SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Clean Power Plan aims to cut carbon emissions from power plants to 32 percent below their 2005 levels. (Photo: Tony Webster/Flickr/cc)
EPA's Plan to Repeal Clean Power Plan 'Will Put Us All in Danger'
Internal document shows agency could soon move on repealing key rule meant to reduce U.S. carbon emissions
Oct 04, 2017
Environmental advocates expressed concern about the impact of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) planned repeal of the Clean Power Plan, the Obama administration's central legislation aimed at cutting carbon emissions from power plants.
"Rolling back this plan will put us all in danger," wrote the National Resources Defense Council on Twitter on Wednesday after Reuters obtained an internal EPA memo indicating the move.
The Clean Power Plan has been under the review by President Donald Trump's EPA since March. The rule was introduced in 2015 with the goal of bringing carbon emissions to 32 percent below pre-2005 levels, over 15 years.
Agency head Scott Pruitt is expected to "solicit input on a rule to replace" the plan, according to Reuters. The memo surfaced just a day after the New York Times reported how Pruitt has what is essentially an open-door policy for industry executives and lobbyists while shunning those pushing for environmental protections.
On social media, progressive voices stressed that the Clean Power Plan, while an imperfect solution to the issue of humans' contributions to climate change, represents the United States' strongest effort in recent years to reduce fossil fuel emissions and shift to other methods of producing energy. A growing number of countries around the world are taking their own steps in this direction, including China, which has steadily reduced its carbon emissions over the last four years, and Scotland, which announced on Tuesday that it would ban fracking.
Others drew attention to the EPA's own research which showed earlier this year that the Clean Power Plan would ultimately improve Americans' lives and prevent loss of life.
According to a CNN report in April, after the EPA announced it would review the plan, "The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that when implemented, the plan would prevent 3,600 premature deaths a year. In addition, the agency said, it would prevent 1,700 heart attacks, 90,000 asthma attacks and 300,000 missed days of work or school a year."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Environmental advocates expressed concern about the impact of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) planned repeal of the Clean Power Plan, the Obama administration's central legislation aimed at cutting carbon emissions from power plants.
"Rolling back this plan will put us all in danger," wrote the National Resources Defense Council on Twitter on Wednesday after Reuters obtained an internal EPA memo indicating the move.
The Clean Power Plan has been under the review by President Donald Trump's EPA since March. The rule was introduced in 2015 with the goal of bringing carbon emissions to 32 percent below pre-2005 levels, over 15 years.
Agency head Scott Pruitt is expected to "solicit input on a rule to replace" the plan, according to Reuters. The memo surfaced just a day after the New York Times reported how Pruitt has what is essentially an open-door policy for industry executives and lobbyists while shunning those pushing for environmental protections.
On social media, progressive voices stressed that the Clean Power Plan, while an imperfect solution to the issue of humans' contributions to climate change, represents the United States' strongest effort in recent years to reduce fossil fuel emissions and shift to other methods of producing energy. A growing number of countries around the world are taking their own steps in this direction, including China, which has steadily reduced its carbon emissions over the last four years, and Scotland, which announced on Tuesday that it would ban fracking.
Others drew attention to the EPA's own research which showed earlier this year that the Clean Power Plan would ultimately improve Americans' lives and prevent loss of life.
According to a CNN report in April, after the EPA announced it would review the plan, "The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that when implemented, the plan would prevent 3,600 premature deaths a year. In addition, the agency said, it would prevent 1,700 heart attacks, 90,000 asthma attacks and 300,000 missed days of work or school a year."
Environmental advocates expressed concern about the impact of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) planned repeal of the Clean Power Plan, the Obama administration's central legislation aimed at cutting carbon emissions from power plants.
"Rolling back this plan will put us all in danger," wrote the National Resources Defense Council on Twitter on Wednesday after Reuters obtained an internal EPA memo indicating the move.
The Clean Power Plan has been under the review by President Donald Trump's EPA since March. The rule was introduced in 2015 with the goal of bringing carbon emissions to 32 percent below pre-2005 levels, over 15 years.
Agency head Scott Pruitt is expected to "solicit input on a rule to replace" the plan, according to Reuters. The memo surfaced just a day after the New York Times reported how Pruitt has what is essentially an open-door policy for industry executives and lobbyists while shunning those pushing for environmental protections.
On social media, progressive voices stressed that the Clean Power Plan, while an imperfect solution to the issue of humans' contributions to climate change, represents the United States' strongest effort in recent years to reduce fossil fuel emissions and shift to other methods of producing energy. A growing number of countries around the world are taking their own steps in this direction, including China, which has steadily reduced its carbon emissions over the last four years, and Scotland, which announced on Tuesday that it would ban fracking.
Others drew attention to the EPA's own research which showed earlier this year that the Clean Power Plan would ultimately improve Americans' lives and prevent loss of life.
According to a CNN report in April, after the EPA announced it would review the plan, "The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that when implemented, the plan would prevent 3,600 premature deaths a year. In addition, the agency said, it would prevent 1,700 heart attacks, 90,000 asthma attacks and 300,000 missed days of work or school a year."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.