The Trump administration is reportedly considering new asylum restrictions that critics denounce as inhumane and unconstitutional. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
Trump's New "Fundamentally Cruel" Policy Would Effectively Bar Central American Refugees From Seeking Asylum
"Once again, the administration is seeking to slam the door on vulnerable people."
Immigrant and human rights advocates responded with alarm Thursday to a report that the Trump administration "is considering sweeping restrictions on asylum that would effectively block Central American migrants from entering the U.S.," condemning the proposed policy as both inhumane and unconstitutional.
"This latest policy is a disgusting example of the lengths the Trump administration will go to deny people protection," Charanya Krishnaswami of Amnesty International USA said in a statement. "To effectively close the border to Central Americans and the vast majority of people seeking asylum not only violates human rights obligations, but is also fundamentally cruel."
According to Politico:
A draft proposal circulating among Trump's Homeland Security advisers would prohibit migrants from seeking asylum if they have transited through a country other than their own before coming to the U.S., according to a [Department of Homeland Security] official and an outside advocate familiar with the plan. If executed, it would deny asylum to thousands of migrants waiting just south of the border, many of whom have trekked a perilous journey through Mexico.
...While Trump aides believe they can make the changes through an administrative rule, they are also seeking a legislative fix that would be far less vulnerable to a court challenge. Similar language is expected to be included in Trump's new immigration bill that would boost security at the southern border and push the nation to admit more high-skilled, well-educated immigrants, rather than immigrants who enter the U.S. based on family ties, according to two people familiar with the proposal.
"It's unbelievably extreme to try to inhibit anyone who comes through another country in their quest for asylum," Kerri Talbot, the federal advocacy director for the group Immigration Hub, told Politico. "It basically means it would block all Central Americans from coming to the U.S."
The new rules would build on the administration's previous efforts to make it harder for migrants to seek asylum in the United States--including the so-called "Remain in Mexico" policy that created a "virtual wall" along the border by forcing asylum-seekers to stay in Mexico while their applications are processed by the U.S. government.
"Once again, the administration is seeking to slam the door on vulnerable people, in likely contravention of U.S. law and America's legacy of providing safe haven to the persecuted," Nazanin Ash of the International Rescue Committee (IRC) said in a statement. "The administration's policies have already kept thousands of vulnerable people waiting unnecessarily at the border for the chance to claim asylum--at great risk, hardship, and expense--only to now be told they won't even have the opportunity to have their claims heard."
Ash noted that an IRC survey from April of nearly 600 people residing in shelters at the border "demonstrated that children are at risk of kidnapping, gang recruitment, sexual abuse, and other physical violence." The survey results also indicated migrant women and girls are particularly at risk of sexual violence in Mexico.
Calling on Congress to "assert its authority" and prevent further suffering, Ash added, "the rules can't keep shifting when lives hang in the balance."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Immigrant and human rights advocates responded with alarm Thursday to a report that the Trump administration "is considering sweeping restrictions on asylum that would effectively block Central American migrants from entering the U.S.," condemning the proposed policy as both inhumane and unconstitutional.
"This latest policy is a disgusting example of the lengths the Trump administration will go to deny people protection," Charanya Krishnaswami of Amnesty International USA said in a statement. "To effectively close the border to Central Americans and the vast majority of people seeking asylum not only violates human rights obligations, but is also fundamentally cruel."
According to Politico:
A draft proposal circulating among Trump's Homeland Security advisers would prohibit migrants from seeking asylum if they have transited through a country other than their own before coming to the U.S., according to a [Department of Homeland Security] official and an outside advocate familiar with the plan. If executed, it would deny asylum to thousands of migrants waiting just south of the border, many of whom have trekked a perilous journey through Mexico.
...While Trump aides believe they can make the changes through an administrative rule, they are also seeking a legislative fix that would be far less vulnerable to a court challenge. Similar language is expected to be included in Trump's new immigration bill that would boost security at the southern border and push the nation to admit more high-skilled, well-educated immigrants, rather than immigrants who enter the U.S. based on family ties, according to two people familiar with the proposal.
"It's unbelievably extreme to try to inhibit anyone who comes through another country in their quest for asylum," Kerri Talbot, the federal advocacy director for the group Immigration Hub, told Politico. "It basically means it would block all Central Americans from coming to the U.S."
The new rules would build on the administration's previous efforts to make it harder for migrants to seek asylum in the United States--including the so-called "Remain in Mexico" policy that created a "virtual wall" along the border by forcing asylum-seekers to stay in Mexico while their applications are processed by the U.S. government.
"Once again, the administration is seeking to slam the door on vulnerable people, in likely contravention of U.S. law and America's legacy of providing safe haven to the persecuted," Nazanin Ash of the International Rescue Committee (IRC) said in a statement. "The administration's policies have already kept thousands of vulnerable people waiting unnecessarily at the border for the chance to claim asylum--at great risk, hardship, and expense--only to now be told they won't even have the opportunity to have their claims heard."
Ash noted that an IRC survey from April of nearly 600 people residing in shelters at the border "demonstrated that children are at risk of kidnapping, gang recruitment, sexual abuse, and other physical violence." The survey results also indicated migrant women and girls are particularly at risk of sexual violence in Mexico.
Calling on Congress to "assert its authority" and prevent further suffering, Ash added, "the rules can't keep shifting when lives hang in the balance."
Immigrant and human rights advocates responded with alarm Thursday to a report that the Trump administration "is considering sweeping restrictions on asylum that would effectively block Central American migrants from entering the U.S.," condemning the proposed policy as both inhumane and unconstitutional.
"This latest policy is a disgusting example of the lengths the Trump administration will go to deny people protection," Charanya Krishnaswami of Amnesty International USA said in a statement. "To effectively close the border to Central Americans and the vast majority of people seeking asylum not only violates human rights obligations, but is also fundamentally cruel."
According to Politico:
A draft proposal circulating among Trump's Homeland Security advisers would prohibit migrants from seeking asylum if they have transited through a country other than their own before coming to the U.S., according to a [Department of Homeland Security] official and an outside advocate familiar with the plan. If executed, it would deny asylum to thousands of migrants waiting just south of the border, many of whom have trekked a perilous journey through Mexico.
...While Trump aides believe they can make the changes through an administrative rule, they are also seeking a legislative fix that would be far less vulnerable to a court challenge. Similar language is expected to be included in Trump's new immigration bill that would boost security at the southern border and push the nation to admit more high-skilled, well-educated immigrants, rather than immigrants who enter the U.S. based on family ties, according to two people familiar with the proposal.
"It's unbelievably extreme to try to inhibit anyone who comes through another country in their quest for asylum," Kerri Talbot, the federal advocacy director for the group Immigration Hub, told Politico. "It basically means it would block all Central Americans from coming to the U.S."
The new rules would build on the administration's previous efforts to make it harder for migrants to seek asylum in the United States--including the so-called "Remain in Mexico" policy that created a "virtual wall" along the border by forcing asylum-seekers to stay in Mexico while their applications are processed by the U.S. government.
"Once again, the administration is seeking to slam the door on vulnerable people, in likely contravention of U.S. law and America's legacy of providing safe haven to the persecuted," Nazanin Ash of the International Rescue Committee (IRC) said in a statement. "The administration's policies have already kept thousands of vulnerable people waiting unnecessarily at the border for the chance to claim asylum--at great risk, hardship, and expense--only to now be told they won't even have the opportunity to have their claims heard."
Ash noted that an IRC survey from April of nearly 600 people residing in shelters at the border "demonstrated that children are at risk of kidnapping, gang recruitment, sexual abuse, and other physical violence." The survey results also indicated migrant women and girls are particularly at risk of sexual violence in Mexico.
Calling on Congress to "assert its authority" and prevent further suffering, Ash added, "the rules can't keep shifting when lives hang in the balance."