Journalists and civil liberties advocates are cautioning against the derailing of the debate over CIA Director nominee Gina Haspel's history of overseeing torture and her fitness to lead the agency, after ProPublica retracted portions of its reporting on her role in the Bush-era program.
According to critics, the real scandal continues to be Haspel's participation in torture and the subsequent cover-up—not the news outlet's error.
It would probably be much easier for reporters to avoid unintentional errors when reporting on CIA torture if they didn't have to read between the lines of ridiculous government redactions meant to cover up crimes.— Trevor Timm (@trevortimm) March 16, 2018
In February 2017, ProPublica reported on Haspel's career at the CIA during the George W. Bush administration, when she ran a clandestine prison in Thailand, overseeing the waterboarding of detainees and pushed senior officers to destroy evidence of the torture.
The investigative news outlet incorrectly reported that she oversaw the black site when al Qaeda suspect Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded there 83 times, and that she privately mocked the prisoner.
ProPublica corrected those two details on Thursday evening and issued an apology, with editor-in-chief Stephen Engelberg writing, "Neither of these assertions is correct and we retract them. It is now clear that Haspel did not take charge of the base until after the interrogation of Zubaydah ended."
However, Haspel's participation in the CIA's torture program and her history of covering up proof of torture is not disputed, and critics are demanding that her actions disqualify her from leading the agency—and that she be held accountable for torturing detainees.
1. No, it isn’t. 2. Haspel still oversaw torture. 3. She still helped destroy evidence. 4. CIA’s own duplicity & secrecy is to blame here. 5. She should be thankful bc this error got her nominated to be CIA director by Trump. 6. There needs to be a truth & reconciliation project. https://t.co/1QM2ztVyHn— Stuart Schrader (@stschrader1) March 16, 2018
One way to avoid this sort of confusion would have been to expose and prosecute our war criminals https://t.co/HXn57DKOns— Tom Scocca (@tomscocca) March 16, 2018
"Once Abu Zubaydah and [detainee] Nashiri were shipped to their next stop in a series of black sites, Haspel started her multiyear campaign to destroy the videos that showed their torture, which indisputably contradicted written authorizations and records," wrote Marcy Wheeler at the Huffington Post. "Defying the warnings of multiple Democrats, the director of national intelligence, and several judges, Haspel in November 2005, as chief of staff for the director of clandestine services, sent a cable ordering officers to stick the tapes into an industrial-strength shredder."
"America continues to suffer the consequences of those twin acts, the torture and the cover-up," she added.
Meanwhile, NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden denounced the characterization of Haspel by torture supporters including Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy.) as someone who has "spent her career defending the American people" while those who criticize her are "defending terrorists." Cheney also claimed that the CIA's use of torture produced valuable intelligence that saved American lives.
NARRATOR: Actually, the US Senate's reviewed 6,300,000 classified CIA torture files, finding "the CIA's brutal interrogations of terrorism suspects produced no useful intelligence." Torture stopped no attacks, and saved no lives. https://t.co/ggSeAOQ0Kl https://t.co/3q5XCK5NG9— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) March 15, 2018
Listen, you can defend torture, or you can defend the Constitution. Not both. The 8th Amendment explicitly forbids torture with all forms of cruel and unusual punishment. To defend torture is to attack the Constitution.— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) March 15, 2018
At the Washington Post, former CIA counterterrorism officer John Kiriakou, who served 23 months in prison for publicly confirming the existence of the agency's torture program in 2007, wrote about the message Haspel's promotion to CIA Director would send to Americans and the international community.
"Trump's move hurts morale among CIA officers who recognize that torture is wrong. It comforts people at the agency who still believe 'enhanced interrogation' is somehow acceptable," Kiriakou wrote. "And the message it sends to our friends and allies (and the countries we criticize in the State Department's annual human rights reports) is this: We say we're a shining city on a hill, a beacon of respect for human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law. But actually, that's nonsense...when push comes to shove, we do what we want, international law be damned."