SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
After an Oval Office meeting with Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau, President Trump attacked NBC for its reporting on his comments about increasing the nation's nuclear arsenal. (Photo: @RT_America/Twitter)
Citing Dictatorial Tendencies, Critics Slam Trump for 'Madcap Threat' Aimed at NBC
While the president can't take away the network's ability to operate, former FCC commissioner calls ongoing attempts to intimidate journalists "chilling"
Oct 11, 2017
Free speech advocates and journalists spoke out against President Donald Trump's latest attack on the news media on Wednesday after he suggested a "challenge" of NBC's license.
Michael Copps, the former FCC commissioner who now serves as special advisor to the grassroots organization Common Cause, noted that while Trump isn't legally able to carry out his threats, his attempts to intimidate the press are deeply disconcerting:
This madcap threat, if pursued, would be blatant and unacceptable intervention in the decisions of an independent agency. The law does not countenance such interference. President Trump might be happier as emperor, but I think the American people would strip him of his clothes on this issue. Additionally, it's not just NBC stations that will find this threat chilling, but also smaller independent stations around the country who might lack the resources to fight back.
Trump made the comment about NBC's license after the network published a report saying the president shocked his national security team earlier this year by requesting a "tenfold" increase in the nation's nuclear weapons arsenal. Trump denied the report on Twitter, and in a televised Oval Office appearance he attacked NBC for its reliance on anonymous sources. "It is frankly disgusting the press is able to write whatever it wants to write," Trump told reporters.
In response, The Nation's John Nichols wrote:
Even if the president is merely making another round of social-media threats, the fact that he is now mingling those threats with talk of formal action to punish a network that does not meet with his approval is deeply troubling.
There is no question that the message Trump is sending to the rest of the world is a dangerous one, as the Committee to Protect Journalists reminds us. "Trump's assertion that @NBC's license could be challenged emboldens other gov'ts to embrace authoritarian tendencies," notes the CPJ.
The message that Trump is sending at home is also unsettling. Congressman Keith Ellison, D-Minnesota, described the president's expression of disgust with those who write critically about him as the "words of an authoritarian."
Wednesday's comments are far from the first time that the Trump administration has questioned the news media's right to exist in its current form. At a rally in August, the president told a room full of his supporters in Phoenix that most journalists are "really, really dishonest people, and they're bad people" who "don't like our country."
"The NBC threat is a reminder that if Trump were competent and powerful enough to be an authoritarian, he would be one."--Ezra Klein, Vox.com
Earlier that month, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the Justice Department was reviewing its policy on media subpoenas, potentially making it easier for courts to force journalists to testify about confidential sources.
And in March, Trump suggested that libel laws should be changed, in a tweet criticizing the New York Times which he said had "gotten me wrong for two solid years."
On Twitter, the ACLU and other press freedom advocates denounced the president's latest attack on the media.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Free speech advocates and journalists spoke out against President Donald Trump's latest attack on the news media on Wednesday after he suggested a "challenge" of NBC's license.
Michael Copps, the former FCC commissioner who now serves as special advisor to the grassroots organization Common Cause, noted that while Trump isn't legally able to carry out his threats, his attempts to intimidate the press are deeply disconcerting:
This madcap threat, if pursued, would be blatant and unacceptable intervention in the decisions of an independent agency. The law does not countenance such interference. President Trump might be happier as emperor, but I think the American people would strip him of his clothes on this issue. Additionally, it's not just NBC stations that will find this threat chilling, but also smaller independent stations around the country who might lack the resources to fight back.
Trump made the comment about NBC's license after the network published a report saying the president shocked his national security team earlier this year by requesting a "tenfold" increase in the nation's nuclear weapons arsenal. Trump denied the report on Twitter, and in a televised Oval Office appearance he attacked NBC for its reliance on anonymous sources. "It is frankly disgusting the press is able to write whatever it wants to write," Trump told reporters.
In response, The Nation's John Nichols wrote:
Even if the president is merely making another round of social-media threats, the fact that he is now mingling those threats with talk of formal action to punish a network that does not meet with his approval is deeply troubling.
There is no question that the message Trump is sending to the rest of the world is a dangerous one, as the Committee to Protect Journalists reminds us. "Trump's assertion that @NBC's license could be challenged emboldens other gov'ts to embrace authoritarian tendencies," notes the CPJ.
The message that Trump is sending at home is also unsettling. Congressman Keith Ellison, D-Minnesota, described the president's expression of disgust with those who write critically about him as the "words of an authoritarian."
Wednesday's comments are far from the first time that the Trump administration has questioned the news media's right to exist in its current form. At a rally in August, the president told a room full of his supporters in Phoenix that most journalists are "really, really dishonest people, and they're bad people" who "don't like our country."
"The NBC threat is a reminder that if Trump were competent and powerful enough to be an authoritarian, he would be one."--Ezra Klein, Vox.com
Earlier that month, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the Justice Department was reviewing its policy on media subpoenas, potentially making it easier for courts to force journalists to testify about confidential sources.
And in March, Trump suggested that libel laws should be changed, in a tweet criticizing the New York Times which he said had "gotten me wrong for two solid years."
On Twitter, the ACLU and other press freedom advocates denounced the president's latest attack on the media.
Free speech advocates and journalists spoke out against President Donald Trump's latest attack on the news media on Wednesday after he suggested a "challenge" of NBC's license.
Michael Copps, the former FCC commissioner who now serves as special advisor to the grassroots organization Common Cause, noted that while Trump isn't legally able to carry out his threats, his attempts to intimidate the press are deeply disconcerting:
This madcap threat, if pursued, would be blatant and unacceptable intervention in the decisions of an independent agency. The law does not countenance such interference. President Trump might be happier as emperor, but I think the American people would strip him of his clothes on this issue. Additionally, it's not just NBC stations that will find this threat chilling, but also smaller independent stations around the country who might lack the resources to fight back.
Trump made the comment about NBC's license after the network published a report saying the president shocked his national security team earlier this year by requesting a "tenfold" increase in the nation's nuclear weapons arsenal. Trump denied the report on Twitter, and in a televised Oval Office appearance he attacked NBC for its reliance on anonymous sources. "It is frankly disgusting the press is able to write whatever it wants to write," Trump told reporters.
In response, The Nation's John Nichols wrote:
Even if the president is merely making another round of social-media threats, the fact that he is now mingling those threats with talk of formal action to punish a network that does not meet with his approval is deeply troubling.
There is no question that the message Trump is sending to the rest of the world is a dangerous one, as the Committee to Protect Journalists reminds us. "Trump's assertion that @NBC's license could be challenged emboldens other gov'ts to embrace authoritarian tendencies," notes the CPJ.
The message that Trump is sending at home is also unsettling. Congressman Keith Ellison, D-Minnesota, described the president's expression of disgust with those who write critically about him as the "words of an authoritarian."
Wednesday's comments are far from the first time that the Trump administration has questioned the news media's right to exist in its current form. At a rally in August, the president told a room full of his supporters in Phoenix that most journalists are "really, really dishonest people, and they're bad people" who "don't like our country."
"The NBC threat is a reminder that if Trump were competent and powerful enough to be an authoritarian, he would be one."--Ezra Klein, Vox.com
Earlier that month, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the Justice Department was reviewing its policy on media subpoenas, potentially making it easier for courts to force journalists to testify about confidential sources.
And in March, Trump suggested that libel laws should be changed, in a tweet criticizing the New York Times which he said had "gotten me wrong for two solid years."
On Twitter, the ACLU and other press freedom advocates denounced the president's latest attack on the media.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.