Jemele Hill has spoken out in support of black NFL players who have chosen to kneel during the national anthem, while President Trump has urged team owners to punish them. (Photo: Blavity/Twitter)
Oct 10, 2017
Fellow journalists, free speech defenders, and racial justice advocates are jumping to the defense of sports anchor Jemele Hill on Tuesday, after she was suspended for two weeks for "a second violation" of ESPN's social media policy.
Hill posted a series of tweets about Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones' demand that his players stand for the national anthem. Jones's move sparked outrage as many NFL players have chosen to kneel during the anthem to draw attention to police brutality and other forms of injustice experienced disproportionately by black Americans.
Rashad Robinson, executive director of the advocacy group Color of Change, slammed ESPN's decision as he called it "a flagrant suppression of Black voices in sports. ESPN is happy to stand with enablers of racism and sexism, but dare speak out against these issues and you're in trouble."
Hill suggested NFL fans who disagree with Jones should show their disapproval by refusing to support his team's sponsors.
\u201cThis play always work. Change happens when advertisers are impacted. If you feel strongly about JJ's statement, boycott his advertisers. https://t.co/LFXJ9YQe74\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507517130
\u201cIf you strongly reject what Jerry Jones said, the key is his advertisers. Don't place the burden squarely on the players. https://t.co/Gc48kchkuv\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507517407
\u201cJust so we're clear: I'm not advocating a NFL boycott. But an unfair burden has been put on players in Dallas & Miami w/ anthem directives.\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507565409
\u201cIf fans really are that upset about what JJ & Stephen Ross have done, don't call the players sellouts, but you're watching every Sunday.\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507565492
Hill previously called President Donald Trump a white supremacist last month. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters Hill should be fired for her comments.
While President Donald Trump tweeted an attack on Hill Tuesday morning (blaming her for their ratings, which he incorrectly said have "tanked"), journalist John Nichols was among those who defended Hill's statement as social commentary on the over-arching issue of racial injustice--one that ESPN can't simply ignore when many in the sports world are publicly speaking out against it.
\u201cIf we take seriously the idea that commentary is best when it honestly and boldly confronts essential issues, we must #StandWithJemeleHill.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1507611000
Organizers of the Women's March released a statement in support of Hill:
The suspension of Jemele Hill is a despicable attempt to silence a Black woman speaking out against systematic oppression in this country. This suspension is proof of how deeply entrenched racism is within our institutions.
Jemele's comments to encourage consumers to let advertisers know how they feel, reflect the feelings of many of us. Millions of Americans understand the importance of protecting our first amendment right to free speech and of using this sacred right to express legitimate fear about the current climate of racism and bigotry.
ESPN defended its earlier reprimand of Hill last month by saying the company "is not a political organization" and therefore political statements by reporters aren't appropriate. But as Robinson noted, the network's stance is itself political. "By choosing to ban its reporters' opinions, ESPN is making an explicitly political decision to side with the Trump administration on the wrong side of history," he said.
Others spoke out on social media, with many noting the irony of ESPN holding Hill's social media activity to a standard that the president hasn't met:
\u201cJemele Hill, now suspended by ESPN, will be home to watch Hank Williams Jr. -- who once compared Obama to Hitler -- work for @ESPN tonight.\u201d— Ja'han Jones (@Ja'han Jones) 1507581853
\u201cJemele Hill is held to a higher standard for her online behavior than the current President of the United States. Just think about that.\u201d— Andrew Jerell Jones, Luke 1:37 (IG:twdbk3) (@Andrew Jerell Jones, Luke 1:37 (IG:twdbk3)) 1507579721
\u201cIf Jemele Hill didn\u2019t want to get suspended, she should have just sexually harassed women for decades.\u201d— Sleeping Giants (@Sleeping Giants) 1507611685
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Fellow journalists, free speech defenders, and racial justice advocates are jumping to the defense of sports anchor Jemele Hill on Tuesday, after she was suspended for two weeks for "a second violation" of ESPN's social media policy.
Hill posted a series of tweets about Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones' demand that his players stand for the national anthem. Jones's move sparked outrage as many NFL players have chosen to kneel during the anthem to draw attention to police brutality and other forms of injustice experienced disproportionately by black Americans.
Rashad Robinson, executive director of the advocacy group Color of Change, slammed ESPN's decision as he called it "a flagrant suppression of Black voices in sports. ESPN is happy to stand with enablers of racism and sexism, but dare speak out against these issues and you're in trouble."
Hill suggested NFL fans who disagree with Jones should show their disapproval by refusing to support his team's sponsors.
\u201cThis play always work. Change happens when advertisers are impacted. If you feel strongly about JJ's statement, boycott his advertisers. https://t.co/LFXJ9YQe74\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507517130
\u201cIf you strongly reject what Jerry Jones said, the key is his advertisers. Don't place the burden squarely on the players. https://t.co/Gc48kchkuv\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507517407
\u201cJust so we're clear: I'm not advocating a NFL boycott. But an unfair burden has been put on players in Dallas & Miami w/ anthem directives.\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507565409
\u201cIf fans really are that upset about what JJ & Stephen Ross have done, don't call the players sellouts, but you're watching every Sunday.\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507565492
Hill previously called President Donald Trump a white supremacist last month. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters Hill should be fired for her comments.
While President Donald Trump tweeted an attack on Hill Tuesday morning (blaming her for their ratings, which he incorrectly said have "tanked"), journalist John Nichols was among those who defended Hill's statement as social commentary on the over-arching issue of racial injustice--one that ESPN can't simply ignore when many in the sports world are publicly speaking out against it.
\u201cIf we take seriously the idea that commentary is best when it honestly and boldly confronts essential issues, we must #StandWithJemeleHill.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1507611000
Organizers of the Women's March released a statement in support of Hill:
The suspension of Jemele Hill is a despicable attempt to silence a Black woman speaking out against systematic oppression in this country. This suspension is proof of how deeply entrenched racism is within our institutions.
Jemele's comments to encourage consumers to let advertisers know how they feel, reflect the feelings of many of us. Millions of Americans understand the importance of protecting our first amendment right to free speech and of using this sacred right to express legitimate fear about the current climate of racism and bigotry.
ESPN defended its earlier reprimand of Hill last month by saying the company "is not a political organization" and therefore political statements by reporters aren't appropriate. But as Robinson noted, the network's stance is itself political. "By choosing to ban its reporters' opinions, ESPN is making an explicitly political decision to side with the Trump administration on the wrong side of history," he said.
Others spoke out on social media, with many noting the irony of ESPN holding Hill's social media activity to a standard that the president hasn't met:
\u201cJemele Hill, now suspended by ESPN, will be home to watch Hank Williams Jr. -- who once compared Obama to Hitler -- work for @ESPN tonight.\u201d— Ja'han Jones (@Ja'han Jones) 1507581853
\u201cJemele Hill is held to a higher standard for her online behavior than the current President of the United States. Just think about that.\u201d— Andrew Jerell Jones, Luke 1:37 (IG:twdbk3) (@Andrew Jerell Jones, Luke 1:37 (IG:twdbk3)) 1507579721
\u201cIf Jemele Hill didn\u2019t want to get suspended, she should have just sexually harassed women for decades.\u201d— Sleeping Giants (@Sleeping Giants) 1507611685
Fellow journalists, free speech defenders, and racial justice advocates are jumping to the defense of sports anchor Jemele Hill on Tuesday, after she was suspended for two weeks for "a second violation" of ESPN's social media policy.
Hill posted a series of tweets about Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones' demand that his players stand for the national anthem. Jones's move sparked outrage as many NFL players have chosen to kneel during the anthem to draw attention to police brutality and other forms of injustice experienced disproportionately by black Americans.
Rashad Robinson, executive director of the advocacy group Color of Change, slammed ESPN's decision as he called it "a flagrant suppression of Black voices in sports. ESPN is happy to stand with enablers of racism and sexism, but dare speak out against these issues and you're in trouble."
Hill suggested NFL fans who disagree with Jones should show their disapproval by refusing to support his team's sponsors.
\u201cThis play always work. Change happens when advertisers are impacted. If you feel strongly about JJ's statement, boycott his advertisers. https://t.co/LFXJ9YQe74\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507517130
\u201cIf you strongly reject what Jerry Jones said, the key is his advertisers. Don't place the burden squarely on the players. https://t.co/Gc48kchkuv\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507517407
\u201cJust so we're clear: I'm not advocating a NFL boycott. But an unfair burden has been put on players in Dallas & Miami w/ anthem directives.\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507565409
\u201cIf fans really are that upset about what JJ & Stephen Ross have done, don't call the players sellouts, but you're watching every Sunday.\u201d— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill) 1507565492
Hill previously called President Donald Trump a white supremacist last month. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters Hill should be fired for her comments.
While President Donald Trump tweeted an attack on Hill Tuesday morning (blaming her for their ratings, which he incorrectly said have "tanked"), journalist John Nichols was among those who defended Hill's statement as social commentary on the over-arching issue of racial injustice--one that ESPN can't simply ignore when many in the sports world are publicly speaking out against it.
\u201cIf we take seriously the idea that commentary is best when it honestly and boldly confronts essential issues, we must #StandWithJemeleHill.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1507611000
Organizers of the Women's March released a statement in support of Hill:
The suspension of Jemele Hill is a despicable attempt to silence a Black woman speaking out against systematic oppression in this country. This suspension is proof of how deeply entrenched racism is within our institutions.
Jemele's comments to encourage consumers to let advertisers know how they feel, reflect the feelings of many of us. Millions of Americans understand the importance of protecting our first amendment right to free speech and of using this sacred right to express legitimate fear about the current climate of racism and bigotry.
ESPN defended its earlier reprimand of Hill last month by saying the company "is not a political organization" and therefore political statements by reporters aren't appropriate. But as Robinson noted, the network's stance is itself political. "By choosing to ban its reporters' opinions, ESPN is making an explicitly political decision to side with the Trump administration on the wrong side of history," he said.
Others spoke out on social media, with many noting the irony of ESPN holding Hill's social media activity to a standard that the president hasn't met:
\u201cJemele Hill, now suspended by ESPN, will be home to watch Hank Williams Jr. -- who once compared Obama to Hitler -- work for @ESPN tonight.\u201d— Ja'han Jones (@Ja'han Jones) 1507581853
\u201cJemele Hill is held to a higher standard for her online behavior than the current President of the United States. Just think about that.\u201d— Andrew Jerell Jones, Luke 1:37 (IG:twdbk3) (@Andrew Jerell Jones, Luke 1:37 (IG:twdbk3)) 1507579721
\u201cIf Jemele Hill didn\u2019t want to get suspended, she should have just sexually harassed women for decades.\u201d— Sleeping Giants (@Sleeping Giants) 1507611685
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.