Volunteers from City harvest distribute food in Harlem on March 28, 2020 in New York City. (Photo: Kena Betancur/AFP via Getty Images)
Mar 25, 2021
The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Wednesday announced the official end of a Trump-era policy that could have stripped federal food benefits from more than a million people during the coronavirus pandemic by imposing more draconian work requirements on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program recipients.
A federal court allowed the Biden USDA--headed by recently confirmed Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack--to withdraw the Trump administration's appeal of an earlier ruling that blocked the policy change, which would have made it more difficult for states to waive work requirements for SNAP beneficiaries despite the ongoing economic crisis.
"Hunger is not an economic motivator--it is a policy failure. SNAP benefits provide the hand up so many Americans need in times of financial instability."
--Rep. Jahana Hayes
"We are pleased to finally put to rest a policy that would have restricted the ability of states to provide nutrition assistance to able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) during times of high unemployment," Vilsack said in a statement. "The rule would have penalized individuals who were unable to find consistent income, when many low-wage jobs have variable hours, and limited to no sick leave."
"Groups with typically higher unemployment, including rural Americans, Black, Indigenous, Hispanic and People of Color, and those with less than a high school education would have been disproportionately harmed by this cruel policy," Vilsack added.
According to the Trump USDA's own estimates, the rule would have rendered more than 700,000 people ineligible for federal nutrition benefits, a devastating blow for those struggling to put food on the table amid widespread joblessness. Experts argued that the USDA's analysis likely underestimated the number of people who would have been harmed by the policy change.
With hunger still at staggering levels across the U.S.--the latest Census data shows that more than 20 million adults said their households did not have enough to eat last month--Democratic lawmakers and activists celebrated USDA's move to scrap a policy that would have made the crisis much worse.
\u201cHUGE NEWS: Trump's biggest regulatory attack on SNAP is officially dead and buried!!\n\n@USDA has withdrawn the appeal the Trump administration filed last year, challenging the D.C. Circuit Court's decision striking down the rule.\n\nSecretary Vilsack's statement:\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1616605764
Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-Conn.), chair of the House Subcommittee on Nutrition, Oversight, and Department Operations, said in a statement Wednesday that "amidst a pandemic in which millions of Americans are struggling to find work, it is especially important to ensure that as many Americans as possible retain eligibility for federal benefits like SNAP."
"Hunger is not an economic motivator--it is a policy failure," Hayes added. "SNAP benefits provide the hand up so many Americans need in times of financial instability. I am pleased USDA has dropped this appeal."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Wednesday announced the official end of a Trump-era policy that could have stripped federal food benefits from more than a million people during the coronavirus pandemic by imposing more draconian work requirements on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program recipients.
A federal court allowed the Biden USDA--headed by recently confirmed Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack--to withdraw the Trump administration's appeal of an earlier ruling that blocked the policy change, which would have made it more difficult for states to waive work requirements for SNAP beneficiaries despite the ongoing economic crisis.
"Hunger is not an economic motivator--it is a policy failure. SNAP benefits provide the hand up so many Americans need in times of financial instability."
--Rep. Jahana Hayes
"We are pleased to finally put to rest a policy that would have restricted the ability of states to provide nutrition assistance to able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) during times of high unemployment," Vilsack said in a statement. "The rule would have penalized individuals who were unable to find consistent income, when many low-wage jobs have variable hours, and limited to no sick leave."
"Groups with typically higher unemployment, including rural Americans, Black, Indigenous, Hispanic and People of Color, and those with less than a high school education would have been disproportionately harmed by this cruel policy," Vilsack added.
According to the Trump USDA's own estimates, the rule would have rendered more than 700,000 people ineligible for federal nutrition benefits, a devastating blow for those struggling to put food on the table amid widespread joblessness. Experts argued that the USDA's analysis likely underestimated the number of people who would have been harmed by the policy change.
With hunger still at staggering levels across the U.S.--the latest Census data shows that more than 20 million adults said their households did not have enough to eat last month--Democratic lawmakers and activists celebrated USDA's move to scrap a policy that would have made the crisis much worse.
\u201cHUGE NEWS: Trump's biggest regulatory attack on SNAP is officially dead and buried!!\n\n@USDA has withdrawn the appeal the Trump administration filed last year, challenging the D.C. Circuit Court's decision striking down the rule.\n\nSecretary Vilsack's statement:\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1616605764
Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-Conn.), chair of the House Subcommittee on Nutrition, Oversight, and Department Operations, said in a statement Wednesday that "amidst a pandemic in which millions of Americans are struggling to find work, it is especially important to ensure that as many Americans as possible retain eligibility for federal benefits like SNAP."
"Hunger is not an economic motivator--it is a policy failure," Hayes added. "SNAP benefits provide the hand up so many Americans need in times of financial instability. I am pleased USDA has dropped this appeal."
The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Wednesday announced the official end of a Trump-era policy that could have stripped federal food benefits from more than a million people during the coronavirus pandemic by imposing more draconian work requirements on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program recipients.
A federal court allowed the Biden USDA--headed by recently confirmed Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack--to withdraw the Trump administration's appeal of an earlier ruling that blocked the policy change, which would have made it more difficult for states to waive work requirements for SNAP beneficiaries despite the ongoing economic crisis.
"Hunger is not an economic motivator--it is a policy failure. SNAP benefits provide the hand up so many Americans need in times of financial instability."
--Rep. Jahana Hayes
"We are pleased to finally put to rest a policy that would have restricted the ability of states to provide nutrition assistance to able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) during times of high unemployment," Vilsack said in a statement. "The rule would have penalized individuals who were unable to find consistent income, when many low-wage jobs have variable hours, and limited to no sick leave."
"Groups with typically higher unemployment, including rural Americans, Black, Indigenous, Hispanic and People of Color, and those with less than a high school education would have been disproportionately harmed by this cruel policy," Vilsack added.
According to the Trump USDA's own estimates, the rule would have rendered more than 700,000 people ineligible for federal nutrition benefits, a devastating blow for those struggling to put food on the table amid widespread joblessness. Experts argued that the USDA's analysis likely underestimated the number of people who would have been harmed by the policy change.
With hunger still at staggering levels across the U.S.--the latest Census data shows that more than 20 million adults said their households did not have enough to eat last month--Democratic lawmakers and activists celebrated USDA's move to scrap a policy that would have made the crisis much worse.
\u201cHUGE NEWS: Trump's biggest regulatory attack on SNAP is officially dead and buried!!\n\n@USDA has withdrawn the appeal the Trump administration filed last year, challenging the D.C. Circuit Court's decision striking down the rule.\n\nSecretary Vilsack's statement:\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1616605764
Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-Conn.), chair of the House Subcommittee on Nutrition, Oversight, and Department Operations, said in a statement Wednesday that "amidst a pandemic in which millions of Americans are struggling to find work, it is especially important to ensure that as many Americans as possible retain eligibility for federal benefits like SNAP."
"Hunger is not an economic motivator--it is a policy failure," Hayes added. "SNAP benefits provide the hand up so many Americans need in times of financial instability. I am pleased USDA has dropped this appeal."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.