Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy announced four amendments to the Graham-Cassidy healthcare bill, one of which would ensure states have no ability to set up single-payer systems. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Sep 19, 2017
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) announced his intention Tuesday to introduce four amendments to the Graham-Cassidy bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), one of which would forbid states from using the law's block grants to provide residents with a state-run single payer healthcare system--provoking some to question his commitment to the perennial Republican issue of "states' rights."
The Graham-Cassidy bill would repeal many of the ACA's key components, including marketplace subsidies which help low-income Americans afford monthly premiums. These would be replaced by federal block grants, which the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) call "inadequate." The block grants "would be well below current law federal funding for coverage, would not adjust based on need, would disappear altogether after 2026, and could be spent on virtually any health care purpose, with no requirement to offer low- and moderate-income people coverage or financial assistance," says the CBPP.
While critics have sounded the alarm about the bill's insufficient block grants and other provisions which could eliminate coverage for as many as 32 million Americans, Kennedy's only concern about the grants is that states could potentially use the funding to set up systems covering all residents.
"I don't think states should have the authority to take money from the American taxpayer and set up a single-payer system," said Kennedy, adding, "It's our job to make sure that money is properly spent."
In addition to scrapping marketplace subsidies, the block grant funding would also be spent to eliminate the ACA's Medicaid expansion and replace it with a fixed amount paid by the federal government to states for each Medicaid recipient, regardless of actual Medicaid costs.
While Republicans attempt to push through their third attempt to repeal the ACA, proposals for a nationwide government-funded healthcare system has gained traction in recent weeks. Sixteen Democrats signed on as co-sponsors of Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) Medicare for All bill last week; a year ago Sanders was the only member of the Senate Democratic Caucus officially promoting a universal healthcare system.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) announced his intention Tuesday to introduce four amendments to the Graham-Cassidy bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), one of which would forbid states from using the law's block grants to provide residents with a state-run single payer healthcare system--provoking some to question his commitment to the perennial Republican issue of "states' rights."
The Graham-Cassidy bill would repeal many of the ACA's key components, including marketplace subsidies which help low-income Americans afford monthly premiums. These would be replaced by federal block grants, which the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) call "inadequate." The block grants "would be well below current law federal funding for coverage, would not adjust based on need, would disappear altogether after 2026, and could be spent on virtually any health care purpose, with no requirement to offer low- and moderate-income people coverage or financial assistance," says the CBPP.
While critics have sounded the alarm about the bill's insufficient block grants and other provisions which could eliminate coverage for as many as 32 million Americans, Kennedy's only concern about the grants is that states could potentially use the funding to set up systems covering all residents.
"I don't think states should have the authority to take money from the American taxpayer and set up a single-payer system," said Kennedy, adding, "It's our job to make sure that money is properly spent."
In addition to scrapping marketplace subsidies, the block grant funding would also be spent to eliminate the ACA's Medicaid expansion and replace it with a fixed amount paid by the federal government to states for each Medicaid recipient, regardless of actual Medicaid costs.
While Republicans attempt to push through their third attempt to repeal the ACA, proposals for a nationwide government-funded healthcare system has gained traction in recent weeks. Sixteen Democrats signed on as co-sponsors of Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) Medicare for All bill last week; a year ago Sanders was the only member of the Senate Democratic Caucus officially promoting a universal healthcare system.
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) announced his intention Tuesday to introduce four amendments to the Graham-Cassidy bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), one of which would forbid states from using the law's block grants to provide residents with a state-run single payer healthcare system--provoking some to question his commitment to the perennial Republican issue of "states' rights."
The Graham-Cassidy bill would repeal many of the ACA's key components, including marketplace subsidies which help low-income Americans afford monthly premiums. These would be replaced by federal block grants, which the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) call "inadequate." The block grants "would be well below current law federal funding for coverage, would not adjust based on need, would disappear altogether after 2026, and could be spent on virtually any health care purpose, with no requirement to offer low- and moderate-income people coverage or financial assistance," says the CBPP.
While critics have sounded the alarm about the bill's insufficient block grants and other provisions which could eliminate coverage for as many as 32 million Americans, Kennedy's only concern about the grants is that states could potentially use the funding to set up systems covering all residents.
"I don't think states should have the authority to take money from the American taxpayer and set up a single-payer system," said Kennedy, adding, "It's our job to make sure that money is properly spent."
In addition to scrapping marketplace subsidies, the block grant funding would also be spent to eliminate the ACA's Medicaid expansion and replace it with a fixed amount paid by the federal government to states for each Medicaid recipient, regardless of actual Medicaid costs.
While Republicans attempt to push through their third attempt to repeal the ACA, proposals for a nationwide government-funded healthcare system has gained traction in recent weeks. Sixteen Democrats signed on as co-sponsors of Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) Medicare for All bill last week; a year ago Sanders was the only member of the Senate Democratic Caucus officially promoting a universal healthcare system.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.