The Trump administration is reportedly considering new asylum restrictions that critics denounce as inhumane and unconstitutional. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
Trump's New "Fundamentally Cruel" Policy Would Effectively Bar Central American Refugees From Seeking Asylum
"Once again, the administration is seeking to slam the door on vulnerable people."
Immigrant and human rights advocates responded with alarm Thursday to a report that the Trump administration "is considering sweeping restrictions on asylum that would effectively block Central American migrants from entering the U.S.," condemning the proposed policy as both inhumane and unconstitutional.
"This latest policy is a disgusting example of the lengths the Trump administration will go to deny people protection," Charanya Krishnaswami of Amnesty International USA said in a statement. "To effectively close the border to Central Americans and the vast majority of people seeking asylum not only violates human rights obligations, but is also fundamentally cruel."
According to Politico:
A draft proposal circulating among Trump's Homeland Security advisers would prohibit migrants from seeking asylum if they have transited through a country other than their own before coming to the U.S., according to a [Department of Homeland Security] official and an outside advocate familiar with the plan. If executed, it would deny asylum to thousands of migrants waiting just south of the border, many of whom have trekked a perilous journey through Mexico.
...While Trump aides believe they can make the changes through an administrative rule, they are also seeking a legislative fix that would be far less vulnerable to a court challenge. Similar language is expected to be included in Trump's new immigration bill that would boost security at the southern border and push the nation to admit more high-skilled, well-educated immigrants, rather than immigrants who enter the U.S. based on family ties, according to two people familiar with the proposal.
"It's unbelievably extreme to try to inhibit anyone who comes through another country in their quest for asylum," Kerri Talbot, the federal advocacy director for the group Immigration Hub, told Politico. "It basically means it would block all Central Americans from coming to the U.S."
The new rules would build on the administration's previous efforts to make it harder for migrants to seek asylum in the United States--including the so-called "Remain in Mexico" policy that created a "virtual wall" along the border by forcing asylum-seekers to stay in Mexico while their applications are processed by the U.S. government.
"Once again, the administration is seeking to slam the door on vulnerable people, in likely contravention of U.S. law and America's legacy of providing safe haven to the persecuted," Nazanin Ash of the International Rescue Committee (IRC) said in a statement. "The administration's policies have already kept thousands of vulnerable people waiting unnecessarily at the border for the chance to claim asylum--at great risk, hardship, and expense--only to now be told they won't even have the opportunity to have their claims heard."
Ash noted that an IRC survey from April of nearly 600 people residing in shelters at the border "demonstrated that children are at risk of kidnapping, gang recruitment, sexual abuse, and other physical violence." The survey results also indicated migrant women and girls are particularly at risk of sexual violence in Mexico.
Calling on Congress to "assert its authority" and prevent further suffering, Ash added, "the rules can't keep shifting when lives hang in the balance."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Immigrant and human rights advocates responded with alarm Thursday to a report that the Trump administration "is considering sweeping restrictions on asylum that would effectively block Central American migrants from entering the U.S.," condemning the proposed policy as both inhumane and unconstitutional.
"This latest policy is a disgusting example of the lengths the Trump administration will go to deny people protection," Charanya Krishnaswami of Amnesty International USA said in a statement. "To effectively close the border to Central Americans and the vast majority of people seeking asylum not only violates human rights obligations, but is also fundamentally cruel."
According to Politico:
A draft proposal circulating among Trump's Homeland Security advisers would prohibit migrants from seeking asylum if they have transited through a country other than their own before coming to the U.S., according to a [Department of Homeland Security] official and an outside advocate familiar with the plan. If executed, it would deny asylum to thousands of migrants waiting just south of the border, many of whom have trekked a perilous journey through Mexico.
...While Trump aides believe they can make the changes through an administrative rule, they are also seeking a legislative fix that would be far less vulnerable to a court challenge. Similar language is expected to be included in Trump's new immigration bill that would boost security at the southern border and push the nation to admit more high-skilled, well-educated immigrants, rather than immigrants who enter the U.S. based on family ties, according to two people familiar with the proposal.
"It's unbelievably extreme to try to inhibit anyone who comes through another country in their quest for asylum," Kerri Talbot, the federal advocacy director for the group Immigration Hub, told Politico. "It basically means it would block all Central Americans from coming to the U.S."
The new rules would build on the administration's previous efforts to make it harder for migrants to seek asylum in the United States--including the so-called "Remain in Mexico" policy that created a "virtual wall" along the border by forcing asylum-seekers to stay in Mexico while their applications are processed by the U.S. government.
"Once again, the administration is seeking to slam the door on vulnerable people, in likely contravention of U.S. law and America's legacy of providing safe haven to the persecuted," Nazanin Ash of the International Rescue Committee (IRC) said in a statement. "The administration's policies have already kept thousands of vulnerable people waiting unnecessarily at the border for the chance to claim asylum--at great risk, hardship, and expense--only to now be told they won't even have the opportunity to have their claims heard."
Ash noted that an IRC survey from April of nearly 600 people residing in shelters at the border "demonstrated that children are at risk of kidnapping, gang recruitment, sexual abuse, and other physical violence." The survey results also indicated migrant women and girls are particularly at risk of sexual violence in Mexico.
Calling on Congress to "assert its authority" and prevent further suffering, Ash added, "the rules can't keep shifting when lives hang in the balance."
Immigrant and human rights advocates responded with alarm Thursday to a report that the Trump administration "is considering sweeping restrictions on asylum that would effectively block Central American migrants from entering the U.S.," condemning the proposed policy as both inhumane and unconstitutional.
"This latest policy is a disgusting example of the lengths the Trump administration will go to deny people protection," Charanya Krishnaswami of Amnesty International USA said in a statement. "To effectively close the border to Central Americans and the vast majority of people seeking asylum not only violates human rights obligations, but is also fundamentally cruel."
According to Politico:
A draft proposal circulating among Trump's Homeland Security advisers would prohibit migrants from seeking asylum if they have transited through a country other than their own before coming to the U.S., according to a [Department of Homeland Security] official and an outside advocate familiar with the plan. If executed, it would deny asylum to thousands of migrants waiting just south of the border, many of whom have trekked a perilous journey through Mexico.
...While Trump aides believe they can make the changes through an administrative rule, they are also seeking a legislative fix that would be far less vulnerable to a court challenge. Similar language is expected to be included in Trump's new immigration bill that would boost security at the southern border and push the nation to admit more high-skilled, well-educated immigrants, rather than immigrants who enter the U.S. based on family ties, according to two people familiar with the proposal.
"It's unbelievably extreme to try to inhibit anyone who comes through another country in their quest for asylum," Kerri Talbot, the federal advocacy director for the group Immigration Hub, told Politico. "It basically means it would block all Central Americans from coming to the U.S."
The new rules would build on the administration's previous efforts to make it harder for migrants to seek asylum in the United States--including the so-called "Remain in Mexico" policy that created a "virtual wall" along the border by forcing asylum-seekers to stay in Mexico while their applications are processed by the U.S. government.
"Once again, the administration is seeking to slam the door on vulnerable people, in likely contravention of U.S. law and America's legacy of providing safe haven to the persecuted," Nazanin Ash of the International Rescue Committee (IRC) said in a statement. "The administration's policies have already kept thousands of vulnerable people waiting unnecessarily at the border for the chance to claim asylum--at great risk, hardship, and expense--only to now be told they won't even have the opportunity to have their claims heard."
Ash noted that an IRC survey from April of nearly 600 people residing in shelters at the border "demonstrated that children are at risk of kidnapping, gang recruitment, sexual abuse, and other physical violence." The survey results also indicated migrant women and girls are particularly at risk of sexual violence in Mexico.
Calling on Congress to "assert its authority" and prevent further suffering, Ash added, "the rules can't keep shifting when lives hang in the balance."