A sign directed voters to a polling location during the Florida presidential primary on March 17, 2020 at Miami Beach City Hall in Miami Beach, Florida. (Photo: Cliff Hawkins/Getty Images)
US Supreme Court Upholds 'Pay-to-Vote Scheme,' Allowing Florida to Impose Poll Tax on Those With Felony Convictions
"This Court's order prevents thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida's primary election simply because they are poor," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her dissent.
The voting rights of hundreds of thousands of former felons in Florida were called into question Thursday after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a lower court ruling to stand, permitting the state to bar former inmates from voting if they owe court fees or fines.
The decision relates to Amendment 4, a law that overwhelmingly passed in November 2018 via a referendum. Sixty-five percent of Florida voters approved of the amendment, which said former felons can vote in the state after they have completed "all terms of [their] sentence."
"Florida's voters spoke loud and clear when nearly two-thirds of them supported rights restoration at the ballot box in 2018. The Supreme Court stood by as the Eleventh Circuit prevented hundreds of thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida's primary election simply because they can't afford to pay fines and fees."
--Paul Smith, Campaign Legal Center
After Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis entered office in 2019, however, he and state GOP lawmakers passed a bill retroactively stating that sentence terms apply to the payment of all fees, in addition to the completion of probation and prison time.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit recently halted a judge's order that would have allowed ex-felons to register to vote regardless of outstanding fees, and the Supreme Court declined to overturn that decision.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, with Sotomayor denouncing the unsigned majority opinion.
"This Court's inaction continues a trend of condoning [disenfranchisement]," the judge wrote.
Calling the law a "pay-to-vote scheme," the Campaign Legal Center (CLC), which joined the ACLU and other voting rights groups earlier this month in asking the Supreme Court to rule on the case, called the decision "deeply disappointing."
"Florida's voters spoke loud and clear when nearly two-thirds of them supported rights restoration at the ballot box in 2018," said Paul Smith, vice president of the CLC. "The Supreme Court stood by as the Eleventh Circuit prevented hundreds of thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida's primary election simply because they can't afford to pay fines and fees. We look forward to continuing to fight for Florida voters so they can participate in the General Election in November."
The Fines and Fees Justice Center told CNN that fees owed by recently-released former felons are frequently insurmountable, especially as many struggle to find well-paying employment.
The fines and fees "can range from a couple hundred to tens of thousands of dollars," CNN reported. "And in Florida, all the court charges that are unpaid after 90 days are referred to private debt collectors, who are allowed to add up to a 40% surcharge on the unpaid court debt."
On social media, advocates for voting rights condemned the high court's decision, which comes just days before Florida's Monday voter registration deadline ahead of the primary election in August.
\u201cA poll tax by another name is still a poll tax. \n\nhttps://t.co/kyeW5svGWy\n\n#SCOTUS #Florida #VotingRights #VoterSuppression #RestoreTheVRA\u201d— Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II (@Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II) 1594932418
\u201cGod damnit.\n\nUnsigned 6-3 opinion. Terrible AND cowardly. And what the hell, Breyer?\n\nThe fines and fees are often impossible for the poor ppl they are imposed on to pay. Like, ever.\n\nVoting is a right, not a privilege. Tired of this antidemocratic crap.\n\nhttps://t.co/ezKv8B9mDT\u201d— John Pfaff \u2014 Johnfpfaff@mastodon.social (@John Pfaff \u2014 Johnfpfaff@mastodon.social) 1594929312
\u201cAs Justice Sotomayor said, "This Court\u2019s order prevents thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida\u2019s primary election simply because they are poor."\n\nWe\u2019ll keep fighting.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1594923482
"This ruling means if you're a poor person with a felony conviction you're disenfranchised," tweeted Joyce Vance, a U.S. Attorney under the Obama administration. "If you can afford to pay fines you can vote. Setting aside that there's no reason to keep people who've served their sentence from voting forever, this is a poll tax."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The voting rights of hundreds of thousands of former felons in Florida were called into question Thursday after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a lower court ruling to stand, permitting the state to bar former inmates from voting if they owe court fees or fines.
The decision relates to Amendment 4, a law that overwhelmingly passed in November 2018 via a referendum. Sixty-five percent of Florida voters approved of the amendment, which said former felons can vote in the state after they have completed "all terms of [their] sentence."
"Florida's voters spoke loud and clear when nearly two-thirds of them supported rights restoration at the ballot box in 2018. The Supreme Court stood by as the Eleventh Circuit prevented hundreds of thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida's primary election simply because they can't afford to pay fines and fees."
--Paul Smith, Campaign Legal Center
After Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis entered office in 2019, however, he and state GOP lawmakers passed a bill retroactively stating that sentence terms apply to the payment of all fees, in addition to the completion of probation and prison time.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit recently halted a judge's order that would have allowed ex-felons to register to vote regardless of outstanding fees, and the Supreme Court declined to overturn that decision.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, with Sotomayor denouncing the unsigned majority opinion.
"This Court's inaction continues a trend of condoning [disenfranchisement]," the judge wrote.
Calling the law a "pay-to-vote scheme," the Campaign Legal Center (CLC), which joined the ACLU and other voting rights groups earlier this month in asking the Supreme Court to rule on the case, called the decision "deeply disappointing."
"Florida's voters spoke loud and clear when nearly two-thirds of them supported rights restoration at the ballot box in 2018," said Paul Smith, vice president of the CLC. "The Supreme Court stood by as the Eleventh Circuit prevented hundreds of thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida's primary election simply because they can't afford to pay fines and fees. We look forward to continuing to fight for Florida voters so they can participate in the General Election in November."
The Fines and Fees Justice Center told CNN that fees owed by recently-released former felons are frequently insurmountable, especially as many struggle to find well-paying employment.
The fines and fees "can range from a couple hundred to tens of thousands of dollars," CNN reported. "And in Florida, all the court charges that are unpaid after 90 days are referred to private debt collectors, who are allowed to add up to a 40% surcharge on the unpaid court debt."
On social media, advocates for voting rights condemned the high court's decision, which comes just days before Florida's Monday voter registration deadline ahead of the primary election in August.
\u201cA poll tax by another name is still a poll tax. \n\nhttps://t.co/kyeW5svGWy\n\n#SCOTUS #Florida #VotingRights #VoterSuppression #RestoreTheVRA\u201d— Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II (@Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II) 1594932418
\u201cGod damnit.\n\nUnsigned 6-3 opinion. Terrible AND cowardly. And what the hell, Breyer?\n\nThe fines and fees are often impossible for the poor ppl they are imposed on to pay. Like, ever.\n\nVoting is a right, not a privilege. Tired of this antidemocratic crap.\n\nhttps://t.co/ezKv8B9mDT\u201d— John Pfaff \u2014 Johnfpfaff@mastodon.social (@John Pfaff \u2014 Johnfpfaff@mastodon.social) 1594929312
\u201cAs Justice Sotomayor said, "This Court\u2019s order prevents thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida\u2019s primary election simply because they are poor."\n\nWe\u2019ll keep fighting.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1594923482
"This ruling means if you're a poor person with a felony conviction you're disenfranchised," tweeted Joyce Vance, a U.S. Attorney under the Obama administration. "If you can afford to pay fines you can vote. Setting aside that there's no reason to keep people who've served their sentence from voting forever, this is a poll tax."
The voting rights of hundreds of thousands of former felons in Florida were called into question Thursday after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a lower court ruling to stand, permitting the state to bar former inmates from voting if they owe court fees or fines.
The decision relates to Amendment 4, a law that overwhelmingly passed in November 2018 via a referendum. Sixty-five percent of Florida voters approved of the amendment, which said former felons can vote in the state after they have completed "all terms of [their] sentence."
"Florida's voters spoke loud and clear when nearly two-thirds of them supported rights restoration at the ballot box in 2018. The Supreme Court stood by as the Eleventh Circuit prevented hundreds of thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida's primary election simply because they can't afford to pay fines and fees."
--Paul Smith, Campaign Legal Center
After Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis entered office in 2019, however, he and state GOP lawmakers passed a bill retroactively stating that sentence terms apply to the payment of all fees, in addition to the completion of probation and prison time.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit recently halted a judge's order that would have allowed ex-felons to register to vote regardless of outstanding fees, and the Supreme Court declined to overturn that decision.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, with Sotomayor denouncing the unsigned majority opinion.
"This Court's inaction continues a trend of condoning [disenfranchisement]," the judge wrote.
Calling the law a "pay-to-vote scheme," the Campaign Legal Center (CLC), which joined the ACLU and other voting rights groups earlier this month in asking the Supreme Court to rule on the case, called the decision "deeply disappointing."
"Florida's voters spoke loud and clear when nearly two-thirds of them supported rights restoration at the ballot box in 2018," said Paul Smith, vice president of the CLC. "The Supreme Court stood by as the Eleventh Circuit prevented hundreds of thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida's primary election simply because they can't afford to pay fines and fees. We look forward to continuing to fight for Florida voters so they can participate in the General Election in November."
The Fines and Fees Justice Center told CNN that fees owed by recently-released former felons are frequently insurmountable, especially as many struggle to find well-paying employment.
The fines and fees "can range from a couple hundred to tens of thousands of dollars," CNN reported. "And in Florida, all the court charges that are unpaid after 90 days are referred to private debt collectors, who are allowed to add up to a 40% surcharge on the unpaid court debt."
On social media, advocates for voting rights condemned the high court's decision, which comes just days before Florida's Monday voter registration deadline ahead of the primary election in August.
\u201cA poll tax by another name is still a poll tax. \n\nhttps://t.co/kyeW5svGWy\n\n#SCOTUS #Florida #VotingRights #VoterSuppression #RestoreTheVRA\u201d— Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II (@Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II) 1594932418
\u201cGod damnit.\n\nUnsigned 6-3 opinion. Terrible AND cowardly. And what the hell, Breyer?\n\nThe fines and fees are often impossible for the poor ppl they are imposed on to pay. Like, ever.\n\nVoting is a right, not a privilege. Tired of this antidemocratic crap.\n\nhttps://t.co/ezKv8B9mDT\u201d— John Pfaff \u2014 Johnfpfaff@mastodon.social (@John Pfaff \u2014 Johnfpfaff@mastodon.social) 1594929312
\u201cAs Justice Sotomayor said, "This Court\u2019s order prevents thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida\u2019s primary election simply because they are poor."\n\nWe\u2019ll keep fighting.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1594923482
"This ruling means if you're a poor person with a felony conviction you're disenfranchised," tweeted Joyce Vance, a U.S. Attorney under the Obama administration. "If you can afford to pay fines you can vote. Setting aside that there's no reason to keep people who've served their sentence from voting forever, this is a poll tax."