Apr 19, 2018
Flouting urgent demands by anti-war groups, environmentalists, and LGBTQ rights organizations to reject Mike Pompeo over his lengthy record of warmongering and bigotry, Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) on Thursday became the first Democrat to declare her support for President Donald Trump's secretary of state pick.
The announcement virtually ensures that Pompeo will become America's top diplomat--as he likely only needs one Democratic vote to make it through the Senate--and immediately drew criticism from progressives who have been pressuring Democrats to block his confirmation.
"Democrats like Heitkamp think that voting for Trump picks will give them cred as far as winning over Trump voters. It won't. It will gain you no political capital."
--Ethan Grey
"This is a vote she will not be proud of when she looks back on her career," Stephen Miles, director of Win Without War, told Common Dreams in response to Heitkamp's statement in support of Pompeo. "Sen. Heitkamp may want to look past his record of extremism and that he will enable Donald Trump and John Bolton's worst instincts, but history won't."
Thanks to one Republican defection and the likely absence of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Senate Democrats had the power to block Pompeo's nomination. The question in recent days has been whether they would come together and use it.
Heitkamp's support for Pompeo answers this question and all but kills the possibility of a united Democratic coalition. (And there are some indications that other so-called moderate Democrats could follow her lead.)
"Don't send me anymore Heidi Heitkamp fundraising emails," tweeted Lizz Winnstead, progressive activist and co-creator of the Daily Show. "It is disgusting that she would support Pompeo."
\u201cDeeply disappointing to see @SenatorHeitkamp back Pompeo in spite of his hostility to diplomacy, preference for bombing Iran & history of being a 'yes man' to Trump: https://t.co/7fueudqpu7\u201d— NIAC Action PAC (@NIAC Action PAC) 1524172004
Other critics were quick to mock any possible political calculus behind Heitkamp's decision to back Pompeo, arguing that a 'yes' vote won't help her standing among Trump voters in her upcoming reelection bid or stop Republicans from attacking her.
\u201c@SenatorHeitkamp Let's be clear - supporting Pompeo is not going to insulate you from a full court press from the GOP next fall. If anything, your uphill battle just got steeper.\u201d— Meaghan Shawcross (@Meaghan Shawcross) 1524171658
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Flouting urgent demands by anti-war groups, environmentalists, and LGBTQ rights organizations to reject Mike Pompeo over his lengthy record of warmongering and bigotry, Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) on Thursday became the first Democrat to declare her support for President Donald Trump's secretary of state pick.
The announcement virtually ensures that Pompeo will become America's top diplomat--as he likely only needs one Democratic vote to make it through the Senate--and immediately drew criticism from progressives who have been pressuring Democrats to block his confirmation.
"Democrats like Heitkamp think that voting for Trump picks will give them cred as far as winning over Trump voters. It won't. It will gain you no political capital."
--Ethan Grey
"This is a vote she will not be proud of when she looks back on her career," Stephen Miles, director of Win Without War, told Common Dreams in response to Heitkamp's statement in support of Pompeo. "Sen. Heitkamp may want to look past his record of extremism and that he will enable Donald Trump and John Bolton's worst instincts, but history won't."
Thanks to one Republican defection and the likely absence of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Senate Democrats had the power to block Pompeo's nomination. The question in recent days has been whether they would come together and use it.
Heitkamp's support for Pompeo answers this question and all but kills the possibility of a united Democratic coalition. (And there are some indications that other so-called moderate Democrats could follow her lead.)
"Don't send me anymore Heidi Heitkamp fundraising emails," tweeted Lizz Winnstead, progressive activist and co-creator of the Daily Show. "It is disgusting that she would support Pompeo."
\u201cDeeply disappointing to see @SenatorHeitkamp back Pompeo in spite of his hostility to diplomacy, preference for bombing Iran & history of being a 'yes man' to Trump: https://t.co/7fueudqpu7\u201d— NIAC Action PAC (@NIAC Action PAC) 1524172004
Other critics were quick to mock any possible political calculus behind Heitkamp's decision to back Pompeo, arguing that a 'yes' vote won't help her standing among Trump voters in her upcoming reelection bid or stop Republicans from attacking her.
\u201c@SenatorHeitkamp Let's be clear - supporting Pompeo is not going to insulate you from a full court press from the GOP next fall. If anything, your uphill battle just got steeper.\u201d— Meaghan Shawcross (@Meaghan Shawcross) 1524171658
Flouting urgent demands by anti-war groups, environmentalists, and LGBTQ rights organizations to reject Mike Pompeo over his lengthy record of warmongering and bigotry, Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) on Thursday became the first Democrat to declare her support for President Donald Trump's secretary of state pick.
The announcement virtually ensures that Pompeo will become America's top diplomat--as he likely only needs one Democratic vote to make it through the Senate--and immediately drew criticism from progressives who have been pressuring Democrats to block his confirmation.
"Democrats like Heitkamp think that voting for Trump picks will give them cred as far as winning over Trump voters. It won't. It will gain you no political capital."
--Ethan Grey
"This is a vote she will not be proud of when she looks back on her career," Stephen Miles, director of Win Without War, told Common Dreams in response to Heitkamp's statement in support of Pompeo. "Sen. Heitkamp may want to look past his record of extremism and that he will enable Donald Trump and John Bolton's worst instincts, but history won't."
Thanks to one Republican defection and the likely absence of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Senate Democrats had the power to block Pompeo's nomination. The question in recent days has been whether they would come together and use it.
Heitkamp's support for Pompeo answers this question and all but kills the possibility of a united Democratic coalition. (And there are some indications that other so-called moderate Democrats could follow her lead.)
"Don't send me anymore Heidi Heitkamp fundraising emails," tweeted Lizz Winnstead, progressive activist and co-creator of the Daily Show. "It is disgusting that she would support Pompeo."
\u201cDeeply disappointing to see @SenatorHeitkamp back Pompeo in spite of his hostility to diplomacy, preference for bombing Iran & history of being a 'yes man' to Trump: https://t.co/7fueudqpu7\u201d— NIAC Action PAC (@NIAC Action PAC) 1524172004
Other critics were quick to mock any possible political calculus behind Heitkamp's decision to back Pompeo, arguing that a 'yes' vote won't help her standing among Trump voters in her upcoming reelection bid or stop Republicans from attacking her.
\u201c@SenatorHeitkamp Let's be clear - supporting Pompeo is not going to insulate you from a full court press from the GOP next fall. If anything, your uphill battle just got steeper.\u201d— Meaghan Shawcross (@Meaghan Shawcross) 1524171658
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.