SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross violated the law when he attempted to add a citizenship question to the U.S. Census, a federal judge found Wednesday. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
As Second Judge Rejects Census Citizenship Question, Trump's Backup Plan to Count Non-Citizens Exposed
"The administration's determination to weaponize the Census Bureau is really something."
Mar 06, 2019
In the wake of the second legal defeat of President Donald Trump's plan to count all non-citizens in the 2020 census, new reporting reveals the Census Bureau has been secretly working with Homeland Security officials to develop a new method of sharing immigration status data in order to identify individuals and target communities nationwide.
As the Associated Press reported Thursday, the Census Bureau has been working with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for weeks to obtain information about the legal status of millions of immigrants.
The AP's report followed the second federal court ruling against Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross's attempt to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census.
On Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Seeborg rejected the administration's move to include the question, saying Ross did not provide a factual basis for the move and that the secretary broke the law when he ordered his top aides to find a rationale for adding the question to the survey.
The Commerce Department, Seeborg wrote in his ruling, violated the Administrative Procedures Act by mounting "an effort to concoct a rationale bearing no plausible relation to the real reason, whatever that may be, underlying the decision."
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which brought the case to court, applauded the decision on social media.
Immigrant and civil rights groups warn that the inclusion of a citizenship question, which has been left off the census since 1950, would prevent Latinx households from filling out the census amid fears of Trump's anti-immigration agenda. Critics say an inaccurate census could then result in further under-representation of those communities in Washington.
"Judge Seeborg found incontrovertible evidence that the addition of the citizenship question would drive down participation by non-citizens in the 2020 Census," Common Cause president Karen Hobert Flynn said in a statement. "This is reprehensible, undemocratic, and in defiance of the goal of the census as outlined in the United States Constitution. The attempt to add of the citizenship question to the 2020 census is underhanded politics at its very worst."
"The news of this proposed plan will surely send shockwaves through immigrant communities across the country. This new development raises even more questions about the motivations behind this untested citizenship question and Secretary Ross better be ready to answer them." --Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.)Seeborg's decision came two months after a federal judge in New York issued a similar ruling. The Supreme Court is considering both lower courts' rulings and is expected to hand down its own assessment by June.
But, as AP reported, the Trump administration began exploring how the Census Bureau could obtain citizenship information as the New York court's ruling was announced.
The bureau and DHS began collaborating in January on their pending agreement, under which DHS would share share noncitizens' full names, addresses, birth dates and places, Social Security numbers, and alien registration numbers.
"What's going on here is they are trying to circumvent the need for a citizenship question by using data collected by another agency for a different purpose," Jeramie Scott, an attorney at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, told AP.
Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) said he planned to question Ross about the plan when the commerce secretary testifies before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform next week.
"The news of this proposed plan will surely send shockwaves through immigrant communities across the country," Gomez told the AP. "This new development raises even more questions about the motivations behind this untested citizenship question and Secretary Ross better be ready to answer them."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In the wake of the second legal defeat of President Donald Trump's plan to count all non-citizens in the 2020 census, new reporting reveals the Census Bureau has been secretly working with Homeland Security officials to develop a new method of sharing immigration status data in order to identify individuals and target communities nationwide.
As the Associated Press reported Thursday, the Census Bureau has been working with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for weeks to obtain information about the legal status of millions of immigrants.
The AP's report followed the second federal court ruling against Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross's attempt to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census.
On Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Seeborg rejected the administration's move to include the question, saying Ross did not provide a factual basis for the move and that the secretary broke the law when he ordered his top aides to find a rationale for adding the question to the survey.
The Commerce Department, Seeborg wrote in his ruling, violated the Administrative Procedures Act by mounting "an effort to concoct a rationale bearing no plausible relation to the real reason, whatever that may be, underlying the decision."
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which brought the case to court, applauded the decision on social media.
Immigrant and civil rights groups warn that the inclusion of a citizenship question, which has been left off the census since 1950, would prevent Latinx households from filling out the census amid fears of Trump's anti-immigration agenda. Critics say an inaccurate census could then result in further under-representation of those communities in Washington.
"Judge Seeborg found incontrovertible evidence that the addition of the citizenship question would drive down participation by non-citizens in the 2020 Census," Common Cause president Karen Hobert Flynn said in a statement. "This is reprehensible, undemocratic, and in defiance of the goal of the census as outlined in the United States Constitution. The attempt to add of the citizenship question to the 2020 census is underhanded politics at its very worst."
"The news of this proposed plan will surely send shockwaves through immigrant communities across the country. This new development raises even more questions about the motivations behind this untested citizenship question and Secretary Ross better be ready to answer them." --Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.)Seeborg's decision came two months after a federal judge in New York issued a similar ruling. The Supreme Court is considering both lower courts' rulings and is expected to hand down its own assessment by June.
But, as AP reported, the Trump administration began exploring how the Census Bureau could obtain citizenship information as the New York court's ruling was announced.
The bureau and DHS began collaborating in January on their pending agreement, under which DHS would share share noncitizens' full names, addresses, birth dates and places, Social Security numbers, and alien registration numbers.
"What's going on here is they are trying to circumvent the need for a citizenship question by using data collected by another agency for a different purpose," Jeramie Scott, an attorney at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, told AP.
Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) said he planned to question Ross about the plan when the commerce secretary testifies before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform next week.
"The news of this proposed plan will surely send shockwaves through immigrant communities across the country," Gomez told the AP. "This new development raises even more questions about the motivations behind this untested citizenship question and Secretary Ross better be ready to answer them."
In the wake of the second legal defeat of President Donald Trump's plan to count all non-citizens in the 2020 census, new reporting reveals the Census Bureau has been secretly working with Homeland Security officials to develop a new method of sharing immigration status data in order to identify individuals and target communities nationwide.
As the Associated Press reported Thursday, the Census Bureau has been working with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for weeks to obtain information about the legal status of millions of immigrants.
The AP's report followed the second federal court ruling against Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross's attempt to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census.
On Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Seeborg rejected the administration's move to include the question, saying Ross did not provide a factual basis for the move and that the secretary broke the law when he ordered his top aides to find a rationale for adding the question to the survey.
The Commerce Department, Seeborg wrote in his ruling, violated the Administrative Procedures Act by mounting "an effort to concoct a rationale bearing no plausible relation to the real reason, whatever that may be, underlying the decision."
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which brought the case to court, applauded the decision on social media.
Immigrant and civil rights groups warn that the inclusion of a citizenship question, which has been left off the census since 1950, would prevent Latinx households from filling out the census amid fears of Trump's anti-immigration agenda. Critics say an inaccurate census could then result in further under-representation of those communities in Washington.
"Judge Seeborg found incontrovertible evidence that the addition of the citizenship question would drive down participation by non-citizens in the 2020 Census," Common Cause president Karen Hobert Flynn said in a statement. "This is reprehensible, undemocratic, and in defiance of the goal of the census as outlined in the United States Constitution. The attempt to add of the citizenship question to the 2020 census is underhanded politics at its very worst."
"The news of this proposed plan will surely send shockwaves through immigrant communities across the country. This new development raises even more questions about the motivations behind this untested citizenship question and Secretary Ross better be ready to answer them." --Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.)Seeborg's decision came two months after a federal judge in New York issued a similar ruling. The Supreme Court is considering both lower courts' rulings and is expected to hand down its own assessment by June.
But, as AP reported, the Trump administration began exploring how the Census Bureau could obtain citizenship information as the New York court's ruling was announced.
The bureau and DHS began collaborating in January on their pending agreement, under which DHS would share share noncitizens' full names, addresses, birth dates and places, Social Security numbers, and alien registration numbers.
"What's going on here is they are trying to circumvent the need for a citizenship question by using data collected by another agency for a different purpose," Jeramie Scott, an attorney at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, told AP.
Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) said he planned to question Ross about the plan when the commerce secretary testifies before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform next week.
"The news of this proposed plan will surely send shockwaves through immigrant communities across the country," Gomez told the AP. "This new development raises even more questions about the motivations behind this untested citizenship question and Secretary Ross better be ready to answer them."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.