SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. ambassador to the Netherlands Pete Hoekstra attempted to ignore Dutch journalists' questions about his remarks from 2015 about terrorism in the country, only to have them demand answers. (Photo: @anneowenphd/Twitter)
Dutch Reporters Offer Master Class By Refusing to Let Trump Official Tell 'Blatant Lies'
"This is the Netherlands, you have to answer questions."
Jan 11, 2018
Weeks after leaving a Dutch reporter stunned by denying that he'd made televised remarks about terrorism, several of the Netherlands' political journalists refused to allow a Trump appointee to ignore their questions about the incident, demonstrating effective political journalism while many American news outlets are criticized for allowing elected officials to get away with blatant and repeated lies.
Reporters at a press conference repeatedly asked Pete Hoekstra, the new U.S. ambassador to the Netherlands, to comment on his remarks at a hearing in 2015. Hoekstra urged the press to move on from the issue, but to no avail.
In Hoekstra's comments in 2015, he said areas of the country had been marked "no-go zones" because of terrorism and that "there are politicians that are being burnt."
When Hoekstra ignored a reporter's question about the latter statement, one journalist said, "This is not how it works."
"This is the Netherlands, you have to answer questions," said another.
Watch:
\u201c"Meneer de ambassadeur, kunt u een Nederlandse politicus noemen die de afgelopen jaren is verbrand?" Geen antwoord. Nieuwe Amerikaanse ambassadeur Pete Hoekstra had een lastige eerste ontmoeting met de Nederlandse pers. \u2192 https://t.co/8IDcPrVBPE\u201d— NOS (@NOS) 1515595546
On social media, political observers remarked on the video's clear depiction of not only the Trump administration's lack of transparency and honesty--but of the failure of much of the American corporate press to hold elected officials and their spokespeople accountable for their lies and incorrect statements.
\u201cJourney with me to the far off, imaginary kingdom of the Netherlands, where reporters don't let powerful people tell blatant lies https://t.co/o2Ok3B32hX by @RobertMackey\u201d— \ud83e\udd80 Jon Schwarz \ud83e\udd80 (@\ud83e\udd80 Jon Schwarz \ud83e\udd80) 1515689062
\u201cAmerican reporters just gave up gently trying to get Trump to explain his lie about watching thousands of Muslims cheer as the towers fell on 9/11; Dutch reporters are not letting the new ambassador Trump sent them off so easily https://t.co/aamn1a3f24\u201d— Robert Mackey (@Robert Mackey) 1515683572
Can we replace the white house press corps with these Dutch reporters? https://t.co/UHgTSryIei
-- Gordon Ramsme (@GordonRamsme7) January 11, 2018
In contrast to the Dutch reporters at the briefing, the White House Press Corps has been criticized for agreeing to off-camera briefings for several weeks last summer and failing to call out White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and follow up when she refuses to answer questions or responds with lies about the administration. Many political journalists have also denounced the New York Times for publishing interviews with President Donald Trump that include few or no follow-up questions.
And so it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Weeks after leaving a Dutch reporter stunned by denying that he'd made televised remarks about terrorism, several of the Netherlands' political journalists refused to allow a Trump appointee to ignore their questions about the incident, demonstrating effective political journalism while many American news outlets are criticized for allowing elected officials to get away with blatant and repeated lies.
Reporters at a press conference repeatedly asked Pete Hoekstra, the new U.S. ambassador to the Netherlands, to comment on his remarks at a hearing in 2015. Hoekstra urged the press to move on from the issue, but to no avail.
In Hoekstra's comments in 2015, he said areas of the country had been marked "no-go zones" because of terrorism and that "there are politicians that are being burnt."
When Hoekstra ignored a reporter's question about the latter statement, one journalist said, "This is not how it works."
"This is the Netherlands, you have to answer questions," said another.
Watch:
\u201c"Meneer de ambassadeur, kunt u een Nederlandse politicus noemen die de afgelopen jaren is verbrand?" Geen antwoord. Nieuwe Amerikaanse ambassadeur Pete Hoekstra had een lastige eerste ontmoeting met de Nederlandse pers. \u2192 https://t.co/8IDcPrVBPE\u201d— NOS (@NOS) 1515595546
On social media, political observers remarked on the video's clear depiction of not only the Trump administration's lack of transparency and honesty--but of the failure of much of the American corporate press to hold elected officials and their spokespeople accountable for their lies and incorrect statements.
\u201cJourney with me to the far off, imaginary kingdom of the Netherlands, where reporters don't let powerful people tell blatant lies https://t.co/o2Ok3B32hX by @RobertMackey\u201d— \ud83e\udd80 Jon Schwarz \ud83e\udd80 (@\ud83e\udd80 Jon Schwarz \ud83e\udd80) 1515689062
\u201cAmerican reporters just gave up gently trying to get Trump to explain his lie about watching thousands of Muslims cheer as the towers fell on 9/11; Dutch reporters are not letting the new ambassador Trump sent them off so easily https://t.co/aamn1a3f24\u201d— Robert Mackey (@Robert Mackey) 1515683572
Can we replace the white house press corps with these Dutch reporters? https://t.co/UHgTSryIei
-- Gordon Ramsme (@GordonRamsme7) January 11, 2018
In contrast to the Dutch reporters at the briefing, the White House Press Corps has been criticized for agreeing to off-camera briefings for several weeks last summer and failing to call out White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and follow up when she refuses to answer questions or responds with lies about the administration. Many political journalists have also denounced the New York Times for publishing interviews with President Donald Trump that include few or no follow-up questions.
Weeks after leaving a Dutch reporter stunned by denying that he'd made televised remarks about terrorism, several of the Netherlands' political journalists refused to allow a Trump appointee to ignore their questions about the incident, demonstrating effective political journalism while many American news outlets are criticized for allowing elected officials to get away with blatant and repeated lies.
Reporters at a press conference repeatedly asked Pete Hoekstra, the new U.S. ambassador to the Netherlands, to comment on his remarks at a hearing in 2015. Hoekstra urged the press to move on from the issue, but to no avail.
In Hoekstra's comments in 2015, he said areas of the country had been marked "no-go zones" because of terrorism and that "there are politicians that are being burnt."
When Hoekstra ignored a reporter's question about the latter statement, one journalist said, "This is not how it works."
"This is the Netherlands, you have to answer questions," said another.
Watch:
\u201c"Meneer de ambassadeur, kunt u een Nederlandse politicus noemen die de afgelopen jaren is verbrand?" Geen antwoord. Nieuwe Amerikaanse ambassadeur Pete Hoekstra had een lastige eerste ontmoeting met de Nederlandse pers. \u2192 https://t.co/8IDcPrVBPE\u201d— NOS (@NOS) 1515595546
On social media, political observers remarked on the video's clear depiction of not only the Trump administration's lack of transparency and honesty--but of the failure of much of the American corporate press to hold elected officials and their spokespeople accountable for their lies and incorrect statements.
\u201cJourney with me to the far off, imaginary kingdom of the Netherlands, where reporters don't let powerful people tell blatant lies https://t.co/o2Ok3B32hX by @RobertMackey\u201d— \ud83e\udd80 Jon Schwarz \ud83e\udd80 (@\ud83e\udd80 Jon Schwarz \ud83e\udd80) 1515689062
\u201cAmerican reporters just gave up gently trying to get Trump to explain his lie about watching thousands of Muslims cheer as the towers fell on 9/11; Dutch reporters are not letting the new ambassador Trump sent them off so easily https://t.co/aamn1a3f24\u201d— Robert Mackey (@Robert Mackey) 1515683572
Can we replace the white house press corps with these Dutch reporters? https://t.co/UHgTSryIei
-- Gordon Ramsme (@GordonRamsme7) January 11, 2018
In contrast to the Dutch reporters at the briefing, the White House Press Corps has been criticized for agreeing to off-camera briefings for several weeks last summer and failing to call out White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and follow up when she refuses to answer questions or responds with lies about the administration. Many political journalists have also denounced the New York Times for publishing interviews with President Donald Trump that include few or no follow-up questions.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.