps at the U.S. Capitol on June 23, 2021. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Jun 25, 2021
Some progressives are celebrating President Joe Biden's commitment to a two-track approach to infrastructure despite reports of GOP "fury" over his comments that the $579 billion bipartisan deal and a Democratic reconciliation bill must come to his desk "in tandem."
In a pair of Friday tweets about the Republican reaction to Biden's remarks, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) addressed some of the progressive priorities that are expected in a reconciliation bill that could be passed by Democrats without any GOP support.
"It's time to move forward, rebuild infrastructure and draw down carbon, lower the age of Medicare and extend it to cover vision and dental, expand childcare and housing accessibility, and serve the American people," she said. "That is bipartisan too, with two-party support among the electorate."
The congresswoman also accused GOP lawmakers who may now withdraw their support of the bipartisan infrastructure deal--which focuses on physical infrastructure like roads and bridges and is far smaller than Biden's American Jobs Plan--of negotiating with the White House in bad faith:
\u201c@AOC .@EdMarkey predicted this yesterday. It\u2019s exactly the same thing Republicans did to stop climate legislation in 2009. https://t.co/Q5r12c8YHS\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1624645608
Josh Miller-Lewis of More Perfect Union responded to her tweets with a video from Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.)--who co-sponsors various climate legislation with Ocasio-Cortez--highlighting GOP behavior on a key climate bill over a decade ago.
"The last time Democrats were in power in Washington, I watched as climate action took a backseat to other legislative priorities, wasting precious time and political power," said Markey, then a member of the House. "We are in danger of making the same mistake."
Even though Democratic leadership in Congress has long been working on the dual-track approach, Biden's confirmation Thursday--the same day the bipartisan deal was officially announced--that he wouldn't sign just one of the bills thrilled progressives but outraged Republicans, including some who were involved in the recent negotiations.
\u201cThis is a big deal. \n\n @USProgressives have been pushing for a big, bold reconciliation package that tackles the climate crisis, expands Medicare, and meets the scale of our childcare crisis. \n\nLet\u2019s get this done!\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1624648731
The Washington Postrevealed that senators who negotiated the bipartisan deal held a call about the president's position Friday afternoon.
"Many in the group were irritated about having stuck their necks out to back Biden's agreement in the first place and having just been at the White House less than 24 hours before," reportedCNN. "Agreeing to the bipartisan deal was always going to put them at odds with some of their conservative colleagues, and they viewed the president's words as having undercut their good-faith deal."
According to Politico, "Democrats were privately confident afterward that their Republican colleagues would stay on board and that their outrage would pass."
Biden ally Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who endorsed the deal, told the outlet that "having spoken with several colleagues, I'm optimistic that despite some hiccups, the historic scope and widespread public support for this bipartisan infrastructure deal will keep it moving forward."
Despite that optimism, Biden's promise to block bipartisan legislation without a reconciliation bill could be "a potential dealbreaker" for Republicans, Politico noted, citing GOP aides:
One aide said that clearly linking the two infrastructure bills was never discussed--not within the group of 10 senators who met Biden on Thursday, the bigger group of 21 senators who endorsed their work, or with the White House. A second aide said that frustrations run far deeper than Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who began griping publicly late Thursday.
"In endorsing the deal, Biden praised the group for 'keeping their word,' but then immediately broke his," said a third Republican aide.
"No deal by extortion!" Graham, who had endorsed the deal, tweeted Friday. "It was never suggested to me during these negotiations that President Biden was holding hostage the bipartisan infrastructure proposal unless a liberal reconciliation package was also passed."
In a series of tweets, NBC News policy editor Benjy Sarlin noted that while everyone involved with the talks knew a reconciliation effort was possible, Biden's clear requirement that the bills come together is new.
\u201c@Fritschner @JStein_WaPo @StevenTDennis Now you can argue Biden's pledge is beyond the parameters of the deal, has nothing to do with the substance, and mostly implied by the first part. But it was a new statement and people on the left treated it that way just as the right did.\u201d— Benjy Sarlin (@Benjy Sarlin) 1624648386
Ocasio-Cortez and others, meanwhile, pointed to previous comments from the president as well as GOP lawmakers that suggested everyone involved expected both a bipartisan deal and a reconciliation bill.
\u201cOh look, a receipt! \ud83e\uddfe Looks like it\u2019s good for returning the Senate GOP\u2019s excuses for bad faith negotiating\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1624654216
\u201cOr Bill Cassidy, yesterday: \u201cI think we've made progress even if Majority Leader Schumer decides to proceed with another\u00a0reconciliation\u00a0bill.\u201d\u201d— Edward-Isaac Dovere (@Edward-Isaac Dovere) 1624639456
In a call Friday with Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), who led the bipartisan talks along with Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), "the president reiterated strong support for both the bipartisan infrastructure bill and a reconciliation bill containing the American Families Plan moving forward on a two-track system," according to a readout from the White House.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki echoed that message during a Friday briefing, telling reporters, "I think the American people are quite focused on how we're getting work done on their behalf--less focused on the mechanics of the process."
"Now, it is up to Republicans... to decide if they are going to vote against a historic investment in infrastructure that's going to rebuild roads and railways and bridges in their communities simply because they don't like the mechanics of the process," she added. "That's a pretty absurd argument for them to make. Good luck on the political front on that argument."
\u201cRep. Pramila Jayapal @RepJayapal, chair of the House Progressive Caucus, points out that a simultaneous, dual bill solution is what progressives were advocating for for weeks.\u201d— Maddow Blog (@Maddow Blog) 1624597385
Though progressives welcomed Biden's commitment to a reconciliation bill Thursday, the bipartisan deal has generated concerns on several fronts--including its potential impact on unemployment benefits, its push for privatization, and the fact that it could exacerbate the climate emergency.
"On infrastructure, the Biden administration has now presented a package where the contents are so far from what needs to be done it's impossible to even celebrate the dollar value," Alexander Sammon wrote Thursday for The American Prospect.
"It would be better to let the country's crumbling, outmoded, fossil fuel-heavy infrastructure continue to fall into disrepair," Sammon suggested, "than to take a deal that would extend the life and use of calamitous land and water use patterns further."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Some progressives are celebrating President Joe Biden's commitment to a two-track approach to infrastructure despite reports of GOP "fury" over his comments that the $579 billion bipartisan deal and a Democratic reconciliation bill must come to his desk "in tandem."
In a pair of Friday tweets about the Republican reaction to Biden's remarks, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) addressed some of the progressive priorities that are expected in a reconciliation bill that could be passed by Democrats without any GOP support.
"It's time to move forward, rebuild infrastructure and draw down carbon, lower the age of Medicare and extend it to cover vision and dental, expand childcare and housing accessibility, and serve the American people," she said. "That is bipartisan too, with two-party support among the electorate."
The congresswoman also accused GOP lawmakers who may now withdraw their support of the bipartisan infrastructure deal--which focuses on physical infrastructure like roads and bridges and is far smaller than Biden's American Jobs Plan--of negotiating with the White House in bad faith:
\u201c@AOC .@EdMarkey predicted this yesterday. It\u2019s exactly the same thing Republicans did to stop climate legislation in 2009. https://t.co/Q5r12c8YHS\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1624645608
Josh Miller-Lewis of More Perfect Union responded to her tweets with a video from Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.)--who co-sponsors various climate legislation with Ocasio-Cortez--highlighting GOP behavior on a key climate bill over a decade ago.
"The last time Democrats were in power in Washington, I watched as climate action took a backseat to other legislative priorities, wasting precious time and political power," said Markey, then a member of the House. "We are in danger of making the same mistake."
Even though Democratic leadership in Congress has long been working on the dual-track approach, Biden's confirmation Thursday--the same day the bipartisan deal was officially announced--that he wouldn't sign just one of the bills thrilled progressives but outraged Republicans, including some who were involved in the recent negotiations.
\u201cThis is a big deal. \n\n @USProgressives have been pushing for a big, bold reconciliation package that tackles the climate crisis, expands Medicare, and meets the scale of our childcare crisis. \n\nLet\u2019s get this done!\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1624648731
The Washington Postrevealed that senators who negotiated the bipartisan deal held a call about the president's position Friday afternoon.
"Many in the group were irritated about having stuck their necks out to back Biden's agreement in the first place and having just been at the White House less than 24 hours before," reportedCNN. "Agreeing to the bipartisan deal was always going to put them at odds with some of their conservative colleagues, and they viewed the president's words as having undercut their good-faith deal."
According to Politico, "Democrats were privately confident afterward that their Republican colleagues would stay on board and that their outrage would pass."
Biden ally Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who endorsed the deal, told the outlet that "having spoken with several colleagues, I'm optimistic that despite some hiccups, the historic scope and widespread public support for this bipartisan infrastructure deal will keep it moving forward."
Despite that optimism, Biden's promise to block bipartisan legislation without a reconciliation bill could be "a potential dealbreaker" for Republicans, Politico noted, citing GOP aides:
One aide said that clearly linking the two infrastructure bills was never discussed--not within the group of 10 senators who met Biden on Thursday, the bigger group of 21 senators who endorsed their work, or with the White House. A second aide said that frustrations run far deeper than Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who began griping publicly late Thursday.
"In endorsing the deal, Biden praised the group for 'keeping their word,' but then immediately broke his," said a third Republican aide.
"No deal by extortion!" Graham, who had endorsed the deal, tweeted Friday. "It was never suggested to me during these negotiations that President Biden was holding hostage the bipartisan infrastructure proposal unless a liberal reconciliation package was also passed."
In a series of tweets, NBC News policy editor Benjy Sarlin noted that while everyone involved with the talks knew a reconciliation effort was possible, Biden's clear requirement that the bills come together is new.
\u201c@Fritschner @JStein_WaPo @StevenTDennis Now you can argue Biden's pledge is beyond the parameters of the deal, has nothing to do with the substance, and mostly implied by the first part. But it was a new statement and people on the left treated it that way just as the right did.\u201d— Benjy Sarlin (@Benjy Sarlin) 1624648386
Ocasio-Cortez and others, meanwhile, pointed to previous comments from the president as well as GOP lawmakers that suggested everyone involved expected both a bipartisan deal and a reconciliation bill.
\u201cOh look, a receipt! \ud83e\uddfe Looks like it\u2019s good for returning the Senate GOP\u2019s excuses for bad faith negotiating\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1624654216
\u201cOr Bill Cassidy, yesterday: \u201cI think we've made progress even if Majority Leader Schumer decides to proceed with another\u00a0reconciliation\u00a0bill.\u201d\u201d— Edward-Isaac Dovere (@Edward-Isaac Dovere) 1624639456
In a call Friday with Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), who led the bipartisan talks along with Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), "the president reiterated strong support for both the bipartisan infrastructure bill and a reconciliation bill containing the American Families Plan moving forward on a two-track system," according to a readout from the White House.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki echoed that message during a Friday briefing, telling reporters, "I think the American people are quite focused on how we're getting work done on their behalf--less focused on the mechanics of the process."
"Now, it is up to Republicans... to decide if they are going to vote against a historic investment in infrastructure that's going to rebuild roads and railways and bridges in their communities simply because they don't like the mechanics of the process," she added. "That's a pretty absurd argument for them to make. Good luck on the political front on that argument."
\u201cRep. Pramila Jayapal @RepJayapal, chair of the House Progressive Caucus, points out that a simultaneous, dual bill solution is what progressives were advocating for for weeks.\u201d— Maddow Blog (@Maddow Blog) 1624597385
Though progressives welcomed Biden's commitment to a reconciliation bill Thursday, the bipartisan deal has generated concerns on several fronts--including its potential impact on unemployment benefits, its push for privatization, and the fact that it could exacerbate the climate emergency.
"On infrastructure, the Biden administration has now presented a package where the contents are so far from what needs to be done it's impossible to even celebrate the dollar value," Alexander Sammon wrote Thursday for The American Prospect.
"It would be better to let the country's crumbling, outmoded, fossil fuel-heavy infrastructure continue to fall into disrepair," Sammon suggested, "than to take a deal that would extend the life and use of calamitous land and water use patterns further."
Some progressives are celebrating President Joe Biden's commitment to a two-track approach to infrastructure despite reports of GOP "fury" over his comments that the $579 billion bipartisan deal and a Democratic reconciliation bill must come to his desk "in tandem."
In a pair of Friday tweets about the Republican reaction to Biden's remarks, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) addressed some of the progressive priorities that are expected in a reconciliation bill that could be passed by Democrats without any GOP support.
"It's time to move forward, rebuild infrastructure and draw down carbon, lower the age of Medicare and extend it to cover vision and dental, expand childcare and housing accessibility, and serve the American people," she said. "That is bipartisan too, with two-party support among the electorate."
The congresswoman also accused GOP lawmakers who may now withdraw their support of the bipartisan infrastructure deal--which focuses on physical infrastructure like roads and bridges and is far smaller than Biden's American Jobs Plan--of negotiating with the White House in bad faith:
\u201c@AOC .@EdMarkey predicted this yesterday. It\u2019s exactly the same thing Republicans did to stop climate legislation in 2009. https://t.co/Q5r12c8YHS\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1624645608
Josh Miller-Lewis of More Perfect Union responded to her tweets with a video from Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.)--who co-sponsors various climate legislation with Ocasio-Cortez--highlighting GOP behavior on a key climate bill over a decade ago.
"The last time Democrats were in power in Washington, I watched as climate action took a backseat to other legislative priorities, wasting precious time and political power," said Markey, then a member of the House. "We are in danger of making the same mistake."
Even though Democratic leadership in Congress has long been working on the dual-track approach, Biden's confirmation Thursday--the same day the bipartisan deal was officially announced--that he wouldn't sign just one of the bills thrilled progressives but outraged Republicans, including some who were involved in the recent negotiations.
\u201cThis is a big deal. \n\n @USProgressives have been pushing for a big, bold reconciliation package that tackles the climate crisis, expands Medicare, and meets the scale of our childcare crisis. \n\nLet\u2019s get this done!\u201d— Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan Omar) 1624648731
The Washington Postrevealed that senators who negotiated the bipartisan deal held a call about the president's position Friday afternoon.
"Many in the group were irritated about having stuck their necks out to back Biden's agreement in the first place and having just been at the White House less than 24 hours before," reportedCNN. "Agreeing to the bipartisan deal was always going to put them at odds with some of their conservative colleagues, and they viewed the president's words as having undercut their good-faith deal."
According to Politico, "Democrats were privately confident afterward that their Republican colleagues would stay on board and that their outrage would pass."
Biden ally Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who endorsed the deal, told the outlet that "having spoken with several colleagues, I'm optimistic that despite some hiccups, the historic scope and widespread public support for this bipartisan infrastructure deal will keep it moving forward."
Despite that optimism, Biden's promise to block bipartisan legislation without a reconciliation bill could be "a potential dealbreaker" for Republicans, Politico noted, citing GOP aides:
One aide said that clearly linking the two infrastructure bills was never discussed--not within the group of 10 senators who met Biden on Thursday, the bigger group of 21 senators who endorsed their work, or with the White House. A second aide said that frustrations run far deeper than Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who began griping publicly late Thursday.
"In endorsing the deal, Biden praised the group for 'keeping their word,' but then immediately broke his," said a third Republican aide.
"No deal by extortion!" Graham, who had endorsed the deal, tweeted Friday. "It was never suggested to me during these negotiations that President Biden was holding hostage the bipartisan infrastructure proposal unless a liberal reconciliation package was also passed."
In a series of tweets, NBC News policy editor Benjy Sarlin noted that while everyone involved with the talks knew a reconciliation effort was possible, Biden's clear requirement that the bills come together is new.
\u201c@Fritschner @JStein_WaPo @StevenTDennis Now you can argue Biden's pledge is beyond the parameters of the deal, has nothing to do with the substance, and mostly implied by the first part. But it was a new statement and people on the left treated it that way just as the right did.\u201d— Benjy Sarlin (@Benjy Sarlin) 1624648386
Ocasio-Cortez and others, meanwhile, pointed to previous comments from the president as well as GOP lawmakers that suggested everyone involved expected both a bipartisan deal and a reconciliation bill.
\u201cOh look, a receipt! \ud83e\uddfe Looks like it\u2019s good for returning the Senate GOP\u2019s excuses for bad faith negotiating\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1624654216
\u201cOr Bill Cassidy, yesterday: \u201cI think we've made progress even if Majority Leader Schumer decides to proceed with another\u00a0reconciliation\u00a0bill.\u201d\u201d— Edward-Isaac Dovere (@Edward-Isaac Dovere) 1624639456
In a call Friday with Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), who led the bipartisan talks along with Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), "the president reiterated strong support for both the bipartisan infrastructure bill and a reconciliation bill containing the American Families Plan moving forward on a two-track system," according to a readout from the White House.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki echoed that message during a Friday briefing, telling reporters, "I think the American people are quite focused on how we're getting work done on their behalf--less focused on the mechanics of the process."
"Now, it is up to Republicans... to decide if they are going to vote against a historic investment in infrastructure that's going to rebuild roads and railways and bridges in their communities simply because they don't like the mechanics of the process," she added. "That's a pretty absurd argument for them to make. Good luck on the political front on that argument."
\u201cRep. Pramila Jayapal @RepJayapal, chair of the House Progressive Caucus, points out that a simultaneous, dual bill solution is what progressives were advocating for for weeks.\u201d— Maddow Blog (@Maddow Blog) 1624597385
Though progressives welcomed Biden's commitment to a reconciliation bill Thursday, the bipartisan deal has generated concerns on several fronts--including its potential impact on unemployment benefits, its push for privatization, and the fact that it could exacerbate the climate emergency.
"On infrastructure, the Biden administration has now presented a package where the contents are so far from what needs to be done it's impossible to even celebrate the dollar value," Alexander Sammon wrote Thursday for The American Prospect.
"It would be better to let the country's crumbling, outmoded, fossil fuel-heavy infrastructure continue to fall into disrepair," Sammon suggested, "than to take a deal that would extend the life and use of calamitous land and water use patterns further."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.