SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Soot is one of the most understood, most dangerous pollutants around, and despite mountains of evidence that scientists and public health experts have provided him, Wheeler has refused to protect the public from soot's frightening health consequences," said Sierra Club's Al Armendariz. (Photo: Marcel Kusch/picture alliance via Getty Images)
On Way Out the Door, Trump EPA Rejects Tightening Deadly Soot Pollution Standards
"The failure to strengthen particulate-matter protections is a dereliction of duty that puts lives at risk."
Dec 06, 2020
President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency was accused Monday of putting "the health of tens of millions of Americans at risk" after rejecting science-backed, strengthened standards for particulate matter pollution, commonly known as soot.
"The EPA has one job: to protect public health and the environment, based on the best available science. With only a few weeks left in their tenure, President Trump's EPA political appointees have abdicated this responsibility," said Dr. Gretchen T. Goldman, research director for the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).
"The failure to strengthen particulate-matter protections is a dereliction of duty that puts lives at risk," Goldman said.
EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler--a former coal lobbyist--signed the rule Friday, the Washington Post reported. He is expected to announce rule Monday.
The decision will keep in place 2012 standards that put the threshold of industrial soot pollution, or PM 2.5, at 12 micrograms per cubic meter. An EPA assessment from earlier this year said the current levels are associated with over 45,000 premature deaths per year and found that dropping the limit to nine micrograms per cubic meter could save over 12,000 lives annually. The assessment further said that evidence and scientific assessments "can reasonably be viewed as calling into question the adequacy of the public health protection afforded by the combination of the current annual and 24-hour primary PM 2.5 standards."
As Rachel Fullmer, senior attorney with Environmental Defense Fund, noted, "Particle pollution is linked to asthma attacks, bronchitis, heart disease, and premature death."
"EPA's record also shows that communities in close proximity to industrial sources are disproportionately bearing the burden of this pollution, including Black, Latino, Indigenous, and other communities of color," she added. "This action comes at the same time these communities are also disproportionately suffering from the Covid-19 pandemic."
UCS's Goldman, in her statement, also pointed to the communities most heavily impacted by particulate-matter air pollution and the interplay with the coronavirus pandemic.
"We know that communities of color are disproportionately exposed to this pollution, leading to racial disparities in health conditions like asthma and cardiovascular disease. And the latest studies suggest that particulate pollution can also increase the severity of Covid-19," said Goldman.
The decision, while drawing outrage from environmental and public health advocacy groups, is also seen as unsurprising; it's completely on brand from Wheeler, who's been seen as doing the bidding of polluting industries, and the Trump administration more broadly has repeatedly rejected science and rolled back environmental safeguards.
"Soot is one of the most understood, most dangerous pollutants around, and despite mountains of evidence that scientists and public health experts have provided him, Wheeler has refused to protect the public from soot's frightening health consequences," said Al Armendariz, Sierra Club's senior director of federal campaigns.
"In its waning days, the Trump administration is still letting polluters off scot-free and leaving the rest of us to keep breathing the industry's deadly pollution--even in the midst of a respiratory pandemic," said John Walke, Clean Air director at Natural Resources Defense Council.
"This administration could have strengthened the limits on soot to protect our lungs and give people at the highest risk of dying from Covid-19 a better chance at fighting off this virus," Walke continued. "But it chose not to--leaving the health of tens of millions of Americans at risk."
Walked urged the incoming Biden administration to undo the "reckless decision."
"It's time polluters stopped making us sick," he said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency was accused Monday of putting "the health of tens of millions of Americans at risk" after rejecting science-backed, strengthened standards for particulate matter pollution, commonly known as soot.
"The EPA has one job: to protect public health and the environment, based on the best available science. With only a few weeks left in their tenure, President Trump's EPA political appointees have abdicated this responsibility," said Dr. Gretchen T. Goldman, research director for the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).
"The failure to strengthen particulate-matter protections is a dereliction of duty that puts lives at risk," Goldman said.
EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler--a former coal lobbyist--signed the rule Friday, the Washington Post reported. He is expected to announce rule Monday.
The decision will keep in place 2012 standards that put the threshold of industrial soot pollution, or PM 2.5, at 12 micrograms per cubic meter. An EPA assessment from earlier this year said the current levels are associated with over 45,000 premature deaths per year and found that dropping the limit to nine micrograms per cubic meter could save over 12,000 lives annually. The assessment further said that evidence and scientific assessments "can reasonably be viewed as calling into question the adequacy of the public health protection afforded by the combination of the current annual and 24-hour primary PM 2.5 standards."
As Rachel Fullmer, senior attorney with Environmental Defense Fund, noted, "Particle pollution is linked to asthma attacks, bronchitis, heart disease, and premature death."
"EPA's record also shows that communities in close proximity to industrial sources are disproportionately bearing the burden of this pollution, including Black, Latino, Indigenous, and other communities of color," she added. "This action comes at the same time these communities are also disproportionately suffering from the Covid-19 pandemic."
UCS's Goldman, in her statement, also pointed to the communities most heavily impacted by particulate-matter air pollution and the interplay with the coronavirus pandemic.
"We know that communities of color are disproportionately exposed to this pollution, leading to racial disparities in health conditions like asthma and cardiovascular disease. And the latest studies suggest that particulate pollution can also increase the severity of Covid-19," said Goldman.
The decision, while drawing outrage from environmental and public health advocacy groups, is also seen as unsurprising; it's completely on brand from Wheeler, who's been seen as doing the bidding of polluting industries, and the Trump administration more broadly has repeatedly rejected science and rolled back environmental safeguards.
"Soot is one of the most understood, most dangerous pollutants around, and despite mountains of evidence that scientists and public health experts have provided him, Wheeler has refused to protect the public from soot's frightening health consequences," said Al Armendariz, Sierra Club's senior director of federal campaigns.
"In its waning days, the Trump administration is still letting polluters off scot-free and leaving the rest of us to keep breathing the industry's deadly pollution--even in the midst of a respiratory pandemic," said John Walke, Clean Air director at Natural Resources Defense Council.
"This administration could have strengthened the limits on soot to protect our lungs and give people at the highest risk of dying from Covid-19 a better chance at fighting off this virus," Walke continued. "But it chose not to--leaving the health of tens of millions of Americans at risk."
Walked urged the incoming Biden administration to undo the "reckless decision."
"It's time polluters stopped making us sick," he said.
President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency was accused Monday of putting "the health of tens of millions of Americans at risk" after rejecting science-backed, strengthened standards for particulate matter pollution, commonly known as soot.
"The EPA has one job: to protect public health and the environment, based on the best available science. With only a few weeks left in their tenure, President Trump's EPA political appointees have abdicated this responsibility," said Dr. Gretchen T. Goldman, research director for the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).
"The failure to strengthen particulate-matter protections is a dereliction of duty that puts lives at risk," Goldman said.
EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler--a former coal lobbyist--signed the rule Friday, the Washington Post reported. He is expected to announce rule Monday.
The decision will keep in place 2012 standards that put the threshold of industrial soot pollution, or PM 2.5, at 12 micrograms per cubic meter. An EPA assessment from earlier this year said the current levels are associated with over 45,000 premature deaths per year and found that dropping the limit to nine micrograms per cubic meter could save over 12,000 lives annually. The assessment further said that evidence and scientific assessments "can reasonably be viewed as calling into question the adequacy of the public health protection afforded by the combination of the current annual and 24-hour primary PM 2.5 standards."
As Rachel Fullmer, senior attorney with Environmental Defense Fund, noted, "Particle pollution is linked to asthma attacks, bronchitis, heart disease, and premature death."
"EPA's record also shows that communities in close proximity to industrial sources are disproportionately bearing the burden of this pollution, including Black, Latino, Indigenous, and other communities of color," she added. "This action comes at the same time these communities are also disproportionately suffering from the Covid-19 pandemic."
UCS's Goldman, in her statement, also pointed to the communities most heavily impacted by particulate-matter air pollution and the interplay with the coronavirus pandemic.
"We know that communities of color are disproportionately exposed to this pollution, leading to racial disparities in health conditions like asthma and cardiovascular disease. And the latest studies suggest that particulate pollution can also increase the severity of Covid-19," said Goldman.
The decision, while drawing outrage from environmental and public health advocacy groups, is also seen as unsurprising; it's completely on brand from Wheeler, who's been seen as doing the bidding of polluting industries, and the Trump administration more broadly has repeatedly rejected science and rolled back environmental safeguards.
"Soot is one of the most understood, most dangerous pollutants around, and despite mountains of evidence that scientists and public health experts have provided him, Wheeler has refused to protect the public from soot's frightening health consequences," said Al Armendariz, Sierra Club's senior director of federal campaigns.
"In its waning days, the Trump administration is still letting polluters off scot-free and leaving the rest of us to keep breathing the industry's deadly pollution--even in the midst of a respiratory pandemic," said John Walke, Clean Air director at Natural Resources Defense Council.
"This administration could have strengthened the limits on soot to protect our lungs and give people at the highest risk of dying from Covid-19 a better chance at fighting off this virus," Walke continued. "But it chose not to--leaving the health of tens of millions of Americans at risk."
Walked urged the incoming Biden administration to undo the "reckless decision."
"It's time polluters stopped making us sick," he said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.