SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
NOAA ship Miller Freeman was the premier fisheries research trawler for the U.S. Pacific Northwest and Alaska for many years. (Photo: Public Domain)
'Unconscionable' and 'Shocking': Trump's Head of NOAA Proposes Axing 'Climate' and Conservation From Agency's Mission
"Redefining NOAA's mission is a serious threat to the breadth of science, services, and stewardship that NOAA provides," one scientist responded
Jun 25, 2018
The Trump-appointed acting director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration--which plays a key role in monitoring the global climate crisis--has reportedly proposed stripping "conservation" and "climate" from NOAA's mission statement, which scientists say "would undermine the agency's vital work on behalf of the American people."
During a recent Department of Commerce meeting, Rear Admiral Timothy Gallaudet--President Donald Trump selected him for NOAA's number two spot, but he is leading the agency while the controversial pick for director is tied up in the Senate--reportedly gave a presentation in which he proposed notable alterations to NOAA's mission statement.
The agency's current mission statement (emphasis added):
- To understand and predict changes in climate, weather, oceans, and coasts;
- To share that knowledge and information with others; and
- To conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems and resources.
Gallaudet's proposal:
- To observe, understand, and predict atmospheric and ocean conditions;
- To share that knowledge and information with others; and
- To protect lives and property, empower the economy, and support homeland and national security.
The suggested cuts seem to align with the Trump administration's broader war on science, and could signal a significant shift in the future endeavors at an agency which, as the New York Times noted, "because of its work on climate science data collection and analysis... has become one of the most important American agencies for making sense of the warming planet."
Given NOAA's notable contributions to climate research, the proposal was met with swift condemnation by the scientific community. Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists--and a former NOAA scientist and senior executive--called it "shocking" and "foolhardy."
"Understanding the changing climate is becoming more critical by the day, as the effects of global warming mount, and it's essential to protecting our economy and security," Rosenberg said. "NOAA is continuously working to improve forecasts of extreme events, which are intensifying in a warming world. As we know from last year's wildfires and hurricanes, these kind of forecasts are critical for protecting American lives and infrastructure."
"Removing 'conservation' from its mission statement is equally alarming. We have made outstanding progress in ocean conservation, from fisheries to whales and other endangered species over the past few decades," he added. "NOAA's revised mission seems to be all about deregulation, which could have a big impact on fish stocks."
Gallaudet's "misguided and harmful" proposal, Rosenberg concluded, "is another unconscionable action taken by the administration under the guise of national security."
Other critics turned to Twitter to sound alarms:
If the revised mission takes effect, NOAA won't be the first federal agency to alter its publicly declared purpose under Trump. Earlier this year, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) came under fire for cutting "nation of immigrants" from it mission while the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has abandoned its founding purpose--to protect consumer from corporate predators.
In March, it was reported that Secretary Ben Carson was planning to replace an anti-discrimination promise in the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) mission statement to language that emphasizes "self-sufficiency," but the change has not been made on the agency website and Carson has reportedly asked staff to submit alternative suggestions.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Trump-appointed acting director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration--which plays a key role in monitoring the global climate crisis--has reportedly proposed stripping "conservation" and "climate" from NOAA's mission statement, which scientists say "would undermine the agency's vital work on behalf of the American people."
During a recent Department of Commerce meeting, Rear Admiral Timothy Gallaudet--President Donald Trump selected him for NOAA's number two spot, but he is leading the agency while the controversial pick for director is tied up in the Senate--reportedly gave a presentation in which he proposed notable alterations to NOAA's mission statement.
The agency's current mission statement (emphasis added):
- To understand and predict changes in climate, weather, oceans, and coasts;
- To share that knowledge and information with others; and
- To conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems and resources.
Gallaudet's proposal:
- To observe, understand, and predict atmospheric and ocean conditions;
- To share that knowledge and information with others; and
- To protect lives and property, empower the economy, and support homeland and national security.
The suggested cuts seem to align with the Trump administration's broader war on science, and could signal a significant shift in the future endeavors at an agency which, as the New York Times noted, "because of its work on climate science data collection and analysis... has become one of the most important American agencies for making sense of the warming planet."
Given NOAA's notable contributions to climate research, the proposal was met with swift condemnation by the scientific community. Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists--and a former NOAA scientist and senior executive--called it "shocking" and "foolhardy."
"Understanding the changing climate is becoming more critical by the day, as the effects of global warming mount, and it's essential to protecting our economy and security," Rosenberg said. "NOAA is continuously working to improve forecasts of extreme events, which are intensifying in a warming world. As we know from last year's wildfires and hurricanes, these kind of forecasts are critical for protecting American lives and infrastructure."
"Removing 'conservation' from its mission statement is equally alarming. We have made outstanding progress in ocean conservation, from fisheries to whales and other endangered species over the past few decades," he added. "NOAA's revised mission seems to be all about deregulation, which could have a big impact on fish stocks."
Gallaudet's "misguided and harmful" proposal, Rosenberg concluded, "is another unconscionable action taken by the administration under the guise of national security."
Other critics turned to Twitter to sound alarms:
If the revised mission takes effect, NOAA won't be the first federal agency to alter its publicly declared purpose under Trump. Earlier this year, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) came under fire for cutting "nation of immigrants" from it mission while the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has abandoned its founding purpose--to protect consumer from corporate predators.
In March, it was reported that Secretary Ben Carson was planning to replace an anti-discrimination promise in the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) mission statement to language that emphasizes "self-sufficiency," but the change has not been made on the agency website and Carson has reportedly asked staff to submit alternative suggestions.
The Trump-appointed acting director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration--which plays a key role in monitoring the global climate crisis--has reportedly proposed stripping "conservation" and "climate" from NOAA's mission statement, which scientists say "would undermine the agency's vital work on behalf of the American people."
During a recent Department of Commerce meeting, Rear Admiral Timothy Gallaudet--President Donald Trump selected him for NOAA's number two spot, but he is leading the agency while the controversial pick for director is tied up in the Senate--reportedly gave a presentation in which he proposed notable alterations to NOAA's mission statement.
The agency's current mission statement (emphasis added):
- To understand and predict changes in climate, weather, oceans, and coasts;
- To share that knowledge and information with others; and
- To conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems and resources.
Gallaudet's proposal:
- To observe, understand, and predict atmospheric and ocean conditions;
- To share that knowledge and information with others; and
- To protect lives and property, empower the economy, and support homeland and national security.
The suggested cuts seem to align with the Trump administration's broader war on science, and could signal a significant shift in the future endeavors at an agency which, as the New York Times noted, "because of its work on climate science data collection and analysis... has become one of the most important American agencies for making sense of the warming planet."
Given NOAA's notable contributions to climate research, the proposal was met with swift condemnation by the scientific community. Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists--and a former NOAA scientist and senior executive--called it "shocking" and "foolhardy."
"Understanding the changing climate is becoming more critical by the day, as the effects of global warming mount, and it's essential to protecting our economy and security," Rosenberg said. "NOAA is continuously working to improve forecasts of extreme events, which are intensifying in a warming world. As we know from last year's wildfires and hurricanes, these kind of forecasts are critical for protecting American lives and infrastructure."
"Removing 'conservation' from its mission statement is equally alarming. We have made outstanding progress in ocean conservation, from fisheries to whales and other endangered species over the past few decades," he added. "NOAA's revised mission seems to be all about deregulation, which could have a big impact on fish stocks."
Gallaudet's "misguided and harmful" proposal, Rosenberg concluded, "is another unconscionable action taken by the administration under the guise of national security."
Other critics turned to Twitter to sound alarms:
If the revised mission takes effect, NOAA won't be the first federal agency to alter its publicly declared purpose under Trump. Earlier this year, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) came under fire for cutting "nation of immigrants" from it mission while the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has abandoned its founding purpose--to protect consumer from corporate predators.
In March, it was reported that Secretary Ben Carson was planning to replace an anti-discrimination promise in the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) mission statement to language that emphasizes "self-sufficiency," but the change has not been made on the agency website and Carson has reportedly asked staff to submit alternative suggestions.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.