Government assistance programs including WIC and SNAP report that fewer immigrant families have applied for help since President Donald Trump proposed passing immigrants over for green cards if they use public assistance. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
Healthy Babies at Risk, Warn Experts, as Trump Fearmongering Drives Immigrant Families Off Nutrition Assistance Program
"Even without any official order banning immigrants and their US-born children from utilizing life-saving services, the rumors are already traumatizing families."
Three months after President Donald Trump proposed penalizing immigrants for using public assistance programs, families appear to have received his message loud and clear--likely risking the health of young immigrant children across the country.
As Politico reported on Monday, providers of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) has noted a sharp decline in at least 18 states in the use of its benefits by families who immigrated to the United States.
\u201cHealth providers say they\u2019ve received panicked calls from documented and undocumented immigrant families demanding to be dropped from WIC after news reports White House is potentially planning to deny legal status to immigrants who\u2019ve used public benefits. https://t.co/ezd4q06OYO\u201d— Jawn Staley \ud83d\ude37\ud83e\uddfc\ud83e\uddf4\ud83d\udc89 (@Jawn Staley \ud83d\ude37\ud83e\uddfc\ud83e\uddf4\ud83d\udc89) 1535981517
The program offers infant formula and food to low-income pregnant women and families with new babies and young children, as well as supporting women who are breastfeeding. WIC serves about half of all babies born in the United States.
Enrollment in the program dropped from 7.4 million when Trump took office to 6.8 million in May. While multiple factors may have driven the overall reduction, more than a dozen WIC providers across the nation told Politico that the decline in participation among immigrant families has been stark:
Politico interviewed more than a dozen WIC providers nationwide who serve tens of thousands of children from Washington state, Kansas and New York state. Almost all said they have seen immigrant mothers and their children drop from WIC, citing public charge concerns. They also said they've fielded inquiries about whether participating in WIC could put a family at risk of either deportation or at a disadvantage in immigration proceedings.
One agency in Longview, Texas reported losing 75 to 90 percent of participants per month, while a provider in Beacon, New York told the outlet its caseload had decreased by about 20 percent.
"The big concern for all of us in the WIC community is that this program is really about growing healthy babies," Rev. Douglas Greenaway, president and CEO of the National WIC Association, told Politico. "When any population that's potential eligible for this program is either driven away by changes in regulation or legislation or simply by political rhetoric inducing fear there are huge personal consequences to those babies and their families."
The report follows Trump's proposal in May to reject visa-carrying immigrants who apply for legal permanent residence, or green cards, if they have used programs including Medicaid, SNAP, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or other assistance.
In proposing the plan, the Trump administration indicated that making use of government-run programs to feed his or her family would identify an immigrant as a "public charge"--going against a 1999 proclamation making clear that immigrants are free to use public benefits.
The proposal is among a host of initiatives Trump has introduced to send the message to immigrants, whether documented or not, that they will be treated with hostility. Within days of taking office, Trump first proposed his Muslim ban, his first step in adopting a virulently anti-immigrant agenda which would also include his family separation policy at the U.S.-Mexico border, and a surge in immigration raids terrorizing Latino communities.
While the rule has not officially been adopted yet, the observations of WIC agencies suggest that the Trump administration doesn't need to pass a formal regulation to frighten immigrant parents out of seeking completely legal forms of assistance for their families.
"It's a stealth regulation," Kathleen Campbell Walker, an immigration attorney in El Paso, Texas, told Politico. "It doesn't really exist, but it's being applied subliminally."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Three months after President Donald Trump proposed penalizing immigrants for using public assistance programs, families appear to have received his message loud and clear--likely risking the health of young immigrant children across the country.
As Politico reported on Monday, providers of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) has noted a sharp decline in at least 18 states in the use of its benefits by families who immigrated to the United States.
\u201cHealth providers say they\u2019ve received panicked calls from documented and undocumented immigrant families demanding to be dropped from WIC after news reports White House is potentially planning to deny legal status to immigrants who\u2019ve used public benefits. https://t.co/ezd4q06OYO\u201d— Jawn Staley \ud83d\ude37\ud83e\uddfc\ud83e\uddf4\ud83d\udc89 (@Jawn Staley \ud83d\ude37\ud83e\uddfc\ud83e\uddf4\ud83d\udc89) 1535981517
The program offers infant formula and food to low-income pregnant women and families with new babies and young children, as well as supporting women who are breastfeeding. WIC serves about half of all babies born in the United States.
Enrollment in the program dropped from 7.4 million when Trump took office to 6.8 million in May. While multiple factors may have driven the overall reduction, more than a dozen WIC providers across the nation told Politico that the decline in participation among immigrant families has been stark:
Politico interviewed more than a dozen WIC providers nationwide who serve tens of thousands of children from Washington state, Kansas and New York state. Almost all said they have seen immigrant mothers and their children drop from WIC, citing public charge concerns. They also said they've fielded inquiries about whether participating in WIC could put a family at risk of either deportation or at a disadvantage in immigration proceedings.
One agency in Longview, Texas reported losing 75 to 90 percent of participants per month, while a provider in Beacon, New York told the outlet its caseload had decreased by about 20 percent.
"The big concern for all of us in the WIC community is that this program is really about growing healthy babies," Rev. Douglas Greenaway, president and CEO of the National WIC Association, told Politico. "When any population that's potential eligible for this program is either driven away by changes in regulation or legislation or simply by political rhetoric inducing fear there are huge personal consequences to those babies and their families."
The report follows Trump's proposal in May to reject visa-carrying immigrants who apply for legal permanent residence, or green cards, if they have used programs including Medicaid, SNAP, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or other assistance.
In proposing the plan, the Trump administration indicated that making use of government-run programs to feed his or her family would identify an immigrant as a "public charge"--going against a 1999 proclamation making clear that immigrants are free to use public benefits.
The proposal is among a host of initiatives Trump has introduced to send the message to immigrants, whether documented or not, that they will be treated with hostility. Within days of taking office, Trump first proposed his Muslim ban, his first step in adopting a virulently anti-immigrant agenda which would also include his family separation policy at the U.S.-Mexico border, and a surge in immigration raids terrorizing Latino communities.
While the rule has not officially been adopted yet, the observations of WIC agencies suggest that the Trump administration doesn't need to pass a formal regulation to frighten immigrant parents out of seeking completely legal forms of assistance for their families.
"It's a stealth regulation," Kathleen Campbell Walker, an immigration attorney in El Paso, Texas, told Politico. "It doesn't really exist, but it's being applied subliminally."
Three months after President Donald Trump proposed penalizing immigrants for using public assistance programs, families appear to have received his message loud and clear--likely risking the health of young immigrant children across the country.
As Politico reported on Monday, providers of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) has noted a sharp decline in at least 18 states in the use of its benefits by families who immigrated to the United States.
\u201cHealth providers say they\u2019ve received panicked calls from documented and undocumented immigrant families demanding to be dropped from WIC after news reports White House is potentially planning to deny legal status to immigrants who\u2019ve used public benefits. https://t.co/ezd4q06OYO\u201d— Jawn Staley \ud83d\ude37\ud83e\uddfc\ud83e\uddf4\ud83d\udc89 (@Jawn Staley \ud83d\ude37\ud83e\uddfc\ud83e\uddf4\ud83d\udc89) 1535981517
The program offers infant formula and food to low-income pregnant women and families with new babies and young children, as well as supporting women who are breastfeeding. WIC serves about half of all babies born in the United States.
Enrollment in the program dropped from 7.4 million when Trump took office to 6.8 million in May. While multiple factors may have driven the overall reduction, more than a dozen WIC providers across the nation told Politico that the decline in participation among immigrant families has been stark:
Politico interviewed more than a dozen WIC providers nationwide who serve tens of thousands of children from Washington state, Kansas and New York state. Almost all said they have seen immigrant mothers and their children drop from WIC, citing public charge concerns. They also said they've fielded inquiries about whether participating in WIC could put a family at risk of either deportation or at a disadvantage in immigration proceedings.
One agency in Longview, Texas reported losing 75 to 90 percent of participants per month, while a provider in Beacon, New York told the outlet its caseload had decreased by about 20 percent.
"The big concern for all of us in the WIC community is that this program is really about growing healthy babies," Rev. Douglas Greenaway, president and CEO of the National WIC Association, told Politico. "When any population that's potential eligible for this program is either driven away by changes in regulation or legislation or simply by political rhetoric inducing fear there are huge personal consequences to those babies and their families."
The report follows Trump's proposal in May to reject visa-carrying immigrants who apply for legal permanent residence, or green cards, if they have used programs including Medicaid, SNAP, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or other assistance.
In proposing the plan, the Trump administration indicated that making use of government-run programs to feed his or her family would identify an immigrant as a "public charge"--going against a 1999 proclamation making clear that immigrants are free to use public benefits.
The proposal is among a host of initiatives Trump has introduced to send the message to immigrants, whether documented or not, that they will be treated with hostility. Within days of taking office, Trump first proposed his Muslim ban, his first step in adopting a virulently anti-immigrant agenda which would also include his family separation policy at the U.S.-Mexico border, and a surge in immigration raids terrorizing Latino communities.
While the rule has not officially been adopted yet, the observations of WIC agencies suggest that the Trump administration doesn't need to pass a formal regulation to frighten immigrant parents out of seeking completely legal forms of assistance for their families.
"It's a stealth regulation," Kathleen Campbell Walker, an immigration attorney in El Paso, Texas, told Politico. "It doesn't really exist, but it's being applied subliminally."