SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. President Donald Trump (R) shakes hands with Judge Neil Gorsuch after nominating him to the Supreme Court during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House January 31, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
'Downright Unconstitutional': Gorsuch Slammed for Headlining Event at Trump Hotel
"Especially as many Trump decisions are likely soon to reach the court's docket, a healthy respect for public confidence in the court should have led Justice Gorsuch to demur."
Aug 18, 2017
In what critics are calling a blatant violation of "basic ethical principles about conflicts of interest," Trump-appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has reportedly agreed to headline the "Defending Freedom Luncheon" next month at the Trump International Hotel, which is the subject of numerous lawsuits that could eventually reach the nation's highest court.
"Hmmm... SCOTUS justice who might be asked to hear case related to Trump hotel will headline event at Trump hotel. "
--Kenneth Vogel, New York TimesLegal experts immediately sounded alarm upon learning that Gorsuch is set to be the featured speaker at the event, which is hosted by the conservative group The Fund for American Studies.
"It's a terrible signal for this group to be holding their meeting at the Trump International Hotel and for a Supreme Court justice to legitimate it by attending," Stanford law professor Deborah L. Rhode told the New York Times.
New York University ethics expert Stephen Gillers agreed, saying in an interview with the Times: "At this highly divisive political moment, especially as many Trump decisions are likely soon to reach the court's docket, one just days later, a healthy respect for public confidence in the court should have led Justice Gorsuch to demur."
Other commentators and legal observers expressed similar concerns on social media, and MoveOn.org quickly began circulating a petition calling on Gorsuch to withdraw from the event.
In an indication of the many potential conflicts the September event raises, Richard Painter--vice chair of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW)--declined to comment on the Times story because "the status of the hotel [is] at issue" in several pending lawsuits.
CREW, along with other groups and individuals, is suing President Donald Trump on the grounds that he has violated the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, which bars the president from receiving gifts from foreign governments and prohibits Trump from "receiving benefits from the federal and state governments apart from his congressionally approved compensation."
"Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
--Nan Aron, Alliance for JusticeThe lawsuit was initially filed in January, just three days into Trump's presidency, and it argues that the president has profited from foreign payments to his hotel.
CREW argued in a recent update that the violations have only continued to pile up.
"We would've liked to be dropping our case because the president got in line with the Constitution," said Noah Bookbinder. "Instead, the violations we anticipated when we brought our case became much more concrete."
By ignoring these concerns, Gorsuch is "legitimizing" both Trump's "conflicts of interest" and the "hosting group's attempt to curry favor," argued Walter Shaub, the former head of the Office of Government Ethics.
In a statement on Friday, Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice, added: "Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In what critics are calling a blatant violation of "basic ethical principles about conflicts of interest," Trump-appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has reportedly agreed to headline the "Defending Freedom Luncheon" next month at the Trump International Hotel, which is the subject of numerous lawsuits that could eventually reach the nation's highest court.
"Hmmm... SCOTUS justice who might be asked to hear case related to Trump hotel will headline event at Trump hotel. "
--Kenneth Vogel, New York TimesLegal experts immediately sounded alarm upon learning that Gorsuch is set to be the featured speaker at the event, which is hosted by the conservative group The Fund for American Studies.
"It's a terrible signal for this group to be holding their meeting at the Trump International Hotel and for a Supreme Court justice to legitimate it by attending," Stanford law professor Deborah L. Rhode told the New York Times.
New York University ethics expert Stephen Gillers agreed, saying in an interview with the Times: "At this highly divisive political moment, especially as many Trump decisions are likely soon to reach the court's docket, one just days later, a healthy respect for public confidence in the court should have led Justice Gorsuch to demur."
Other commentators and legal observers expressed similar concerns on social media, and MoveOn.org quickly began circulating a petition calling on Gorsuch to withdraw from the event.
In an indication of the many potential conflicts the September event raises, Richard Painter--vice chair of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW)--declined to comment on the Times story because "the status of the hotel [is] at issue" in several pending lawsuits.
CREW, along with other groups and individuals, is suing President Donald Trump on the grounds that he has violated the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, which bars the president from receiving gifts from foreign governments and prohibits Trump from "receiving benefits from the federal and state governments apart from his congressionally approved compensation."
"Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
--Nan Aron, Alliance for JusticeThe lawsuit was initially filed in January, just three days into Trump's presidency, and it argues that the president has profited from foreign payments to his hotel.
CREW argued in a recent update that the violations have only continued to pile up.
"We would've liked to be dropping our case because the president got in line with the Constitution," said Noah Bookbinder. "Instead, the violations we anticipated when we brought our case became much more concrete."
By ignoring these concerns, Gorsuch is "legitimizing" both Trump's "conflicts of interest" and the "hosting group's attempt to curry favor," argued Walter Shaub, the former head of the Office of Government Ethics.
In a statement on Friday, Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice, added: "Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
In what critics are calling a blatant violation of "basic ethical principles about conflicts of interest," Trump-appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has reportedly agreed to headline the "Defending Freedom Luncheon" next month at the Trump International Hotel, which is the subject of numerous lawsuits that could eventually reach the nation's highest court.
"Hmmm... SCOTUS justice who might be asked to hear case related to Trump hotel will headline event at Trump hotel. "
--Kenneth Vogel, New York TimesLegal experts immediately sounded alarm upon learning that Gorsuch is set to be the featured speaker at the event, which is hosted by the conservative group The Fund for American Studies.
"It's a terrible signal for this group to be holding their meeting at the Trump International Hotel and for a Supreme Court justice to legitimate it by attending," Stanford law professor Deborah L. Rhode told the New York Times.
New York University ethics expert Stephen Gillers agreed, saying in an interview with the Times: "At this highly divisive political moment, especially as many Trump decisions are likely soon to reach the court's docket, one just days later, a healthy respect for public confidence in the court should have led Justice Gorsuch to demur."
Other commentators and legal observers expressed similar concerns on social media, and MoveOn.org quickly began circulating a petition calling on Gorsuch to withdraw from the event.
In an indication of the many potential conflicts the September event raises, Richard Painter--vice chair of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW)--declined to comment on the Times story because "the status of the hotel [is] at issue" in several pending lawsuits.
CREW, along with other groups and individuals, is suing President Donald Trump on the grounds that he has violated the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, which bars the president from receiving gifts from foreign governments and prohibits Trump from "receiving benefits from the federal and state governments apart from his congressionally approved compensation."
"Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
--Nan Aron, Alliance for JusticeThe lawsuit was initially filed in January, just three days into Trump's presidency, and it argues that the president has profited from foreign payments to his hotel.
CREW argued in a recent update that the violations have only continued to pile up.
"We would've liked to be dropping our case because the president got in line with the Constitution," said Noah Bookbinder. "Instead, the violations we anticipated when we brought our case became much more concrete."
By ignoring these concerns, Gorsuch is "legitimizing" both Trump's "conflicts of interest" and the "hosting group's attempt to curry favor," argued Walter Shaub, the former head of the Office of Government Ethics.
In a statement on Friday, Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice, added: "Justice Gorsuch should have known better than to sign up as the headliner for an event that will line Donald Trump's pockets in a way that is at best ethically sketchy, and at worst downright unconstitutional."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy