To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
President Donald Trump hands out pens to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin (L) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (C) after signing the CARES act, a $2 trillion rescue package to provide economic relief amid the coronavirus outbreak, at the Oval Office of the White House on March 27, 2020. (Photo: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)
Progressive lawmakers on Friday evening denounced President Donald Trump's intention to disregard provisions in the just-passed coronavirus relief bill that would provide crucial oversight of $500 billion in taxpayer money already poised to be a "Wall Street slush fund."
"This is unacceptable," Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) said on Twitter Friday.
The $2 trillion relief package-- the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act or CARES--was passed by the House on Friday. Democratic lawmakers welcomed the critical aid it would provide to working families but called the measure far from perfect, with the legislation's half a trillion dollar fund to bail out corporations, to be controlled by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, drawing sharp criticism.
Shortly after signing the bill into law Friday, the president released a "signing statement" in which he signaled he views himself as decider of who staffs an oversight committee and would reject a newly created inspector general questioning how Mnuchin chooses to dole out the bailout money.
As the New York Timesreported,
Trump suggested that under his own understanding of his constitutional powers as president, he can gag the special inspector general for pandemic recovery, known by the acronym S.I.G.P.R., and keep information from Congress. [...]
The signing statement also challenged several other provisions in the bill, including one requiring consultation with Congress about who should be the staff leaders of a newly formed executive branch committee charged with conducting oversight of the government's response to the pandemic.
The White House statement drew sharp rebuke from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) AOC--who'd earlier in the day denounced the legislative package as already being too corporate-friendly.
\u201cAnd just like that, the Congressional oversight provisions for the 1/2 TRILLION dollar Wall St slush fund (which were *already* too weak) are tossed away the day the bill is signed.\n\nThis is a frightening amount of public money to have given a corrupt admin w/ 0 accountability.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1585351804
Rep. Porter said Trump's intention to disregard oversight should spur urgent congressional action, especially in light of the administration's track record of having "lack of respect for the checks and balances in the Constitution."
"What he's pushing back on specifically... is the appointment of an inspector general and this oversight council," Porter said Friday on MSNBC's "The Last Word."
"And just like that, the Congressional oversight provisions for the 1/2 TRILLION dollar Wall St slush fund (which were *already* too weak) are tossed away the day the bill is signed."
--Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez"What that means is the congressional oversight commission where the members are going to be appointed by Congress itself," she continued, calling the body "the most important tool because arguably the president has no authority to restrict the work that it does."
The law does have important "guardrails," Porter said, like preventing increases in executive compensation for companies that get a loan and barring stock buybacks during the loan period. "But that's about it," said Porter, "What it doesn't do is provide any conditions that the loan money be used to keep people on payroll--which is really the point of doing this."
That means it's critical to have "rigorous oversight" that's "done quickly," said Porter, stressing that taxpayers' own dollars are at play.
"The Treasury has the ability to move this money extremely quickly; there's nobody that Secretary Mnuchin has to ask," she warned. "He can decide $100 billion to this individual industry, $100 bill to that industry. Meanwhile, he could be ignoring some of the industries that most desperately need the money and that are some of the largest employers in the country."
Porter expressed concern over "a real potential here for the administration to play favorites, and there's a real potential here for the money to go out the door long before this oversight commission even gets set up, long before the inspector general can even do its work."
Given "what President Trump said about his intent to ignore these oversight provisions," Porter continued, "we in Congress need to be appointing people to this congressional panel immediately and they need to be starting their work this evening and tomorrow ... to see what Secretary Mnuchin is doing with our $500 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Progressive lawmakers on Friday evening denounced President Donald Trump's intention to disregard provisions in the just-passed coronavirus relief bill that would provide crucial oversight of $500 billion in taxpayer money already poised to be a "Wall Street slush fund."
"This is unacceptable," Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) said on Twitter Friday.
The $2 trillion relief package-- the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act or CARES--was passed by the House on Friday. Democratic lawmakers welcomed the critical aid it would provide to working families but called the measure far from perfect, with the legislation's half a trillion dollar fund to bail out corporations, to be controlled by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, drawing sharp criticism.
Shortly after signing the bill into law Friday, the president released a "signing statement" in which he signaled he views himself as decider of who staffs an oversight committee and would reject a newly created inspector general questioning how Mnuchin chooses to dole out the bailout money.
As the New York Timesreported,
Trump suggested that under his own understanding of his constitutional powers as president, he can gag the special inspector general for pandemic recovery, known by the acronym S.I.G.P.R., and keep information from Congress. [...]
The signing statement also challenged several other provisions in the bill, including one requiring consultation with Congress about who should be the staff leaders of a newly formed executive branch committee charged with conducting oversight of the government's response to the pandemic.
The White House statement drew sharp rebuke from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) AOC--who'd earlier in the day denounced the legislative package as already being too corporate-friendly.
\u201cAnd just like that, the Congressional oversight provisions for the 1/2 TRILLION dollar Wall St slush fund (which were *already* too weak) are tossed away the day the bill is signed.\n\nThis is a frightening amount of public money to have given a corrupt admin w/ 0 accountability.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1585351804
Rep. Porter said Trump's intention to disregard oversight should spur urgent congressional action, especially in light of the administration's track record of having "lack of respect for the checks and balances in the Constitution."
"What he's pushing back on specifically... is the appointment of an inspector general and this oversight council," Porter said Friday on MSNBC's "The Last Word."
"And just like that, the Congressional oversight provisions for the 1/2 TRILLION dollar Wall St slush fund (which were *already* too weak) are tossed away the day the bill is signed."
--Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez"What that means is the congressional oversight commission where the members are going to be appointed by Congress itself," she continued, calling the body "the most important tool because arguably the president has no authority to restrict the work that it does."
The law does have important "guardrails," Porter said, like preventing increases in executive compensation for companies that get a loan and barring stock buybacks during the loan period. "But that's about it," said Porter, "What it doesn't do is provide any conditions that the loan money be used to keep people on payroll--which is really the point of doing this."
That means it's critical to have "rigorous oversight" that's "done quickly," said Porter, stressing that taxpayers' own dollars are at play.
"The Treasury has the ability to move this money extremely quickly; there's nobody that Secretary Mnuchin has to ask," she warned. "He can decide $100 billion to this individual industry, $100 bill to that industry. Meanwhile, he could be ignoring some of the industries that most desperately need the money and that are some of the largest employers in the country."
Porter expressed concern over "a real potential here for the administration to play favorites, and there's a real potential here for the money to go out the door long before this oversight commission even gets set up, long before the inspector general can even do its work."
Given "what President Trump said about his intent to ignore these oversight provisions," Porter continued, "we in Congress need to be appointing people to this congressional panel immediately and they need to be starting their work this evening and tomorrow ... to see what Secretary Mnuchin is doing with our $500 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Progressive lawmakers on Friday evening denounced President Donald Trump's intention to disregard provisions in the just-passed coronavirus relief bill that would provide crucial oversight of $500 billion in taxpayer money already poised to be a "Wall Street slush fund."
"This is unacceptable," Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) said on Twitter Friday.
The $2 trillion relief package-- the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act or CARES--was passed by the House on Friday. Democratic lawmakers welcomed the critical aid it would provide to working families but called the measure far from perfect, with the legislation's half a trillion dollar fund to bail out corporations, to be controlled by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, drawing sharp criticism.
Shortly after signing the bill into law Friday, the president released a "signing statement" in which he signaled he views himself as decider of who staffs an oversight committee and would reject a newly created inspector general questioning how Mnuchin chooses to dole out the bailout money.
As the New York Timesreported,
Trump suggested that under his own understanding of his constitutional powers as president, he can gag the special inspector general for pandemic recovery, known by the acronym S.I.G.P.R., and keep information from Congress. [...]
The signing statement also challenged several other provisions in the bill, including one requiring consultation with Congress about who should be the staff leaders of a newly formed executive branch committee charged with conducting oversight of the government's response to the pandemic.
The White House statement drew sharp rebuke from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) AOC--who'd earlier in the day denounced the legislative package as already being too corporate-friendly.
\u201cAnd just like that, the Congressional oversight provisions for the 1/2 TRILLION dollar Wall St slush fund (which were *already* too weak) are tossed away the day the bill is signed.\n\nThis is a frightening amount of public money to have given a corrupt admin w/ 0 accountability.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1585351804
Rep. Porter said Trump's intention to disregard oversight should spur urgent congressional action, especially in light of the administration's track record of having "lack of respect for the checks and balances in the Constitution."
"What he's pushing back on specifically... is the appointment of an inspector general and this oversight council," Porter said Friday on MSNBC's "The Last Word."
"And just like that, the Congressional oversight provisions for the 1/2 TRILLION dollar Wall St slush fund (which were *already* too weak) are tossed away the day the bill is signed."
--Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez"What that means is the congressional oversight commission where the members are going to be appointed by Congress itself," she continued, calling the body "the most important tool because arguably the president has no authority to restrict the work that it does."
The law does have important "guardrails," Porter said, like preventing increases in executive compensation for companies that get a loan and barring stock buybacks during the loan period. "But that's about it," said Porter, "What it doesn't do is provide any conditions that the loan money be used to keep people on payroll--which is really the point of doing this."
That means it's critical to have "rigorous oversight" that's "done quickly," said Porter, stressing that taxpayers' own dollars are at play.
"The Treasury has the ability to move this money extremely quickly; there's nobody that Secretary Mnuchin has to ask," she warned. "He can decide $100 billion to this individual industry, $100 bill to that industry. Meanwhile, he could be ignoring some of the industries that most desperately need the money and that are some of the largest employers in the country."
Porter expressed concern over "a real potential here for the administration to play favorites, and there's a real potential here for the money to go out the door long before this oversight commission even gets set up, long before the inspector general can even do its work."
Given "what President Trump said about his intent to ignore these oversight provisions," Porter continued, "we in Congress need to be appointing people to this congressional panel immediately and they need to be starting their work this evening and tomorrow ... to see what Secretary Mnuchin is doing with our $500 billion in taxpayer dollars."