The EPA took a step toward regulating PFAS, often called "forever chemicals," in drinking water on Thursday.
'Avalanche of Public Pressure' Forces Trump's EPA to Regulate PFAS
"States should not wait for the EPA to act."
Safe drinking water advocates applauded the public pressure which forced the EPA on Thursday to announce it would regulate substances known as "forever chemicals"--but warned the new rules could take years to have an impact on water safety.
Public interest organizations like the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and Food & Water Watch for years pressured the EPA to limit per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, in drinking water. The agency on Thursday announced it had proposed a "regulatory determination" period to set a national drinking standard for two of the thousands of substances which fall under the PFAS category: PFOA, formerly used to make Teflon, and PFOS, formerly an ingredient in Scotchgard.
"EPA has wasted decades deciding whether to regulate PFAS. Today's decision shows that an avalanche of public pressure and overwhelming science is finally forcing EPA to act."
--Melanie Benesh, EWG"EPA has wasted decades deciding whether to regulate PFAS," said EWG legislative attorney Melanie Benesh. "Today's decision shows that an avalanche of public pressure and overwhelming science is finally forcing EPA to act."
Benesh warned, however, that it "could take many more years before a drinking water standard is finalized," and advised state regulators to set their own safety standards.
"States should not wait for the EPA to act," she said in a statement.
The environmental law group Earthjustice estimates that PFAS contaminate the drinking water of at least 16 million people in 33 states and Puerto Rico, and groundwater in at least 38 states.
In a study released by EWG last month, only one location out of 44 places in 31 states and the District of Columbia was found to have tap water with no detectable PFAS. Miami, Philadelphia, New Orleans, and the northern New Jersey suburbs of New York City have been found to have some of the highest levels of the substances.
PFAS have been linked to certain cancers, reproductive health harms, and other public health concerns. Environmental scientists call them "forever chemicals" because they don't break down easily in the environment and can stay in a person's system for decades after exposure.
The EPA recommends that drinking water contain no more than 70 parts per trillion (ppt) of PFAS, but the standard is not mandatory and is far higher than the level recommended by EWG and several independent studies: just 1 ppt.
"EPA's lax attitude toward industry's responsibility to monitor and clean up the industry chemical is putting 2.3 million children who attend school less than five miles from PFAS contamination sites at risk," tweeted the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).
\u201cThe @EPA's lax attitude toward industry\u2019s responsibility to monitor and cleanup the industry chemical #PFAS is putting 2.3 million children who attend school less than 5 miles from PFAS contamination sites at risk. We need to #ProtectKids not industry. https://t.co/djpjkfTc1J\u201d— Union of Concerned Scientists (@Union of Concerned Scientists) 1582232406
The EPA's Thursday announcement begins a two-year period during which it will determine a new safety standard. It could take years, however, to actually enforce the new regulations. The agency also "appears poised to approve four new varieties of PFAS in 2020," according to a recent HuffPost report.
"EPA's process to regulate chemicals like PFOA and PFOS presumes they are innocent until proven guilty," tweeted Dr. David Michaels, former head of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). "Opponents of regulation can delay the process by manufacturing uncertainty about scientific evidence. We badly need a new system that protects people rather than chemicals."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Safe drinking water advocates applauded the public pressure which forced the EPA on Thursday to announce it would regulate substances known as "forever chemicals"--but warned the new rules could take years to have an impact on water safety.
Public interest organizations like the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and Food & Water Watch for years pressured the EPA to limit per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, in drinking water. The agency on Thursday announced it had proposed a "regulatory determination" period to set a national drinking standard for two of the thousands of substances which fall under the PFAS category: PFOA, formerly used to make Teflon, and PFOS, formerly an ingredient in Scotchgard.
"EPA has wasted decades deciding whether to regulate PFAS. Today's decision shows that an avalanche of public pressure and overwhelming science is finally forcing EPA to act."
--Melanie Benesh, EWG"EPA has wasted decades deciding whether to regulate PFAS," said EWG legislative attorney Melanie Benesh. "Today's decision shows that an avalanche of public pressure and overwhelming science is finally forcing EPA to act."
Benesh warned, however, that it "could take many more years before a drinking water standard is finalized," and advised state regulators to set their own safety standards.
"States should not wait for the EPA to act," she said in a statement.
The environmental law group Earthjustice estimates that PFAS contaminate the drinking water of at least 16 million people in 33 states and Puerto Rico, and groundwater in at least 38 states.
In a study released by EWG last month, only one location out of 44 places in 31 states and the District of Columbia was found to have tap water with no detectable PFAS. Miami, Philadelphia, New Orleans, and the northern New Jersey suburbs of New York City have been found to have some of the highest levels of the substances.
PFAS have been linked to certain cancers, reproductive health harms, and other public health concerns. Environmental scientists call them "forever chemicals" because they don't break down easily in the environment and can stay in a person's system for decades after exposure.
The EPA recommends that drinking water contain no more than 70 parts per trillion (ppt) of PFAS, but the standard is not mandatory and is far higher than the level recommended by EWG and several independent studies: just 1 ppt.
"EPA's lax attitude toward industry's responsibility to monitor and clean up the industry chemical is putting 2.3 million children who attend school less than five miles from PFAS contamination sites at risk," tweeted the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).
\u201cThe @EPA's lax attitude toward industry\u2019s responsibility to monitor and cleanup the industry chemical #PFAS is putting 2.3 million children who attend school less than 5 miles from PFAS contamination sites at risk. We need to #ProtectKids not industry. https://t.co/djpjkfTc1J\u201d— Union of Concerned Scientists (@Union of Concerned Scientists) 1582232406
The EPA's Thursday announcement begins a two-year period during which it will determine a new safety standard. It could take years, however, to actually enforce the new regulations. The agency also "appears poised to approve four new varieties of PFAS in 2020," according to a recent HuffPost report.
"EPA's process to regulate chemicals like PFOA and PFOS presumes they are innocent until proven guilty," tweeted Dr. David Michaels, former head of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). "Opponents of regulation can delay the process by manufacturing uncertainty about scientific evidence. We badly need a new system that protects people rather than chemicals."
Safe drinking water advocates applauded the public pressure which forced the EPA on Thursday to announce it would regulate substances known as "forever chemicals"--but warned the new rules could take years to have an impact on water safety.
Public interest organizations like the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and Food & Water Watch for years pressured the EPA to limit per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, in drinking water. The agency on Thursday announced it had proposed a "regulatory determination" period to set a national drinking standard for two of the thousands of substances which fall under the PFAS category: PFOA, formerly used to make Teflon, and PFOS, formerly an ingredient in Scotchgard.
"EPA has wasted decades deciding whether to regulate PFAS. Today's decision shows that an avalanche of public pressure and overwhelming science is finally forcing EPA to act."
--Melanie Benesh, EWG"EPA has wasted decades deciding whether to regulate PFAS," said EWG legislative attorney Melanie Benesh. "Today's decision shows that an avalanche of public pressure and overwhelming science is finally forcing EPA to act."
Benesh warned, however, that it "could take many more years before a drinking water standard is finalized," and advised state regulators to set their own safety standards.
"States should not wait for the EPA to act," she said in a statement.
The environmental law group Earthjustice estimates that PFAS contaminate the drinking water of at least 16 million people in 33 states and Puerto Rico, and groundwater in at least 38 states.
In a study released by EWG last month, only one location out of 44 places in 31 states and the District of Columbia was found to have tap water with no detectable PFAS. Miami, Philadelphia, New Orleans, and the northern New Jersey suburbs of New York City have been found to have some of the highest levels of the substances.
PFAS have been linked to certain cancers, reproductive health harms, and other public health concerns. Environmental scientists call them "forever chemicals" because they don't break down easily in the environment and can stay in a person's system for decades after exposure.
The EPA recommends that drinking water contain no more than 70 parts per trillion (ppt) of PFAS, but the standard is not mandatory and is far higher than the level recommended by EWG and several independent studies: just 1 ppt.
"EPA's lax attitude toward industry's responsibility to monitor and clean up the industry chemical is putting 2.3 million children who attend school less than five miles from PFAS contamination sites at risk," tweeted the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).
\u201cThe @EPA's lax attitude toward industry\u2019s responsibility to monitor and cleanup the industry chemical #PFAS is putting 2.3 million children who attend school less than 5 miles from PFAS contamination sites at risk. We need to #ProtectKids not industry. https://t.co/djpjkfTc1J\u201d— Union of Concerned Scientists (@Union of Concerned Scientists) 1582232406
The EPA's Thursday announcement begins a two-year period during which it will determine a new safety standard. It could take years, however, to actually enforce the new regulations. The agency also "appears poised to approve four new varieties of PFAS in 2020," according to a recent HuffPost report.
"EPA's process to regulate chemicals like PFOA and PFOS presumes they are innocent until proven guilty," tweeted Dr. David Michaels, former head of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). "Opponents of regulation can delay the process by manufacturing uncertainty about scientific evidence. We badly need a new system that protects people rather than chemicals."