Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill September 27, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Melina Mara-Pool/Getty Images)
Sep 28, 2018
Following the "powerful" testimony of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and his "unhinged" performance before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, the American Bar Association--which had previously bestowed the rating of "well-qualified" on the Supreme Court nominee--pulled its support by calling for a delay in his confirmation and a thorough investigation by the FBI into the sexual assault allegations that three women have now publicaly made against him.
"This is indeed remarkable!"
--Karine Jean-Pierre, MoveOn.org
"The basic principles that underscore the Senate's constitutional duty of advice and consent on federal judicial nominees require nothing less than a careful examination of the accusations and facts by the FBI," wrote Robert Carlson, president of the ABA, the nation's largest organization of lawyers, in a letter addressed to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the committee chair, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif), its ranking member.
\u201cThe American Bar Association, which originally endorsed Kavanaugh, is making an \u201cextraordinary request to delay his hearing\u201d because of their \u201crespect for the rule of law and due process under law.\u201d https://t.co/AcQfqXBAiz\u201d— Matt McDermott (@Matt McDermott) 1538107023
While progressive forces opposed to Kavanaugh are mobilizing for mass demonstrations on Friday to demand senators reject Kavanaugh and Republicans circle the wagons to rush him through to a vote, the letter by the ABA comes as a striking blow by a seemingly less partisan organization that sees itself as defending the reputation of the legal committee, advocating for the "rule of law," and represents the collective voice of over 400,000 of the nation's licensed lawyers.
While Kavanaugh during Thursday's hearing repeatedly refused opportunities to endorse the FBI investigation that the White House and Senate Republicans have also rejected out of hand, Carlson's letter argued that such a probe was clearly needed and that a vote by the committee--currently scheduled for 9:30 AM on Friday--was wholly inappropriate.
"Each appointment to our nation's Highest Court (as with all others) is simply too important to rush to a vote," the letter states. "Deciding to proceed without conducting additional investigation would not only have a lasting impact on the Senate's reputation, but it will also negatively affect the great trust necessary for the American people to have in the Supreme Court."
In his testimony on Thurdsay, Brett Kavanaugh himself cited the approval he's received from the ABA as did other Republicans, including Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who called their system the "gold standard" for rating judicial nominees.
\u201cWow, Brett Kavanaugh bragged about his high rating by The American Bar Association multiple times during the Hearing yesterday. This is indeed remarkable!\u201d— Karine Jean-Pierre (@Karine Jean-Pierre) 1538128122
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Following the "powerful" testimony of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and his "unhinged" performance before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, the American Bar Association--which had previously bestowed the rating of "well-qualified" on the Supreme Court nominee--pulled its support by calling for a delay in his confirmation and a thorough investigation by the FBI into the sexual assault allegations that three women have now publicaly made against him.
"This is indeed remarkable!"
--Karine Jean-Pierre, MoveOn.org
"The basic principles that underscore the Senate's constitutional duty of advice and consent on federal judicial nominees require nothing less than a careful examination of the accusations and facts by the FBI," wrote Robert Carlson, president of the ABA, the nation's largest organization of lawyers, in a letter addressed to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the committee chair, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif), its ranking member.
\u201cThe American Bar Association, which originally endorsed Kavanaugh, is making an \u201cextraordinary request to delay his hearing\u201d because of their \u201crespect for the rule of law and due process under law.\u201d https://t.co/AcQfqXBAiz\u201d— Matt McDermott (@Matt McDermott) 1538107023
While progressive forces opposed to Kavanaugh are mobilizing for mass demonstrations on Friday to demand senators reject Kavanaugh and Republicans circle the wagons to rush him through to a vote, the letter by the ABA comes as a striking blow by a seemingly less partisan organization that sees itself as defending the reputation of the legal committee, advocating for the "rule of law," and represents the collective voice of over 400,000 of the nation's licensed lawyers.
While Kavanaugh during Thursday's hearing repeatedly refused opportunities to endorse the FBI investigation that the White House and Senate Republicans have also rejected out of hand, Carlson's letter argued that such a probe was clearly needed and that a vote by the committee--currently scheduled for 9:30 AM on Friday--was wholly inappropriate.
"Each appointment to our nation's Highest Court (as with all others) is simply too important to rush to a vote," the letter states. "Deciding to proceed without conducting additional investigation would not only have a lasting impact on the Senate's reputation, but it will also negatively affect the great trust necessary for the American people to have in the Supreme Court."
In his testimony on Thurdsay, Brett Kavanaugh himself cited the approval he's received from the ABA as did other Republicans, including Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who called their system the "gold standard" for rating judicial nominees.
\u201cWow, Brett Kavanaugh bragged about his high rating by The American Bar Association multiple times during the Hearing yesterday. This is indeed remarkable!\u201d— Karine Jean-Pierre (@Karine Jean-Pierre) 1538128122
Following the "powerful" testimony of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and his "unhinged" performance before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, the American Bar Association--which had previously bestowed the rating of "well-qualified" on the Supreme Court nominee--pulled its support by calling for a delay in his confirmation and a thorough investigation by the FBI into the sexual assault allegations that three women have now publicaly made against him.
"This is indeed remarkable!"
--Karine Jean-Pierre, MoveOn.org
"The basic principles that underscore the Senate's constitutional duty of advice and consent on federal judicial nominees require nothing less than a careful examination of the accusations and facts by the FBI," wrote Robert Carlson, president of the ABA, the nation's largest organization of lawyers, in a letter addressed to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the committee chair, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif), its ranking member.
\u201cThe American Bar Association, which originally endorsed Kavanaugh, is making an \u201cextraordinary request to delay his hearing\u201d because of their \u201crespect for the rule of law and due process under law.\u201d https://t.co/AcQfqXBAiz\u201d— Matt McDermott (@Matt McDermott) 1538107023
While progressive forces opposed to Kavanaugh are mobilizing for mass demonstrations on Friday to demand senators reject Kavanaugh and Republicans circle the wagons to rush him through to a vote, the letter by the ABA comes as a striking blow by a seemingly less partisan organization that sees itself as defending the reputation of the legal committee, advocating for the "rule of law," and represents the collective voice of over 400,000 of the nation's licensed lawyers.
While Kavanaugh during Thursday's hearing repeatedly refused opportunities to endorse the FBI investigation that the White House and Senate Republicans have also rejected out of hand, Carlson's letter argued that such a probe was clearly needed and that a vote by the committee--currently scheduled for 9:30 AM on Friday--was wholly inappropriate.
"Each appointment to our nation's Highest Court (as with all others) is simply too important to rush to a vote," the letter states. "Deciding to proceed without conducting additional investigation would not only have a lasting impact on the Senate's reputation, but it will also negatively affect the great trust necessary for the American people to have in the Supreme Court."
In his testimony on Thurdsay, Brett Kavanaugh himself cited the approval he's received from the ABA as did other Republicans, including Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who called their system the "gold standard" for rating judicial nominees.
\u201cWow, Brett Kavanaugh bragged about his high rating by The American Bar Association multiple times during the Hearing yesterday. This is indeed remarkable!\u201d— Karine Jean-Pierre (@Karine Jean-Pierre) 1538128122
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.