In a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Rep. Mark Pocan, a Wisconsin Democrat and co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, demanded to know precisely who ordered Sondland not to testify. (Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
In Warning to Pompeo, Pocan Calls for Suspending Salaries of Trump Officials Holding 'Witnesses Hostage'
"We refuse to bankroll this administration while they hold witnesses hostage. Sondland must testify on Ukraine," said Pocan, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
After the Trump administration blocked U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland from testifying before the House as part of the body's impeachment inquiry, Rep. Mark Pocan on Tuesday sent a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo reminding him of the federal law that prohibits paying the salary of any official who bars a government employee from communicating with Congress.
Pocan, a Wisconsin Democrat and co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, demanded to know who ordered Sondland not to testify. As The Guardian reported, a State Department official left a voicemail with Sondland's lawyers early Tuesday morning ordering the ambassador not to attend House hearings.
"I ask that you direct the person who prohibited Ambassador Sondland from communicating with Congress to section 713 of Division D of Public Law 116-6 signed by President Trump earlier this year," Pocan wrote to Pompeo. "As you are aware, this section prohibits paying the salary of any 'officer or employee of the federal government from... communication or contact with any member, committee, or subcommittee of Congress."
"I believe the person prohibiting Ambassador Sondland from testifying before the House Intelligence Committee is in violation of this statute," Pocan continued, "and that their salary should be withheld until Ambassador Sondland appears before Congress."
In a tweet containing his full letter to Pompeo, Pocan said "we refuse to bankroll this administration while they hold witnesses hostage."
As Common Dreams reported, the Trump administration's decision to bar Sondland from testifying was viewed by Democrats in Congress and progressive observers as further evidence of White House obstruction as the House moves forward with its impeachment probe.
House Democrats issued a subpoena to Sondland shortly after he did not appear at Tuesday's scheduled hearing.
In text exchanges with America's top Ukraine diplomat Bill Taylor that were released by House Democrats earlier this month, Sondland appeared to defend President Donald Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine's leader to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.
After Taylor raised alarm last month that the White House was attempting to condition aid to Ukraine on an investigation into Biden, Sondland replied five hours later, "Call me."
Over a week later, Sondland insisted to Taylor that Trump "has been crystal clear no quid pro quo's of any kind."
As MSNBC's Chris Hayes said in response to the text exchanges, "Sondland taking five hours to respond, talking to Trump, and then replying 'no quid pro quo' shows 1) they knew what they were doing 2) knew it was wrong 3) settled on the 'no quid pro quo' defense before it ever became public."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
After the Trump administration blocked U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland from testifying before the House as part of the body's impeachment inquiry, Rep. Mark Pocan on Tuesday sent a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo reminding him of the federal law that prohibits paying the salary of any official who bars a government employee from communicating with Congress.
Pocan, a Wisconsin Democrat and co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, demanded to know who ordered Sondland not to testify. As The Guardian reported, a State Department official left a voicemail with Sondland's lawyers early Tuesday morning ordering the ambassador not to attend House hearings.
"I ask that you direct the person who prohibited Ambassador Sondland from communicating with Congress to section 713 of Division D of Public Law 116-6 signed by President Trump earlier this year," Pocan wrote to Pompeo. "As you are aware, this section prohibits paying the salary of any 'officer or employee of the federal government from... communication or contact with any member, committee, or subcommittee of Congress."
"I believe the person prohibiting Ambassador Sondland from testifying before the House Intelligence Committee is in violation of this statute," Pocan continued, "and that their salary should be withheld until Ambassador Sondland appears before Congress."
In a tweet containing his full letter to Pompeo, Pocan said "we refuse to bankroll this administration while they hold witnesses hostage."
As Common Dreams reported, the Trump administration's decision to bar Sondland from testifying was viewed by Democrats in Congress and progressive observers as further evidence of White House obstruction as the House moves forward with its impeachment probe.
House Democrats issued a subpoena to Sondland shortly after he did not appear at Tuesday's scheduled hearing.
In text exchanges with America's top Ukraine diplomat Bill Taylor that were released by House Democrats earlier this month, Sondland appeared to defend President Donald Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine's leader to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.
After Taylor raised alarm last month that the White House was attempting to condition aid to Ukraine on an investigation into Biden, Sondland replied five hours later, "Call me."
Over a week later, Sondland insisted to Taylor that Trump "has been crystal clear no quid pro quo's of any kind."
As MSNBC's Chris Hayes said in response to the text exchanges, "Sondland taking five hours to respond, talking to Trump, and then replying 'no quid pro quo' shows 1) they knew what they were doing 2) knew it was wrong 3) settled on the 'no quid pro quo' defense before it ever became public."
After the Trump administration blocked U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland from testifying before the House as part of the body's impeachment inquiry, Rep. Mark Pocan on Tuesday sent a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo reminding him of the federal law that prohibits paying the salary of any official who bars a government employee from communicating with Congress.
Pocan, a Wisconsin Democrat and co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, demanded to know who ordered Sondland not to testify. As The Guardian reported, a State Department official left a voicemail with Sondland's lawyers early Tuesday morning ordering the ambassador not to attend House hearings.
"I ask that you direct the person who prohibited Ambassador Sondland from communicating with Congress to section 713 of Division D of Public Law 116-6 signed by President Trump earlier this year," Pocan wrote to Pompeo. "As you are aware, this section prohibits paying the salary of any 'officer or employee of the federal government from... communication or contact with any member, committee, or subcommittee of Congress."
"I believe the person prohibiting Ambassador Sondland from testifying before the House Intelligence Committee is in violation of this statute," Pocan continued, "and that their salary should be withheld until Ambassador Sondland appears before Congress."
In a tweet containing his full letter to Pompeo, Pocan said "we refuse to bankroll this administration while they hold witnesses hostage."
As Common Dreams reported, the Trump administration's decision to bar Sondland from testifying was viewed by Democrats in Congress and progressive observers as further evidence of White House obstruction as the House moves forward with its impeachment probe.
House Democrats issued a subpoena to Sondland shortly after he did not appear at Tuesday's scheduled hearing.
In text exchanges with America's top Ukraine diplomat Bill Taylor that were released by House Democrats earlier this month, Sondland appeared to defend President Donald Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine's leader to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.
After Taylor raised alarm last month that the White House was attempting to condition aid to Ukraine on an investigation into Biden, Sondland replied five hours later, "Call me."
Over a week later, Sondland insisted to Taylor that Trump "has been crystal clear no quid pro quo's of any kind."
As MSNBC's Chris Hayes said in response to the text exchanges, "Sondland taking five hours to respond, talking to Trump, and then replying 'no quid pro quo' shows 1) they knew what they were doing 2) knew it was wrong 3) settled on the 'no quid pro quo' defense before it ever became public."