SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Israel launched airstrikes into Gaza over the weekend, killing at least 19 people. (Photo: @TheIMEU/Twitter)
Critics Condemn 'Double Dehumanization' of Palestinians by Corporate Media as Headlines Focus on Israeli Casualties
"Palestinian deaths are primarily viewed as 'retaliation' by international media outlets, while Israeli deaths would never receive that kind coverage."
May 06, 2019
Human rights advocates and progressives in Congress on Monday slammed the corporate media for perpetuating anti-Palestinian sentiments in their reporting on the violence in Gaza and Israel over the weekend.
Major newspapers gave little in-depth information or a timeline regarding the Israeli military's killing of four Palestinians at a protest on Friday--one of the weekly demonstrations Palestinians have held for more than a year to call for an end to illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, blockades which have led to food and medicine shortages, and ongoing attacks by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).
Instead, major news sources reported mainly on more than 200 rockets which Hamas and the Islamic Jihad launched into Israel and Israeli settlements, writing that Israel retaliated for those attacks and ignoring what led up to the rocket strikes.
The rocket strikes on Saturdayfrom Gaza killed four people, while Israel's airstrikes which were launched later killed at least 23, including two pregnant women and two infants.
As TRT World reported Monday, "Palestinian deaths are primarily viewed as 'retaliation' by international media outlets, while Israeli deaths would never receive that kind coverage."
In February, the United Nations said that Israeli soldiers who attack Palestinians at peaceful protests could be found liable for war crimes.
Critics directly confronted several news outlets on social media for printing headlines suggesting that the rocket strikes were spontaneous acts of violence.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), the first Palestinian-American woman to serve in the U.S. Congress, denounced the New York Times for a headline reading, "Gaza Militants Fire 250 Rockets, and Israel Responds With Airstrikes."
"Headlines like this and framing it in this way just feeds into the continued lack of responsibility on Israel who unjustly oppress and target Palestinian children and families," wrote Tlaib.
Author and professor Saree Makdisi also wrote Monday about newspapers' choices regarding the language with which they describe Palestinians and Israelis, and how such choices leave news consumers with little sense of the reality on the ground:
The way sentences are constructed and the word choices made ('militant,' 'retaliation,' etc.) frame the story in such a way that the story is told before it even really begins, because the words have done their work. (Once you hear that a state is 'retaliating' for 'militant' rocket fire, what more do you really need to know? And how different would it be if you read that the rockets were being fired in 'retaliation' for years of occupation?). 'Militant' is used to describe Palestinians but not Israelis (who are presumably peaceable).
TRT World also noted that CNN failed to mention the pregnant civilians' deaths in Gaza until the sixth paragraph of its report on the violence. Journalist Katie Halper wrote that neglecting to report on the deaths of routinely-persecuted Palestinians amounted to "double dehumanization."
Tlaib's colleague in Congress, fellow progressive Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), attempted to correct the record put forth by a number of influential news sources--writing on Twitter that "the status quo of occupation and humanitarian crisis in Gaza is unsustainable" and that its continuation will only result in continued violence in the region.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Human rights advocates and progressives in Congress on Monday slammed the corporate media for perpetuating anti-Palestinian sentiments in their reporting on the violence in Gaza and Israel over the weekend.
Major newspapers gave little in-depth information or a timeline regarding the Israeli military's killing of four Palestinians at a protest on Friday--one of the weekly demonstrations Palestinians have held for more than a year to call for an end to illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, blockades which have led to food and medicine shortages, and ongoing attacks by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).
Instead, major news sources reported mainly on more than 200 rockets which Hamas and the Islamic Jihad launched into Israel and Israeli settlements, writing that Israel retaliated for those attacks and ignoring what led up to the rocket strikes.
The rocket strikes on Saturdayfrom Gaza killed four people, while Israel's airstrikes which were launched later killed at least 23, including two pregnant women and two infants.
As TRT World reported Monday, "Palestinian deaths are primarily viewed as 'retaliation' by international media outlets, while Israeli deaths would never receive that kind coverage."
In February, the United Nations said that Israeli soldiers who attack Palestinians at peaceful protests could be found liable for war crimes.
Critics directly confronted several news outlets on social media for printing headlines suggesting that the rocket strikes were spontaneous acts of violence.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), the first Palestinian-American woman to serve in the U.S. Congress, denounced the New York Times for a headline reading, "Gaza Militants Fire 250 Rockets, and Israel Responds With Airstrikes."
"Headlines like this and framing it in this way just feeds into the continued lack of responsibility on Israel who unjustly oppress and target Palestinian children and families," wrote Tlaib.
Author and professor Saree Makdisi also wrote Monday about newspapers' choices regarding the language with which they describe Palestinians and Israelis, and how such choices leave news consumers with little sense of the reality on the ground:
The way sentences are constructed and the word choices made ('militant,' 'retaliation,' etc.) frame the story in such a way that the story is told before it even really begins, because the words have done their work. (Once you hear that a state is 'retaliating' for 'militant' rocket fire, what more do you really need to know? And how different would it be if you read that the rockets were being fired in 'retaliation' for years of occupation?). 'Militant' is used to describe Palestinians but not Israelis (who are presumably peaceable).
TRT World also noted that CNN failed to mention the pregnant civilians' deaths in Gaza until the sixth paragraph of its report on the violence. Journalist Katie Halper wrote that neglecting to report on the deaths of routinely-persecuted Palestinians amounted to "double dehumanization."
Tlaib's colleague in Congress, fellow progressive Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), attempted to correct the record put forth by a number of influential news sources--writing on Twitter that "the status quo of occupation and humanitarian crisis in Gaza is unsustainable" and that its continuation will only result in continued violence in the region.
Human rights advocates and progressives in Congress on Monday slammed the corporate media for perpetuating anti-Palestinian sentiments in their reporting on the violence in Gaza and Israel over the weekend.
Major newspapers gave little in-depth information or a timeline regarding the Israeli military's killing of four Palestinians at a protest on Friday--one of the weekly demonstrations Palestinians have held for more than a year to call for an end to illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, blockades which have led to food and medicine shortages, and ongoing attacks by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).
Instead, major news sources reported mainly on more than 200 rockets which Hamas and the Islamic Jihad launched into Israel and Israeli settlements, writing that Israel retaliated for those attacks and ignoring what led up to the rocket strikes.
The rocket strikes on Saturdayfrom Gaza killed four people, while Israel's airstrikes which were launched later killed at least 23, including two pregnant women and two infants.
As TRT World reported Monday, "Palestinian deaths are primarily viewed as 'retaliation' by international media outlets, while Israeli deaths would never receive that kind coverage."
In February, the United Nations said that Israeli soldiers who attack Palestinians at peaceful protests could be found liable for war crimes.
Critics directly confronted several news outlets on social media for printing headlines suggesting that the rocket strikes were spontaneous acts of violence.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), the first Palestinian-American woman to serve in the U.S. Congress, denounced the New York Times for a headline reading, "Gaza Militants Fire 250 Rockets, and Israel Responds With Airstrikes."
"Headlines like this and framing it in this way just feeds into the continued lack of responsibility on Israel who unjustly oppress and target Palestinian children and families," wrote Tlaib.
Author and professor Saree Makdisi also wrote Monday about newspapers' choices regarding the language with which they describe Palestinians and Israelis, and how such choices leave news consumers with little sense of the reality on the ground:
The way sentences are constructed and the word choices made ('militant,' 'retaliation,' etc.) frame the story in such a way that the story is told before it even really begins, because the words have done their work. (Once you hear that a state is 'retaliating' for 'militant' rocket fire, what more do you really need to know? And how different would it be if you read that the rockets were being fired in 'retaliation' for years of occupation?). 'Militant' is used to describe Palestinians but not Israelis (who are presumably peaceable).
TRT World also noted that CNN failed to mention the pregnant civilians' deaths in Gaza until the sixth paragraph of its report on the violence. Journalist Katie Halper wrote that neglecting to report on the deaths of routinely-persecuted Palestinians amounted to "double dehumanization."
Tlaib's colleague in Congress, fellow progressive Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), attempted to correct the record put forth by a number of influential news sources--writing on Twitter that "the status quo of occupation and humanitarian crisis in Gaza is unsustainable" and that its continuation will only result in continued violence in the region.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.