SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaks at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol on October 31, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
'Not a Big Fan of Medicare for All': Pelosi Attacks Plan Backed by Leading 2020 Democrats, Majority of Party
The House Speaker's remarks came hours after Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a 2020 Democratic presidential contender, released her proposal to finance Medicare for All.
Nov 01, 2019
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Friday that she is "not a big fan of Medicare for All" despite support for the ambitious proposal among the majority of her caucus, three-quarters of Democratic voters, and two leading 2020 Democratic presidential candidates.
"It is expensive," Pelosi told Bloomberg, without mentioning that studies show Medicare for All would save the U.S. trillions of dollars while providing comprehensive coverage to all.
"Medicare for All doesn't cost money. It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world."
--Alex Lawson, Social Security Works
"Who pays is very important," continued Pelosi. "What are the benefits that come in there? So I would think that hopefully as we emerge into the election year, the mantra would be more 'Healthcare for All Americans.'"
The Speaker added that "there is a comfort level that some people have with their current private insurance that they have, and if that is to be phased out, let's talk about it."
Progressive activist Jonathan Cohn denounced Pelosi's comments as "sabotage" of two of the Democratic Party's presidential frontrunners, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
Watch:
The comments were met with immediate outrage by Medicare for All proponents:
\u201cCall @SpeakerPelosi right now and demand she support #MedicareForAll.\u201d— Medicare for All (@Medicare for All) 1572629235
Pelosi's remarks came just hours after Warren released a Medicare for All financing plan that she says would deliver a major tax cut for most families in the U.S. while also reducing national healthcare spending compared to the current for-profit system.
In a statement applauding Warren's proposal, Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson said "Medicare for All doesn't cost money."
"It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world," said Lawson. "That's why 'how will you pay for it?' has always been a completely false premise."
Contrary to Pelosi's suggestion that Medicare for All could damage Democrats' chances in the 2020 election, recent polling (pdf) by Data for Progress showed "supporting Medicare for All would not hurt" the Democratic presidential nominee in a race against President Donald Trump.
"We tested a Democrat running on Medicare for All against Trump. Six times. With three different vendors," Data for Progress co-founder Sean McElwee said Friday. "Every time the Medicare for All Democrat wins, usually by double-digits."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Friday that she is "not a big fan of Medicare for All" despite support for the ambitious proposal among the majority of her caucus, three-quarters of Democratic voters, and two leading 2020 Democratic presidential candidates.
"It is expensive," Pelosi told Bloomberg, without mentioning that studies show Medicare for All would save the U.S. trillions of dollars while providing comprehensive coverage to all.
"Medicare for All doesn't cost money. It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world."
--Alex Lawson, Social Security Works
"Who pays is very important," continued Pelosi. "What are the benefits that come in there? So I would think that hopefully as we emerge into the election year, the mantra would be more 'Healthcare for All Americans.'"
The Speaker added that "there is a comfort level that some people have with their current private insurance that they have, and if that is to be phased out, let's talk about it."
Progressive activist Jonathan Cohn denounced Pelosi's comments as "sabotage" of two of the Democratic Party's presidential frontrunners, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
Watch:
The comments were met with immediate outrage by Medicare for All proponents:
\u201cCall @SpeakerPelosi right now and demand she support #MedicareForAll.\u201d— Medicare for All (@Medicare for All) 1572629235
Pelosi's remarks came just hours after Warren released a Medicare for All financing plan that she says would deliver a major tax cut for most families in the U.S. while also reducing national healthcare spending compared to the current for-profit system.
In a statement applauding Warren's proposal, Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson said "Medicare for All doesn't cost money."
"It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world," said Lawson. "That's why 'how will you pay for it?' has always been a completely false premise."
Contrary to Pelosi's suggestion that Medicare for All could damage Democrats' chances in the 2020 election, recent polling (pdf) by Data for Progress showed "supporting Medicare for All would not hurt" the Democratic presidential nominee in a race against President Donald Trump.
"We tested a Democrat running on Medicare for All against Trump. Six times. With three different vendors," Data for Progress co-founder Sean McElwee said Friday. "Every time the Medicare for All Democrat wins, usually by double-digits."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Friday that she is "not a big fan of Medicare for All" despite support for the ambitious proposal among the majority of her caucus, three-quarters of Democratic voters, and two leading 2020 Democratic presidential candidates.
"It is expensive," Pelosi told Bloomberg, without mentioning that studies show Medicare for All would save the U.S. trillions of dollars while providing comprehensive coverage to all.
"Medicare for All doesn't cost money. It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world."
--Alex Lawson, Social Security Works
"Who pays is very important," continued Pelosi. "What are the benefits that come in there? So I would think that hopefully as we emerge into the election year, the mantra would be more 'Healthcare for All Americans.'"
The Speaker added that "there is a comfort level that some people have with their current private insurance that they have, and if that is to be phased out, let's talk about it."
Progressive activist Jonathan Cohn denounced Pelosi's comments as "sabotage" of two of the Democratic Party's presidential frontrunners, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
Watch:
The comments were met with immediate outrage by Medicare for All proponents:
\u201cCall @SpeakerPelosi right now and demand she support #MedicareForAll.\u201d— Medicare for All (@Medicare for All) 1572629235
Pelosi's remarks came just hours after Warren released a Medicare for All financing plan that she says would deliver a major tax cut for most families in the U.S. while also reducing national healthcare spending compared to the current for-profit system.
In a statement applauding Warren's proposal, Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson said "Medicare for All doesn't cost money."
"It saves money by eliminating the for-profit waste in the insurance system and ending the rip-off of paying the highest drug prices in the world," said Lawson. "That's why 'how will you pay for it?' has always been a completely false premise."
Contrary to Pelosi's suggestion that Medicare for All could damage Democrats' chances in the 2020 election, recent polling (pdf) by Data for Progress showed "supporting Medicare for All would not hurt" the Democratic presidential nominee in a race against President Donald Trump.
"We tested a Democrat running on Medicare for All against Trump. Six times. With three different vendors," Data for Progress co-founder Sean McElwee said Friday. "Every time the Medicare for All Democrat wins, usually by double-digits."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.