"Medicaid work requirements will almost certainly cause many low-income adults to lose health coverage," the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities finds. (Photo: Stephen Melkisethian/flickr/cc)
New Analyses Suggest Trump Admin Really Just Wants to Push Millions of Medicaid Recipients Off Care
One study found that work requirements could impact about half of the 10 states' Medicaid population
Recent analyses bolster the case that attacks on Medicaid via work requirements--encouraged and permitted by the Trump administration--threaten the access to care and therefore health of millions of Americans.
Ten states have so far requested approval from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to impose work or "community engagement" requirements on Medicaid beneficiaries. Three of them--Kentucky, Indiana, and Arkansas--have already received White House approval, while the other seven--Arizona, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah, and Wisconsin--are waiting for the same.
Looking just at those 10 states, PwC's Health Research Institute found that the requirements will impact 1.7 million Medicaid recipients. That equals about half--46 percent--of the entire Medicaid populations in those states.
PwC notes that the requirements could lead to "a steady increase in uninsured patients." The analysis adds: "Many of the states requesting waivers also have rural hospital systems heavily dependent on Medicaid, struggling with low margins. Some states, such as Kentucky, have counties with rates of unemployment higher than the national average, which could make finding consistent work challenging."
Kentucky, however, was the first state to get the CMS seal of approval.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) put it simply: "Medicaid work requirements will almost certainly cause many low-income adults to lose health coverage."
But as CBPP's analysis from last week highlights, it's not just Medicaid beneficiaries who aren't working that are at risk form the new requirements but those who are, in fact, working.
Less understood, many working people also will likely lose coverage due to work requirements. Most non-elderly adult Medicaid enrollees work, but in low-wage jobs that generally do not offer health insurance and are often unstable, with frequent job losses and work hours that can fluctuate sharply from month to month. As a result, our analysis finds that 46 percent of low-income workers who could be affected by Medicaid work requirements would be at risk of losing coverage for one or more months under a work requirement policy like Kentucky's. Even among people working 1,000 hours over the course of the year--about 80 hours per month, meeting Kentucky's standard on average--1 in 4 (25 percent) would be at risk of losing coverage for one or more months because they would not meet the 80-hour requirement in every month.
"These estimates suggest that, if all states adopted work requirements along the lines of Kentucky's, millions of working people could lose coverage or face interruptions in coverage due to unstable employment or hours In addition, some enrollees who are actually meeting Medicaid work requirements will likely lose coverage because they get tripped up by the paperwork required to prove it," the analysis added.
Over 150 organizations recently expressed their opposition to the requirements and outlined their concerns in a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar.
Gabrielle de la Gueronniere, director of policy at the Legal Action Center, which helped draft the letter, said, "CMS's new policy cruelly punishes and stigmatizes low-income people--depriving them of the life-saving care that many need to become and remain healthy."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Recent analyses bolster the case that attacks on Medicaid via work requirements--encouraged and permitted by the Trump administration--threaten the access to care and therefore health of millions of Americans.
Ten states have so far requested approval from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to impose work or "community engagement" requirements on Medicaid beneficiaries. Three of them--Kentucky, Indiana, and Arkansas--have already received White House approval, while the other seven--Arizona, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah, and Wisconsin--are waiting for the same.
Looking just at those 10 states, PwC's Health Research Institute found that the requirements will impact 1.7 million Medicaid recipients. That equals about half--46 percent--of the entire Medicaid populations in those states.
PwC notes that the requirements could lead to "a steady increase in uninsured patients." The analysis adds: "Many of the states requesting waivers also have rural hospital systems heavily dependent on Medicaid, struggling with low margins. Some states, such as Kentucky, have counties with rates of unemployment higher than the national average, which could make finding consistent work challenging."
Kentucky, however, was the first state to get the CMS seal of approval.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) put it simply: "Medicaid work requirements will almost certainly cause many low-income adults to lose health coverage."
But as CBPP's analysis from last week highlights, it's not just Medicaid beneficiaries who aren't working that are at risk form the new requirements but those who are, in fact, working.
Less understood, many working people also will likely lose coverage due to work requirements. Most non-elderly adult Medicaid enrollees work, but in low-wage jobs that generally do not offer health insurance and are often unstable, with frequent job losses and work hours that can fluctuate sharply from month to month. As a result, our analysis finds that 46 percent of low-income workers who could be affected by Medicaid work requirements would be at risk of losing coverage for one or more months under a work requirement policy like Kentucky's. Even among people working 1,000 hours over the course of the year--about 80 hours per month, meeting Kentucky's standard on average--1 in 4 (25 percent) would be at risk of losing coverage for one or more months because they would not meet the 80-hour requirement in every month.
"These estimates suggest that, if all states adopted work requirements along the lines of Kentucky's, millions of working people could lose coverage or face interruptions in coverage due to unstable employment or hours In addition, some enrollees who are actually meeting Medicaid work requirements will likely lose coverage because they get tripped up by the paperwork required to prove it," the analysis added.
Over 150 organizations recently expressed their opposition to the requirements and outlined their concerns in a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar.
Gabrielle de la Gueronniere, director of policy at the Legal Action Center, which helped draft the letter, said, "CMS's new policy cruelly punishes and stigmatizes low-income people--depriving them of the life-saving care that many need to become and remain healthy."
Recent analyses bolster the case that attacks on Medicaid via work requirements--encouraged and permitted by the Trump administration--threaten the access to care and therefore health of millions of Americans.
Ten states have so far requested approval from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to impose work or "community engagement" requirements on Medicaid beneficiaries. Three of them--Kentucky, Indiana, and Arkansas--have already received White House approval, while the other seven--Arizona, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah, and Wisconsin--are waiting for the same.
Looking just at those 10 states, PwC's Health Research Institute found that the requirements will impact 1.7 million Medicaid recipients. That equals about half--46 percent--of the entire Medicaid populations in those states.
PwC notes that the requirements could lead to "a steady increase in uninsured patients." The analysis adds: "Many of the states requesting waivers also have rural hospital systems heavily dependent on Medicaid, struggling with low margins. Some states, such as Kentucky, have counties with rates of unemployment higher than the national average, which could make finding consistent work challenging."
Kentucky, however, was the first state to get the CMS seal of approval.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) put it simply: "Medicaid work requirements will almost certainly cause many low-income adults to lose health coverage."
But as CBPP's analysis from last week highlights, it's not just Medicaid beneficiaries who aren't working that are at risk form the new requirements but those who are, in fact, working.
Less understood, many working people also will likely lose coverage due to work requirements. Most non-elderly adult Medicaid enrollees work, but in low-wage jobs that generally do not offer health insurance and are often unstable, with frequent job losses and work hours that can fluctuate sharply from month to month. As a result, our analysis finds that 46 percent of low-income workers who could be affected by Medicaid work requirements would be at risk of losing coverage for one or more months under a work requirement policy like Kentucky's. Even among people working 1,000 hours over the course of the year--about 80 hours per month, meeting Kentucky's standard on average--1 in 4 (25 percent) would be at risk of losing coverage for one or more months because they would not meet the 80-hour requirement in every month.
"These estimates suggest that, if all states adopted work requirements along the lines of Kentucky's, millions of working people could lose coverage or face interruptions in coverage due to unstable employment or hours In addition, some enrollees who are actually meeting Medicaid work requirements will likely lose coverage because they get tripped up by the paperwork required to prove it," the analysis added.
Over 150 organizations recently expressed their opposition to the requirements and outlined their concerns in a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar.
Gabrielle de la Gueronniere, director of policy at the Legal Action Center, which helped draft the letter, said, "CMS's new policy cruelly punishes and stigmatizes low-income people--depriving them of the life-saving care that many need to become and remain healthy."