Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) during a hearing before the House Oversight and Reform Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on February 27, 2019. (Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images)
Jun 20, 2019
After the House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a massive spending package that includes $733 billion for the Pentagon--up from $716 billion the previous year--Rep. Rashida Tlaib slammed America's "out of control warfare budget" and said the U.S. should be investing more in programs that benefit the public, not massive defense contractors.
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer."
--Rep. Rashida Tlaib
"These are huge checks being written to Boeing and Lockheed Martin, when we should be cutting checks to everyday people struggling to make ends meet," said Tlaib, one of just seven Democrats to vote against the trillion-dollar spending measure.
The other House Democrats who voted against the measure were Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ayanna Pressley (Mass.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Denny Heck (Wash.), Collin Peterson (Minn.), and Ben McAdams (Utah). View the full roll call here.
In a tweet following Wednesday's vote, Tlaib wrote, "Giving our military industrial complex another $733B windfall doesn't bring [Michigan's 13th congressional district] closer to economic opportunities we need."
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer," the Michigan congresswoman wrote.
\u201cGiving our military industrial complex another $733B windfall doesn't bring #13thDistrictStrong closer to economic opportunities we need. We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer. I voted no on #HR2740.\u201d— Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (@Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib) 1560977606
While the $733 billion in military spending is less than the $750 billion President Donald Trump demanded in his 2020 budget request, progressives have pushed back against hiking the military budget without major increases in spending on education, healthcare, and other social programs.
According to the Washington Post, House Democrats' spending measure "boosts the Pentagon budget by about $16 billion over current levels, about a two percent increase, while giving health, education, and labor programs an almost seven percent boost."
Tlaib said the latter increase is far from sufficient, arguing that key social programs are being "robbed blind" while spending on the military soars.
As the Post's Jeff Stein and Aaron Gregg reported in April, "America's military budget is set to grow for a fifth consecutive year to near-historic highs in 2020."
Under either House Democrats' $733 billion Pentagon budget plan or Trump's $750 billion proposal, Stein and Gregg wrote, "the United States is expected to spend more on its military in 2020 than at any point since World War II, except for a handful of years at the height of the Iraq War."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After the House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a massive spending package that includes $733 billion for the Pentagon--up from $716 billion the previous year--Rep. Rashida Tlaib slammed America's "out of control warfare budget" and said the U.S. should be investing more in programs that benefit the public, not massive defense contractors.
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer."
--Rep. Rashida Tlaib
"These are huge checks being written to Boeing and Lockheed Martin, when we should be cutting checks to everyday people struggling to make ends meet," said Tlaib, one of just seven Democrats to vote against the trillion-dollar spending measure.
The other House Democrats who voted against the measure were Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ayanna Pressley (Mass.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Denny Heck (Wash.), Collin Peterson (Minn.), and Ben McAdams (Utah). View the full roll call here.
In a tweet following Wednesday's vote, Tlaib wrote, "Giving our military industrial complex another $733B windfall doesn't bring [Michigan's 13th congressional district] closer to economic opportunities we need."
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer," the Michigan congresswoman wrote.
\u201cGiving our military industrial complex another $733B windfall doesn't bring #13thDistrictStrong closer to economic opportunities we need. We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer. I voted no on #HR2740.\u201d— Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (@Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib) 1560977606
While the $733 billion in military spending is less than the $750 billion President Donald Trump demanded in his 2020 budget request, progressives have pushed back against hiking the military budget without major increases in spending on education, healthcare, and other social programs.
According to the Washington Post, House Democrats' spending measure "boosts the Pentagon budget by about $16 billion over current levels, about a two percent increase, while giving health, education, and labor programs an almost seven percent boost."
Tlaib said the latter increase is far from sufficient, arguing that key social programs are being "robbed blind" while spending on the military soars.
As the Post's Jeff Stein and Aaron Gregg reported in April, "America's military budget is set to grow for a fifth consecutive year to near-historic highs in 2020."
Under either House Democrats' $733 billion Pentagon budget plan or Trump's $750 billion proposal, Stein and Gregg wrote, "the United States is expected to spend more on its military in 2020 than at any point since World War II, except for a handful of years at the height of the Iraq War."
After the House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a massive spending package that includes $733 billion for the Pentagon--up from $716 billion the previous year--Rep. Rashida Tlaib slammed America's "out of control warfare budget" and said the U.S. should be investing more in programs that benefit the public, not massive defense contractors.
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer."
--Rep. Rashida Tlaib
"These are huge checks being written to Boeing and Lockheed Martin, when we should be cutting checks to everyday people struggling to make ends meet," said Tlaib, one of just seven Democrats to vote against the trillion-dollar spending measure.
The other House Democrats who voted against the measure were Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ayanna Pressley (Mass.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Denny Heck (Wash.), Collin Peterson (Minn.), and Ben McAdams (Utah). View the full roll call here.
In a tweet following Wednesday's vote, Tlaib wrote, "Giving our military industrial complex another $733B windfall doesn't bring [Michigan's 13th congressional district] closer to economic opportunities we need."
"We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer," the Michigan congresswoman wrote.
\u201cGiving our military industrial complex another $733B windfall doesn't bring #13thDistrictStrong closer to economic opportunities we need. We deserve better than to come second to for-profit defense spending that doesn't make our nation any safer. I voted no on #HR2740.\u201d— Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (@Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib) 1560977606
While the $733 billion in military spending is less than the $750 billion President Donald Trump demanded in his 2020 budget request, progressives have pushed back against hiking the military budget without major increases in spending on education, healthcare, and other social programs.
According to the Washington Post, House Democrats' spending measure "boosts the Pentagon budget by about $16 billion over current levels, about a two percent increase, while giving health, education, and labor programs an almost seven percent boost."
Tlaib said the latter increase is far from sufficient, arguing that key social programs are being "robbed blind" while spending on the military soars.
As the Post's Jeff Stein and Aaron Gregg reported in April, "America's military budget is set to grow for a fifth consecutive year to near-historic highs in 2020."
Under either House Democrats' $733 billion Pentagon budget plan or Trump's $750 billion proposal, Stein and Gregg wrote, "the United States is expected to spend more on its military in 2020 than at any point since World War II, except for a handful of years at the height of the Iraq War."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.