SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) during a hearing before the House Oversight and Reform Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on February 27, 2019. (Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images)
'These Are Huge Checks Being Written to Boeing and Lockheed': Rep. Rashida Tlaib Rips Endless War Budget as House Passes $733B in Military Spending
"We should be cutting checks to everyday people struggling to make ends meet."
Jun 20, 2019
After the House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a massive spending package that includes $733 billion for the Pentagon--up from $716 billion the previous year--Rep. Rashida Tlaib slammed America's "out of control warfare budget" and said the U.S. should be investing more in programs that benefit the public, not massive defense contractors.
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer."
--Rep. Rashida Tlaib
"These are huge checks being written to Boeing and Lockheed Martin, when we should be cutting checks to everyday people struggling to make ends meet," said Tlaib, one of just seven Democrats to vote against the trillion-dollar spending measure.
The other House Democrats who voted against the measure were Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ayanna Pressley (Mass.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Denny Heck (Wash.), Collin Peterson (Minn.), and Ben McAdams (Utah). View the full roll call here.
In a tweet following Wednesday's vote, Tlaib wrote, "Giving our military industrial complex another $733B windfall doesn't bring [Michigan's 13th congressional district] closer to economic opportunities we need."
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer," the Michigan congresswoman wrote.
While the $733 billion in military spending is less than the $750 billion President Donald Trump demanded in his 2020 budget request, progressives have pushed back against hiking the military budget without major increases in spending on education, healthcare, and other social programs.
According to the Washington Post, House Democrats' spending measure "boosts the Pentagon budget by about $16 billion over current levels, about a two percent increase, while giving health, education, and labor programs an almost seven percent boost."
Tlaib said the latter increase is far from sufficient, arguing that key social programs are being "robbed blind" while spending on the military soars.
As the Post's Jeff Stein and Aaron Gregg reported in April, "America's military budget is set to grow for a fifth consecutive year to near-historic highs in 2020."
Under either House Democrats' $733 billion Pentagon budget plan or Trump's $750 billion proposal, Stein and Gregg wrote, "the United States is expected to spend more on its military in 2020 than at any point since World War II, except for a handful of years at the height of the Iraq War."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After the House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a massive spending package that includes $733 billion for the Pentagon--up from $716 billion the previous year--Rep. Rashida Tlaib slammed America's "out of control warfare budget" and said the U.S. should be investing more in programs that benefit the public, not massive defense contractors.
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer."
--Rep. Rashida Tlaib
"These are huge checks being written to Boeing and Lockheed Martin, when we should be cutting checks to everyday people struggling to make ends meet," said Tlaib, one of just seven Democrats to vote against the trillion-dollar spending measure.
The other House Democrats who voted against the measure were Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ayanna Pressley (Mass.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Denny Heck (Wash.), Collin Peterson (Minn.), and Ben McAdams (Utah). View the full roll call here.
In a tweet following Wednesday's vote, Tlaib wrote, "Giving our military industrial complex another $733B windfall doesn't bring [Michigan's 13th congressional district] closer to economic opportunities we need."
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer," the Michigan congresswoman wrote.
While the $733 billion in military spending is less than the $750 billion President Donald Trump demanded in his 2020 budget request, progressives have pushed back against hiking the military budget without major increases in spending on education, healthcare, and other social programs.
According to the Washington Post, House Democrats' spending measure "boosts the Pentagon budget by about $16 billion over current levels, about a two percent increase, while giving health, education, and labor programs an almost seven percent boost."
Tlaib said the latter increase is far from sufficient, arguing that key social programs are being "robbed blind" while spending on the military soars.
As the Post's Jeff Stein and Aaron Gregg reported in April, "America's military budget is set to grow for a fifth consecutive year to near-historic highs in 2020."
Under either House Democrats' $733 billion Pentagon budget plan or Trump's $750 billion proposal, Stein and Gregg wrote, "the United States is expected to spend more on its military in 2020 than at any point since World War II, except for a handful of years at the height of the Iraq War."
After the House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a massive spending package that includes $733 billion for the Pentagon--up from $716 billion the previous year--Rep. Rashida Tlaib slammed America's "out of control warfare budget" and said the U.S. should be investing more in programs that benefit the public, not massive defense contractors.
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer."
--Rep. Rashida Tlaib
"These are huge checks being written to Boeing and Lockheed Martin, when we should be cutting checks to everyday people struggling to make ends meet," said Tlaib, one of just seven Democrats to vote against the trillion-dollar spending measure.
The other House Democrats who voted against the measure were Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ayanna Pressley (Mass.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Denny Heck (Wash.), Collin Peterson (Minn.), and Ben McAdams (Utah). View the full roll call here.
In a tweet following Wednesday's vote, Tlaib wrote, "Giving our military industrial complex another $733B windfall doesn't bring [Michigan's 13th congressional district] closer to economic opportunities we need."
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer," the Michigan congresswoman wrote.
While the $733 billion in military spending is less than the $750 billion President Donald Trump demanded in his 2020 budget request, progressives have pushed back against hiking the military budget without major increases in spending on education, healthcare, and other social programs.
According to the Washington Post, House Democrats' spending measure "boosts the Pentagon budget by about $16 billion over current levels, about a two percent increase, while giving health, education, and labor programs an almost seven percent boost."
Tlaib said the latter increase is far from sufficient, arguing that key social programs are being "robbed blind" while spending on the military soars.
As the Post's Jeff Stein and Aaron Gregg reported in April, "America's military budget is set to grow for a fifth consecutive year to near-historic highs in 2020."
Under either House Democrats' $733 billion Pentagon budget plan or Trump's $750 billion proposal, Stein and Gregg wrote, "the United States is expected to spend more on its military in 2020 than at any point since World War II, except for a handful of years at the height of the Iraq War."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.