SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
President Donald Trump tweeted Monday that the question of whether Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani posed an imminent threat to the U.S. when Trump ordered his assassination was irrelevant "because of his horrible past." (Photo: Stringer/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
After Days of Claiming Soleimani Posed "Imminent" Threat to US, Trump Finally Declares "It Doesn't Really Matter"
"If this is the case, then nothing matters."
Jan 13, 2020
After NBC News reported that President Donald Trump approved the assassination of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani last June--undercutting administration claims that Soleimani was targeted for a drone strike because of an immediate threat--the president claimed his rationale for unilaterally killing a foreign leader was irrelevant if he deemed the assassination necessary.
Trump concluded several tweets about his impeachment, the 2020 presidential campaign, and other topics by reiterating his administration's claim that Soleimani posed an "imminent" threat to the U.S., but added that "it doesn't really matter because of his horrible past."
\u201cThe Fake News Media and their Democrat Partners are working hard to determine whether or not the future attack by terrorist Soleimani was \u201cimminent\u201d or not, & was my team in agreement. The answer to both is a strong YES., but it doesn\u2019t really matter because of his horrible past!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1578931757
"In one tweet, Trump is blowing apart his administration's rationale for killing Soleimani," tweeted Washington Post national intelligence reporter Shane Harris.
Administration officials have spent more than a week making various claims about the danger Soleimani posed, including that he was plotting to bomb U.S. embassies--a claim with Defense Secretary Mark Esper wouldn't confirm on record Sunday. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo openly mocked reports from Iraq's prime minister that Soleimani was in Baghdad at the time of his killing to discuss easing tensions with Saudi Arabia.
But a White House briefing last week in which officials shared intelligence about so-called "imminent" threats posed by Soleimani was condemned as "insulting" and "utterly unconvincing" by members of Trump's own party.
On social media, some observers wrote that Trump's phrasing of his tweet on Monday could be applied to many of his decisions and his treatment of the truth.
"It doesn't really matter," tweeted MSNBC political analyst Richard Stengel. "He's not saying that just about Soleimani, but about the truth. Those who lie for Trump are then undercut by him."
"If this is the case, then nothing matters," added anti-Trump activist Andrew Wortman. "He can assassinate anyone anywhere and bring us to the brink of war for no reason and face no accountability."
\u201cTrump says \u201cIt doesn\u2019t really matter\u201d if Soleimani posed an imminent threat. If this is the case, then nothing matters. He can assassinate anyone anywhere and bring us to the brink of war for no reason and face no accountability. https://t.co/DoDAqMoOCv\u201d— Andrew Wortman (@Andrew Wortman) 1578952193
\u201cThis should be world shaking news.\n\nIn Trumplandia, it barely merits a glance.\n\n***\nA Narrative Collapses as Trump Tweets: \u2018It Doesn\u2019t Really Matter\u2019 https://t.co/xO3KtEe9cD\u201d— Annie Gabston-Howell- (@Annie Gabston-Howell-) 1579006375
The unraveling of the White House narrative about Soleimani's assassination was reminiscent of Trump's treatment of the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018. After spending weeks assuring the public that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had nothing to do with the killing, the president finally told reporters, "Maybe he did and maybe he didn't... In any case, our relationship is with the kingdom of Saudi Arabia."
A recent USA Today/Ipsos poll found that 52% of respondents view the killing of Soleimani as "reckless."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After NBC News reported that President Donald Trump approved the assassination of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani last June--undercutting administration claims that Soleimani was targeted for a drone strike because of an immediate threat--the president claimed his rationale for unilaterally killing a foreign leader was irrelevant if he deemed the assassination necessary.
Trump concluded several tweets about his impeachment, the 2020 presidential campaign, and other topics by reiterating his administration's claim that Soleimani posed an "imminent" threat to the U.S., but added that "it doesn't really matter because of his horrible past."
\u201cThe Fake News Media and their Democrat Partners are working hard to determine whether or not the future attack by terrorist Soleimani was \u201cimminent\u201d or not, & was my team in agreement. The answer to both is a strong YES., but it doesn\u2019t really matter because of his horrible past!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1578931757
"In one tweet, Trump is blowing apart his administration's rationale for killing Soleimani," tweeted Washington Post national intelligence reporter Shane Harris.
Administration officials have spent more than a week making various claims about the danger Soleimani posed, including that he was plotting to bomb U.S. embassies--a claim with Defense Secretary Mark Esper wouldn't confirm on record Sunday. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo openly mocked reports from Iraq's prime minister that Soleimani was in Baghdad at the time of his killing to discuss easing tensions with Saudi Arabia.
But a White House briefing last week in which officials shared intelligence about so-called "imminent" threats posed by Soleimani was condemned as "insulting" and "utterly unconvincing" by members of Trump's own party.
On social media, some observers wrote that Trump's phrasing of his tweet on Monday could be applied to many of his decisions and his treatment of the truth.
"It doesn't really matter," tweeted MSNBC political analyst Richard Stengel. "He's not saying that just about Soleimani, but about the truth. Those who lie for Trump are then undercut by him."
"If this is the case, then nothing matters," added anti-Trump activist Andrew Wortman. "He can assassinate anyone anywhere and bring us to the brink of war for no reason and face no accountability."
\u201cTrump says \u201cIt doesn\u2019t really matter\u201d if Soleimani posed an imminent threat. If this is the case, then nothing matters. He can assassinate anyone anywhere and bring us to the brink of war for no reason and face no accountability. https://t.co/DoDAqMoOCv\u201d— Andrew Wortman (@Andrew Wortman) 1578952193
\u201cThis should be world shaking news.\n\nIn Trumplandia, it barely merits a glance.\n\n***\nA Narrative Collapses as Trump Tweets: \u2018It Doesn\u2019t Really Matter\u2019 https://t.co/xO3KtEe9cD\u201d— Annie Gabston-Howell- (@Annie Gabston-Howell-) 1579006375
The unraveling of the White House narrative about Soleimani's assassination was reminiscent of Trump's treatment of the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018. After spending weeks assuring the public that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had nothing to do with the killing, the president finally told reporters, "Maybe he did and maybe he didn't... In any case, our relationship is with the kingdom of Saudi Arabia."
A recent USA Today/Ipsos poll found that 52% of respondents view the killing of Soleimani as "reckless."
After NBC News reported that President Donald Trump approved the assassination of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani last June--undercutting administration claims that Soleimani was targeted for a drone strike because of an immediate threat--the president claimed his rationale for unilaterally killing a foreign leader was irrelevant if he deemed the assassination necessary.
Trump concluded several tweets about his impeachment, the 2020 presidential campaign, and other topics by reiterating his administration's claim that Soleimani posed an "imminent" threat to the U.S., but added that "it doesn't really matter because of his horrible past."
\u201cThe Fake News Media and their Democrat Partners are working hard to determine whether or not the future attack by terrorist Soleimani was \u201cimminent\u201d or not, & was my team in agreement. The answer to both is a strong YES., but it doesn\u2019t really matter because of his horrible past!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1578931757
"In one tweet, Trump is blowing apart his administration's rationale for killing Soleimani," tweeted Washington Post national intelligence reporter Shane Harris.
Administration officials have spent more than a week making various claims about the danger Soleimani posed, including that he was plotting to bomb U.S. embassies--a claim with Defense Secretary Mark Esper wouldn't confirm on record Sunday. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo openly mocked reports from Iraq's prime minister that Soleimani was in Baghdad at the time of his killing to discuss easing tensions with Saudi Arabia.
But a White House briefing last week in which officials shared intelligence about so-called "imminent" threats posed by Soleimani was condemned as "insulting" and "utterly unconvincing" by members of Trump's own party.
On social media, some observers wrote that Trump's phrasing of his tweet on Monday could be applied to many of his decisions and his treatment of the truth.
"It doesn't really matter," tweeted MSNBC political analyst Richard Stengel. "He's not saying that just about Soleimani, but about the truth. Those who lie for Trump are then undercut by him."
"If this is the case, then nothing matters," added anti-Trump activist Andrew Wortman. "He can assassinate anyone anywhere and bring us to the brink of war for no reason and face no accountability."
\u201cTrump says \u201cIt doesn\u2019t really matter\u201d if Soleimani posed an imminent threat. If this is the case, then nothing matters. He can assassinate anyone anywhere and bring us to the brink of war for no reason and face no accountability. https://t.co/DoDAqMoOCv\u201d— Andrew Wortman (@Andrew Wortman) 1578952193
\u201cThis should be world shaking news.\n\nIn Trumplandia, it barely merits a glance.\n\n***\nA Narrative Collapses as Trump Tweets: \u2018It Doesn\u2019t Really Matter\u2019 https://t.co/xO3KtEe9cD\u201d— Annie Gabston-Howell- (@Annie Gabston-Howell-) 1579006375
The unraveling of the White House narrative about Soleimani's assassination was reminiscent of Trump's treatment of the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018. After spending weeks assuring the public that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had nothing to do with the killing, the president finally told reporters, "Maybe he did and maybe he didn't... In any case, our relationship is with the kingdom of Saudi Arabia."
A recent USA Today/Ipsos poll found that 52% of respondents view the killing of Soleimani as "reckless."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.