The Trump adminstration just reversed a ban on using bee-poisoning pesticides in wildlife refuges. (Photo: Amy Whitehead/Flickr/cc)
'An Insult to Our National Wildlife': Trump Reverses Ban on GMOs and Bee-Killing Pesticides in Refuges
"Industrial agriculture has no place on public lands dedicated to conservation of biological diversity and the protection of our most vulnerable species."
While regulators in other regions of the world have recently worked to ban bee-poisoning pesticides called neonicotinoids that scientists have long warned could cause an "ecological armageddon," the Trump administration just reversed an Obama-era policy that had outlawed the use of neonics and genetically modified crops in the nation's wildlife refuges.
"The more we learn about the toxicity of neonics, the more apparent it is that pretty much any plant with nectar or pollen sprayed with these poisons is unsafe for bees."
--Nathan Donley, Center for Biological Diversity
Defenders of Wildlife CEO and president Jamie Rappaport Clark, who served as director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) during the Clinton administration, called the move "an insult to our national wildlife refuges and the wildlife that rely on them."
"Industrial agriculture has no place on public lands dedicated to conservation of biological diversity and the protection of our most vulnerable species, including pollinators like bumble bees and monarch butterflies," she added.
The reversal was revealed in an Aug. 2 FWS memo signed by the agency's acting director, Gregory Sheehan, and posted online by Clark's group. Sheehan withdrew the 2014 memo that established a universal ban--which had been praised as "a national victory nearly ten years in the making"--and introduced a new policy: Refuge managers and federal officials will now consider the use of genetically modified crops and neonics on a "case-by-case basis."
Sheehan claimed that although "in some cases the phasing out of those practices was appropriate and expedient," the sweeping ban "does not provide the on-the-ground latitude for refuge managers to work adaptively and make field level decisions about the best matter to fulfill the purposes of the refuge."
Released just ahead of this policy change, a new analysis by California's Department of Pesticide Regulation bolstered a growing mountain of research that has determined common neonics are harmful to bees and other pollinators.
"The more we learn about the toxicity of neonics, the more apparent it is that pretty much any plant with nectar or pollen sprayed with these poisons is unsafe for bees," responded Nathan Donley, a senior scientist with the Center for Biological Diversity. "This important analysis is further proof that it's time to ban all outdoor use of these harmful pesticides on crops."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
While regulators in other regions of the world have recently worked to ban bee-poisoning pesticides called neonicotinoids that scientists have long warned could cause an "ecological armageddon," the Trump administration just reversed an Obama-era policy that had outlawed the use of neonics and genetically modified crops in the nation's wildlife refuges.
"The more we learn about the toxicity of neonics, the more apparent it is that pretty much any plant with nectar or pollen sprayed with these poisons is unsafe for bees."
--Nathan Donley, Center for Biological Diversity
Defenders of Wildlife CEO and president Jamie Rappaport Clark, who served as director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) during the Clinton administration, called the move "an insult to our national wildlife refuges and the wildlife that rely on them."
"Industrial agriculture has no place on public lands dedicated to conservation of biological diversity and the protection of our most vulnerable species, including pollinators like bumble bees and monarch butterflies," she added.
The reversal was revealed in an Aug. 2 FWS memo signed by the agency's acting director, Gregory Sheehan, and posted online by Clark's group. Sheehan withdrew the 2014 memo that established a universal ban--which had been praised as "a national victory nearly ten years in the making"--and introduced a new policy: Refuge managers and federal officials will now consider the use of genetically modified crops and neonics on a "case-by-case basis."
Sheehan claimed that although "in some cases the phasing out of those practices was appropriate and expedient," the sweeping ban "does not provide the on-the-ground latitude for refuge managers to work adaptively and make field level decisions about the best matter to fulfill the purposes of the refuge."
Released just ahead of this policy change, a new analysis by California's Department of Pesticide Regulation bolstered a growing mountain of research that has determined common neonics are harmful to bees and other pollinators.
"The more we learn about the toxicity of neonics, the more apparent it is that pretty much any plant with nectar or pollen sprayed with these poisons is unsafe for bees," responded Nathan Donley, a senior scientist with the Center for Biological Diversity. "This important analysis is further proof that it's time to ban all outdoor use of these harmful pesticides on crops."
While regulators in other regions of the world have recently worked to ban bee-poisoning pesticides called neonicotinoids that scientists have long warned could cause an "ecological armageddon," the Trump administration just reversed an Obama-era policy that had outlawed the use of neonics and genetically modified crops in the nation's wildlife refuges.
"The more we learn about the toxicity of neonics, the more apparent it is that pretty much any plant with nectar or pollen sprayed with these poisons is unsafe for bees."
--Nathan Donley, Center for Biological Diversity
Defenders of Wildlife CEO and president Jamie Rappaport Clark, who served as director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) during the Clinton administration, called the move "an insult to our national wildlife refuges and the wildlife that rely on them."
"Industrial agriculture has no place on public lands dedicated to conservation of biological diversity and the protection of our most vulnerable species, including pollinators like bumble bees and monarch butterflies," she added.
The reversal was revealed in an Aug. 2 FWS memo signed by the agency's acting director, Gregory Sheehan, and posted online by Clark's group. Sheehan withdrew the 2014 memo that established a universal ban--which had been praised as "a national victory nearly ten years in the making"--and introduced a new policy: Refuge managers and federal officials will now consider the use of genetically modified crops and neonics on a "case-by-case basis."
Sheehan claimed that although "in some cases the phasing out of those practices was appropriate and expedient," the sweeping ban "does not provide the on-the-ground latitude for refuge managers to work adaptively and make field level decisions about the best matter to fulfill the purposes of the refuge."
Released just ahead of this policy change, a new analysis by California's Department of Pesticide Regulation bolstered a growing mountain of research that has determined common neonics are harmful to bees and other pollinators.
"The more we learn about the toxicity of neonics, the more apparent it is that pretty much any plant with nectar or pollen sprayed with these poisons is unsafe for bees," responded Nathan Donley, a senior scientist with the Center for Biological Diversity. "This important analysis is further proof that it's time to ban all outdoor use of these harmful pesticides on crops."