SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar speaks during a press conference on recent developments with the coronavirus on February 7, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Democrats Rip Trump for 'Raiding Money' From Other Health Emergencies to Fund Lackluster Coronavirus Response
"The president is compounding our vulnerabilities by seeking to ransack funds still needed to keep Ebola in check."
Feb 24, 2020
Democratic members of Congress on Monday slammed President Donald Trump's failed management of the nation's public health system as he attempts to shift congressionally appropriated funds away from other public health emergencies to fund the administration's effort to combat the growing threat of the coronavirus.
Trump's $2.5 billion emergency budget request, sent to Congress Monday night, calls for $1.25 billion in new funding and proposes using over $530 million in unspent Ebola response money to fight the coronavirus outbreak. More than $1 billion of the request would go toward developing a coronavirus vaccine.
"It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
--Rep. Nita Lowey
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) issued a statement Monday night rejecting Trump's request and calling it "long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
"For almost two years, the Trump administration has left critical positions in charge of managing pandemics at the National Security Council and the Department of Homeland Security vacant," said Pelosi. "His most recent budget called for slashing funding for the Centers for Disease Control, which is on the frontlines of this emergency. And now, the president is compounding our vulnerabilities by seeking to ransack funds still needed to keep Ebola in check."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," added Pelosi, who said the House will propose its own coronavirus response plan. "The president should not be raiding money that Congress has appropriated for other life-or-death public health priorities."
\u201cSome perspective on Trump's $2.5 billion #coronavirus request:\n\n-His budget cuts $3 billion from global health programs, $3 billion from NIH, and another 16% from CDC\n\n-He's eliminated WH pandemic position\n\n-He's more concerned about health of stock market than public health\u201d— Chris Lu (@Chris Lu) 1582592710
House Appropriations Commitee chairwoman Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) echoed Pelosi, calling Trump's request "woefully insufficient to protect Americans from the deadly coronavirus outbreak."
"Despite urgent warnings from Congress and the public health community, the Trump administration took weeks to request these emergency funds," Lowey said in a statement. "It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
Trump dismissed Democrats' concerns about his request in a tweet Tuesday morning.
"Cryin' Chuck Schumer is complaining, for publicity purposes only, that I should be asking for more money than $2.5 billion to prepare for coronavirus," Trump tweeted, referring to the Senate Minority Leader's statement condemning the request as indicative of the president's "towering incompetence."
\u201cCryin\u2019 Chuck Schumer is complaining, for publicity purposes only, that I should be asking for more money than $2.5 Billion to prepare for Coronavirus. If I asked for more he would say it is too much. He didn\u2019t like my early travel closings. I was right. He is incompetent!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1582639335
"I think that we're doing a great job," Trump said of the White House's response to the coronavirus during a press conference in India Tuesday.
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, a former pharmaceutical executive, was grilled Tuesday about the administration's emergency budget request in a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing--and not just by Democratic members.
"Seems to me at the outset that this request... is lowballing it, possibly, and you can't afford to do that," said Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.). "If you lowball something like this, you'll pay for it later."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Democratic members of Congress on Monday slammed President Donald Trump's failed management of the nation's public health system as he attempts to shift congressionally appropriated funds away from other public health emergencies to fund the administration's effort to combat the growing threat of the coronavirus.
Trump's $2.5 billion emergency budget request, sent to Congress Monday night, calls for $1.25 billion in new funding and proposes using over $530 million in unspent Ebola response money to fight the coronavirus outbreak. More than $1 billion of the request would go toward developing a coronavirus vaccine.
"It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
--Rep. Nita Lowey
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) issued a statement Monday night rejecting Trump's request and calling it "long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
"For almost two years, the Trump administration has left critical positions in charge of managing pandemics at the National Security Council and the Department of Homeland Security vacant," said Pelosi. "His most recent budget called for slashing funding for the Centers for Disease Control, which is on the frontlines of this emergency. And now, the president is compounding our vulnerabilities by seeking to ransack funds still needed to keep Ebola in check."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," added Pelosi, who said the House will propose its own coronavirus response plan. "The president should not be raiding money that Congress has appropriated for other life-or-death public health priorities."
\u201cSome perspective on Trump's $2.5 billion #coronavirus request:\n\n-His budget cuts $3 billion from global health programs, $3 billion from NIH, and another 16% from CDC\n\n-He's eliminated WH pandemic position\n\n-He's more concerned about health of stock market than public health\u201d— Chris Lu (@Chris Lu) 1582592710
House Appropriations Commitee chairwoman Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) echoed Pelosi, calling Trump's request "woefully insufficient to protect Americans from the deadly coronavirus outbreak."
"Despite urgent warnings from Congress and the public health community, the Trump administration took weeks to request these emergency funds," Lowey said in a statement. "It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
Trump dismissed Democrats' concerns about his request in a tweet Tuesday morning.
"Cryin' Chuck Schumer is complaining, for publicity purposes only, that I should be asking for more money than $2.5 billion to prepare for coronavirus," Trump tweeted, referring to the Senate Minority Leader's statement condemning the request as indicative of the president's "towering incompetence."
\u201cCryin\u2019 Chuck Schumer is complaining, for publicity purposes only, that I should be asking for more money than $2.5 Billion to prepare for Coronavirus. If I asked for more he would say it is too much. He didn\u2019t like my early travel closings. I was right. He is incompetent!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1582639335
"I think that we're doing a great job," Trump said of the White House's response to the coronavirus during a press conference in India Tuesday.
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, a former pharmaceutical executive, was grilled Tuesday about the administration's emergency budget request in a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing--and not just by Democratic members.
"Seems to me at the outset that this request... is lowballing it, possibly, and you can't afford to do that," said Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.). "If you lowball something like this, you'll pay for it later."
Democratic members of Congress on Monday slammed President Donald Trump's failed management of the nation's public health system as he attempts to shift congressionally appropriated funds away from other public health emergencies to fund the administration's effort to combat the growing threat of the coronavirus.
Trump's $2.5 billion emergency budget request, sent to Congress Monday night, calls for $1.25 billion in new funding and proposes using over $530 million in unspent Ebola response money to fight the coronavirus outbreak. More than $1 billion of the request would go toward developing a coronavirus vaccine.
"It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
--Rep. Nita Lowey
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) issued a statement Monday night rejecting Trump's request and calling it "long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
"For almost two years, the Trump administration has left critical positions in charge of managing pandemics at the National Security Council and the Department of Homeland Security vacant," said Pelosi. "His most recent budget called for slashing funding for the Centers for Disease Control, which is on the frontlines of this emergency. And now, the president is compounding our vulnerabilities by seeking to ransack funds still needed to keep Ebola in check."
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe," added Pelosi, who said the House will propose its own coronavirus response plan. "The president should not be raiding money that Congress has appropriated for other life-or-death public health priorities."
\u201cSome perspective on Trump's $2.5 billion #coronavirus request:\n\n-His budget cuts $3 billion from global health programs, $3 billion from NIH, and another 16% from CDC\n\n-He's eliminated WH pandemic position\n\n-He's more concerned about health of stock market than public health\u201d— Chris Lu (@Chris Lu) 1582592710
House Appropriations Commitee chairwoman Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) echoed Pelosi, calling Trump's request "woefully insufficient to protect Americans from the deadly coronavirus outbreak."
"Despite urgent warnings from Congress and the public health community, the Trump administration took weeks to request these emergency funds," Lowey said in a statement. "It is profoundly disturbing that their answer now is to raid money Congress has designated for other critical public health priorities."
Trump dismissed Democrats' concerns about his request in a tweet Tuesday morning.
"Cryin' Chuck Schumer is complaining, for publicity purposes only, that I should be asking for more money than $2.5 billion to prepare for coronavirus," Trump tweeted, referring to the Senate Minority Leader's statement condemning the request as indicative of the president's "towering incompetence."
\u201cCryin\u2019 Chuck Schumer is complaining, for publicity purposes only, that I should be asking for more money than $2.5 Billion to prepare for Coronavirus. If I asked for more he would say it is too much. He didn\u2019t like my early travel closings. I was right. He is incompetent!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1582639335
"I think that we're doing a great job," Trump said of the White House's response to the coronavirus during a press conference in India Tuesday.
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, a former pharmaceutical executive, was grilled Tuesday about the administration's emergency budget request in a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing--and not just by Democratic members.
"Seems to me at the outset that this request... is lowballing it, possibly, and you can't afford to do that," said Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.). "If you lowball something like this, you'll pay for it later."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.