SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
President Donald Trump introduces U.S. Circuit Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh as his nominee to the United States Supreme Court during an event in the East Room of the White House July 9, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
'This Is a Farce, Not an Investigation': Trump Accused of Rigging FBI's Kavanaugh Probe By Imposing 'Outrageous' Limits
"It insults the intelligence of the Senate and the country and is an act of profound disrespect toward Dr. Blasey Ford and all survivors of sexual violence."
Sep 29, 2018
Just 24 hours after caving to pressure from the Senate and requesting an FBI probe into the sexual assault allegations against his Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump is reportedly already working to impose strict limitations on the scope of the investigation--a move that has been denounced as a flagrant attempt to further rig the process in Kavanaugh's favor.
"The White House has a list of people the FBI can talk to. This investigation is already a sham."
-- CREDO
Citing multiple anonymous officials briefed on the matter, NBC News reported on Saturday that while "the FBI will examine the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez, the bureau has not been permitted to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s."
Michael Avenatti, the attorney of Stormy Daniels who is representing Swetnick, wrote on Twitter that if NBC's report is accurate, "this is outrageous."
"Why are Trump and his cronies in the Senate trying to prevent the American people from learning the truth?" Avenatti asked. "Why do they insist on muzzling women with information submitted under penalty of perjury? Why Ramirez but not my client?"
According to NBC News, the White House counsel's office has also "given the FBI a list of witnesses they are permitted to interview," a restriction that "may make it difficult to pursue additional leads in a case in which a Supreme Court nominee has been accused of sexual assault."
Additionally, the FBI will not be permitted to "examine why Kavanaugh's account of his drinking at Yale University differs from those of some former classmates" or ask the supermarket that employed Kavanaugh's friend Mark Judge "for records verifying when he was employed there"--a line of inquiry that could help bolster Ford's account.
"This is a farce, not an investigation," MoveOn.org declared in a tweet reacting to NBC's reporting. "It insults the intelligence of the Senate and the country and is an act of profound disrespect toward Dr. Blasey Ford and all survivors of sexual violence. No self-respecting senator can pretend otherwise."
Independent journalist Marcy Wheeler argued that the primary reason the White House is working to "carefully control" the scope of the FBI probe is because "Kavanaugh lied so much on Thursday that if FBI pursues obvious leads, [Kavanaugh] will get referred for lying his ass off."
In a tweet responding to NBC's report late Saturday, Trump insisted that he is not limiting the FBI's probe. But shortly after Trump's denial, the New York Times confirmed that the White House has provided the FBI a list of witnesses it can interview and is restricting the scope of the investigation.
Denouncing the reported restraints the Trump White House is reportedly imposing on the FBI's investigation despite the president's vow of no limitations, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) wrote: "This is not how you conduct an investigation. But it is how you do a whitewash."
Immediately after NBC's story was published on Saturday, commentators and activists immediately began sending the story to Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who has agreed to vote yes on Kavanaugh as long as there is a full FBI investigation into the sexual assault allegations against him.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Just 24 hours after caving to pressure from the Senate and requesting an FBI probe into the sexual assault allegations against his Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump is reportedly already working to impose strict limitations on the scope of the investigation--a move that has been denounced as a flagrant attempt to further rig the process in Kavanaugh's favor.
"The White House has a list of people the FBI can talk to. This investigation is already a sham."
-- CREDO
Citing multiple anonymous officials briefed on the matter, NBC News reported on Saturday that while "the FBI will examine the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez, the bureau has not been permitted to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s."
Michael Avenatti, the attorney of Stormy Daniels who is representing Swetnick, wrote on Twitter that if NBC's report is accurate, "this is outrageous."
"Why are Trump and his cronies in the Senate trying to prevent the American people from learning the truth?" Avenatti asked. "Why do they insist on muzzling women with information submitted under penalty of perjury? Why Ramirez but not my client?"
According to NBC News, the White House counsel's office has also "given the FBI a list of witnesses they are permitted to interview," a restriction that "may make it difficult to pursue additional leads in a case in which a Supreme Court nominee has been accused of sexual assault."
Additionally, the FBI will not be permitted to "examine why Kavanaugh's account of his drinking at Yale University differs from those of some former classmates" or ask the supermarket that employed Kavanaugh's friend Mark Judge "for records verifying when he was employed there"--a line of inquiry that could help bolster Ford's account.
"This is a farce, not an investigation," MoveOn.org declared in a tweet reacting to NBC's reporting. "It insults the intelligence of the Senate and the country and is an act of profound disrespect toward Dr. Blasey Ford and all survivors of sexual violence. No self-respecting senator can pretend otherwise."
Independent journalist Marcy Wheeler argued that the primary reason the White House is working to "carefully control" the scope of the FBI probe is because "Kavanaugh lied so much on Thursday that if FBI pursues obvious leads, [Kavanaugh] will get referred for lying his ass off."
In a tweet responding to NBC's report late Saturday, Trump insisted that he is not limiting the FBI's probe. But shortly after Trump's denial, the New York Times confirmed that the White House has provided the FBI a list of witnesses it can interview and is restricting the scope of the investigation.
Denouncing the reported restraints the Trump White House is reportedly imposing on the FBI's investigation despite the president's vow of no limitations, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) wrote: "This is not how you conduct an investigation. But it is how you do a whitewash."
Immediately after NBC's story was published on Saturday, commentators and activists immediately began sending the story to Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who has agreed to vote yes on Kavanaugh as long as there is a full FBI investigation into the sexual assault allegations against him.
Just 24 hours after caving to pressure from the Senate and requesting an FBI probe into the sexual assault allegations against his Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump is reportedly already working to impose strict limitations on the scope of the investigation--a move that has been denounced as a flagrant attempt to further rig the process in Kavanaugh's favor.
"The White House has a list of people the FBI can talk to. This investigation is already a sham."
-- CREDO
Citing multiple anonymous officials briefed on the matter, NBC News reported on Saturday that while "the FBI will examine the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez, the bureau has not been permitted to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s."
Michael Avenatti, the attorney of Stormy Daniels who is representing Swetnick, wrote on Twitter that if NBC's report is accurate, "this is outrageous."
"Why are Trump and his cronies in the Senate trying to prevent the American people from learning the truth?" Avenatti asked. "Why do they insist on muzzling women with information submitted under penalty of perjury? Why Ramirez but not my client?"
According to NBC News, the White House counsel's office has also "given the FBI a list of witnesses they are permitted to interview," a restriction that "may make it difficult to pursue additional leads in a case in which a Supreme Court nominee has been accused of sexual assault."
Additionally, the FBI will not be permitted to "examine why Kavanaugh's account of his drinking at Yale University differs from those of some former classmates" or ask the supermarket that employed Kavanaugh's friend Mark Judge "for records verifying when he was employed there"--a line of inquiry that could help bolster Ford's account.
"This is a farce, not an investigation," MoveOn.org declared in a tweet reacting to NBC's reporting. "It insults the intelligence of the Senate and the country and is an act of profound disrespect toward Dr. Blasey Ford and all survivors of sexual violence. No self-respecting senator can pretend otherwise."
Independent journalist Marcy Wheeler argued that the primary reason the White House is working to "carefully control" the scope of the FBI probe is because "Kavanaugh lied so much on Thursday that if FBI pursues obvious leads, [Kavanaugh] will get referred for lying his ass off."
In a tweet responding to NBC's report late Saturday, Trump insisted that he is not limiting the FBI's probe. But shortly after Trump's denial, the New York Times confirmed that the White House has provided the FBI a list of witnesses it can interview and is restricting the scope of the investigation.
Denouncing the reported restraints the Trump White House is reportedly imposing on the FBI's investigation despite the president's vow of no limitations, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) wrote: "This is not how you conduct an investigation. But it is how you do a whitewash."
Immediately after NBC's story was published on Saturday, commentators and activists immediately began sending the story to Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who has agreed to vote yes on Kavanaugh as long as there is a full FBI investigation into the sexual assault allegations against him.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.