SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) speaks to reporters after a Republican Senate luncheon at the U.S. Capitol Building on June 15, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
McConnell Makes Clear 'All Republicans Will Oppose' Manchin Voting Rights Compromise
"The idea that Manchin can pass a law to protect the vote with help from the very people it needs protecting from is suspect at best."
Jun 17, 2021
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell unequivocally declared Thursday that Republicans will support neither the original For the People Act nor a watered-down version offered by Sen. Joe Manchin, who has continued to insist that bipartisan compromise on voting rights is achievable despite mounting evidence to the contrary.
"Republicans aren't interested in passing laws that protect our right to vote, because they're the ones actively attacking that right in 43+ states."
--Progress Arizona
During a press conference flanked by fellow Senate Republicans, McConnell (R-Ky.) said that the For the People Act (pdf) and Manchin's proposed alternative are "equally unacceptable" and "totally inappropriate."
"All Republicans will oppose that," McConnell added, referring to redistricting reforms and campaign finance disclosure rules that Manchin endorsed in a memo (pdf) outlining provisions of the For the People Act that he is willing to support ahead of an expected vote on the bill later this month.
The West Virginia Democrat's memo--which drew criticism from progressive lawmakers--also calls for the inclusion of voter ID requirements "with allowable alternatives" such as a utility bill, a proposal viewed as a sop to Republican lawmakers.
"The problem is, Manchin's approach allows the GOP to compromise our democracy," tweeted Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.). "Anyway, how many Republicans will Manchin's 'compromise' bring on board? The same number who support the For the People Act: 0. We can't compromise with the GOP when they won't even come to the negotiating table. When will we learn our lesson?"
In a statement on Thursday, McConnell proclaimed that Manchin's compromise version of the For the People Act "retains S. 1's rotten core: an assault on the fundamental idea that states, not the federal government, should decide how to run their own elections."
"In reality, the plan endorsed by Stacey Abrams is no compromise," said McConnell, referring to the former Georgia gubernatorial candidate's comments in support of Manchin's proposal. "It still subverts the First Amendment to supercharge cancel culture and the left's name-and-shame campaign model."
McConnell's position appeared to leave little doubt that Republicans will remain unanimously opposed to the popular voting rights legislation when it hits the Senate floor later this month.
But in response to the Republican leader's remarks, Manchin--the only Democratic senator who has yet to co-sponsor S. 1--signaled that he still believes Democrats can win over some GOP lawmakers to the proposed expansion of ballot access.
"McConnell has a right to do whatever he thinks he can do," Manchin told reporters Thursday. "I would hope that there's enough good Republicans who understand the bedrock of our society is having an accessible, fair, open, election."
Last month, the West Virginia senator similarly expressed "faith" that there were "ten good people" on the Republican side who would approve a commission to investigate the January 6 insurrection. Just six Republicans ultimately joined Democrats in voting to advance the commission bill, leaving the Senate four votes short of breaking the 60-vote legislative filibuster--an archaic rule that Manchin has repeatedly vowed to uphold.
"There will not be 10 votes to reinforce American democracy from a party that has radicalized against American democracy as one of its central ordering principles," MSNBC's Chris Hayes tweeted Thursday.
If passed, the For the People Act would help neutralize the hundreds of voter suppression measures that Republicans are rushing to enact in states across the country--which, according to analysts, is all the more reason to believe that the congressional GOP will continue to oppose the bill regardless of Manchin's proposed changes.
As Vanity Fair's Eric Lutz put it on Thursday, "The idea that Manchin can pass a law to protect the vote with help from the very people it needs protecting from is suspect at best."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell unequivocally declared Thursday that Republicans will support neither the original For the People Act nor a watered-down version offered by Sen. Joe Manchin, who has continued to insist that bipartisan compromise on voting rights is achievable despite mounting evidence to the contrary.
"Republicans aren't interested in passing laws that protect our right to vote, because they're the ones actively attacking that right in 43+ states."
--Progress Arizona
During a press conference flanked by fellow Senate Republicans, McConnell (R-Ky.) said that the For the People Act (pdf) and Manchin's proposed alternative are "equally unacceptable" and "totally inappropriate."
"All Republicans will oppose that," McConnell added, referring to redistricting reforms and campaign finance disclosure rules that Manchin endorsed in a memo (pdf) outlining provisions of the For the People Act that he is willing to support ahead of an expected vote on the bill later this month.
The West Virginia Democrat's memo--which drew criticism from progressive lawmakers--also calls for the inclusion of voter ID requirements "with allowable alternatives" such as a utility bill, a proposal viewed as a sop to Republican lawmakers.
"The problem is, Manchin's approach allows the GOP to compromise our democracy," tweeted Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.). "Anyway, how many Republicans will Manchin's 'compromise' bring on board? The same number who support the For the People Act: 0. We can't compromise with the GOP when they won't even come to the negotiating table. When will we learn our lesson?"
In a statement on Thursday, McConnell proclaimed that Manchin's compromise version of the For the People Act "retains S. 1's rotten core: an assault on the fundamental idea that states, not the federal government, should decide how to run their own elections."
"In reality, the plan endorsed by Stacey Abrams is no compromise," said McConnell, referring to the former Georgia gubernatorial candidate's comments in support of Manchin's proposal. "It still subverts the First Amendment to supercharge cancel culture and the left's name-and-shame campaign model."
McConnell's position appeared to leave little doubt that Republicans will remain unanimously opposed to the popular voting rights legislation when it hits the Senate floor later this month.
But in response to the Republican leader's remarks, Manchin--the only Democratic senator who has yet to co-sponsor S. 1--signaled that he still believes Democrats can win over some GOP lawmakers to the proposed expansion of ballot access.
"McConnell has a right to do whatever he thinks he can do," Manchin told reporters Thursday. "I would hope that there's enough good Republicans who understand the bedrock of our society is having an accessible, fair, open, election."
Last month, the West Virginia senator similarly expressed "faith" that there were "ten good people" on the Republican side who would approve a commission to investigate the January 6 insurrection. Just six Republicans ultimately joined Democrats in voting to advance the commission bill, leaving the Senate four votes short of breaking the 60-vote legislative filibuster--an archaic rule that Manchin has repeatedly vowed to uphold.
"There will not be 10 votes to reinforce American democracy from a party that has radicalized against American democracy as one of its central ordering principles," MSNBC's Chris Hayes tweeted Thursday.
If passed, the For the People Act would help neutralize the hundreds of voter suppression measures that Republicans are rushing to enact in states across the country--which, according to analysts, is all the more reason to believe that the congressional GOP will continue to oppose the bill regardless of Manchin's proposed changes.
As Vanity Fair's Eric Lutz put it on Thursday, "The idea that Manchin can pass a law to protect the vote with help from the very people it needs protecting from is suspect at best."
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell unequivocally declared Thursday that Republicans will support neither the original For the People Act nor a watered-down version offered by Sen. Joe Manchin, who has continued to insist that bipartisan compromise on voting rights is achievable despite mounting evidence to the contrary.
"Republicans aren't interested in passing laws that protect our right to vote, because they're the ones actively attacking that right in 43+ states."
--Progress Arizona
During a press conference flanked by fellow Senate Republicans, McConnell (R-Ky.) said that the For the People Act (pdf) and Manchin's proposed alternative are "equally unacceptable" and "totally inappropriate."
"All Republicans will oppose that," McConnell added, referring to redistricting reforms and campaign finance disclosure rules that Manchin endorsed in a memo (pdf) outlining provisions of the For the People Act that he is willing to support ahead of an expected vote on the bill later this month.
The West Virginia Democrat's memo--which drew criticism from progressive lawmakers--also calls for the inclusion of voter ID requirements "with allowable alternatives" such as a utility bill, a proposal viewed as a sop to Republican lawmakers.
"The problem is, Manchin's approach allows the GOP to compromise our democracy," tweeted Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.). "Anyway, how many Republicans will Manchin's 'compromise' bring on board? The same number who support the For the People Act: 0. We can't compromise with the GOP when they won't even come to the negotiating table. When will we learn our lesson?"
In a statement on Thursday, McConnell proclaimed that Manchin's compromise version of the For the People Act "retains S. 1's rotten core: an assault on the fundamental idea that states, not the federal government, should decide how to run their own elections."
"In reality, the plan endorsed by Stacey Abrams is no compromise," said McConnell, referring to the former Georgia gubernatorial candidate's comments in support of Manchin's proposal. "It still subverts the First Amendment to supercharge cancel culture and the left's name-and-shame campaign model."
McConnell's position appeared to leave little doubt that Republicans will remain unanimously opposed to the popular voting rights legislation when it hits the Senate floor later this month.
But in response to the Republican leader's remarks, Manchin--the only Democratic senator who has yet to co-sponsor S. 1--signaled that he still believes Democrats can win over some GOP lawmakers to the proposed expansion of ballot access.
"McConnell has a right to do whatever he thinks he can do," Manchin told reporters Thursday. "I would hope that there's enough good Republicans who understand the bedrock of our society is having an accessible, fair, open, election."
Last month, the West Virginia senator similarly expressed "faith" that there were "ten good people" on the Republican side who would approve a commission to investigate the January 6 insurrection. Just six Republicans ultimately joined Democrats in voting to advance the commission bill, leaving the Senate four votes short of breaking the 60-vote legislative filibuster--an archaic rule that Manchin has repeatedly vowed to uphold.
"There will not be 10 votes to reinforce American democracy from a party that has radicalized against American democracy as one of its central ordering principles," MSNBC's Chris Hayes tweeted Thursday.
If passed, the For the People Act would help neutralize the hundreds of voter suppression measures that Republicans are rushing to enact in states across the country--which, according to analysts, is all the more reason to believe that the congressional GOP will continue to oppose the bill regardless of Manchin's proposed changes.
As Vanity Fair's Eric Lutz put it on Thursday, "The idea that Manchin can pass a law to protect the vote with help from the very people it needs protecting from is suspect at best."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.