SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
More than 80 percent of American voters support keeping net neutrality rules in place, according to a poll taken by the University of Maryland just before the FCC defied the public and voted to repeal the regulations in December. (Photo: Free Press)
Collins Comes Aboard, But Six Senate Democrats Still Missing on Net Neutrality
"The public has spoken. Lawmakers who stick their heads in the sand on this issue will pay the price at the polls."
Jan 10, 2018
A resolution in the U.S. Senate that would reverse last month's move by the FCC to kill net neutrality protections nabbed its first Republican backer on Tuesday, but campaigners say that six Democratic holdouts are stilling missing in action if the critical effort is to succeed.
After Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) joined 40 Democrats along with Sens. Angus King (I-Maine) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in supporting a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution on Tuesday, the nonprofit group Fight for the Future applauded her decision to side with her constituents, but warned that senators who don't get on board with the effort are backing a deeply unpopular decision.
The group noted that "the overwhelming majority of voters from across the political spectrum" support net neutrality regulations, which keep internet service provides from giving preferential treatment to companies that can afford it, while relegating smaller websites to a "slow lane."
Collins's "support for a Senate vote to block the FCC's repeal of net neutrality shows that this is not a partisan issue, and brings us one huge step closer to restoring basic protections that keep the Internet free from throttling, censorship, and paid prioritization scams," said Evan Greer, campaign director for Fight for the Future, in a statement. "The public has spoken. Lawmakers who stick their heads in the sand on this issue will pay the price at the polls. We will fight lobbyists' attacks on net neutrality every step of the way, and in the end, the Internet will win."
The media reform group Free Press urged supporters to put pressure on the few Democrats who have not announced their support for the CRA.
Political journalists have said the CRA resolution would likely not pass in the Republican-controlled House even if it passes in the Senate, and that it would be subject to a potential veto by President Donald Trump.
But Fight for the Future expressed hope that the growing support for the CRA, as well as the support for internet freedom by 75 percent of Republican voters, could save net neutrality.
As Jon Brodkin of Ars Technica argued this week, advocates are working to keep citizens informed about the implications of the FCC's decision as well as to reverse the vote.
"A vote would keep net neutrality in the spotlight as Democrats prepare to make the repeal a campaign issue in the November elections," he wrote.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A resolution in the U.S. Senate that would reverse last month's move by the FCC to kill net neutrality protections nabbed its first Republican backer on Tuesday, but campaigners say that six Democratic holdouts are stilling missing in action if the critical effort is to succeed.
After Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) joined 40 Democrats along with Sens. Angus King (I-Maine) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in supporting a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution on Tuesday, the nonprofit group Fight for the Future applauded her decision to side with her constituents, but warned that senators who don't get on board with the effort are backing a deeply unpopular decision.
The group noted that "the overwhelming majority of voters from across the political spectrum" support net neutrality regulations, which keep internet service provides from giving preferential treatment to companies that can afford it, while relegating smaller websites to a "slow lane."
Collins's "support for a Senate vote to block the FCC's repeal of net neutrality shows that this is not a partisan issue, and brings us one huge step closer to restoring basic protections that keep the Internet free from throttling, censorship, and paid prioritization scams," said Evan Greer, campaign director for Fight for the Future, in a statement. "The public has spoken. Lawmakers who stick their heads in the sand on this issue will pay the price at the polls. We will fight lobbyists' attacks on net neutrality every step of the way, and in the end, the Internet will win."
The media reform group Free Press urged supporters to put pressure on the few Democrats who have not announced their support for the CRA.
Political journalists have said the CRA resolution would likely not pass in the Republican-controlled House even if it passes in the Senate, and that it would be subject to a potential veto by President Donald Trump.
But Fight for the Future expressed hope that the growing support for the CRA, as well as the support for internet freedom by 75 percent of Republican voters, could save net neutrality.
As Jon Brodkin of Ars Technica argued this week, advocates are working to keep citizens informed about the implications of the FCC's decision as well as to reverse the vote.
"A vote would keep net neutrality in the spotlight as Democrats prepare to make the repeal a campaign issue in the November elections," he wrote.
A resolution in the U.S. Senate that would reverse last month's move by the FCC to kill net neutrality protections nabbed its first Republican backer on Tuesday, but campaigners say that six Democratic holdouts are stilling missing in action if the critical effort is to succeed.
After Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) joined 40 Democrats along with Sens. Angus King (I-Maine) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in supporting a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution on Tuesday, the nonprofit group Fight for the Future applauded her decision to side with her constituents, but warned that senators who don't get on board with the effort are backing a deeply unpopular decision.
The group noted that "the overwhelming majority of voters from across the political spectrum" support net neutrality regulations, which keep internet service provides from giving preferential treatment to companies that can afford it, while relegating smaller websites to a "slow lane."
Collins's "support for a Senate vote to block the FCC's repeal of net neutrality shows that this is not a partisan issue, and brings us one huge step closer to restoring basic protections that keep the Internet free from throttling, censorship, and paid prioritization scams," said Evan Greer, campaign director for Fight for the Future, in a statement. "The public has spoken. Lawmakers who stick their heads in the sand on this issue will pay the price at the polls. We will fight lobbyists' attacks on net neutrality every step of the way, and in the end, the Internet will win."
The media reform group Free Press urged supporters to put pressure on the few Democrats who have not announced their support for the CRA.
Political journalists have said the CRA resolution would likely not pass in the Republican-controlled House even if it passes in the Senate, and that it would be subject to a potential veto by President Donald Trump.
But Fight for the Future expressed hope that the growing support for the CRA, as well as the support for internet freedom by 75 percent of Republican voters, could save net neutrality.
As Jon Brodkin of Ars Technica argued this week, advocates are working to keep citizens informed about the implications of the FCC's decision as well as to reverse the vote.
"A vote would keep net neutrality in the spotlight as Democrats prepare to make the repeal a campaign issue in the November elections," he wrote.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.