House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaks at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol on October 31, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Nov 01, 2019
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Friday that she is "not a big fan of Medicare for All" despite support for the ambitious proposal among the majority of her caucus, three-quarters of Democratic voters, and two leading 2020 Democratic presidential candidates.
"It is expensive," Pelosi told Bloomberg, without mentioning that studies show Medicare for All would save the U.S. trillions of dollars while providing comprehensive coverage to all.
"Medicare for All doesn't cost money. It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world."
--Alex Lawson, Social Security Works
"Who pays is very important," continued Pelosi. "What are the benefits that come in there? So I would think that hopefully as we emerge into the election year, the mantra would be more 'Healthcare for All Americans.'"
The Speaker added that "there is a comfort level that some people have with their current private insurance that they have, and if that is to be phased out, let's talk about it."
Progressive activist Jonathan Cohn denounced Pelosi's comments as "sabotage" of two of the Democratic Party's presidential frontrunners, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
Watch:
The comments were met with immediate outrage by Medicare for All proponents:
\u201cCall @SpeakerPelosi right now and demand she support #MedicareForAll.\u201d— Medicare for All (@Medicare for All) 1572629235
Pelosi's remarks came just hours after Warren released a Medicare for All financing plan that she says would deliver a major tax cut for most families in the U.S. while also reducing national healthcare spending compared to the current for-profit system.
In a statement applauding Warren's proposal, Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson said "Medicare for All doesn't cost money."
"It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world," said Lawson. "That's why 'how will you pay for it?' has always been a completely false premise."
Contrary to Pelosi's suggestion that Medicare for All could damage Democrats' chances in the 2020 election, recent polling (pdf) by Data for Progress showed "supporting Medicare for All would not hurt" the Democratic presidential nominee in a race against President Donald Trump.
"We tested a Democrat running on Medicare for All against Trump. Six times. With three different vendors," Data for Progress co-founder Sean McElwee said Friday. "Every time the Medicare for All Democrat wins, usually by double-digits."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Friday that she is "not a big fan of Medicare for All" despite support for the ambitious proposal among the majority of her caucus, three-quarters of Democratic voters, and two leading 2020 Democratic presidential candidates.
"It is expensive," Pelosi told Bloomberg, without mentioning that studies show Medicare for All would save the U.S. trillions of dollars while providing comprehensive coverage to all.
"Medicare for All doesn't cost money. It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world."
--Alex Lawson, Social Security Works
"Who pays is very important," continued Pelosi. "What are the benefits that come in there? So I would think that hopefully as we emerge into the election year, the mantra would be more 'Healthcare for All Americans.'"
The Speaker added that "there is a comfort level that some people have with their current private insurance that they have, and if that is to be phased out, let's talk about it."
Progressive activist Jonathan Cohn denounced Pelosi's comments as "sabotage" of two of the Democratic Party's presidential frontrunners, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
Watch:
The comments were met with immediate outrage by Medicare for All proponents:
\u201cCall @SpeakerPelosi right now and demand she support #MedicareForAll.\u201d— Medicare for All (@Medicare for All) 1572629235
Pelosi's remarks came just hours after Warren released a Medicare for All financing plan that she says would deliver a major tax cut for most families in the U.S. while also reducing national healthcare spending compared to the current for-profit system.
In a statement applauding Warren's proposal, Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson said "Medicare for All doesn't cost money."
"It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world," said Lawson. "That's why 'how will you pay for it?' has always been a completely false premise."
Contrary to Pelosi's suggestion that Medicare for All could damage Democrats' chances in the 2020 election, recent polling (pdf) by Data for Progress showed "supporting Medicare for All would not hurt" the Democratic presidential nominee in a race against President Donald Trump.
"We tested a Democrat running on Medicare for All against Trump. Six times. With three different vendors," Data for Progress co-founder Sean McElwee said Friday. "Every time the Medicare for All Democrat wins, usually by double-digits."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Friday that she is "not a big fan of Medicare for All" despite support for the ambitious proposal among the majority of her caucus, three-quarters of Democratic voters, and two leading 2020 Democratic presidential candidates.
"It is expensive," Pelosi told Bloomberg, without mentioning that studies show Medicare for All would save the U.S. trillions of dollars while providing comprehensive coverage to all.
"Medicare for All doesn't cost money. It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world."
--Alex Lawson, Social Security Works
"Who pays is very important," continued Pelosi. "What are the benefits that come in there? So I would think that hopefully as we emerge into the election year, the mantra would be more 'Healthcare for All Americans.'"
The Speaker added that "there is a comfort level that some people have with their current private insurance that they have, and if that is to be phased out, let's talk about it."
Progressive activist Jonathan Cohn denounced Pelosi's comments as "sabotage" of two of the Democratic Party's presidential frontrunners, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
Watch:
The comments were met with immediate outrage by Medicare for All proponents:
\u201cCall @SpeakerPelosi right now and demand she support #MedicareForAll.\u201d— Medicare for All (@Medicare for All) 1572629235
Pelosi's remarks came just hours after Warren released a Medicare for All financing plan that she says would deliver a major tax cut for most families in the U.S. while also reducing national healthcare spending compared to the current for-profit system.
In a statement applauding Warren's proposal, Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson said "Medicare for All doesn't cost money."
"It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world," said Lawson. "That's why 'how will you pay for it?' has always been a completely false premise."
Contrary to Pelosi's suggestion that Medicare for All could damage Democrats' chances in the 2020 election, recent polling (pdf) by Data for Progress showed "supporting Medicare for All would not hurt" the Democratic presidential nominee in a race against President Donald Trump.
"We tested a Democrat running on Medicare for All against Trump. Six times. With three different vendors," Data for Progress co-founder Sean McElwee said Friday. "Every time the Medicare for All Democrat wins, usually by double-digits."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.