Using the federal agency that oversees public housing to wage its latest attack on immigrants, the Trump administration has proposed a rule that critics warn would result in tens of thousands of children being evicted from their homes.
Weeks after announcing it would tighten restrictions on undocumented immigrants who live in public housing, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) unveiled a proposal on Friday which would take away all housing aid from families with at least one member who is an undocumented immigrant.
An analysis by HUD openly admitted that the rule would likely have a major impact on about 25,000 families with "mixed" immigration status, putting many at risk for homelessness—with extremely limited benefits for families that are currently waiting for apartments in public housing complexes.
Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, called the proposal "a callous action by HUD and Secretary Ben Carson."
The HUD plan to purge undocumented immigrants from subsidized housing could leave 55,000 children *who are citizens* homeless, and draws a *legal* line between which citizens matter and which don't based on to whom they were born. This is appalling. https://t.co/MM2XcFzkQ8
— Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) May 10, 2019
Another despicable action by the Trump Administration to disrupt communities and separate families. If Secretary Carson and this White House really wanted to address housing needs, they wouldn't have slashed affordable housing in their budget. https://t.co/0TmnWFbuYJ
— Sherrod Brown (@SenSherrodBrown) May 10, 2019
Robert Greenstein, president of the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) said the proposal was the latest in "the barrage of policies the administration has put forward" as part of its attempt at "sharply altering our nation's immigration policies and making life more difficult for immigrants."
"Coming on top of other executive orders and actions that have placed various immigrants at risk, the draft rule is another severe and unjustified measure that would harm both immigrant families and U.S. citizens and ill serve our country," Greenstein continued. "Threatening people who want to build better lives for themselves and their families is contrary to the national interest and our nation's most cherished values."
About 55,000 children are among the 108,000 people who could lose their homes thanks to the rule.
Many families would likely separate, with undocumented members leaving the rest of the family to continue living in public housing. Many others would be forcibly evicted or would leave in fear of the rule—a possibility that Diane Yentel, president of the National Low Income Housing Coalition, argued was likely "the true motivation behind the proposed rule."
THEN - and this is really the kicker - HUD tells us the true motivation behind the proposed rule.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Our Summer Campaign Is Underway
Support Common Dreams Today
Independent News and Views Putting People Over Profit
“HUD expects the fear of being separated would lead to a prompt evacuation by most mixed-status families, whether or not that fear is justified.” 9/ pic.twitter.com/Ifrst6Pe8o
— Diane Yentel (@dianeyentel) May 10, 2019
"Temporary homelessness could arise for a household, if they are unable to find alternative housing, for example in tight housing markets," the HUD analysis acknowledges.
"The cruelty of it is really breathtaking, and it would do real harm to kids and to families—and for what?" Yentel told NPR.
While the proposal is ostensibly aimed at reserving housing aid for families in which all members are legal residents or citizens, NPR noted, "HUD's unusually frank analysis concludes that there would be few benefits from the change for other low-income families waiting for aid."
"Mixed status" households generally get lower subsidies than other families, so HUD would likely begin spending more per year if all undocumented residents were forced to leave their homes.
HUD would likely "have to reduce the quantity and quality of assisted housing in response to higher costs," the agency wrote.
The new policy would "have an impact on the quality of service, e.g., maintenance of the units and possibly deterioration of the units that could lead to vacancy," the report added.
If Carson and President Donald Trump "really cared about housing wait lists," wrote Clarke on Twitter, "they would ask Congress for money for affordable housing."