The Federal Communication Commission's December decision to roll back net neutrality rules provoked widespread protests. (Photo: Tim Carter/Flickr/cc)
22 States File Suit to 'Stop the FFC's Illegal Rollback of Net Neutrality'
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is leading the effort to protect "an open internet—and the free exchange of ideas it allows," which he says "is critical to our democratic process."
A coalition of 22 state attorneys general came together on Tuesday to keep their promise to file a lawsuit challenging the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) recent move to roll back net neutrality consumer protections.
"The repeal of net neutrality would turn internet service providers into gatekeepers--allowing them to put profits over consumers while controlling what we see, what we do, and what we say online."
--Eric Schneiderman, New York Attorney General
Last month, the FCC--led by industry insider Ajit Pai--voted along party lines to repeal rules that banned internet service providers from charging more for or blocking access to particular content.
Leading this latest effort "to stop the FCC's illegal rollback of net neutrality" is New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who said in a statement, "An open internet--and the free exchange of ideas it allows--is critical to our democratic process."
"The repeal of net neutrality would turn internet service providers into gatekeepers--allowing them to put profits over consumers while controlling what we see, what we do, and what we say online," Schneiderman added. "This would be a disaster for New York consumers and businesses, and for everyone who cares about a free and open internet."
The other attorneys general who joined Schneiderman in filing the suit represent California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
Their petition (pdf) claims the FCC order rolling back net neutrality protections "is arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion" under the Administrative Procedure Act; violates the U.S. Constitution and the Communications Act of 1934; and "conflicts with the notice-and-rulemaking requirements" established by federal law.
The lawsuit comes as federal lawmakers, led by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), are working to use the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to pass a "resolution of disapproval" that would overrule the FCC order. In response to intense public pressure, Democrats have slowly signed on to the legislation, which is now reportedly only one Republican vote shy of the simple majority support that's required to pass the proposal.
The legislation would also need to be voted on by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) on Tuesday shared the names of 81 members of the House who have pledged their support for the proposal so far, and vowed to continue seeking co-sponsors.
"There's overwhelming public support for preserving net neutrality, so it's no surprise that there's strong support in Congress as well," Doyle said. "I'm confident that if there's enough public pressure, Congress will overturn the FCC's order killing net neutrality."
Public opposition to the FCC decision is widespread and defies party lines. A poll published last month, just as the FCC was repealing the consumer protections, revealed more than 80 percent of Americans--75 percent of Republicans, 89 percent of Democrats, and 86 percent of Independents--opposed Pai's plan to roll back net neutrality rules.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A coalition of 22 state attorneys general came together on Tuesday to keep their promise to file a lawsuit challenging the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) recent move to roll back net neutrality consumer protections.
"The repeal of net neutrality would turn internet service providers into gatekeepers--allowing them to put profits over consumers while controlling what we see, what we do, and what we say online."
--Eric Schneiderman, New York Attorney General
Last month, the FCC--led by industry insider Ajit Pai--voted along party lines to repeal rules that banned internet service providers from charging more for or blocking access to particular content.
Leading this latest effort "to stop the FCC's illegal rollback of net neutrality" is New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who said in a statement, "An open internet--and the free exchange of ideas it allows--is critical to our democratic process."
"The repeal of net neutrality would turn internet service providers into gatekeepers--allowing them to put profits over consumers while controlling what we see, what we do, and what we say online," Schneiderman added. "This would be a disaster for New York consumers and businesses, and for everyone who cares about a free and open internet."
The other attorneys general who joined Schneiderman in filing the suit represent California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
Their petition (pdf) claims the FCC order rolling back net neutrality protections "is arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion" under the Administrative Procedure Act; violates the U.S. Constitution and the Communications Act of 1934; and "conflicts with the notice-and-rulemaking requirements" established by federal law.
The lawsuit comes as federal lawmakers, led by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), are working to use the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to pass a "resolution of disapproval" that would overrule the FCC order. In response to intense public pressure, Democrats have slowly signed on to the legislation, which is now reportedly only one Republican vote shy of the simple majority support that's required to pass the proposal.
The legislation would also need to be voted on by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) on Tuesday shared the names of 81 members of the House who have pledged their support for the proposal so far, and vowed to continue seeking co-sponsors.
"There's overwhelming public support for preserving net neutrality, so it's no surprise that there's strong support in Congress as well," Doyle said. "I'm confident that if there's enough public pressure, Congress will overturn the FCC's order killing net neutrality."
Public opposition to the FCC decision is widespread and defies party lines. A poll published last month, just as the FCC was repealing the consumer protections, revealed more than 80 percent of Americans--75 percent of Republicans, 89 percent of Democrats, and 86 percent of Independents--opposed Pai's plan to roll back net neutrality rules.
A coalition of 22 state attorneys general came together on Tuesday to keep their promise to file a lawsuit challenging the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) recent move to roll back net neutrality consumer protections.
"The repeal of net neutrality would turn internet service providers into gatekeepers--allowing them to put profits over consumers while controlling what we see, what we do, and what we say online."
--Eric Schneiderman, New York Attorney General
Last month, the FCC--led by industry insider Ajit Pai--voted along party lines to repeal rules that banned internet service providers from charging more for or blocking access to particular content.
Leading this latest effort "to stop the FCC's illegal rollback of net neutrality" is New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who said in a statement, "An open internet--and the free exchange of ideas it allows--is critical to our democratic process."
"The repeal of net neutrality would turn internet service providers into gatekeepers--allowing them to put profits over consumers while controlling what we see, what we do, and what we say online," Schneiderman added. "This would be a disaster for New York consumers and businesses, and for everyone who cares about a free and open internet."
The other attorneys general who joined Schneiderman in filing the suit represent California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
Their petition (pdf) claims the FCC order rolling back net neutrality protections "is arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion" under the Administrative Procedure Act; violates the U.S. Constitution and the Communications Act of 1934; and "conflicts with the notice-and-rulemaking requirements" established by federal law.
The lawsuit comes as federal lawmakers, led by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), are working to use the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to pass a "resolution of disapproval" that would overrule the FCC order. In response to intense public pressure, Democrats have slowly signed on to the legislation, which is now reportedly only one Republican vote shy of the simple majority support that's required to pass the proposal.
The legislation would also need to be voted on by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) on Tuesday shared the names of 81 members of the House who have pledged their support for the proposal so far, and vowed to continue seeking co-sponsors.
"There's overwhelming public support for preserving net neutrality, so it's no surprise that there's strong support in Congress as well," Doyle said. "I'm confident that if there's enough public pressure, Congress will overturn the FCC's order killing net neutrality."
Public opposition to the FCC decision is widespread and defies party lines. A poll published last month, just as the FCC was repealing the consumer protections, revealed more than 80 percent of Americans--75 percent of Republicans, 89 percent of Democrats, and 86 percent of Independents--opposed Pai's plan to roll back net neutrality rules.