Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai leaves a meeting Dec. 14, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Net Neutrality Repeal, Evidence Shows, Is Doing None of the Good Stuff Ajit Pai and Telecom Industry Promised
"Sorry, @AjitPaiFCC: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did."
The telecom industry and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai justified the Republican repeal of net neutrality protections in December of 2017 with promises that a "light-touch framework" would spur investment, giving broadband providers "stronger incentives to build networks, especially in unserved areas, and to upgrade networks."
"The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."
-- Gigi Sohn, former FCC lawyer
However, according to recent reports, in the year after the repeal--which officially took effect last June--cable companies' investments actually fell, just as net neutrality supporters had warned they would.
Those fighting the rollback pointed to the declines in spending as just one piece of evidence that the deregulation push by Pai--a former Verizon lawyer appointed by President Donald Trump--was always designed to benefit industry at the public's expense.
"The repeal of net neutrality is nothing but a massive government handout to some of the most unscrupulous, and least popular, corporations in the United States," Fight for the Future's Evan Greer told Motherboard. "It's not helping workers at these companies. It's not helping people in rural communities. It's not closing the digital divide."
\u201c*Sigh.* Repealing #NetNeutrality did NOT increase network investment. \n\nIt DID give telecom giants like @Comcast the power to block, throttle, and charge Internet users new fees.\n\n\u270a\u00a0We will fight this. We will get net neutrality back. https://t.co/8A7ScjeqgT\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1548280322
"Sorry, [Ajit Pai]: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did," tweeted Tim Karr, Free Press's senior director of strategy and communications.
\u201cSorry, @AjitPaiFCC: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did: https://t.co/qVTiRyboy2 via @jbrodkin\u201d— Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social) (@Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social)) 1548283503
Comcast's overall expenditures increased in 2018, according to an earnings announcement released Wednesday, but "Cable Communications' capital expenditures decreased 3.0 percent to $7.7 billion, reflecting decreased spending on customer premise equipment and support capital, partially offset by higher investment in scalable infrastructure and line extensions."
While Comcast is one of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs), as Ars Technica, noted: "Comcast isn't the only ISP that lowered network investment last year. Charter and Verizon both said in 2018 that they were reducing capital expenditures." And that trend is expected to continue in 2019--at least, for Comcast and Charter--according to MoffettNathanson estimates cited in a Light Reading article this week.
In addition, as Ars Technica reported, "The net neutrality repeal hasn't closed broadband gaps in rural areas, where industry trade groups say they won't expand service unless the government gives them more direct funding," arguing that without such assistance, the return on investment wouldn't be worth it.
As Gigi Sohn, a former FCC lawyer who helped craft the repealed net neutrality rules, concluded in an email to Motherboard, "The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The telecom industry and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai justified the Republican repeal of net neutrality protections in December of 2017 with promises that a "light-touch framework" would spur investment, giving broadband providers "stronger incentives to build networks, especially in unserved areas, and to upgrade networks."
"The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."
-- Gigi Sohn, former FCC lawyer
However, according to recent reports, in the year after the repeal--which officially took effect last June--cable companies' investments actually fell, just as net neutrality supporters had warned they would.
Those fighting the rollback pointed to the declines in spending as just one piece of evidence that the deregulation push by Pai--a former Verizon lawyer appointed by President Donald Trump--was always designed to benefit industry at the public's expense.
"The repeal of net neutrality is nothing but a massive government handout to some of the most unscrupulous, and least popular, corporations in the United States," Fight for the Future's Evan Greer told Motherboard. "It's not helping workers at these companies. It's not helping people in rural communities. It's not closing the digital divide."
\u201c*Sigh.* Repealing #NetNeutrality did NOT increase network investment. \n\nIt DID give telecom giants like @Comcast the power to block, throttle, and charge Internet users new fees.\n\n\u270a\u00a0We will fight this. We will get net neutrality back. https://t.co/8A7ScjeqgT\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1548280322
"Sorry, [Ajit Pai]: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did," tweeted Tim Karr, Free Press's senior director of strategy and communications.
\u201cSorry, @AjitPaiFCC: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did: https://t.co/qVTiRyboy2 via @jbrodkin\u201d— Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social) (@Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social)) 1548283503
Comcast's overall expenditures increased in 2018, according to an earnings announcement released Wednesday, but "Cable Communications' capital expenditures decreased 3.0 percent to $7.7 billion, reflecting decreased spending on customer premise equipment and support capital, partially offset by higher investment in scalable infrastructure and line extensions."
While Comcast is one of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs), as Ars Technica, noted: "Comcast isn't the only ISP that lowered network investment last year. Charter and Verizon both said in 2018 that they were reducing capital expenditures." And that trend is expected to continue in 2019--at least, for Comcast and Charter--according to MoffettNathanson estimates cited in a Light Reading article this week.
In addition, as Ars Technica reported, "The net neutrality repeal hasn't closed broadband gaps in rural areas, where industry trade groups say they won't expand service unless the government gives them more direct funding," arguing that without such assistance, the return on investment wouldn't be worth it.
As Gigi Sohn, a former FCC lawyer who helped craft the repealed net neutrality rules, concluded in an email to Motherboard, "The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."
The telecom industry and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai justified the Republican repeal of net neutrality protections in December of 2017 with promises that a "light-touch framework" would spur investment, giving broadband providers "stronger incentives to build networks, especially in unserved areas, and to upgrade networks."
"The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."
-- Gigi Sohn, former FCC lawyer
However, according to recent reports, in the year after the repeal--which officially took effect last June--cable companies' investments actually fell, just as net neutrality supporters had warned they would.
Those fighting the rollback pointed to the declines in spending as just one piece of evidence that the deregulation push by Pai--a former Verizon lawyer appointed by President Donald Trump--was always designed to benefit industry at the public's expense.
"The repeal of net neutrality is nothing but a massive government handout to some of the most unscrupulous, and least popular, corporations in the United States," Fight for the Future's Evan Greer told Motherboard. "It's not helping workers at these companies. It's not helping people in rural communities. It's not closing the digital divide."
\u201c*Sigh.* Repealing #NetNeutrality did NOT increase network investment. \n\nIt DID give telecom giants like @Comcast the power to block, throttle, and charge Internet users new fees.\n\n\u270a\u00a0We will fight this. We will get net neutrality back. https://t.co/8A7ScjeqgT\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1548280322
"Sorry, [Ajit Pai]: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did," tweeted Tim Karr, Free Press's senior director of strategy and communications.
\u201cSorry, @AjitPaiFCC: Your sloppy attempts to tie network investment to your #NetNeutrality repeal just don't hold water. And they never did: https://t.co/qVTiRyboy2 via @jbrodkin\u201d— Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social) (@Tim Karr (@TimKarr@mastodon.social)) 1548283503
Comcast's overall expenditures increased in 2018, according to an earnings announcement released Wednesday, but "Cable Communications' capital expenditures decreased 3.0 percent to $7.7 billion, reflecting decreased spending on customer premise equipment and support capital, partially offset by higher investment in scalable infrastructure and line extensions."
While Comcast is one of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs), as Ars Technica, noted: "Comcast isn't the only ISP that lowered network investment last year. Charter and Verizon both said in 2018 that they were reducing capital expenditures." And that trend is expected to continue in 2019--at least, for Comcast and Charter--according to MoffettNathanson estimates cited in a Light Reading article this week.
In addition, as Ars Technica reported, "The net neutrality repeal hasn't closed broadband gaps in rural areas, where industry trade groups say they won't expand service unless the government gives them more direct funding," arguing that without such assistance, the return on investment wouldn't be worth it.
As Gigi Sohn, a former FCC lawyer who helped craft the repealed net neutrality rules, concluded in an email to Motherboard, "The cornerstone of Ajit Pai's net neutrality repeal order has quickly crumbled."