SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
More than 200 people were indicted on felony rioting charges during anti-Trump protests on Inauguration Day. (Photo: Anthony Crider/Flickr/cc)
Trump DOJ Wants Info on Every Person Who Visited Anti-Trump Protest Site
Web hosting company vows to protect users from 'overreach' and 'abuse of government authority'
Aug 15, 2017
Decrying it as "investigatory overreach" and a "clear abuse of government authority," web hosting provider DreamHost is challenging a request it received from the Justice Department for information about visitors to a client's site used to organize protests against President Donald Trump on his Inauguration Day.
In a blog post titled "We Fight for the Users," the DreamHost wrote on Monday evening that the DOJ had demanded personal information of more than 1.3 million people who visited disruptj20.org, where they could find information about where anti-Trump events were taking place on January 20.
"No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."--Mark Rumold, Electronic Frontier Foundation
In a July 12 search warrant the DOJ said it was looking for information about violations of riot laws in Washington, D.C., by requesting "names, addresses, telephone numbers and other identifiers, e-mail addresses, business information, the length of service (including start date), means and source of payment for services (including any credit card or bank account number), and information about any domain name registration."
The company said the overly-broad request "chills free association and the right of free speech afforded by the Constitution," and the information the DOJ is attempting to collect "could be used to identify any individuals who used this site to exercise and express political speech...That should be enough to set alarm bells off in anyone's mind."
DreamHost's general counsel, Chris Ghazarian, has filed a legal argument (pdf) against the DOJ's request:
In essence, the Search Warrant not only aims to identify the political dissidents of the current administration, but attempts to identify and understand what content each of these dissidents viewed on the website. The Search Warrant...fails to identify with the required particularity what will be seized by the government. It also fails to provide DreamHost with any assurance that the government will return or destroy the large portion of the information irrelevant to the government's criminal case or cases.
DreamHost said it is also working closely with the non-profit civil liberties group Electronic Frontier Foundation. In a blog post, Mark Rumold, senior staff attorney for EFF, wrote, "No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."
Ghazarian will attend a hearing on the DOJ's request on August 18.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Decrying it as "investigatory overreach" and a "clear abuse of government authority," web hosting provider DreamHost is challenging a request it received from the Justice Department for information about visitors to a client's site used to organize protests against President Donald Trump on his Inauguration Day.
In a blog post titled "We Fight for the Users," the DreamHost wrote on Monday evening that the DOJ had demanded personal information of more than 1.3 million people who visited disruptj20.org, where they could find information about where anti-Trump events were taking place on January 20.
"No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."--Mark Rumold, Electronic Frontier Foundation
In a July 12 search warrant the DOJ said it was looking for information about violations of riot laws in Washington, D.C., by requesting "names, addresses, telephone numbers and other identifiers, e-mail addresses, business information, the length of service (including start date), means and source of payment for services (including any credit card or bank account number), and information about any domain name registration."
The company said the overly-broad request "chills free association and the right of free speech afforded by the Constitution," and the information the DOJ is attempting to collect "could be used to identify any individuals who used this site to exercise and express political speech...That should be enough to set alarm bells off in anyone's mind."
DreamHost's general counsel, Chris Ghazarian, has filed a legal argument (pdf) against the DOJ's request:
In essence, the Search Warrant not only aims to identify the political dissidents of the current administration, but attempts to identify and understand what content each of these dissidents viewed on the website. The Search Warrant...fails to identify with the required particularity what will be seized by the government. It also fails to provide DreamHost with any assurance that the government will return or destroy the large portion of the information irrelevant to the government's criminal case or cases.
DreamHost said it is also working closely with the non-profit civil liberties group Electronic Frontier Foundation. In a blog post, Mark Rumold, senior staff attorney for EFF, wrote, "No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."
Ghazarian will attend a hearing on the DOJ's request on August 18.
Decrying it as "investigatory overreach" and a "clear abuse of government authority," web hosting provider DreamHost is challenging a request it received from the Justice Department for information about visitors to a client's site used to organize protests against President Donald Trump on his Inauguration Day.
In a blog post titled "We Fight for the Users," the DreamHost wrote on Monday evening that the DOJ had demanded personal information of more than 1.3 million people who visited disruptj20.org, where they could find information about where anti-Trump events were taking place on January 20.
"No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."--Mark Rumold, Electronic Frontier Foundation
In a July 12 search warrant the DOJ said it was looking for information about violations of riot laws in Washington, D.C., by requesting "names, addresses, telephone numbers and other identifiers, e-mail addresses, business information, the length of service (including start date), means and source of payment for services (including any credit card or bank account number), and information about any domain name registration."
The company said the overly-broad request "chills free association and the right of free speech afforded by the Constitution," and the information the DOJ is attempting to collect "could be used to identify any individuals who used this site to exercise and express political speech...That should be enough to set alarm bells off in anyone's mind."
DreamHost's general counsel, Chris Ghazarian, has filed a legal argument (pdf) against the DOJ's request:
In essence, the Search Warrant not only aims to identify the political dissidents of the current administration, but attempts to identify and understand what content each of these dissidents viewed on the website. The Search Warrant...fails to identify with the required particularity what will be seized by the government. It also fails to provide DreamHost with any assurance that the government will return or destroy the large portion of the information irrelevant to the government's criminal case or cases.
DreamHost said it is also working closely with the non-profit civil liberties group Electronic Frontier Foundation. In a blog post, Mark Rumold, senior staff attorney for EFF, wrote, "No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."
Ghazarian will attend a hearing on the DOJ's request on August 18.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.