SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar speaks during a press conference on recent developments with the coronavirus on February 7, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Democrats Rip Trump for 'Raiding Money' From Other Health Emergencies to Fund Lackluster Coronavirus Response
"The president is compounding our vulnerabilities by seeking to ransack funds still needed to keep Ebola in check."
Feb 24, 2020
Democratic members of Congress on Monday slammed President Donald Trump's failed management of the nation's public health system as he attempts to shift congressionally appropriated funds away from other public health emergencies to fund the administration's effort to combat the growing threat of the coronavirus.
Trump's $2.5 billion emergency budget request, sent to Congress Monday night, calls for $1.25 billion in new funding and proposes using over $530 million in unspent Ebola response money to fight the coronavirus outbreak. More than $1 billion of the request would go toward developing a coronavirus vaccine.
"It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
--Rep. Nita Lowey
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) issued a statement Monday night rejecting Trump's request and calling it "long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
"For almost two years, the Trump administration has left critical positions in charge of managing pandemics at the National Security Council and the Department of Homeland Security vacant," said Pelosi. "His most recent budget called for slashing funding for the Centers for Disease Control, which is on the frontlines of this emergency. And now, the president is compounding our vulnerabilities by seeking to ransack funds still needed to keep Ebola in check."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," added Pelosi, who said the House will propose its own coronavirus response plan. "The president should not be raiding money that Congress has appropriated for other life-or-death public health priorities."
House Appropriations Commitee chairwoman Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) echoed Pelosi, calling Trump's request "woefully insufficient to protect Americans from the deadly coronavirus outbreak."
"Despite urgent warnings from Congress and the public health community, the Trump administration took weeks to request these emergency funds," Lowey said in a statement. "It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
Trump dismissed Democrats' concerns about his request in a tweet Tuesday morning.
"Cryin' Chuck Schumer is complaining, for publicity purposes only, that I should be asking for more money than $2.5 billion to prepare for coronavirus," Trump tweeted, referring to the Senate Minority Leader's statement condemning the request as indicative of the president's "towering incompetence."
"I think that we're doing a great job," Trump said of the White House's response to the coronavirus during a press conference in India Tuesday.
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, a former pharmaceutical executive, was grilled Tuesday about the administration's emergency budget request in a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing--and not just by Democratic members.
"Seems to me at the outset that this request... is lowballing it, possibly, and you can't afford to do that," said Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.). "If you lowball something like this, you'll pay for it later."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Democratic members of Congress on Monday slammed President Donald Trump's failed management of the nation's public health system as he attempts to shift congressionally appropriated funds away from other public health emergencies to fund the administration's effort to combat the growing threat of the coronavirus.
Trump's $2.5 billion emergency budget request, sent to Congress Monday night, calls for $1.25 billion in new funding and proposes using over $530 million in unspent Ebola response money to fight the coronavirus outbreak. More than $1 billion of the request would go toward developing a coronavirus vaccine.
"It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
--Rep. Nita Lowey
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) issued a statement Monday night rejecting Trump's request and calling it "long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
"For almost two years, the Trump administration has left critical positions in charge of managing pandemics at the National Security Council and the Department of Homeland Security vacant," said Pelosi. "His most recent budget called for slashing funding for the Centers for Disease Control, which is on the frontlines of this emergency. And now, the president is compounding our vulnerabilities by seeking to ransack funds still needed to keep Ebola in check."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," added Pelosi, who said the House will propose its own coronavirus response plan. "The president should not be raiding money that Congress has appropriated for other life-or-death public health priorities."
House Appropriations Commitee chairwoman Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) echoed Pelosi, calling Trump's request "woefully insufficient to protect Americans from the deadly coronavirus outbreak."
"Despite urgent warnings from Congress and the public health community, the Trump administration took weeks to request these emergency funds," Lowey said in a statement. "It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
Trump dismissed Democrats' concerns about his request in a tweet Tuesday morning.
"Cryin' Chuck Schumer is complaining, for publicity purposes only, that I should be asking for more money than $2.5 billion to prepare for coronavirus," Trump tweeted, referring to the Senate Minority Leader's statement condemning the request as indicative of the president's "towering incompetence."
"I think that we're doing a great job," Trump said of the White House's response to the coronavirus during a press conference in India Tuesday.
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, a former pharmaceutical executive, was grilled Tuesday about the administration's emergency budget request in a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing--and not just by Democratic members.
"Seems to me at the outset that this request... is lowballing it, possibly, and you can't afford to do that," said Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.). "If you lowball something like this, you'll pay for it later."
Democratic members of Congress on Monday slammed President Donald Trump's failed management of the nation's public health system as he attempts to shift congressionally appropriated funds away from other public health emergencies to fund the administration's effort to combat the growing threat of the coronavirus.
Trump's $2.5 billion emergency budget request, sent to Congress Monday night, calls for $1.25 billion in new funding and proposes using over $530 million in unspent Ebola response money to fight the coronavirus outbreak. More than $1 billion of the request would go toward developing a coronavirus vaccine.
"It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
--Rep. Nita Lowey
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) issued a statement Monday night rejecting Trump's request and calling it "long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
"For almost two years, the Trump administration has left critical positions in charge of managing pandemics at the National Security Council and the Department of Homeland Security vacant," said Pelosi. "His most recent budget called for slashing funding for the Centers for Disease Control, which is on the frontlines of this emergency. And now, the president is compounding our vulnerabilities by seeking to ransack funds still needed to keep Ebola in check."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," added Pelosi, who said the House will propose its own coronavirus response plan. "The president should not be raiding money that Congress has appropriated for other life-or-death public health priorities."
House Appropriations Commitee chairwoman Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) echoed Pelosi, calling Trump's request "woefully insufficient to protect Americans from the deadly coronavirus outbreak."
"Despite urgent warnings from Congress and the public health community, the Trump administration took weeks to request these emergency funds," Lowey said in a statement. "It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
Trump dismissed Democrats' concerns about his request in a tweet Tuesday morning.
"Cryin' Chuck Schumer is complaining, for publicity purposes only, that I should be asking for more money than $2.5 billion to prepare for coronavirus," Trump tweeted, referring to the Senate Minority Leader's statement condemning the request as indicative of the president's "towering incompetence."
"I think that we're doing a great job," Trump said of the White House's response to the coronavirus during a press conference in India Tuesday.
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, a former pharmaceutical executive, was grilled Tuesday about the administration's emergency budget request in a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing--and not just by Democratic members.
"Seems to me at the outset that this request... is lowballing it, possibly, and you can't afford to do that," said Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.). "If you lowball something like this, you'll pay for it later."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.