SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In a "horrifying" development that international aid groups and independent critics warn could worsen what is already the world's most devastating humanitarian crisis, the Trump administration is reportedly considering a plan to greatly expand the U.S. military's role in Yemen in an effort to help Saudi-backed forces seize the country's main humanitarian aid port.
"The U.S. is weighing a more direct role in a military operation that will push Yemen's famine into overdrive."
--Alex Emmons, The Intercept
According to the Wall Street Journal--which first reported the details of the plan on Sunday--the Trump White House "is weighing an appeal from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for direct U.S. support" for Saudi-forces that are closing in on the port city of Hodeidah, where nearly 80 percent of all humanitarian aid and food arrives. Hodeidah is currently controlled by Houthi rebels.
"Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has asked for a quick assessment of the UAE's plea for assistance such as surveillance drone flights to help a Saudi-led coalition retake Hodeidah," the Journal noted.
"The push for Hodeidah is likely to exacerbate an already catastrophic security situation in Yemen," Francois Moreillon, head of the International Committee of the Red Cross delegation in Yemen, told the Journal in response to the White House's reported plan.
Amid reports that Saudi-backed forces are now just miles away from Hodeidah after taking over a nearby town, Norway Refugee Council chief Jan Egeland additionally warned that an attack on the port city "would destroy the lifeline to millions."
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.)--one of the few lawmakers from either side of the aisle to speak out forcefully against U.S. complicity in the Saudi-led assault on Yemen--ridiculed the Trump administration's apparent consideration of a plan that could further devastate a nation in which millions are already on the brink of famine.
\u201cTrump Foreign Policy 101:\n\nU.S.: \u201cSaudis, don\u2019t invade Hodeidah. Terrible idea. Tons of civilians will die.\u201d\n\nSaudis: \u201cWe\u2019re doing it.\u201d\n\nU.S.: \u201cPlease don\u2019t. Could be catastrophic.\u201d\n\nSaudis: \u201cWe\u2019re doing it anyway.\u201d\n\nU.S.: \u201cYea? Ok. Maybe we\u2019ll help.\u201d https://t.co/wlX3US2GUs\u201d— Chris Murphy (@Chris Murphy) 1528084183
While the plan for a larger U.S. military role in Yemen has not been finalized, the Journal reports that some U.S. officials are eager to provide further military assistance to Saudi-led forces in Yemen.
"We have folks who are frustrated and ready to say: 'Let's do this. We've been flirting with this for a long time," an anonymous Trump administration official told the Journal. "Something needs to change the dynamic, and if we help the Emiratis do it better, this could be good."
The possibility of deeper U.S. involvement in Yemen comes just weeks after the New York Times revealed that U.S. special forces have been helping train Saudi soldiers along the Yemeni border--a secret operation that was not publicly debated or approved by Congress.
"I have strong concerns that the Trump administration is getting the U.S. more involved in a war in Yemen without congressional authorization," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) warned in response to the Times report. "We must prevent the U.S. from getting dragged into another never-ending war."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a "horrifying" development that international aid groups and independent critics warn could worsen what is already the world's most devastating humanitarian crisis, the Trump administration is reportedly considering a plan to greatly expand the U.S. military's role in Yemen in an effort to help Saudi-backed forces seize the country's main humanitarian aid port.
"The U.S. is weighing a more direct role in a military operation that will push Yemen's famine into overdrive."
--Alex Emmons, The Intercept
According to the Wall Street Journal--which first reported the details of the plan on Sunday--the Trump White House "is weighing an appeal from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for direct U.S. support" for Saudi-forces that are closing in on the port city of Hodeidah, where nearly 80 percent of all humanitarian aid and food arrives. Hodeidah is currently controlled by Houthi rebels.
"Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has asked for a quick assessment of the UAE's plea for assistance such as surveillance drone flights to help a Saudi-led coalition retake Hodeidah," the Journal noted.
"The push for Hodeidah is likely to exacerbate an already catastrophic security situation in Yemen," Francois Moreillon, head of the International Committee of the Red Cross delegation in Yemen, told the Journal in response to the White House's reported plan.
Amid reports that Saudi-backed forces are now just miles away from Hodeidah after taking over a nearby town, Norway Refugee Council chief Jan Egeland additionally warned that an attack on the port city "would destroy the lifeline to millions."
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.)--one of the few lawmakers from either side of the aisle to speak out forcefully against U.S. complicity in the Saudi-led assault on Yemen--ridiculed the Trump administration's apparent consideration of a plan that could further devastate a nation in which millions are already on the brink of famine.
\u201cTrump Foreign Policy 101:\n\nU.S.: \u201cSaudis, don\u2019t invade Hodeidah. Terrible idea. Tons of civilians will die.\u201d\n\nSaudis: \u201cWe\u2019re doing it.\u201d\n\nU.S.: \u201cPlease don\u2019t. Could be catastrophic.\u201d\n\nSaudis: \u201cWe\u2019re doing it anyway.\u201d\n\nU.S.: \u201cYea? Ok. Maybe we\u2019ll help.\u201d https://t.co/wlX3US2GUs\u201d— Chris Murphy (@Chris Murphy) 1528084183
While the plan for a larger U.S. military role in Yemen has not been finalized, the Journal reports that some U.S. officials are eager to provide further military assistance to Saudi-led forces in Yemen.
"We have folks who are frustrated and ready to say: 'Let's do this. We've been flirting with this for a long time," an anonymous Trump administration official told the Journal. "Something needs to change the dynamic, and if we help the Emiratis do it better, this could be good."
The possibility of deeper U.S. involvement in Yemen comes just weeks after the New York Times revealed that U.S. special forces have been helping train Saudi soldiers along the Yemeni border--a secret operation that was not publicly debated or approved by Congress.
"I have strong concerns that the Trump administration is getting the U.S. more involved in a war in Yemen without congressional authorization," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) warned in response to the Times report. "We must prevent the U.S. from getting dragged into another never-ending war."
In a "horrifying" development that international aid groups and independent critics warn could worsen what is already the world's most devastating humanitarian crisis, the Trump administration is reportedly considering a plan to greatly expand the U.S. military's role in Yemen in an effort to help Saudi-backed forces seize the country's main humanitarian aid port.
"The U.S. is weighing a more direct role in a military operation that will push Yemen's famine into overdrive."
--Alex Emmons, The Intercept
According to the Wall Street Journal--which first reported the details of the plan on Sunday--the Trump White House "is weighing an appeal from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for direct U.S. support" for Saudi-forces that are closing in on the port city of Hodeidah, where nearly 80 percent of all humanitarian aid and food arrives. Hodeidah is currently controlled by Houthi rebels.
"Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has asked for a quick assessment of the UAE's plea for assistance such as surveillance drone flights to help a Saudi-led coalition retake Hodeidah," the Journal noted.
"The push for Hodeidah is likely to exacerbate an already catastrophic security situation in Yemen," Francois Moreillon, head of the International Committee of the Red Cross delegation in Yemen, told the Journal in response to the White House's reported plan.
Amid reports that Saudi-backed forces are now just miles away from Hodeidah after taking over a nearby town, Norway Refugee Council chief Jan Egeland additionally warned that an attack on the port city "would destroy the lifeline to millions."
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.)--one of the few lawmakers from either side of the aisle to speak out forcefully against U.S. complicity in the Saudi-led assault on Yemen--ridiculed the Trump administration's apparent consideration of a plan that could further devastate a nation in which millions are already on the brink of famine.
\u201cTrump Foreign Policy 101:\n\nU.S.: \u201cSaudis, don\u2019t invade Hodeidah. Terrible idea. Tons of civilians will die.\u201d\n\nSaudis: \u201cWe\u2019re doing it.\u201d\n\nU.S.: \u201cPlease don\u2019t. Could be catastrophic.\u201d\n\nSaudis: \u201cWe\u2019re doing it anyway.\u201d\n\nU.S.: \u201cYea? Ok. Maybe we\u2019ll help.\u201d https://t.co/wlX3US2GUs\u201d— Chris Murphy (@Chris Murphy) 1528084183
While the plan for a larger U.S. military role in Yemen has not been finalized, the Journal reports that some U.S. officials are eager to provide further military assistance to Saudi-led forces in Yemen.
"We have folks who are frustrated and ready to say: 'Let's do this. We've been flirting with this for a long time," an anonymous Trump administration official told the Journal. "Something needs to change the dynamic, and if we help the Emiratis do it better, this could be good."
The possibility of deeper U.S. involvement in Yemen comes just weeks after the New York Times revealed that U.S. special forces have been helping train Saudi soldiers along the Yemeni border--a secret operation that was not publicly debated or approved by Congress.
"I have strong concerns that the Trump administration is getting the U.S. more involved in a war in Yemen without congressional authorization," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) warned in response to the Times report. "We must prevent the U.S. from getting dragged into another never-ending war."