Feb 02, 2018
After being declassified by President Donald Trump earlier in the day, Republicans in the House of Representatives--led by Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), chair of the Intelligence Committee--followed through with their promise to release a highly controversial memo on Friday.
As a result, Democrats and progressive reacted in a wave of condemnation as they placed the document in historic, political, and legal context.
Here, officially in the public domain, is the 4-page memo (pdf)--a document that Democrats have called "cherry-picked" and "highly misleading" and which the FBI warned was "fundamentally" inaccurate due to "material omissions of fact."
While giving no quarter to the Republicans, but acknowledging the need to be both skeptical and critical of the FBI and intelligence agencies, investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill reacted this way:
\u201cWashington: In one corner, we have despicable partisan rats putting out a skewed propaganda document. On the other, we have political elites fighting to keep their kingdom of secrecy that allows all manner of abuses.\u201d— jeremy scahill (@jeremy scahill) 1517592338
\u201cThe memo doesn't come close to saying what Hannity and company want it to say. It clearly is cherry-picked. It is also laughable, as the Democrats and FBI allege, that this "memo" harms national security. What a shit show of dishonesty across the board.\u201d— jeremy scahill (@jeremy scahill) 1517594005
While Republicans quickly leaked excerpts and details of the memo to right-wing media outlets--including Fox News, the Washington Examiner, and the Daily Caller--other Democrats, progressives, and independent-minded observers wasted no time in shredding the contents of the memo itself and the political brinksmanship by the GOP which led to its creation and release.
Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, led by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), published a detailed takedown of memo released today, which they said "fails to provide vital context and information contained in DOJ's FISA application and renewals [regarding surveillance of Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page], and ignores why and how the FBI initiated, and the Special Counsel has continued, its counterintelligence investigation into Russia's election interference and links to the Trump campaign."
Shortly before it was released, Trump told reporters that the memo--which he personally declassified so Republicans in the House could release it--represents a "disgrace [of] what's going on in this country." The president added that "alot of people should be ashamed of themselves, and worse than that." Watch:
\u201cWATCH: President Trump says memo is 'terrible'\n\n"You want to know the truth, I think it's a disgrace ... A lot of people should be ashamed of themselves"\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1517591154
On Twitter, however, critics unleashed their ire at Republicans--including Trump, Ryan, and Nunes--while offering an array of informed context regarding the memo:
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After being declassified by President Donald Trump earlier in the day, Republicans in the House of Representatives--led by Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), chair of the Intelligence Committee--followed through with their promise to release a highly controversial memo on Friday.
As a result, Democrats and progressive reacted in a wave of condemnation as they placed the document in historic, political, and legal context.
Here, officially in the public domain, is the 4-page memo (pdf)--a document that Democrats have called "cherry-picked" and "highly misleading" and which the FBI warned was "fundamentally" inaccurate due to "material omissions of fact."
While giving no quarter to the Republicans, but acknowledging the need to be both skeptical and critical of the FBI and intelligence agencies, investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill reacted this way:
\u201cWashington: In one corner, we have despicable partisan rats putting out a skewed propaganda document. On the other, we have political elites fighting to keep their kingdom of secrecy that allows all manner of abuses.\u201d— jeremy scahill (@jeremy scahill) 1517592338
\u201cThe memo doesn't come close to saying what Hannity and company want it to say. It clearly is cherry-picked. It is also laughable, as the Democrats and FBI allege, that this "memo" harms national security. What a shit show of dishonesty across the board.\u201d— jeremy scahill (@jeremy scahill) 1517594005
While Republicans quickly leaked excerpts and details of the memo to right-wing media outlets--including Fox News, the Washington Examiner, and the Daily Caller--other Democrats, progressives, and independent-minded observers wasted no time in shredding the contents of the memo itself and the political brinksmanship by the GOP which led to its creation and release.
Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, led by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), published a detailed takedown of memo released today, which they said "fails to provide vital context and information contained in DOJ's FISA application and renewals [regarding surveillance of Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page], and ignores why and how the FBI initiated, and the Special Counsel has continued, its counterintelligence investigation into Russia's election interference and links to the Trump campaign."
Shortly before it was released, Trump told reporters that the memo--which he personally declassified so Republicans in the House could release it--represents a "disgrace [of] what's going on in this country." The president added that "alot of people should be ashamed of themselves, and worse than that." Watch:
\u201cWATCH: President Trump says memo is 'terrible'\n\n"You want to know the truth, I think it's a disgrace ... A lot of people should be ashamed of themselves"\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1517591154
On Twitter, however, critics unleashed their ire at Republicans--including Trump, Ryan, and Nunes--while offering an array of informed context regarding the memo:
After being declassified by President Donald Trump earlier in the day, Republicans in the House of Representatives--led by Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), chair of the Intelligence Committee--followed through with their promise to release a highly controversial memo on Friday.
As a result, Democrats and progressive reacted in a wave of condemnation as they placed the document in historic, political, and legal context.
Here, officially in the public domain, is the 4-page memo (pdf)--a document that Democrats have called "cherry-picked" and "highly misleading" and which the FBI warned was "fundamentally" inaccurate due to "material omissions of fact."
While giving no quarter to the Republicans, but acknowledging the need to be both skeptical and critical of the FBI and intelligence agencies, investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill reacted this way:
\u201cWashington: In one corner, we have despicable partisan rats putting out a skewed propaganda document. On the other, we have political elites fighting to keep their kingdom of secrecy that allows all manner of abuses.\u201d— jeremy scahill (@jeremy scahill) 1517592338
\u201cThe memo doesn't come close to saying what Hannity and company want it to say. It clearly is cherry-picked. It is also laughable, as the Democrats and FBI allege, that this "memo" harms national security. What a shit show of dishonesty across the board.\u201d— jeremy scahill (@jeremy scahill) 1517594005
While Republicans quickly leaked excerpts and details of the memo to right-wing media outlets--including Fox News, the Washington Examiner, and the Daily Caller--other Democrats, progressives, and independent-minded observers wasted no time in shredding the contents of the memo itself and the political brinksmanship by the GOP which led to its creation and release.
Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, led by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), published a detailed takedown of memo released today, which they said "fails to provide vital context and information contained in DOJ's FISA application and renewals [regarding surveillance of Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page], and ignores why and how the FBI initiated, and the Special Counsel has continued, its counterintelligence investigation into Russia's election interference and links to the Trump campaign."
Shortly before it was released, Trump told reporters that the memo--which he personally declassified so Republicans in the House could release it--represents a "disgrace [of] what's going on in this country." The president added that "alot of people should be ashamed of themselves, and worse than that." Watch:
\u201cWATCH: President Trump says memo is 'terrible'\n\n"You want to know the truth, I think it's a disgrace ... A lot of people should be ashamed of themselves"\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1517591154
On Twitter, however, critics unleashed their ire at Republicans--including Trump, Ryan, and Nunes--while offering an array of informed context regarding the memo:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.