SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. President Donald Trump (R) shakes hands with Judge Neil Gorsuch after nominating him to the Supreme Court during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House January 31, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
'Downright Unconstitutional': Gorsuch Slammed for Headlining Event at Trump Hotel
"Especially as many Trump decisions are likely soon to reach the court's docket, a healthy respect for public confidence in the court should have led Justice Gorsuch to demur."
Aug 18, 2017
In what critics are calling a blatant violation of "basic ethical principles about conflicts of interest," Trump-appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has reportedly agreed to headline the "Defending Freedom Luncheon" next month at the Trump International Hotel, which is the subject of numerous lawsuits that could eventually reach the nation's highest court.
"Hmmm... SCOTUS justice who might be asked to hear case related to Trump hotel will headline event at Trump hotel. "
--Kenneth Vogel, New York TimesLegal experts immediately sounded alarm upon learning that Gorsuch is set to be the featured speaker at the event, which is hosted by the conservative group The Fund for American Studies.
"It's a terrible signal for this group to be holding their meeting at the Trump International Hotel and for a Supreme Court justice to legitimate it by attending," Stanford law professor Deborah L. Rhode told the New York Times.
New York University ethics expert Stephen Gillers agreed, saying in an interview with the Times: "At this highly divisive political moment, especially as many Trump decisions are likely soon to reach the court's docket, one just days later, a healthy respect for public confidence in the court should have led Justice Gorsuch to demur."
Other commentators and legal observers expressed similar concerns on social media, and MoveOn.org quickly began circulating a petition calling on Gorsuch to withdraw from the event.
In an indication of the many potential conflicts the September event raises, Richard Painter--vice chair of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW)--declined to comment on the Times story because "the status of the hotel [is] at issue" in several pending lawsuits.
CREW, along with other groups and individuals, is suing President Donald Trump on the grounds that he has violated the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, which bars the president from receiving gifts from foreign governments and prohibits Trump from "receiving benefits from the federal and state governments apart from his congressionally approved compensation."
"Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
--Nan Aron, Alliance for JusticeThe lawsuit was initially filed in January, just three days into Trump's presidency, and it argues that the president has profited from foreign payments to his hotel.
CREW argued in a recent update that the violations have only continued to pile up.
"We would've liked to be dropping our case because the president got in line with the Constitution," said Noah Bookbinder. "Instead, the violations we anticipated when we brought our case became much more concrete."
By ignoring these concerns, Gorsuch is "legitimizing" both Trump's "conflicts of interest" and the "hosting group's attempt to curry favor," argued Walter Shaub, the former head of the Office of Government Ethics.
In a statement on Friday, Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice, added: "Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In what critics are calling a blatant violation of "basic ethical principles about conflicts of interest," Trump-appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has reportedly agreed to headline the "Defending Freedom Luncheon" next month at the Trump International Hotel, which is the subject of numerous lawsuits that could eventually reach the nation's highest court.
"Hmmm... SCOTUS justice who might be asked to hear case related to Trump hotel will headline event at Trump hotel. "
--Kenneth Vogel, New York TimesLegal experts immediately sounded alarm upon learning that Gorsuch is set to be the featured speaker at the event, which is hosted by the conservative group The Fund for American Studies.
"It's a terrible signal for this group to be holding their meeting at the Trump International Hotel and for a Supreme Court justice to legitimate it by attending," Stanford law professor Deborah L. Rhode told the New York Times.
New York University ethics expert Stephen Gillers agreed, saying in an interview with the Times: "At this highly divisive political moment, especially as many Trump decisions are likely soon to reach the court's docket, one just days later, a healthy respect for public confidence in the court should have led Justice Gorsuch to demur."
Other commentators and legal observers expressed similar concerns on social media, and MoveOn.org quickly began circulating a petition calling on Gorsuch to withdraw from the event.
In an indication of the many potential conflicts the September event raises, Richard Painter--vice chair of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW)--declined to comment on the Times story because "the status of the hotel [is] at issue" in several pending lawsuits.
CREW, along with other groups and individuals, is suing President Donald Trump on the grounds that he has violated the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, which bars the president from receiving gifts from foreign governments and prohibits Trump from "receiving benefits from the federal and state governments apart from his congressionally approved compensation."
"Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
--Nan Aron, Alliance for JusticeThe lawsuit was initially filed in January, just three days into Trump's presidency, and it argues that the president has profited from foreign payments to his hotel.
CREW argued in a recent update that the violations have only continued to pile up.
"We would've liked to be dropping our case because the president got in line with the Constitution," said Noah Bookbinder. "Instead, the violations we anticipated when we brought our case became much more concrete."
By ignoring these concerns, Gorsuch is "legitimizing" both Trump's "conflicts of interest" and the "hosting group's attempt to curry favor," argued Walter Shaub, the former head of the Office of Government Ethics.
In a statement on Friday, Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice, added: "Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
In what critics are calling a blatant violation of "basic ethical principles about conflicts of interest," Trump-appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has reportedly agreed to headline the "Defending Freedom Luncheon" next month at the Trump International Hotel, which is the subject of numerous lawsuits that could eventually reach the nation's highest court.
"Hmmm... SCOTUS justice who might be asked to hear case related to Trump hotel will headline event at Trump hotel. "
--Kenneth Vogel, New York TimesLegal experts immediately sounded alarm upon learning that Gorsuch is set to be the featured speaker at the event, which is hosted by the conservative group The Fund for American Studies.
"It's a terrible signal for this group to be holding their meeting at the Trump International Hotel and for a Supreme Court justice to legitimate it by attending," Stanford law professor Deborah L. Rhode told the New York Times.
New York University ethics expert Stephen Gillers agreed, saying in an interview with the Times: "At this highly divisive political moment, especially as many Trump decisions are likely soon to reach the court's docket, one just days later, a healthy respect for public confidence in the court should have led Justice Gorsuch to demur."
Other commentators and legal observers expressed similar concerns on social media, and MoveOn.org quickly began circulating a petition calling on Gorsuch to withdraw from the event.
In an indication of the many potential conflicts the September event raises, Richard Painter--vice chair of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW)--declined to comment on the Times story because "the status of the hotel [is] at issue" in several pending lawsuits.
CREW, along with other groups and individuals, is suing President Donald Trump on the grounds that he has violated the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, which bars the president from receiving gifts from foreign governments and prohibits Trump from "receiving benefits from the federal and state governments apart from his congressionally approved compensation."
"Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
--Nan Aron, Alliance for JusticeThe lawsuit was initially filed in January, just three days into Trump's presidency, and it argues that the president has profited from foreign payments to his hotel.
CREW argued in a recent update that the violations have only continued to pile up.
"We would've liked to be dropping our case because the president got in line with the Constitution," said Noah Bookbinder. "Instead, the violations we anticipated when we brought our case became much more concrete."
By ignoring these concerns, Gorsuch is "legitimizing" both Trump's "conflicts of interest" and the "hosting group's attempt to curry favor," argued Walter Shaub, the former head of the Office of Government Ethics.
In a statement on Friday, Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice, added: "Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.