SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Gladys Francisco stands in front of her destroyed home after U.S. soldiers unloaded food and water, provided by FEMA, to residents in the neighborhood still without grid electricity or running water on Oct. 17, 2017 in San Isidro, Puerto Rico. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Despite Unprecedented Year of Extreme Weather, FEMA Ditches Every Single Mention of 'Climate' From Four-Year Strategic Plan
"The new document doesn't mention climate, global warming, sea-level rise, extreme weather, or any other terminology associated with scientific predictions of rising surface temperatures and their effects."
Mar 16, 2018
While 2017 was the costliest year ever for destruction from extreme weather events--and even as much of Puerto Rico is still struggling with a slow and "dehumanizing" recovery nearly six months after Hurricane Maria--a look at the new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) four-year strategic plan reveals there is not a single mention of "climate change" or "global warming."
The document (pdf), as Bloomberg points out, "doesn't mention climate, global warming, sea-level rise, extreme weather, or any other terminology associated with scientific predictions of rising surface temperatures and their effects." With this "dangerous" decision, FEMA's 2018-2022 strategy departs from the version developed under the Obama adminitration, which "repeatedly cited the challenges caused by a changing climate, and the need for FEMA to incorporate those risks into its long-term plans."
The new plan claims that "[l]arge scale, complex incidents, including FEMA's responses to Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria, as well as the 2017-2018 California wildfires, underscore the criticality of our shared mission and remind us of the importance of learning from past disasters" and acknowledges that "[d]isaster costs are expected to continue to increase due to rising natural hazard risk, decaying critical infrastructure, and economic pressures that limit investments in risk resilience."
However, despite the record-breaking costs of natural disasters last year, FEMA's new plan fails to mention the how global warming--largely driven by greenhouse gas emissions generated by fossil fuel use--is fueling the "rising natural hazard risk" and has exacerbated these recent disasters.
Although the exclusion of climate science from the strategy document aligns with actions of other agencies under President Donald Trump, it still provoked swift condemnation and concern:
Rachel Cleetus, lead economist and climate policy manager at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the move "demonstrates the chilling effect the Trump administration's denialism is having on vital work of federal government agencies." Considering that FEMA's responsibilities include helping communities prepare for and respond to events like the series of intense hurricanes that struck the Caribbean and Southern U.S. last year, she added, "muzzling agencies from speaking out about climate change and preventing them from planning for its impacts is a recipe for disaster."
This is far from the first time FEMA has faced a wave of criticism since Trump took office. During the ongoing recovery effort in Puerto Rico, the agency, as Democracy Now! noted last month, "has been hit by a series of scandals, after it was revealed that only a fraction of the 30 million meals slated to be sent to the island after Hurricane Maria was actually delivered."
"FEMA approved a $156 million contract for a one-woman company to deliver the 30 million meals. But in the end, FEMA canceled the contract after she delivered only 50,000 meals, in what FEMA called a logistical nightmare," the news show reported. "This came after FEMA gave more than $30 million in contracts to a newly created Florida company which failed to deliver a single tarp to Puerto Rico."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
While 2017 was the costliest year ever for destruction from extreme weather events--and even as much of Puerto Rico is still struggling with a slow and "dehumanizing" recovery nearly six months after Hurricane Maria--a look at the new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) four-year strategic plan reveals there is not a single mention of "climate change" or "global warming."
The document (pdf), as Bloomberg points out, "doesn't mention climate, global warming, sea-level rise, extreme weather, or any other terminology associated with scientific predictions of rising surface temperatures and their effects." With this "dangerous" decision, FEMA's 2018-2022 strategy departs from the version developed under the Obama adminitration, which "repeatedly cited the challenges caused by a changing climate, and the need for FEMA to incorporate those risks into its long-term plans."
The new plan claims that "[l]arge scale, complex incidents, including FEMA's responses to Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria, as well as the 2017-2018 California wildfires, underscore the criticality of our shared mission and remind us of the importance of learning from past disasters" and acknowledges that "[d]isaster costs are expected to continue to increase due to rising natural hazard risk, decaying critical infrastructure, and economic pressures that limit investments in risk resilience."
However, despite the record-breaking costs of natural disasters last year, FEMA's new plan fails to mention the how global warming--largely driven by greenhouse gas emissions generated by fossil fuel use--is fueling the "rising natural hazard risk" and has exacerbated these recent disasters.
Although the exclusion of climate science from the strategy document aligns with actions of other agencies under President Donald Trump, it still provoked swift condemnation and concern:
Rachel Cleetus, lead economist and climate policy manager at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the move "demonstrates the chilling effect the Trump administration's denialism is having on vital work of federal government agencies." Considering that FEMA's responsibilities include helping communities prepare for and respond to events like the series of intense hurricanes that struck the Caribbean and Southern U.S. last year, she added, "muzzling agencies from speaking out about climate change and preventing them from planning for its impacts is a recipe for disaster."
This is far from the first time FEMA has faced a wave of criticism since Trump took office. During the ongoing recovery effort in Puerto Rico, the agency, as Democracy Now! noted last month, "has been hit by a series of scandals, after it was revealed that only a fraction of the 30 million meals slated to be sent to the island after Hurricane Maria was actually delivered."
"FEMA approved a $156 million contract for a one-woman company to deliver the 30 million meals. But in the end, FEMA canceled the contract after she delivered only 50,000 meals, in what FEMA called a logistical nightmare," the news show reported. "This came after FEMA gave more than $30 million in contracts to a newly created Florida company which failed to deliver a single tarp to Puerto Rico."
While 2017 was the costliest year ever for destruction from extreme weather events--and even as much of Puerto Rico is still struggling with a slow and "dehumanizing" recovery nearly six months after Hurricane Maria--a look at the new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) four-year strategic plan reveals there is not a single mention of "climate change" or "global warming."
The document (pdf), as Bloomberg points out, "doesn't mention climate, global warming, sea-level rise, extreme weather, or any other terminology associated with scientific predictions of rising surface temperatures and their effects." With this "dangerous" decision, FEMA's 2018-2022 strategy departs from the version developed under the Obama adminitration, which "repeatedly cited the challenges caused by a changing climate, and the need for FEMA to incorporate those risks into its long-term plans."
The new plan claims that "[l]arge scale, complex incidents, including FEMA's responses to Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria, as well as the 2017-2018 California wildfires, underscore the criticality of our shared mission and remind us of the importance of learning from past disasters" and acknowledges that "[d]isaster costs are expected to continue to increase due to rising natural hazard risk, decaying critical infrastructure, and economic pressures that limit investments in risk resilience."
However, despite the record-breaking costs of natural disasters last year, FEMA's new plan fails to mention the how global warming--largely driven by greenhouse gas emissions generated by fossil fuel use--is fueling the "rising natural hazard risk" and has exacerbated these recent disasters.
Although the exclusion of climate science from the strategy document aligns with actions of other agencies under President Donald Trump, it still provoked swift condemnation and concern:
Rachel Cleetus, lead economist and climate policy manager at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the move "demonstrates the chilling effect the Trump administration's denialism is having on vital work of federal government agencies." Considering that FEMA's responsibilities include helping communities prepare for and respond to events like the series of intense hurricanes that struck the Caribbean and Southern U.S. last year, she added, "muzzling agencies from speaking out about climate change and preventing them from planning for its impacts is a recipe for disaster."
This is far from the first time FEMA has faced a wave of criticism since Trump took office. During the ongoing recovery effort in Puerto Rico, the agency, as Democracy Now! noted last month, "has been hit by a series of scandals, after it was revealed that only a fraction of the 30 million meals slated to be sent to the island after Hurricane Maria was actually delivered."
"FEMA approved a $156 million contract for a one-woman company to deliver the 30 million meals. But in the end, FEMA canceled the contract after she delivered only 50,000 meals, in what FEMA called a logistical nightmare," the news show reported. "This came after FEMA gave more than $30 million in contracts to a newly created Florida company which failed to deliver a single tarp to Puerto Rico."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.