Marie Newman, who is challenging Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.) in the 2020 primary for the Illinois 3rd District, told Politico on Friday that a number of vendors have dropped out of her campaign citing DCCC rules. (Photo: Marie Newman campaign website)
Vendors Leave Progressive Challenger's Primary Campaign Over 'Galling' DCCC Threat
"Consultants who planned to work with Newman said that the DCCC delivered the warning in the nicest terms possible—but that it was a very clear threat to their ability to do business with the DCCC."
The Democratic establishment is already taking steps to stop insurgent progressive challengers to the party's incumbents.
Marie Newman, who is challenging Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.) in the 2020 primary for the Illinois 3rd District, told Politico on Friday that a number of vendors have already dropped out of her campaign--the direct result of a rule put in place by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) banning consultants and other campaign mechanics from working with anyone running against a sitting Democrat.
"I've had four consultants leave the campaign," Newman said. "We've now had two mail firms say that they couldn't work with us because of the DCCC issue, and then a [communications] group, a compliance group and several pollsters."
Per Politico:
Consultants who planned to work with Newman said that the DCCC delivered the warning in the nicest terms possible--but that it was a very clear threat to their ability to do business with the DCCC.
The DCCC seems set in its decision to enforce the directive. On Thursday, representatives from the DCCC met with members of progressive PAC Our Revolution to discuss the rule. Our Revolution delivered the committee a petition to rescind the rules with 30,000 signatures, but the DCCC is standing firm, an aide told Politico.
"The DCCC has worked to change how Washington works, increase transparency in politics, and be perfectly clear with all its partners about the standards it expects of them," said the aide.
The Newman campaign, as Sarah Jones wrote in New York Magazine, is poised to test the limits of the DCCC rule:
Newman's nascent campaign has the potential to test outsider groups like Justice Democrats, alongside more established party partners like NARAL Pro-Choice America and EMILY's List. Pro-choice organizations backed Newman against Lipinski in 2018, and could do so again in 2020.
Lipinski's record as a conservative, anti-abortion Democrat came in for criticism from NARAL president Ilyse Hogue.
"Dan Lipinski votes against women's rights, LGBTQ rights and the Affordable Care Act, and the the DCCC is punishing his opponent, Marie Newman who stands up for all of those things," Hogue said in a tweet.
The financial hit that Newman is taking may be acting as a warning, The Intercept reported Friday afternoon.
"This has been very expensive for my campaign," Newman told The Intercept, "it's cost time and money and effort and frustration, but we're working through it."
As Common Dreams has reported, the battle between progressives and the DCCC over challenges to incumbents has raged for over a month, beginning in late March when the DCCC issued its new rules on vendors.
Reaction at the time was swift from progressives, particularly Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), who unseated incumbent Mike Capuano in 2018 on the back of a left wing platform.
Capuano is now a lobbyist with Foley & Lardner.
"I believe fiercely in the potential of our party, but we cannot credibly lay claim to prioritizing diversity and inclusion when institutions like the DCCC implement policies that threaten to silence new voices and historically marginalized communities," Pressley said in a series of tweets on March 30.
"The lesson of 2018 is that our party is made stronger by the inclusion of diverse, disruptive candidates and vendors who bring different perspectives and experiences," Pressley added.
That's the message that progressives are embracing, some by starting an alternative campaign infrastructure meant to challenge the DCCC ban.
Members of the coalition were unsparing in their criticism of the DCCC Friday.
"By putting the protection of right-wing coddling incumbents ahead of our shared progressive values, the DCCC not only hurts the clarity of Democrats' messaging heading into 2020--they risk our chances of holding the House, winning the Senate, and retaking the White House," said Democracy For America Chair Charles Chamberlain.
The DCCC's behavior is "galling," said Data For Progress's Sean McElwee.
Progressive Change Committee's Marissa Barrow said that Newman might have some stress from the DCCC, but that she could rely on her friends in the party's left wing base.
"Progressive challengers like Marie Newman will see more of this cronyism," said Barrow, "but the progressive grassroots will have their backs."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Democratic establishment is already taking steps to stop insurgent progressive challengers to the party's incumbents.
Marie Newman, who is challenging Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.) in the 2020 primary for the Illinois 3rd District, told Politico on Friday that a number of vendors have already dropped out of her campaign--the direct result of a rule put in place by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) banning consultants and other campaign mechanics from working with anyone running against a sitting Democrat.
"I've had four consultants leave the campaign," Newman said. "We've now had two mail firms say that they couldn't work with us because of the DCCC issue, and then a [communications] group, a compliance group and several pollsters."
Per Politico:
Consultants who planned to work with Newman said that the DCCC delivered the warning in the nicest terms possible--but that it was a very clear threat to their ability to do business with the DCCC.
The DCCC seems set in its decision to enforce the directive. On Thursday, representatives from the DCCC met with members of progressive PAC Our Revolution to discuss the rule. Our Revolution delivered the committee a petition to rescind the rules with 30,000 signatures, but the DCCC is standing firm, an aide told Politico.
"The DCCC has worked to change how Washington works, increase transparency in politics, and be perfectly clear with all its partners about the standards it expects of them," said the aide.
The Newman campaign, as Sarah Jones wrote in New York Magazine, is poised to test the limits of the DCCC rule:
Newman's nascent campaign has the potential to test outsider groups like Justice Democrats, alongside more established party partners like NARAL Pro-Choice America and EMILY's List. Pro-choice organizations backed Newman against Lipinski in 2018, and could do so again in 2020.
Lipinski's record as a conservative, anti-abortion Democrat came in for criticism from NARAL president Ilyse Hogue.
"Dan Lipinski votes against women's rights, LGBTQ rights and the Affordable Care Act, and the the DCCC is punishing his opponent, Marie Newman who stands up for all of those things," Hogue said in a tweet.
The financial hit that Newman is taking may be acting as a warning, The Intercept reported Friday afternoon.
"This has been very expensive for my campaign," Newman told The Intercept, "it's cost time and money and effort and frustration, but we're working through it."
As Common Dreams has reported, the battle between progressives and the DCCC over challenges to incumbents has raged for over a month, beginning in late March when the DCCC issued its new rules on vendors.
Reaction at the time was swift from progressives, particularly Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), who unseated incumbent Mike Capuano in 2018 on the back of a left wing platform.
Capuano is now a lobbyist with Foley & Lardner.
"I believe fiercely in the potential of our party, but we cannot credibly lay claim to prioritizing diversity and inclusion when institutions like the DCCC implement policies that threaten to silence new voices and historically marginalized communities," Pressley said in a series of tweets on March 30.
"The lesson of 2018 is that our party is made stronger by the inclusion of diverse, disruptive candidates and vendors who bring different perspectives and experiences," Pressley added.
That's the message that progressives are embracing, some by starting an alternative campaign infrastructure meant to challenge the DCCC ban.
Members of the coalition were unsparing in their criticism of the DCCC Friday.
"By putting the protection of right-wing coddling incumbents ahead of our shared progressive values, the DCCC not only hurts the clarity of Democrats' messaging heading into 2020--they risk our chances of holding the House, winning the Senate, and retaking the White House," said Democracy For America Chair Charles Chamberlain.
The DCCC's behavior is "galling," said Data For Progress's Sean McElwee.
Progressive Change Committee's Marissa Barrow said that Newman might have some stress from the DCCC, but that she could rely on her friends in the party's left wing base.
"Progressive challengers like Marie Newman will see more of this cronyism," said Barrow, "but the progressive grassroots will have their backs."
The Democratic establishment is already taking steps to stop insurgent progressive challengers to the party's incumbents.
Marie Newman, who is challenging Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.) in the 2020 primary for the Illinois 3rd District, told Politico on Friday that a number of vendors have already dropped out of her campaign--the direct result of a rule put in place by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) banning consultants and other campaign mechanics from working with anyone running against a sitting Democrat.
"I've had four consultants leave the campaign," Newman said. "We've now had two mail firms say that they couldn't work with us because of the DCCC issue, and then a [communications] group, a compliance group and several pollsters."
Per Politico:
Consultants who planned to work with Newman said that the DCCC delivered the warning in the nicest terms possible--but that it was a very clear threat to their ability to do business with the DCCC.
The DCCC seems set in its decision to enforce the directive. On Thursday, representatives from the DCCC met with members of progressive PAC Our Revolution to discuss the rule. Our Revolution delivered the committee a petition to rescind the rules with 30,000 signatures, but the DCCC is standing firm, an aide told Politico.
"The DCCC has worked to change how Washington works, increase transparency in politics, and be perfectly clear with all its partners about the standards it expects of them," said the aide.
The Newman campaign, as Sarah Jones wrote in New York Magazine, is poised to test the limits of the DCCC rule:
Newman's nascent campaign has the potential to test outsider groups like Justice Democrats, alongside more established party partners like NARAL Pro-Choice America and EMILY's List. Pro-choice organizations backed Newman against Lipinski in 2018, and could do so again in 2020.
Lipinski's record as a conservative, anti-abortion Democrat came in for criticism from NARAL president Ilyse Hogue.
"Dan Lipinski votes against women's rights, LGBTQ rights and the Affordable Care Act, and the the DCCC is punishing his opponent, Marie Newman who stands up for all of those things," Hogue said in a tweet.
The financial hit that Newman is taking may be acting as a warning, The Intercept reported Friday afternoon.
"This has been very expensive for my campaign," Newman told The Intercept, "it's cost time and money and effort and frustration, but we're working through it."
As Common Dreams has reported, the battle between progressives and the DCCC over challenges to incumbents has raged for over a month, beginning in late March when the DCCC issued its new rules on vendors.
Reaction at the time was swift from progressives, particularly Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), who unseated incumbent Mike Capuano in 2018 on the back of a left wing platform.
Capuano is now a lobbyist with Foley & Lardner.
"I believe fiercely in the potential of our party, but we cannot credibly lay claim to prioritizing diversity and inclusion when institutions like the DCCC implement policies that threaten to silence new voices and historically marginalized communities," Pressley said in a series of tweets on March 30.
"The lesson of 2018 is that our party is made stronger by the inclusion of diverse, disruptive candidates and vendors who bring different perspectives and experiences," Pressley added.
That's the message that progressives are embracing, some by starting an alternative campaign infrastructure meant to challenge the DCCC ban.
Members of the coalition were unsparing in their criticism of the DCCC Friday.
"By putting the protection of right-wing coddling incumbents ahead of our shared progressive values, the DCCC not only hurts the clarity of Democrats' messaging heading into 2020--they risk our chances of holding the House, winning the Senate, and retaking the White House," said Democracy For America Chair Charles Chamberlain.
The DCCC's behavior is "galling," said Data For Progress's Sean McElwee.
Progressive Change Committee's Marissa Barrow said that Newman might have some stress from the DCCC, but that she could rely on her friends in the party's left wing base.
"Progressive challengers like Marie Newman will see more of this cronyism," said Barrow, "but the progressive grassroots will have their backs."