SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Committee Chairman U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) (L) and ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) (R) participate in a markup hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee September 13, 2018 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Top Grassley Staffer Gives Away the Game: 'Unfazed and Determined' to Confirm Kavanaugh Despite Allegations
"Grassley's process is a sham but I didn't expect them to broadcast it so openly."
Sep 20, 2018
There's new evidence for those arguing that Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican Senator from Iowa who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, is being wholly disingenuous about his desire to get to the bottom of the sexual assault accusation by Christine Blasey Ford against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and it comes in the form of public statements made by one of his top staffers on the committee who said plainly overnight that the goal of the current process is not to get to the truth of the matter, but to make sure Trump's right-wing nominee is confirmed regardless of the credible allegations.
"Grassley's process is a sham but I didn't expect them to broadcast it so openly."
--Adam Jentleson, former Democratic senate staffer
"Unfazed and determined. We will confirm Judge Kavanaugh," tweeted Mike Davis, who serves Grassley as the Chief Counsel for Nominations for the SJC, just after 11 PM on Wednesday.
Hours later, betraying any of the public-facing sympathy that GOP lawmakers on the committee have tried to project regarding Ford, Davis said that while he "personally questioned Judge Kavanaugh under penalty of felony and 5 years of imprisonment, if he lies," he was frustrated that he had yet to hear back from Ford's attorneys who, he said derisively, "can't find time between TV appearances to get back to me."
As Adam Jentleson, former deputy chief of staff to retired Democratic senator Harry Reid, pointed out in reaction to Davis' pronouncements, "Grassley and his staff are not making a good faith effort to get the facts - they're on a mission to confirm their boy, no matter what."
Not only do the comments reveal open hostility towards Ford, Jentleson argued, they also bolster the complaint by many critics who say the entire process has been a bad-faith effort by Republicans.
"Here is Grassley's Chief Counsel attacking Ford's camp and confirming he's the one who questioned Kavanaugh, presumably hours before cheerleading for him on Twitter," he added. "Grassley's process is a sham but I didn't expect them to broadcast it so openly."
Meanwhile, Ford's attorneys have made it crystal clear what they want. In a letter sent to the committee, they called for a "full investigation by law enforcement officials" to "ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions."
That both the White House and the GOP-controlled SJC have refused that simple and common-sense request, say critics, reveals something profound about the charade now being orchestrated by Grassley and the party's political machine.
As Charles Blow writes in the New York Times on Thursday:
What are Republicans hiding about Kavanaugh? What don't they want you to know? There is absolutely no rush here, no timeline that must be adhered to, no deadline that must be met.
We are talking about a lifetime appointment here, and if Blasey is telling the truth and Kavanaugh has lied, there is absolutely no way he should be confirmed.
And as Esquire's Charlies P. Pierce wrote on Wednesday, the Republicans are "not interested in a legitimate probe into what Brett Kavanaugh may have done to Christine Blasey Ford," but that are pushing the process forward to get "a quick and dirty he said-she said proceeding that they all can pretend is an actual inquiry."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
brett kavanaughchristine blasey fordchuck grassleyrepublican partysexual assaultus senateus supreme courtwomen
There's new evidence for those arguing that Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican Senator from Iowa who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, is being wholly disingenuous about his desire to get to the bottom of the sexual assault accusation by Christine Blasey Ford against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and it comes in the form of public statements made by one of his top staffers on the committee who said plainly overnight that the goal of the current process is not to get to the truth of the matter, but to make sure Trump's right-wing nominee is confirmed regardless of the credible allegations.
"Grassley's process is a sham but I didn't expect them to broadcast it so openly."
--Adam Jentleson, former Democratic senate staffer
"Unfazed and determined. We will confirm Judge Kavanaugh," tweeted Mike Davis, who serves Grassley as the Chief Counsel for Nominations for the SJC, just after 11 PM on Wednesday.
Hours later, betraying any of the public-facing sympathy that GOP lawmakers on the committee have tried to project regarding Ford, Davis said that while he "personally questioned Judge Kavanaugh under penalty of felony and 5 years of imprisonment, if he lies," he was frustrated that he had yet to hear back from Ford's attorneys who, he said derisively, "can't find time between TV appearances to get back to me."
As Adam Jentleson, former deputy chief of staff to retired Democratic senator Harry Reid, pointed out in reaction to Davis' pronouncements, "Grassley and his staff are not making a good faith effort to get the facts - they're on a mission to confirm their boy, no matter what."
Not only do the comments reveal open hostility towards Ford, Jentleson argued, they also bolster the complaint by many critics who say the entire process has been a bad-faith effort by Republicans.
"Here is Grassley's Chief Counsel attacking Ford's camp and confirming he's the one who questioned Kavanaugh, presumably hours before cheerleading for him on Twitter," he added. "Grassley's process is a sham but I didn't expect them to broadcast it so openly."
Meanwhile, Ford's attorneys have made it crystal clear what they want. In a letter sent to the committee, they called for a "full investigation by law enforcement officials" to "ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions."
That both the White House and the GOP-controlled SJC have refused that simple and common-sense request, say critics, reveals something profound about the charade now being orchestrated by Grassley and the party's political machine.
As Charles Blow writes in the New York Times on Thursday:
What are Republicans hiding about Kavanaugh? What don't they want you to know? There is absolutely no rush here, no timeline that must be adhered to, no deadline that must be met.
We are talking about a lifetime appointment here, and if Blasey is telling the truth and Kavanaugh has lied, there is absolutely no way he should be confirmed.
And as Esquire's Charlies P. Pierce wrote on Wednesday, the Republicans are "not interested in a legitimate probe into what Brett Kavanaugh may have done to Christine Blasey Ford," but that are pushing the process forward to get "a quick and dirty he said-she said proceeding that they all can pretend is an actual inquiry."
There's new evidence for those arguing that Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican Senator from Iowa who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, is being wholly disingenuous about his desire to get to the bottom of the sexual assault accusation by Christine Blasey Ford against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and it comes in the form of public statements made by one of his top staffers on the committee who said plainly overnight that the goal of the current process is not to get to the truth of the matter, but to make sure Trump's right-wing nominee is confirmed regardless of the credible allegations.
"Grassley's process is a sham but I didn't expect them to broadcast it so openly."
--Adam Jentleson, former Democratic senate staffer
"Unfazed and determined. We will confirm Judge Kavanaugh," tweeted Mike Davis, who serves Grassley as the Chief Counsel for Nominations for the SJC, just after 11 PM on Wednesday.
Hours later, betraying any of the public-facing sympathy that GOP lawmakers on the committee have tried to project regarding Ford, Davis said that while he "personally questioned Judge Kavanaugh under penalty of felony and 5 years of imprisonment, if he lies," he was frustrated that he had yet to hear back from Ford's attorneys who, he said derisively, "can't find time between TV appearances to get back to me."
As Adam Jentleson, former deputy chief of staff to retired Democratic senator Harry Reid, pointed out in reaction to Davis' pronouncements, "Grassley and his staff are not making a good faith effort to get the facts - they're on a mission to confirm their boy, no matter what."
Not only do the comments reveal open hostility towards Ford, Jentleson argued, they also bolster the complaint by many critics who say the entire process has been a bad-faith effort by Republicans.
"Here is Grassley's Chief Counsel attacking Ford's camp and confirming he's the one who questioned Kavanaugh, presumably hours before cheerleading for him on Twitter," he added. "Grassley's process is a sham but I didn't expect them to broadcast it so openly."
Meanwhile, Ford's attorneys have made it crystal clear what they want. In a letter sent to the committee, they called for a "full investigation by law enforcement officials" to "ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions."
That both the White House and the GOP-controlled SJC have refused that simple and common-sense request, say critics, reveals something profound about the charade now being orchestrated by Grassley and the party's political machine.
As Charles Blow writes in the New York Times on Thursday:
What are Republicans hiding about Kavanaugh? What don't they want you to know? There is absolutely no rush here, no timeline that must be adhered to, no deadline that must be met.
We are talking about a lifetime appointment here, and if Blasey is telling the truth and Kavanaugh has lied, there is absolutely no way he should be confirmed.
And as Esquire's Charlies P. Pierce wrote on Wednesday, the Republicans are "not interested in a legitimate probe into what Brett Kavanaugh may have done to Christine Blasey Ford," but that are pushing the process forward to get "a quick and dirty he said-she said proceeding that they all can pretend is an actual inquiry."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.