

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Demonstrators march during the March for Science in Washington D.C. on April 22, 2017. (Photo: Stephen Melkisethian/flickr/cc)
The Trump administration's penchant for censoring science has been underscored by a new development that has one advocacy group asking if the Environmental Protection Agency's climate change website is gone for good.
Back in April 2017, the EPA announced it was "undergoing changes that reflect the agency's new direction under President Donald Trump and [then] Administrator Scott Pruitt," and scrubbed multiple climate crisis-related pages, including epa.gov/climatechange, with readers being redirected to a page that said, "This page is being updated." Here's how the page appeared, as the Internet Archive shows:

Watchdog network Environmental Data & Governance Initiative (EDGI) pointed out this week that there's no longer a mention of an "update." A reader searching for epa.gov/climatechange now is redirected to a page that says, "We want to help you find what you are looking for."

The previous "being updated" page also left a link to a snapshot of the EPA's climate page from the last day of the Obama administration, but it now sends readers off to a snapshot of the EPA's home page from that date, not the agency's climate page.
"The cumulative effect of removing these links from the splash page is the substantial reduction of access to EPA's historical public information about climate change," EDGI states.
According to Judith Enck, EPA regional administrator under the Obama administration, "It's an embarrassment."
"It's a bit like Amazon not allowing the public to order books via its website--it's that fundamental," she told the Guardian. "There's no other issue at the EPA more important than climate change; it affects air, water, health, and whether large parts of the world will survive."
As for the EPA's new landing page saying, "We want to help you find what you are looking for," Environmental Working Group (EWG) president Ken Cook argued, "Apparently they don't want to help very much."
"But it's not hard to figure out why," Cook continued. "Andrew Wheeler, acting chief of the agency, was a longtime lobbyist for the fossil fuel industry before he joined President Trump's anti-science, anti-public-health administration. Why would he want an EPA website packed with irrefutable data detailing how that industry is a leading driver behind dirty air, increases in childhood asthma and premature death, wildfires and hurricanes from hell, rising sea levels, drought and famine?"
The website change was also noted by the March for Science. The movement tweeted that content shifted from "Accurate, essential information" to "being updated" to "page not found." It added that senators "elected this year will decide the new head of the EPA."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Trump administration's penchant for censoring science has been underscored by a new development that has one advocacy group asking if the Environmental Protection Agency's climate change website is gone for good.
Back in April 2017, the EPA announced it was "undergoing changes that reflect the agency's new direction under President Donald Trump and [then] Administrator Scott Pruitt," and scrubbed multiple climate crisis-related pages, including epa.gov/climatechange, with readers being redirected to a page that said, "This page is being updated." Here's how the page appeared, as the Internet Archive shows:

Watchdog network Environmental Data & Governance Initiative (EDGI) pointed out this week that there's no longer a mention of an "update." A reader searching for epa.gov/climatechange now is redirected to a page that says, "We want to help you find what you are looking for."

The previous "being updated" page also left a link to a snapshot of the EPA's climate page from the last day of the Obama administration, but it now sends readers off to a snapshot of the EPA's home page from that date, not the agency's climate page.
"The cumulative effect of removing these links from the splash page is the substantial reduction of access to EPA's historical public information about climate change," EDGI states.
According to Judith Enck, EPA regional administrator under the Obama administration, "It's an embarrassment."
"It's a bit like Amazon not allowing the public to order books via its website--it's that fundamental," she told the Guardian. "There's no other issue at the EPA more important than climate change; it affects air, water, health, and whether large parts of the world will survive."
As for the EPA's new landing page saying, "We want to help you find what you are looking for," Environmental Working Group (EWG) president Ken Cook argued, "Apparently they don't want to help very much."
"But it's not hard to figure out why," Cook continued. "Andrew Wheeler, acting chief of the agency, was a longtime lobbyist for the fossil fuel industry before he joined President Trump's anti-science, anti-public-health administration. Why would he want an EPA website packed with irrefutable data detailing how that industry is a leading driver behind dirty air, increases in childhood asthma and premature death, wildfires and hurricanes from hell, rising sea levels, drought and famine?"
The website change was also noted by the March for Science. The movement tweeted that content shifted from "Accurate, essential information" to "being updated" to "page not found." It added that senators "elected this year will decide the new head of the EPA."
The Trump administration's penchant for censoring science has been underscored by a new development that has one advocacy group asking if the Environmental Protection Agency's climate change website is gone for good.
Back in April 2017, the EPA announced it was "undergoing changes that reflect the agency's new direction under President Donald Trump and [then] Administrator Scott Pruitt," and scrubbed multiple climate crisis-related pages, including epa.gov/climatechange, with readers being redirected to a page that said, "This page is being updated." Here's how the page appeared, as the Internet Archive shows:

Watchdog network Environmental Data & Governance Initiative (EDGI) pointed out this week that there's no longer a mention of an "update." A reader searching for epa.gov/climatechange now is redirected to a page that says, "We want to help you find what you are looking for."

The previous "being updated" page also left a link to a snapshot of the EPA's climate page from the last day of the Obama administration, but it now sends readers off to a snapshot of the EPA's home page from that date, not the agency's climate page.
"The cumulative effect of removing these links from the splash page is the substantial reduction of access to EPA's historical public information about climate change," EDGI states.
According to Judith Enck, EPA regional administrator under the Obama administration, "It's an embarrassment."
"It's a bit like Amazon not allowing the public to order books via its website--it's that fundamental," she told the Guardian. "There's no other issue at the EPA more important than climate change; it affects air, water, health, and whether large parts of the world will survive."
As for the EPA's new landing page saying, "We want to help you find what you are looking for," Environmental Working Group (EWG) president Ken Cook argued, "Apparently they don't want to help very much."
"But it's not hard to figure out why," Cook continued. "Andrew Wheeler, acting chief of the agency, was a longtime lobbyist for the fossil fuel industry before he joined President Trump's anti-science, anti-public-health administration. Why would he want an EPA website packed with irrefutable data detailing how that industry is a leading driver behind dirty air, increases in childhood asthma and premature death, wildfires and hurricanes from hell, rising sea levels, drought and famine?"
The website change was also noted by the March for Science. The movement tweeted that content shifted from "Accurate, essential information" to "being updated" to "page not found." It added that senators "elected this year will decide the new head of the EPA."