Aug 24, 2017
Stanford professor Mark Jacobson and 26 researchers have developed revolutionary roadmaps for 139 nations to transition to 100 percent clean, renewable energy by 2050.
"We're not just trying to examine the climate benefits of reducing carbon but also the air pollution benefits, jobs benefits, and cost benefits."
--Mark Jacobson, report author
"What's different between this study and other studies that have proposed solutions is that we're not just trying to examine the climate benefits of reducing carbon but also the air pollution benefits, jobs benefits, and cost benefits," said Jacobson, director of Stanford's Atmosphere and Energy Program and co-founder of the Solutions Project, a U.S. nonprofit that advocates for transitions to renewable energy.
"Policymakers don't usually want to commit to doing something unless there's some reasonable science that can show it's possible and that's what we're trying to do," he toldClean Technica. "We're not saying there's only one way we can do this, but having a scenario gives people direction."
The roadmaps, published in the sustainable energy journal Joule on Wednesday, envision the countries that are collectively responsible for more than 99 percent of global carbon emissions shifting away from fossil fuels to power generated by water, wind, and the sun.
"The solution is to electrify all energy sectors," the report says, including transportation, heating and cooling, industry, agriculture, forestry, and fishing. Each nation's proposal varies based upon economic and geographic conditions, but collectively they would depend on 57.6 percent solar power and 37.1 percent wind power, while also utilizing geothermal, hydroelectric, tidal, and wave energy.
"Most of the electric technologies that we propose for replacing fossil-fuel technologies are already commercial on a large scale today (e.g., electric heat pumps for air and water heating, induction cooktops, electric passenger vehicles, electric induction furnaces, electric arc furnaces, dielectric heaters), but a few are still being designed for commercial use (e.g., electric aircraft and hybrid hydrogen fuel cell-electric aircraft)," the report notes.
Researchers intentionally excluded nuclear energy, because of associated risks and high costs, as well as biofuels and "clean coal," which have much higher emissions than renewable sources. As study co-author Mark Delucchi told NBC News of the renewable power sources included in the proposal: "It is likely that no other energy options can provide such enormous global social benefits."
If all roadmaps were implemented by 2050, researchers predict their proposal would avoid 1.5degC global warming, prevent millions of annual air-pollution deaths, and create more than 24 million full-time jobs worldwide. Such expected benefits align with other recent findings showing the solar industry already employs more people than coal, oil, and natural gas combined.
In addition to substantially curbing carbon emissions to slow global warming, and saving millions of lives by limiting air pollution, researchers also predict the plan would:
- stabilize energy prices;
- use minimal new land;
- enable countries to produce as much energy as they consume;
- increase energy access by up to 4 billion people worldwide;
- and decentralize the global power supply, reducing risks of large-scale disruptions posed by broken machines or terrorism.
"We strive to reduce energy costs, create jobs, stabilize energy prices, eliminate air pollution, health problems and eliminate global warming simultaneously," Jacobson told NBC News. Praising the proposal, Mark Dyson writes for Rocky Mountain Institute that it "helps push forward a conversation within and between the scientific, policy, and business communities about how to envision and plan for a decarbonized economy."
The new report follows earlier roadmaps, published by Jacobson and his colleagues in 2015, for all 50 states in the U.S. to transition to 100 percent clean, renewable energy--part of a trend among climate researchers to develop comprehensive proposals as a way to help policymakers remain committed to, but also go beyond the goals of the 2015 Paris climate agreement.
Earlier this year, a few weeks before U.S. President Donald Trump announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris accord, Paul Hawken and a team of researchers released Drawdown, which "maps, measures, models, and describes the 100 most substantive solutions to global warming," and claimed to be "the most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming," offering similar suggestions to those outlined by Jacobson and his team.
As Common Dreams reported this week, the transition to 100 percent renewable energy is a goal that has gained significant appeal over the past decade.
And that fact is central to the new In These Times cover story by 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben, who says a transition to 100 percent renewable energy--though it should have happened 25 years ago--must now occur "as fast as humanly possible."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Stanford professor Mark Jacobson and 26 researchers have developed revolutionary roadmaps for 139 nations to transition to 100 percent clean, renewable energy by 2050.
"We're not just trying to examine the climate benefits of reducing carbon but also the air pollution benefits, jobs benefits, and cost benefits."
--Mark Jacobson, report author
"What's different between this study and other studies that have proposed solutions is that we're not just trying to examine the climate benefits of reducing carbon but also the air pollution benefits, jobs benefits, and cost benefits," said Jacobson, director of Stanford's Atmosphere and Energy Program and co-founder of the Solutions Project, a U.S. nonprofit that advocates for transitions to renewable energy.
"Policymakers don't usually want to commit to doing something unless there's some reasonable science that can show it's possible and that's what we're trying to do," he toldClean Technica. "We're not saying there's only one way we can do this, but having a scenario gives people direction."
The roadmaps, published in the sustainable energy journal Joule on Wednesday, envision the countries that are collectively responsible for more than 99 percent of global carbon emissions shifting away from fossil fuels to power generated by water, wind, and the sun.
"The solution is to electrify all energy sectors," the report says, including transportation, heating and cooling, industry, agriculture, forestry, and fishing. Each nation's proposal varies based upon economic and geographic conditions, but collectively they would depend on 57.6 percent solar power and 37.1 percent wind power, while also utilizing geothermal, hydroelectric, tidal, and wave energy.
"Most of the electric technologies that we propose for replacing fossil-fuel technologies are already commercial on a large scale today (e.g., electric heat pumps for air and water heating, induction cooktops, electric passenger vehicles, electric induction furnaces, electric arc furnaces, dielectric heaters), but a few are still being designed for commercial use (e.g., electric aircraft and hybrid hydrogen fuel cell-electric aircraft)," the report notes.
Researchers intentionally excluded nuclear energy, because of associated risks and high costs, as well as biofuels and "clean coal," which have much higher emissions than renewable sources. As study co-author Mark Delucchi told NBC News of the renewable power sources included in the proposal: "It is likely that no other energy options can provide such enormous global social benefits."
If all roadmaps were implemented by 2050, researchers predict their proposal would avoid 1.5degC global warming, prevent millions of annual air-pollution deaths, and create more than 24 million full-time jobs worldwide. Such expected benefits align with other recent findings showing the solar industry already employs more people than coal, oil, and natural gas combined.
In addition to substantially curbing carbon emissions to slow global warming, and saving millions of lives by limiting air pollution, researchers also predict the plan would:
- stabilize energy prices;
- use minimal new land;
- enable countries to produce as much energy as they consume;
- increase energy access by up to 4 billion people worldwide;
- and decentralize the global power supply, reducing risks of large-scale disruptions posed by broken machines or terrorism.
"We strive to reduce energy costs, create jobs, stabilize energy prices, eliminate air pollution, health problems and eliminate global warming simultaneously," Jacobson told NBC News. Praising the proposal, Mark Dyson writes for Rocky Mountain Institute that it "helps push forward a conversation within and between the scientific, policy, and business communities about how to envision and plan for a decarbonized economy."
The new report follows earlier roadmaps, published by Jacobson and his colleagues in 2015, for all 50 states in the U.S. to transition to 100 percent clean, renewable energy--part of a trend among climate researchers to develop comprehensive proposals as a way to help policymakers remain committed to, but also go beyond the goals of the 2015 Paris climate agreement.
Earlier this year, a few weeks before U.S. President Donald Trump announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris accord, Paul Hawken and a team of researchers released Drawdown, which "maps, measures, models, and describes the 100 most substantive solutions to global warming," and claimed to be "the most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming," offering similar suggestions to those outlined by Jacobson and his team.
As Common Dreams reported this week, the transition to 100 percent renewable energy is a goal that has gained significant appeal over the past decade.
And that fact is central to the new In These Times cover story by 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben, who says a transition to 100 percent renewable energy--though it should have happened 25 years ago--must now occur "as fast as humanly possible."
Stanford professor Mark Jacobson and 26 researchers have developed revolutionary roadmaps for 139 nations to transition to 100 percent clean, renewable energy by 2050.
"We're not just trying to examine the climate benefits of reducing carbon but also the air pollution benefits, jobs benefits, and cost benefits."
--Mark Jacobson, report author
"What's different between this study and other studies that have proposed solutions is that we're not just trying to examine the climate benefits of reducing carbon but also the air pollution benefits, jobs benefits, and cost benefits," said Jacobson, director of Stanford's Atmosphere and Energy Program and co-founder of the Solutions Project, a U.S. nonprofit that advocates for transitions to renewable energy.
"Policymakers don't usually want to commit to doing something unless there's some reasonable science that can show it's possible and that's what we're trying to do," he toldClean Technica. "We're not saying there's only one way we can do this, but having a scenario gives people direction."
The roadmaps, published in the sustainable energy journal Joule on Wednesday, envision the countries that are collectively responsible for more than 99 percent of global carbon emissions shifting away from fossil fuels to power generated by water, wind, and the sun.
"The solution is to electrify all energy sectors," the report says, including transportation, heating and cooling, industry, agriculture, forestry, and fishing. Each nation's proposal varies based upon economic and geographic conditions, but collectively they would depend on 57.6 percent solar power and 37.1 percent wind power, while also utilizing geothermal, hydroelectric, tidal, and wave energy.
"Most of the electric technologies that we propose for replacing fossil-fuel technologies are already commercial on a large scale today (e.g., electric heat pumps for air and water heating, induction cooktops, electric passenger vehicles, electric induction furnaces, electric arc furnaces, dielectric heaters), but a few are still being designed for commercial use (e.g., electric aircraft and hybrid hydrogen fuel cell-electric aircraft)," the report notes.
Researchers intentionally excluded nuclear energy, because of associated risks and high costs, as well as biofuels and "clean coal," which have much higher emissions than renewable sources. As study co-author Mark Delucchi told NBC News of the renewable power sources included in the proposal: "It is likely that no other energy options can provide such enormous global social benefits."
If all roadmaps were implemented by 2050, researchers predict their proposal would avoid 1.5degC global warming, prevent millions of annual air-pollution deaths, and create more than 24 million full-time jobs worldwide. Such expected benefits align with other recent findings showing the solar industry already employs more people than coal, oil, and natural gas combined.
In addition to substantially curbing carbon emissions to slow global warming, and saving millions of lives by limiting air pollution, researchers also predict the plan would:
- stabilize energy prices;
- use minimal new land;
- enable countries to produce as much energy as they consume;
- increase energy access by up to 4 billion people worldwide;
- and decentralize the global power supply, reducing risks of large-scale disruptions posed by broken machines or terrorism.
"We strive to reduce energy costs, create jobs, stabilize energy prices, eliminate air pollution, health problems and eliminate global warming simultaneously," Jacobson told NBC News. Praising the proposal, Mark Dyson writes for Rocky Mountain Institute that it "helps push forward a conversation within and between the scientific, policy, and business communities about how to envision and plan for a decarbonized economy."
The new report follows earlier roadmaps, published by Jacobson and his colleagues in 2015, for all 50 states in the U.S. to transition to 100 percent clean, renewable energy--part of a trend among climate researchers to develop comprehensive proposals as a way to help policymakers remain committed to, but also go beyond the goals of the 2015 Paris climate agreement.
Earlier this year, a few weeks before U.S. President Donald Trump announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris accord, Paul Hawken and a team of researchers released Drawdown, which "maps, measures, models, and describes the 100 most substantive solutions to global warming," and claimed to be "the most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming," offering similar suggestions to those outlined by Jacobson and his team.
As Common Dreams reported this week, the transition to 100 percent renewable energy is a goal that has gained significant appeal over the past decade.
And that fact is central to the new In These Times cover story by 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben, who says a transition to 100 percent renewable energy--though it should have happened 25 years ago--must now occur "as fast as humanly possible."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.