A London traffic policy has in just six months succeeded in sharply reducing toxic emissions and achieving better air quality in the city, according to city officials.
Mayor Sadiq Khan designated large portions of the fourth-most populous European city as an "Ultra Low Emission Zone" (ULEZ) last April, and revealed in an NPR interview on Tuesday that the plan's implementation is directly linked to a 36 percent reduction in toxic nitrogen dioxide pollution.
Khan praised the results as "a huge improvement as we work to clean up toxic air and protect our children's lungs."
Roadside nitrogen dioxide pollution has reduced by one third in the #ULEZ zone since we launched it six months ago - a huge improvement as we work to clean up toxic air and protect our children’s lungs. #LetLondonBreathe#DeliveringChangeForLondonhttps://t.co/duRRHa4wDL
— Sadiq Khan (@SadiqKhan) October 21, 2019
The ULEZ rule subjects drivers to a charge of £11.50 (almost $15) if they drive in the designated low-emission zone between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm. Daily fees are even higher for drivers with older cars that don't meet current emissions standards.
The regulation has reduced daily traffic by more than 13,000 cars. The revenue from ULEZ fines is going toward improving London's public transportation network, making the city's 9 million residents even more likely to use public transit.
ULEZ has also reduced carbon emissions in the city by four percent, green transportation campaigner Kate Laing wrote.
Just 6 months in, London's ULEZ has achieved a 4% reduction in CO2 emissions and a 3-9% reduction in traffic flows. This is above and beyond the impacts of the congestion charge already realised. https://t.co/xAOqnvxTol
— Kate Laing (@Kate_Laing) October 21, 2019
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
If you think a better world is possible, support our people-powered media model today
The corporate media puts the interests of the 1% ahead of all of us. That's wrong. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
If you believe the survival of independent media is vital to a healthy democracy, please step forward with a donation to nonprofit Common Dreams today:
The ULEZ rule met opposition last year. A petition asking to stop implementation of the rule was signed by 95,000 people.
Khan said Tuesday that taking action against toxic emissions and the climate crisis requires bravery from elected officials, and called on federal lawmakers to follow London's lead.
"I am determined to stop Londoners breathing air so filthy it is damaging our children's lungs and causing thousands of premature deaths," Khan said in a statement. "The ULEZ shows what we can achieve if we are brave enough to implement such ambitious policies."
"I now hope the government will match my ambition and amend their environment bill to ensure it has the legally binding WHO-recommended limits to be achieved by 2030 that we need to protect public health," the mayor added.
Meanwhile, a new report released Tuesday about increased air pollution in the U.S. illustrated Khan's point that bold action can rapidly improve outcomes—by showing increasing emissions in the U.S. after regulatory rollbacks.
Weakened federal regulations are contributing to more air pollution and premature deaths in the U.S. over the past two years, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University reported.
On social media, one cyclist wrote that London appears far ahead of even U.S. cities that are currently implementing climate action.
London seems 10+ years ahead of NYC on the issue of air pollution+transportation. As a daily cyclist, air quality has an impact on my health. Congestion pricing is a start but London has had that for years #thoughleaders @BilldeBlasio @nycgov https://t.co/dtVZciKN6M
— Adam Anzuoni (@adamanzzz) October 22, 2019