SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Participants from South Korea march during a demonstration against nuclear weapons on November 18, 2017 in Berlin, Germany. About 700 demonstrators protested against the current escalation of threat of nuclear attack between the United States of America and North Korea. (Photo: Adam Berry/Getty Images)
US Slammed As 'Heinous Gangsters' After Trump Labels North Korea as Terror Sponsor
Pyongyang called its addition to the United States' list of state sponsors of terrorism a "serious provocation"
Nov 22, 2017
North Korea's hostile response to the U.S. decision to label the isolated country a terrorist state was alarming to many on Wednesday--but critics of the Trump administration's aggressive approach to foreign policy were not surprised by Pyongyang's statement, having warned that further antagonizing North Korea was both dangerous and unproductive.
Two days after the U.S. announced it was relisting North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism--a designation also given to Iran, Sudan, and Syria--the North Korean Central News Agency called the decision a "serious provocation."
"Our army and people are full of rage and anger toward the heinous gangsters who dared to put the name of our sacred country in this wretched list of 'terrorism' and are hardening their will to settle all accounts with those gangsters at any time in any way," said the agency in an official statement.
The government-run Korea Asia-Pacific Peace Committee called the president "old lunatic Trump" and said that the terrorist label had resulted in "hate and spirit to destroy the enemy" among North Koreans.
North Korea was taken off the list of state sponsors of terrorism in 2008, in a move designed to decrease tensions and pave the way for new diplomatic talks.
David Usborne wrote in the Independent on Tuesday that the White House's decision was an unnecessary risk that would ultimately weaken the United States' case should the two nations arrive at the negotiating table in the future:
It is because we can be sure of so little--that this situation is so fragile--that anything that risks pushing either side to take military action should be avoided. That includes slapping Pyongyang with the state-sponsored terrorism label. It is, in fact, a bad idea, because the evidence to justify it is thin at best. That makes the US look like its breaking--or at least, bending--the rules of the game to suit its own purposes.
Usborne added that Trump's latest provocation, combined with new sanctions that were unveiled just after North Korea was added to the terrorist list, could result in Kim Jong-un ordering a new round of missile tests and launches, worsening the crisis.
The newest sanctions will affect shipping companies and are aimed at curbing China's trade relations with North Korea, and follow earlier sanctions on the country's seafood and coal exports, depriving Pyongyang of nearly a third of its revenue.
Following the Trump administration's actions against North Korea this week, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) tweeted that the United States' continued focus of the danger Kim Jong-un ostensibly poses is a show of hypocrisy as the government continues to support the terror-inducing actions of other countries.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
North Korea's hostile response to the U.S. decision to label the isolated country a terrorist state was alarming to many on Wednesday--but critics of the Trump administration's aggressive approach to foreign policy were not surprised by Pyongyang's statement, having warned that further antagonizing North Korea was both dangerous and unproductive.
Two days after the U.S. announced it was relisting North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism--a designation also given to Iran, Sudan, and Syria--the North Korean Central News Agency called the decision a "serious provocation."
"Our army and people are full of rage and anger toward the heinous gangsters who dared to put the name of our sacred country in this wretched list of 'terrorism' and are hardening their will to settle all accounts with those gangsters at any time in any way," said the agency in an official statement.
The government-run Korea Asia-Pacific Peace Committee called the president "old lunatic Trump" and said that the terrorist label had resulted in "hate and spirit to destroy the enemy" among North Koreans.
North Korea was taken off the list of state sponsors of terrorism in 2008, in a move designed to decrease tensions and pave the way for new diplomatic talks.
David Usborne wrote in the Independent on Tuesday that the White House's decision was an unnecessary risk that would ultimately weaken the United States' case should the two nations arrive at the negotiating table in the future:
It is because we can be sure of so little--that this situation is so fragile--that anything that risks pushing either side to take military action should be avoided. That includes slapping Pyongyang with the state-sponsored terrorism label. It is, in fact, a bad idea, because the evidence to justify it is thin at best. That makes the US look like its breaking--or at least, bending--the rules of the game to suit its own purposes.
Usborne added that Trump's latest provocation, combined with new sanctions that were unveiled just after North Korea was added to the terrorist list, could result in Kim Jong-un ordering a new round of missile tests and launches, worsening the crisis.
The newest sanctions will affect shipping companies and are aimed at curbing China's trade relations with North Korea, and follow earlier sanctions on the country's seafood and coal exports, depriving Pyongyang of nearly a third of its revenue.
Following the Trump administration's actions against North Korea this week, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) tweeted that the United States' continued focus of the danger Kim Jong-un ostensibly poses is a show of hypocrisy as the government continues to support the terror-inducing actions of other countries.
North Korea's hostile response to the U.S. decision to label the isolated country a terrorist state was alarming to many on Wednesday--but critics of the Trump administration's aggressive approach to foreign policy were not surprised by Pyongyang's statement, having warned that further antagonizing North Korea was both dangerous and unproductive.
Two days after the U.S. announced it was relisting North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism--a designation also given to Iran, Sudan, and Syria--the North Korean Central News Agency called the decision a "serious provocation."
"Our army and people are full of rage and anger toward the heinous gangsters who dared to put the name of our sacred country in this wretched list of 'terrorism' and are hardening their will to settle all accounts with those gangsters at any time in any way," said the agency in an official statement.
The government-run Korea Asia-Pacific Peace Committee called the president "old lunatic Trump" and said that the terrorist label had resulted in "hate and spirit to destroy the enemy" among North Koreans.
North Korea was taken off the list of state sponsors of terrorism in 2008, in a move designed to decrease tensions and pave the way for new diplomatic talks.
David Usborne wrote in the Independent on Tuesday that the White House's decision was an unnecessary risk that would ultimately weaken the United States' case should the two nations arrive at the negotiating table in the future:
It is because we can be sure of so little--that this situation is so fragile--that anything that risks pushing either side to take military action should be avoided. That includes slapping Pyongyang with the state-sponsored terrorism label. It is, in fact, a bad idea, because the evidence to justify it is thin at best. That makes the US look like its breaking--or at least, bending--the rules of the game to suit its own purposes.
Usborne added that Trump's latest provocation, combined with new sanctions that were unveiled just after North Korea was added to the terrorist list, could result in Kim Jong-un ordering a new round of missile tests and launches, worsening the crisis.
The newest sanctions will affect shipping companies and are aimed at curbing China's trade relations with North Korea, and follow earlier sanctions on the country's seafood and coal exports, depriving Pyongyang of nearly a third of its revenue.
Following the Trump administration's actions against North Korea this week, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) tweeted that the United States' continued focus of the danger Kim Jong-un ostensibly poses is a show of hypocrisy as the government continues to support the terror-inducing actions of other countries.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.