Jan 02, 2021
Days before the U.S. Congress is set to certify President-elect Joe Biden's victory in the November 3 election, political observers on Sunday demanded to know how much effort President Donald Trump has put into pressuring state officials into naming him as the winner, after the Washington Post released audio of Trump pleading with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to "find" more than 11,000 votes for him.
As the Post reported, Trump spoke with Raffensperger and Ryan Germany, general counsel to the secretary of state, warning that by certifying Georgia's election results--which showed Biden winning 49.5% of the vote to Trump's 49.3%, and taking the state's 16 electoral votes--the two are taking "a big risk" and potentially breaking the law.
Trump urged Raffensperger to simply tell the public that he "recalculated" the results and determined the president won the state, to which the secretary of state, also a Republican, told Trump, "The data you have is wrong."
The president soon thereafter took a more direct approach.
"So look," Trump said. "All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state."
Listen:
\u201cThe Washington Post obtained a recording of Trump urging Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to overturn the results of the election. \n\nHere\u2019s the audio...https://t.co/VaEUgHuuu5\u201d— Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc (@Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc) 1609698599
At one point the president asked Germany to substantiate baseless rumors that ballots which cast votes for Trump in Fulton County were "shredded" by poll workers and that Dominion, which supplied voting machines for the election, removed the machinery from polling places to unfairly swing the results in Biden's favor.
"No, Dominion has not moved any machinery out of Fulton County," Germany told Trump, adding, "I'm sure. I'm sure, Mr. President."
The president suggested at one point that as a Republican, Raffensperger should want to have an "accurate election"--or one that Trump won.
"We believe that we do have an accurate election," the secretary of state replied.
In a separate audio clip, Raffensperger reiterated, "We have to stand by our numbers. We believe our numbers are right."
\u201cAnd Part 2...\u201d— Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc (@Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc) 1609698599
Critics condemned the latest evidence that Trump, two months after the election, is actively attempting to undermine the will of American voters.
\u201cNot for nothing, but if the phone call the WP got hold of between the presidenf* and Raffensperger isn\u2019t an impeachable offense, nothing is.\u201d— Charles P. Pierce (@Charles P. Pierce) 1609700006
\u201c"I just want to find 11,780 votes" is cheating. We don't have to pretend it was "highly improper," or "extraordinary," or some other damned euphemistic nonsense.\u201d— Brian Schatz (@Brian Schatz) 1609698289
\u201cHoly. Shit.\n\nThis is criminal extortion by a sitting president in an attempt to overturn a democratic election. \n\nImpeach him again. Then prosecute him once he\u2019s out of office. \n\nI know Biden wants to \u201cheal\u201d, and that\u2019s how we begin that process... because this cannot stand.\u201d— Heather Gardner (@Heather Gardner) 1609700254
\u201cThe last time a tape like this was released the president resigned three days later. https://t.co/2POW80Kqmb\u201d— Angus Johnston (@Angus Johnston) 1609701228
\u201cfirmly of the belief that the only way to keep this stuff from going further than it already has is to put this guy in prison https://t.co/EEYiXB9qtn\u201d— b-boy bouiebaisse (@b-boy bouiebaisse) 1609701129
The phone call came several weeks after Raffensperger told the Post that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was among several Republicans both in and outside of Georgia who pressured the secretary of state to invalidate legally-cast ballots.
Should Trump's and other Republicans' attempts to swing Georgia's numbers in the president's favor succeed, Trump would gain only 16 electoral votes--far fewer than he would need to meet the 270 threshold to be declared the winner of the election.
That suggests, some said on social media, that the president and his allies have likely made or plan to make similar phone calls to other election officials in states where they've contested the results, including Pennsylvania and Michigan.
If somehow Trump had been successful in his call with Raffensperger, it would have only taken him to 248 electoral votes. He'd still be short of the 270 he needs.
Did Trump make more calls to Secretaries of State in WI, MI, and AZ? I'd bet on it.
-- Max Berger (@maxberger) January 3, 2021
\u201cKnowing what Trump has said in leaked phone calls, just imagine what he's said in calls that weren't.\u201d— Robert Maguire (@Robert Maguire) 1609703325
\u201cEveryone who has a tape of Trump abusing his power should release it now\u201d— Preet Bharara (@Preet Bharara) 1609699871
"Everyone who has a tape of Trump abusing his power should release it now," tweeted former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Days before the U.S. Congress is set to certify President-elect Joe Biden's victory in the November 3 election, political observers on Sunday demanded to know how much effort President Donald Trump has put into pressuring state officials into naming him as the winner, after the Washington Post released audio of Trump pleading with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to "find" more than 11,000 votes for him.
As the Post reported, Trump spoke with Raffensperger and Ryan Germany, general counsel to the secretary of state, warning that by certifying Georgia's election results--which showed Biden winning 49.5% of the vote to Trump's 49.3%, and taking the state's 16 electoral votes--the two are taking "a big risk" and potentially breaking the law.
Trump urged Raffensperger to simply tell the public that he "recalculated" the results and determined the president won the state, to which the secretary of state, also a Republican, told Trump, "The data you have is wrong."
The president soon thereafter took a more direct approach.
"So look," Trump said. "All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state."
Listen:
\u201cThe Washington Post obtained a recording of Trump urging Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to overturn the results of the election. \n\nHere\u2019s the audio...https://t.co/VaEUgHuuu5\u201d— Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc (@Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc) 1609698599
At one point the president asked Germany to substantiate baseless rumors that ballots which cast votes for Trump in Fulton County were "shredded" by poll workers and that Dominion, which supplied voting machines for the election, removed the machinery from polling places to unfairly swing the results in Biden's favor.
"No, Dominion has not moved any machinery out of Fulton County," Germany told Trump, adding, "I'm sure. I'm sure, Mr. President."
The president suggested at one point that as a Republican, Raffensperger should want to have an "accurate election"--or one that Trump won.
"We believe that we do have an accurate election," the secretary of state replied.
In a separate audio clip, Raffensperger reiterated, "We have to stand by our numbers. We believe our numbers are right."
\u201cAnd Part 2...\u201d— Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc (@Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc) 1609698599
Critics condemned the latest evidence that Trump, two months after the election, is actively attempting to undermine the will of American voters.
\u201cNot for nothing, but if the phone call the WP got hold of between the presidenf* and Raffensperger isn\u2019t an impeachable offense, nothing is.\u201d— Charles P. Pierce (@Charles P. Pierce) 1609700006
\u201c"I just want to find 11,780 votes" is cheating. We don't have to pretend it was "highly improper," or "extraordinary," or some other damned euphemistic nonsense.\u201d— Brian Schatz (@Brian Schatz) 1609698289
\u201cHoly. Shit.\n\nThis is criminal extortion by a sitting president in an attempt to overturn a democratic election. \n\nImpeach him again. Then prosecute him once he\u2019s out of office. \n\nI know Biden wants to \u201cheal\u201d, and that\u2019s how we begin that process... because this cannot stand.\u201d— Heather Gardner (@Heather Gardner) 1609700254
\u201cThe last time a tape like this was released the president resigned three days later. https://t.co/2POW80Kqmb\u201d— Angus Johnston (@Angus Johnston) 1609701228
\u201cfirmly of the belief that the only way to keep this stuff from going further than it already has is to put this guy in prison https://t.co/EEYiXB9qtn\u201d— b-boy bouiebaisse (@b-boy bouiebaisse) 1609701129
The phone call came several weeks after Raffensperger told the Post that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was among several Republicans both in and outside of Georgia who pressured the secretary of state to invalidate legally-cast ballots.
Should Trump's and other Republicans' attempts to swing Georgia's numbers in the president's favor succeed, Trump would gain only 16 electoral votes--far fewer than he would need to meet the 270 threshold to be declared the winner of the election.
That suggests, some said on social media, that the president and his allies have likely made or plan to make similar phone calls to other election officials in states where they've contested the results, including Pennsylvania and Michigan.
If somehow Trump had been successful in his call with Raffensperger, it would have only taken him to 248 electoral votes. He'd still be short of the 270 he needs.
Did Trump make more calls to Secretaries of State in WI, MI, and AZ? I'd bet on it.
-- Max Berger (@maxberger) January 3, 2021
\u201cKnowing what Trump has said in leaked phone calls, just imagine what he's said in calls that weren't.\u201d— Robert Maguire (@Robert Maguire) 1609703325
\u201cEveryone who has a tape of Trump abusing his power should release it now\u201d— Preet Bharara (@Preet Bharara) 1609699871
"Everyone who has a tape of Trump abusing his power should release it now," tweeted former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara.
Days before the U.S. Congress is set to certify President-elect Joe Biden's victory in the November 3 election, political observers on Sunday demanded to know how much effort President Donald Trump has put into pressuring state officials into naming him as the winner, after the Washington Post released audio of Trump pleading with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to "find" more than 11,000 votes for him.
As the Post reported, Trump spoke with Raffensperger and Ryan Germany, general counsel to the secretary of state, warning that by certifying Georgia's election results--which showed Biden winning 49.5% of the vote to Trump's 49.3%, and taking the state's 16 electoral votes--the two are taking "a big risk" and potentially breaking the law.
Trump urged Raffensperger to simply tell the public that he "recalculated" the results and determined the president won the state, to which the secretary of state, also a Republican, told Trump, "The data you have is wrong."
The president soon thereafter took a more direct approach.
"So look," Trump said. "All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state."
Listen:
\u201cThe Washington Post obtained a recording of Trump urging Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to overturn the results of the election. \n\nHere\u2019s the audio...https://t.co/VaEUgHuuu5\u201d— Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc (@Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc) 1609698599
At one point the president asked Germany to substantiate baseless rumors that ballots which cast votes for Trump in Fulton County were "shredded" by poll workers and that Dominion, which supplied voting machines for the election, removed the machinery from polling places to unfairly swing the results in Biden's favor.
"No, Dominion has not moved any machinery out of Fulton County," Germany told Trump, adding, "I'm sure. I'm sure, Mr. President."
The president suggested at one point that as a Republican, Raffensperger should want to have an "accurate election"--or one that Trump won.
"We believe that we do have an accurate election," the secretary of state replied.
In a separate audio clip, Raffensperger reiterated, "We have to stand by our numbers. We believe our numbers are right."
\u201cAnd Part 2...\u201d— Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc (@Rex Chapman\ud83c\udfc7\ud83c\udffc) 1609698599
Critics condemned the latest evidence that Trump, two months after the election, is actively attempting to undermine the will of American voters.
\u201cNot for nothing, but if the phone call the WP got hold of between the presidenf* and Raffensperger isn\u2019t an impeachable offense, nothing is.\u201d— Charles P. Pierce (@Charles P. Pierce) 1609700006
\u201c"I just want to find 11,780 votes" is cheating. We don't have to pretend it was "highly improper," or "extraordinary," or some other damned euphemistic nonsense.\u201d— Brian Schatz (@Brian Schatz) 1609698289
\u201cHoly. Shit.\n\nThis is criminal extortion by a sitting president in an attempt to overturn a democratic election. \n\nImpeach him again. Then prosecute him once he\u2019s out of office. \n\nI know Biden wants to \u201cheal\u201d, and that\u2019s how we begin that process... because this cannot stand.\u201d— Heather Gardner (@Heather Gardner) 1609700254
\u201cThe last time a tape like this was released the president resigned three days later. https://t.co/2POW80Kqmb\u201d— Angus Johnston (@Angus Johnston) 1609701228
\u201cfirmly of the belief that the only way to keep this stuff from going further than it already has is to put this guy in prison https://t.co/EEYiXB9qtn\u201d— b-boy bouiebaisse (@b-boy bouiebaisse) 1609701129
The phone call came several weeks after Raffensperger told the Post that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was among several Republicans both in and outside of Georgia who pressured the secretary of state to invalidate legally-cast ballots.
Should Trump's and other Republicans' attempts to swing Georgia's numbers in the president's favor succeed, Trump would gain only 16 electoral votes--far fewer than he would need to meet the 270 threshold to be declared the winner of the election.
That suggests, some said on social media, that the president and his allies have likely made or plan to make similar phone calls to other election officials in states where they've contested the results, including Pennsylvania and Michigan.
If somehow Trump had been successful in his call with Raffensperger, it would have only taken him to 248 electoral votes. He'd still be short of the 270 he needs.
Did Trump make more calls to Secretaries of State in WI, MI, and AZ? I'd bet on it.
-- Max Berger (@maxberger) January 3, 2021
\u201cKnowing what Trump has said in leaked phone calls, just imagine what he's said in calls that weren't.\u201d— Robert Maguire (@Robert Maguire) 1609703325
\u201cEveryone who has a tape of Trump abusing his power should release it now\u201d— Preet Bharara (@Preet Bharara) 1609699871
"Everyone who has a tape of Trump abusing his power should release it now," tweeted former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.