Feb 03, 2019
In a warning sign that another devastating economic crash could be just around the corner, Public Citizen found in a report published Monday that penalties against some of the same Wall Street giants that sparked the 2008 financial crisis have plummeted under President Donald Trump.
"Instead of holding the industry that ransacked our economy accountable, our system of justice is being further rigged in its favor."
--Public Citizen
"How can Trump call himself 'tough on crime' while he lets the industry that crashed our economy 10 years ago get away with slap-on-the-wrist penalties?" Rick Claypool, a Public Citizen research director and author of the new report, said in a statement. "Weak enforcement gives Wall Street wrongdoers a green light to ramp up risk and recklessness. We know how that ended last time."
According to Public Citizen's analysis (pdf), in the four cases Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) settled last year against major banks for "financial crisis-era allegations of toxic securities abuses," the penalties were 70 percent lower on average than those imposed by the Obama administration--which was widely criticized by progressives for letting Wall Street banks and executives off the hook for their role in the 2008 crash.
"These four 2018 settlements, which the [Trump] DOJ entered into with Royal Bank of Scotland, Wells Fargo, Barclays Capital, and HSBC, reveal the reduced enforcement that big banks that triggered the Great Recession now face," Public Citizen notes.
The group goes on to point out that, "unlike the Obama-era cases, the banks were allowed to settle while disputing the DOJ's allegations, and none of the settlements provided consumer relief. Taken together, Obama's penalties average out to $8.1 billion per case while Trump's penalties average $2.4 billion."
Public Citizen's report comes nearly a year after Republicans and Democrats in Congress teamed up to pass Trump-backed legislation that loosened regulations on some of the nation's largest financial institutions, a move that analysts warned significantly heightens the risk of another financial crisis.
According to Public Citizen, the Trump administration's willingness to let big banks off with little more than "slap-on-the-wrist penalties" for serious abuses consitutes yet another systemic risk to the American economy.
"Trump's lenience to Wall Street, which is clear to Wall Street analysts, becomes an invitation to misconduct," the group said. "The lower penalties, combined with the refusal to require penalized banks to accept the facts contained in the Justice Department's allegations against them and the elimination of consumer relief from these settlements mean the Trump administration is rewarding Wall Street wrongdoers for resisting settlements and stringing out negotiations."
"Instead of holding the industry that ransacked our economy accountable," Public Citizen concluded, "our system of justice is being further rigged in its favor."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a warning sign that another devastating economic crash could be just around the corner, Public Citizen found in a report published Monday that penalties against some of the same Wall Street giants that sparked the 2008 financial crisis have plummeted under President Donald Trump.
"Instead of holding the industry that ransacked our economy accountable, our system of justice is being further rigged in its favor."
--Public Citizen
"How can Trump call himself 'tough on crime' while he lets the industry that crashed our economy 10 years ago get away with slap-on-the-wrist penalties?" Rick Claypool, a Public Citizen research director and author of the new report, said in a statement. "Weak enforcement gives Wall Street wrongdoers a green light to ramp up risk and recklessness. We know how that ended last time."
According to Public Citizen's analysis (pdf), in the four cases Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) settled last year against major banks for "financial crisis-era allegations of toxic securities abuses," the penalties were 70 percent lower on average than those imposed by the Obama administration--which was widely criticized by progressives for letting Wall Street banks and executives off the hook for their role in the 2008 crash.
"These four 2018 settlements, which the [Trump] DOJ entered into with Royal Bank of Scotland, Wells Fargo, Barclays Capital, and HSBC, reveal the reduced enforcement that big banks that triggered the Great Recession now face," Public Citizen notes.
The group goes on to point out that, "unlike the Obama-era cases, the banks were allowed to settle while disputing the DOJ's allegations, and none of the settlements provided consumer relief. Taken together, Obama's penalties average out to $8.1 billion per case while Trump's penalties average $2.4 billion."
Public Citizen's report comes nearly a year after Republicans and Democrats in Congress teamed up to pass Trump-backed legislation that loosened regulations on some of the nation's largest financial institutions, a move that analysts warned significantly heightens the risk of another financial crisis.
According to Public Citizen, the Trump administration's willingness to let big banks off with little more than "slap-on-the-wrist penalties" for serious abuses consitutes yet another systemic risk to the American economy.
"Trump's lenience to Wall Street, which is clear to Wall Street analysts, becomes an invitation to misconduct," the group said. "The lower penalties, combined with the refusal to require penalized banks to accept the facts contained in the Justice Department's allegations against them and the elimination of consumer relief from these settlements mean the Trump administration is rewarding Wall Street wrongdoers for resisting settlements and stringing out negotiations."
"Instead of holding the industry that ransacked our economy accountable," Public Citizen concluded, "our system of justice is being further rigged in its favor."
In a warning sign that another devastating economic crash could be just around the corner, Public Citizen found in a report published Monday that penalties against some of the same Wall Street giants that sparked the 2008 financial crisis have plummeted under President Donald Trump.
"Instead of holding the industry that ransacked our economy accountable, our system of justice is being further rigged in its favor."
--Public Citizen
"How can Trump call himself 'tough on crime' while he lets the industry that crashed our economy 10 years ago get away with slap-on-the-wrist penalties?" Rick Claypool, a Public Citizen research director and author of the new report, said in a statement. "Weak enforcement gives Wall Street wrongdoers a green light to ramp up risk and recklessness. We know how that ended last time."
According to Public Citizen's analysis (pdf), in the four cases Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) settled last year against major banks for "financial crisis-era allegations of toxic securities abuses," the penalties were 70 percent lower on average than those imposed by the Obama administration--which was widely criticized by progressives for letting Wall Street banks and executives off the hook for their role in the 2008 crash.
"These four 2018 settlements, which the [Trump] DOJ entered into with Royal Bank of Scotland, Wells Fargo, Barclays Capital, and HSBC, reveal the reduced enforcement that big banks that triggered the Great Recession now face," Public Citizen notes.
The group goes on to point out that, "unlike the Obama-era cases, the banks were allowed to settle while disputing the DOJ's allegations, and none of the settlements provided consumer relief. Taken together, Obama's penalties average out to $8.1 billion per case while Trump's penalties average $2.4 billion."
Public Citizen's report comes nearly a year after Republicans and Democrats in Congress teamed up to pass Trump-backed legislation that loosened regulations on some of the nation's largest financial institutions, a move that analysts warned significantly heightens the risk of another financial crisis.
According to Public Citizen, the Trump administration's willingness to let big banks off with little more than "slap-on-the-wrist penalties" for serious abuses consitutes yet another systemic risk to the American economy.
"Trump's lenience to Wall Street, which is clear to Wall Street analysts, becomes an invitation to misconduct," the group said. "The lower penalties, combined with the refusal to require penalized banks to accept the facts contained in the Justice Department's allegations against them and the elimination of consumer relief from these settlements mean the Trump administration is rewarding Wall Street wrongdoers for resisting settlements and stringing out negotiations."
"Instead of holding the industry that ransacked our economy accountable," Public Citizen concluded, "our system of justice is being further rigged in its favor."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.