A man being held inside the Metropolitan Detention Center, which houses detained immigrants, responds to calls of encouragement from demonstrators on the street below on June 30, 2018 in Los Angeles, California. (David McNew/Getty Images)
Jul 03, 2018
Immigrant rights advocates on Tuesday applauded a federal judge's ruling that the Trump administration cannot detain asylum seekers who are awaiting immigration hearings--a practice that breaks the government's own policies as well as international law.
\u201cToday\u2019s ruling means the Trump administration cannot use indefinite detention as a weapon to punish and deter asylum seekers.\n\nIt is a rejection of the blanket policy of locking up those seeking protection in this country.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
The ACLU filed a lawsuit earlier this year on behalf of a number of asylum seekers who had been denied parole after passing a "credible fear" interview with immigration authorities.
In the past, refugees seeking asylum in the U.S. have been required to prove to officials that they have a credible fear of returning to their home country due to political unrest, violence, or persecution. After doing so most asylum seekers have been released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody while they await an immigration hearing, unless they are considered a "flight risk" or a danger to the public.
The ACLU targeted five ICE offices across the country which had blatantly flouted this precedent.
\u201cIn March we filed a lawsuit with @CGRShastings, @humanrights1st, and @CovingtonLLP, targeting five ICE field offices that have almost entirely stopped granting parole since early 2017.\n\nMore than 1,000 asylum seekers have been denied parole in these districts alone.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
\u201cAll of our plaintiffs passed credible fear screenings \u2014 meaning a US asylum officer determined their fear of persecution is credible, and that they have a significant possibility of receiving full asylum.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
\u201cOur client, Ansly, an ethics teacher from Haiti, fled violent, political persecution. He has been granted asylum by a judge TWICE, but the government has appealed each time.\n\n@ICEgov has not let him outside for more than a year. \nhttps://t.co/9wV54P0154\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
"We had a clear record, as the court noted, showing that in these five ICE field offices there really was a very clear pattern in what previously resulted in release of asylum seekers at a rate of 90 percent based on individualized consideration really dwindled down to near zero," Cecillia Wang, the ACLU's deputy legal director, toldNPR.
"This opinion does no more than hold the government accountable to its own policy, which recently has been honored more in the breach than the observance," wrote U.S. District Judge James Boasberg. "Having extended the safeguards of the parole directive to asylum seekers, ICE must now ensure that such protections are realized."
As Juan Cole wrote earlier this month, the Trump administration's indefinite detention of people exercising their legal right to seek asylum violated not only U.S. law but also the 1967 Protocol to the United Nations' 1951 Convention on the Treatment of Refugees.
Although the administration, Cole wrote, "keeps maintaining in public that refugees will have their applications for asylum processed if they present them at a regular border crossing, the evidence is that such applications are being summarily dismissed by immigration officials, who are not permitting asylum seekers access to counsel or judges (this procedure is illegal). As for his policy of arresting undocumented immigrants into the United States for the misdemeanor of crossing the border even where they are asylum seekers from political persecution, this is a violation of international and of U.S. domestic law."
The youth-led immigrant rights group United We Dream celebrated the ACLU's victory while noting that the Trump administration's continued abuse of immigrants must end entirely.
\u201cBREAKING: A Federal court blocks "arbitrary detention" of asylum seekers. Asylum seekers can now be granted "humanitarian parole," as long as they meet "stringent requirements."\n\nA huge win, but not the solution. We must have #FreedomForImmigrants! https://t.co/4Q0TABkEGt\u201d— United We Dream (@United We Dream) 1530570076
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Immigrant rights advocates on Tuesday applauded a federal judge's ruling that the Trump administration cannot detain asylum seekers who are awaiting immigration hearings--a practice that breaks the government's own policies as well as international law.
\u201cToday\u2019s ruling means the Trump administration cannot use indefinite detention as a weapon to punish and deter asylum seekers.\n\nIt is a rejection of the blanket policy of locking up those seeking protection in this country.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
The ACLU filed a lawsuit earlier this year on behalf of a number of asylum seekers who had been denied parole after passing a "credible fear" interview with immigration authorities.
In the past, refugees seeking asylum in the U.S. have been required to prove to officials that they have a credible fear of returning to their home country due to political unrest, violence, or persecution. After doing so most asylum seekers have been released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody while they await an immigration hearing, unless they are considered a "flight risk" or a danger to the public.
The ACLU targeted five ICE offices across the country which had blatantly flouted this precedent.
\u201cIn March we filed a lawsuit with @CGRShastings, @humanrights1st, and @CovingtonLLP, targeting five ICE field offices that have almost entirely stopped granting parole since early 2017.\n\nMore than 1,000 asylum seekers have been denied parole in these districts alone.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
\u201cAll of our plaintiffs passed credible fear screenings \u2014 meaning a US asylum officer determined their fear of persecution is credible, and that they have a significant possibility of receiving full asylum.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
\u201cOur client, Ansly, an ethics teacher from Haiti, fled violent, political persecution. He has been granted asylum by a judge TWICE, but the government has appealed each time.\n\n@ICEgov has not let him outside for more than a year. \nhttps://t.co/9wV54P0154\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
"We had a clear record, as the court noted, showing that in these five ICE field offices there really was a very clear pattern in what previously resulted in release of asylum seekers at a rate of 90 percent based on individualized consideration really dwindled down to near zero," Cecillia Wang, the ACLU's deputy legal director, toldNPR.
"This opinion does no more than hold the government accountable to its own policy, which recently has been honored more in the breach than the observance," wrote U.S. District Judge James Boasberg. "Having extended the safeguards of the parole directive to asylum seekers, ICE must now ensure that such protections are realized."
As Juan Cole wrote earlier this month, the Trump administration's indefinite detention of people exercising their legal right to seek asylum violated not only U.S. law but also the 1967 Protocol to the United Nations' 1951 Convention on the Treatment of Refugees.
Although the administration, Cole wrote, "keeps maintaining in public that refugees will have their applications for asylum processed if they present them at a regular border crossing, the evidence is that such applications are being summarily dismissed by immigration officials, who are not permitting asylum seekers access to counsel or judges (this procedure is illegal). As for his policy of arresting undocumented immigrants into the United States for the misdemeanor of crossing the border even where they are asylum seekers from political persecution, this is a violation of international and of U.S. domestic law."
The youth-led immigrant rights group United We Dream celebrated the ACLU's victory while noting that the Trump administration's continued abuse of immigrants must end entirely.
\u201cBREAKING: A Federal court blocks "arbitrary detention" of asylum seekers. Asylum seekers can now be granted "humanitarian parole," as long as they meet "stringent requirements."\n\nA huge win, but not the solution. We must have #FreedomForImmigrants! https://t.co/4Q0TABkEGt\u201d— United We Dream (@United We Dream) 1530570076
Immigrant rights advocates on Tuesday applauded a federal judge's ruling that the Trump administration cannot detain asylum seekers who are awaiting immigration hearings--a practice that breaks the government's own policies as well as international law.
\u201cToday\u2019s ruling means the Trump administration cannot use indefinite detention as a weapon to punish and deter asylum seekers.\n\nIt is a rejection of the blanket policy of locking up those seeking protection in this country.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
The ACLU filed a lawsuit earlier this year on behalf of a number of asylum seekers who had been denied parole after passing a "credible fear" interview with immigration authorities.
In the past, refugees seeking asylum in the U.S. have been required to prove to officials that they have a credible fear of returning to their home country due to political unrest, violence, or persecution. After doing so most asylum seekers have been released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody while they await an immigration hearing, unless they are considered a "flight risk" or a danger to the public.
The ACLU targeted five ICE offices across the country which had blatantly flouted this precedent.
\u201cIn March we filed a lawsuit with @CGRShastings, @humanrights1st, and @CovingtonLLP, targeting five ICE field offices that have almost entirely stopped granting parole since early 2017.\n\nMore than 1,000 asylum seekers have been denied parole in these districts alone.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
\u201cAll of our plaintiffs passed credible fear screenings \u2014 meaning a US asylum officer determined their fear of persecution is credible, and that they have a significant possibility of receiving full asylum.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
\u201cOur client, Ansly, an ethics teacher from Haiti, fled violent, political persecution. He has been granted asylum by a judge TWICE, but the government has appealed each time.\n\n@ICEgov has not let him outside for more than a year. \nhttps://t.co/9wV54P0154\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1530565626
"We had a clear record, as the court noted, showing that in these five ICE field offices there really was a very clear pattern in what previously resulted in release of asylum seekers at a rate of 90 percent based on individualized consideration really dwindled down to near zero," Cecillia Wang, the ACLU's deputy legal director, toldNPR.
"This opinion does no more than hold the government accountable to its own policy, which recently has been honored more in the breach than the observance," wrote U.S. District Judge James Boasberg. "Having extended the safeguards of the parole directive to asylum seekers, ICE must now ensure that such protections are realized."
As Juan Cole wrote earlier this month, the Trump administration's indefinite detention of people exercising their legal right to seek asylum violated not only U.S. law but also the 1967 Protocol to the United Nations' 1951 Convention on the Treatment of Refugees.
Although the administration, Cole wrote, "keeps maintaining in public that refugees will have their applications for asylum processed if they present them at a regular border crossing, the evidence is that such applications are being summarily dismissed by immigration officials, who are not permitting asylum seekers access to counsel or judges (this procedure is illegal). As for his policy of arresting undocumented immigrants into the United States for the misdemeanor of crossing the border even where they are asylum seekers from political persecution, this is a violation of international and of U.S. domestic law."
The youth-led immigrant rights group United We Dream celebrated the ACLU's victory while noting that the Trump administration's continued abuse of immigrants must end entirely.
\u201cBREAKING: A Federal court blocks "arbitrary detention" of asylum seekers. Asylum seekers can now be granted "humanitarian parole," as long as they meet "stringent requirements."\n\nA huge win, but not the solution. We must have #FreedomForImmigrants! https://t.co/4Q0TABkEGt\u201d— United We Dream (@United We Dream) 1530570076
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.