Afghan security forces walk around the blasted remnants of one of the two fuel tankers destroyed in a September 3, 2009 NATO airstrike in Kunduz province that killed as many as 90 civilians. (Photo: STR/AFP via Getty Images)
Feb 15, 2021
Afghans and human rights advocates around the world expressed deep disappointment Tuesday after the European Court of Human Rights ruled in favor of Germany in a case brought by victims of a 2009 NATO airstrike that killed as many as 90 civilians.
"They martyred a hundred people, they bombed us unjustly, so how can they come to this unjust decision?"
--Abdul Hanan, plaintiff
The New York Timesreports a 17-judge panel of the ECHR ruled unanimously that the German government adequately investigated a September 3, 2009 airstrike in Afghanistan's Kunduz province that targeted two fuel tankers stolen by Taliban fighters. Believing the militants might use the trucks as a mobile bombs, Col. Georg Klein, the German commanding officer of a nearby NATO base, ordered U.S. warplanes to destroy the vehicles.
According toGerman broadcaster Deutsche Welle, prosecutors said Klein made several calls to an informant to ensure there were no civilians present before the strike. However, scores of Afghan civilians including children flocked to the trucks--which were stuck on a sandbank in the Kunduz River--to siphon off fuel at the Taliban's invitation.
A German military investigation later found that as many as 90 civilians died in the massive explosion caused by the strike. The probe concluded that no charges should be brought against Klein.
\u201cThe ECHR rules Germany's investigation into a NATO airstrike in Afghanistan did not breach the human rights convention.\n\nThe applicant, an Afghan man whose two sons were killed, alleged Germany violated the right to life by failing to investigate fully.\nhttps://t.co/I7AFPBEiH3\u201d— DW Europe (@DW Europe) 1613471162
Tuesday's ECHR ruling stated that Klein "had not incurred criminal liability mainly because he had been convinced, at the time of ordering the airstrike, that no civilians had been present at the sand bank." Klein was promoted to general in 2012.
The court also found there was "no violation" of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, that it "had no reason to doubt" Germany's assertion that it thoroughly investigated the airstrike as required under the charter, and that Klein had "not acted with the intent to cause excessive civilian casualties."
The court's findings gave no comfort to plaintiff Abdul Hanan, a farmer whose sons Abdul Bayan and Nesarullah--ages 12 and eight, respectively--were killed in the strike.
"They martyred a hundred people, they bombed us unjustly, so how can they come to this unjust decision?" Hanan told the Times after the ECHR ruling. "Is our blood worth less than the blood of a German?"
"I wanted the court to provide justice, to have mercy on us," Hanan added.
In the aftermath of the mass killing, Germany offered $5,000 payments to families of civilians who died or were seriously injured in the strike. Hanan sought additional damages, as well as an admission by German officials that they failed to protect civilians. The German government argued that it was not legally responsible for the deaths since the airstrike was executed on behalf of the United Nations.
Last December, Germany's constitutional court ruled that the country was not liable for the civilian casualties.
According to the Costs of War Project at Brown University's Watson Institute, more than 43,000 Afghan civilians have been killed during the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan, now in its 20th year. Taliban militants have killed the most noncombatants, but thousands of men, women, and children have also been killed by U.S., allied, and Afghan government bombs and bullets.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Afghans and human rights advocates around the world expressed deep disappointment Tuesday after the European Court of Human Rights ruled in favor of Germany in a case brought by victims of a 2009 NATO airstrike that killed as many as 90 civilians.
"They martyred a hundred people, they bombed us unjustly, so how can they come to this unjust decision?"
--Abdul Hanan, plaintiff
The New York Timesreports a 17-judge panel of the ECHR ruled unanimously that the German government adequately investigated a September 3, 2009 airstrike in Afghanistan's Kunduz province that targeted two fuel tankers stolen by Taliban fighters. Believing the militants might use the trucks as a mobile bombs, Col. Georg Klein, the German commanding officer of a nearby NATO base, ordered U.S. warplanes to destroy the vehicles.
According toGerman broadcaster Deutsche Welle, prosecutors said Klein made several calls to an informant to ensure there were no civilians present before the strike. However, scores of Afghan civilians including children flocked to the trucks--which were stuck on a sandbank in the Kunduz River--to siphon off fuel at the Taliban's invitation.
A German military investigation later found that as many as 90 civilians died in the massive explosion caused by the strike. The probe concluded that no charges should be brought against Klein.
\u201cThe ECHR rules Germany's investigation into a NATO airstrike in Afghanistan did not breach the human rights convention.\n\nThe applicant, an Afghan man whose two sons were killed, alleged Germany violated the right to life by failing to investigate fully.\nhttps://t.co/I7AFPBEiH3\u201d— DW Europe (@DW Europe) 1613471162
Tuesday's ECHR ruling stated that Klein "had not incurred criminal liability mainly because he had been convinced, at the time of ordering the airstrike, that no civilians had been present at the sand bank." Klein was promoted to general in 2012.
The court also found there was "no violation" of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, that it "had no reason to doubt" Germany's assertion that it thoroughly investigated the airstrike as required under the charter, and that Klein had "not acted with the intent to cause excessive civilian casualties."
The court's findings gave no comfort to plaintiff Abdul Hanan, a farmer whose sons Abdul Bayan and Nesarullah--ages 12 and eight, respectively--were killed in the strike.
"They martyred a hundred people, they bombed us unjustly, so how can they come to this unjust decision?" Hanan told the Times after the ECHR ruling. "Is our blood worth less than the blood of a German?"
"I wanted the court to provide justice, to have mercy on us," Hanan added.
In the aftermath of the mass killing, Germany offered $5,000 payments to families of civilians who died or were seriously injured in the strike. Hanan sought additional damages, as well as an admission by German officials that they failed to protect civilians. The German government argued that it was not legally responsible for the deaths since the airstrike was executed on behalf of the United Nations.
Last December, Germany's constitutional court ruled that the country was not liable for the civilian casualties.
According to the Costs of War Project at Brown University's Watson Institute, more than 43,000 Afghan civilians have been killed during the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan, now in its 20th year. Taliban militants have killed the most noncombatants, but thousands of men, women, and children have also been killed by U.S., allied, and Afghan government bombs and bullets.
Afghans and human rights advocates around the world expressed deep disappointment Tuesday after the European Court of Human Rights ruled in favor of Germany in a case brought by victims of a 2009 NATO airstrike that killed as many as 90 civilians.
"They martyred a hundred people, they bombed us unjustly, so how can they come to this unjust decision?"
--Abdul Hanan, plaintiff
The New York Timesreports a 17-judge panel of the ECHR ruled unanimously that the German government adequately investigated a September 3, 2009 airstrike in Afghanistan's Kunduz province that targeted two fuel tankers stolen by Taliban fighters. Believing the militants might use the trucks as a mobile bombs, Col. Georg Klein, the German commanding officer of a nearby NATO base, ordered U.S. warplanes to destroy the vehicles.
According toGerman broadcaster Deutsche Welle, prosecutors said Klein made several calls to an informant to ensure there were no civilians present before the strike. However, scores of Afghan civilians including children flocked to the trucks--which were stuck on a sandbank in the Kunduz River--to siphon off fuel at the Taliban's invitation.
A German military investigation later found that as many as 90 civilians died in the massive explosion caused by the strike. The probe concluded that no charges should be brought against Klein.
\u201cThe ECHR rules Germany's investigation into a NATO airstrike in Afghanistan did not breach the human rights convention.\n\nThe applicant, an Afghan man whose two sons were killed, alleged Germany violated the right to life by failing to investigate fully.\nhttps://t.co/I7AFPBEiH3\u201d— DW Europe (@DW Europe) 1613471162
Tuesday's ECHR ruling stated that Klein "had not incurred criminal liability mainly because he had been convinced, at the time of ordering the airstrike, that no civilians had been present at the sand bank." Klein was promoted to general in 2012.
The court also found there was "no violation" of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, that it "had no reason to doubt" Germany's assertion that it thoroughly investigated the airstrike as required under the charter, and that Klein had "not acted with the intent to cause excessive civilian casualties."
The court's findings gave no comfort to plaintiff Abdul Hanan, a farmer whose sons Abdul Bayan and Nesarullah--ages 12 and eight, respectively--were killed in the strike.
"They martyred a hundred people, they bombed us unjustly, so how can they come to this unjust decision?" Hanan told the Times after the ECHR ruling. "Is our blood worth less than the blood of a German?"
"I wanted the court to provide justice, to have mercy on us," Hanan added.
In the aftermath of the mass killing, Germany offered $5,000 payments to families of civilians who died or were seriously injured in the strike. Hanan sought additional damages, as well as an admission by German officials that they failed to protect civilians. The German government argued that it was not legally responsible for the deaths since the airstrike was executed on behalf of the United Nations.
Last December, Germany's constitutional court ruled that the country was not liable for the civilian casualties.
According to the Costs of War Project at Brown University's Watson Institute, more than 43,000 Afghan civilians have been killed during the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan, now in its 20th year. Taliban militants have killed the most noncombatants, but thousands of men, women, and children have also been killed by U.S., allied, and Afghan government bombs and bullets.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.