Journalists and advocates of press freedoms are once more directing outrage and criticism at Facebook for selectively censoring pages on its platform and refusing to explain the reason behind a decision that appears to many as a clear double standard applied to outlets critical of U.S. foreign policy and corporate interests.Facebook is under fire for shuttering four pages managed by the Berlin-based news and media company Maffick, after CNN reporters asked the social media giant about Maffick not disclosing that it is partly funded by the Russian government.CNN held its report—titled \u0022Russia is backing a viral video company aimed at American millennials\u0022—until Friday, when Facebook blocked Soapbox, Waste-Ed, Backthen, and In The Now.American-Lebanese journalist Rania Khalek, a contributor to Soapbox and In The Now who was interviewed by CNN, outlined the controversy in a lengthy, widely shared series of tweets. Monday morning, Khalek added an update to the Twitter thread:It has been 3 days since @facebook suspended @IntheNow_tweet\u0026#039;s page at the behest of @CNN and US government funded think tanks. We had almost 4 million subscribers, did not violate any Facebook rules, were given no warning \u0026amp; Facebook isn’t responding to us.— Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) February 18, 2019As CNN outlined in its report, which was updated and corrected on Monday:Company records [for Maffick] in Germany show that 51 percent of the company is owned by Ruptly [a subsidiary of RT, which is funded by the Russian government]. The remaining 49 percent is controlled by former RT presenter Anissa Naouai, who is Maffick\u0026#039;s CEO. The records were first reported by the German outlet T-online and later by the Alliance for Securing Democracy, which brought it to CNN\u0026#039;s attention. The Alliance for Securing Democracy is part of the German Marshall Fund, which receives funding from the U.S., German, and other governments. The Alliance for Securing Democracy says that while it is part of the German Marshall Fund, the ASD itself does not receive any funding from the GMF, and gets its money from private family funds and grants but not from government funding.\u0022In the Now was originally a television show on RT, hosted by Naouai. It has more than 3 million followers on Facebook,\u0022 CNN noted. The other three pages \u0022have more than 30 million video views, though they\u0026#039;ve only been operating for a few months.\u0022What kind of content did they produce? Khalek offered a number of examples, including:Some more of @IntheNow_tweet’s content that CNN finds so threatening. Ask yourself, could I have produced this video at any other outlet (besides maybe Al Jazeera)? Why can’t CNN engage w/ the content rather than getting Facebook to suppress this speech? pic.twitter.com/epTKHHf8Ms— Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) February 16, 2019In an interview with CNN, Maffick chief operating officer J. Ray Sparks emphasized that Maffick is editorially independent from RT—which the U.S. government has forced to register as a foreign agent—and pointed out that it is \u0022standard industry practice\u0022 not to disclose ownership of a media producer on a Facebook page.However, as Kevin Gosztola—who cohosts a podcast with Khalek—noted in an article published Saturday on Shadowproof, \u0022Although Khalek and Sparks detailed their editorial independence at Maffick extensively, [CNN correspondent Drew] Griffin remained incredulous at the reality that officials working at the Kremlin are not dictating what specific stories should be covered.\u0022CNN reporter who worked on story conceded in interview on CNN: videos make \u0022lot of legitimate arguments\u0022 and they \u0022weren\u0026#039;t necessarily hiding their Russian ties.\u0022 Didn\u0026#039;t matter. CNN got Facebook to censor media org\u0026#039;s pages. They manufactured news so they\u0026#039;d have story.— Kevin Gosztola (@kgosztola) February 18, 2019\u0022Similarly to NPR, PBS, BBC, DW, CBC, AJ+, and many other media companies, Maffick is supported in part by government funding. Likewise while we haven\u0026#039;t posted funding details on our Facebook pages etc, neither have any of our international peers,\u0022 Maffick said in a statement that charges the company was singled out for \u0022one reason and one reason only: The government that helps fund our company is Russia.\u0022\u0022We did not violate any of Facebook\u0026#039;s policies whatsoever. None of our content promotes disinformation or fake news. Yet CNN pressured Facebook into unprecedented censorship in a desperate attempt to milk ratings by stoking hysteria over Russia,\u0022 the statement continues, calling on Facebook to reinstate its pages and \u0022articulate clear, consistent policies and protocols regarding obligatory funding disclosures which will be applied evenly across all pages.\u0022Since Friday, Khalek and others who often linked to her initial thread have turned to another major social media platform—Twitter—to raise alarm about the role of the ASD and the communication CNN subsequently had with Facebook:Please express your concerns to @facebook about their censorship of @IntheNow_tweet at the behest of US government funded think tanks. They need to know that their users are not okay with governments dictating what ppl see and don’t see.— Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) February 18, 2019VOA, BBC, France24, DW, Al Jazeera (Qatar-funded), TRT World (Turkey-funded), and more state-funded media outlets are all active on social media, but Facebook is giving in to pressure from neo-McCarthyites and deleting the accounts of Russia-funded mediahttps://t.co/MRpjuIr8Db— Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) February 16, 2019Regardless of what you think of @RaniaKhalek, Russia or anything else, this trio - CNN, US-funded German Marshall funded, and Facebook - working together to selectively censor is highly disturbing. But this is the inevitable outcome of begging FB to censor https://t.co/OyElNWwoue https://t.co/xKbJ3l0Fsk— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) February 16, 2019Rania is right. This is not a criterion that is applied in a neutral manner. It\u0026#039;s being used by an elite that is wielding unaccountable power over what is supposed to be a political-intellectual commons to suppress views that oppose the dominant political narrative. https://t.co/wZnIv51W0M— Gareth Porter (@GarethPorter) February 18, 2019As usual, @yashalevine has the most incisive analysis of this development passed on by @RaniaKhalek. https://t.co/SJxWjbdDeP— Tim Shorrock (@TimothyS) February 16, 2019Although Facebook\u0026#039;s rules don\u0026#039;t require pages to disclose parent companies, a spokesperson told CNN in a statement that the social media company planned to reach out to Maffick page administrators \u0022to ask that they disclose this additional information and their affiliation with their parent company to get back on the platform.\u0022The move by Facebook comes after the company temporarily took down one of Khalek\u0026#039;s videos for Soapbox—about \u0022how Israel uses Palestine as a weapons testing laboratory\u0022—in late December, and only restored it after public outcry. Facebook also was intensely criticized last year for censoring the left-leaning Latin American news network teleSUR English, funded by the Venezuelan government and others, as well as a video about Christopher Columbus\u0026#039; brutal legacy produced by Double Down News.