More than 200 people were indicted on felony rioting charges during anti-Trump protests on Inauguration Day. (Photo: Anthony Crider/Flickr/cc)
Aug 15, 2017
Decrying it as "investigatory overreach" and a "clear abuse of government authority," web hosting provider DreamHost is challenging a request it received from the Justice Department for information about visitors to a client's site used to organize protests against President Donald Trump on his Inauguration Day.
In a blog post titled "We Fight for the Users," the DreamHost wrote on Monday evening that the DOJ had demanded personal information of more than 1.3 million people who visited disruptj20.org, where they could find information about where anti-Trump events were taking place on January 20.
"No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."--Mark Rumold, Electronic Frontier Foundation
In a July 12 search warrant the DOJ said it was looking for information about violations of riot laws in Washington, D.C., by requesting "names, addresses, telephone numbers and other identifiers, e-mail addresses, business information, the length of service (including start date), means and source of payment for services (including any credit card or bank account number), and information about any domain name registration."
The company said the overly-broad request "chills free association and the right of free speech afforded by the Constitution," and the information the DOJ is attempting to collect "could be used to identify any individuals who used this site to exercise and express political speech...That should be enough to set alarm bells off in anyone's mind."
DreamHost's general counsel, Chris Ghazarian, has filed a legal argument (pdf) against the DOJ's request:
In essence, the Search Warrant not only aims to identify the political dissidents of the current administration, but attempts to identify and understand what content each of these dissidents viewed on the website. The Search Warrant...fails to identify with the required particularity what will be seized by the government. It also fails to provide DreamHost with any assurance that the government will return or destroy the large portion of the information irrelevant to the government's criminal case or cases.
DreamHost said it is also working closely with the non-profit civil liberties group Electronic Frontier Foundation. In a blog post, Mark Rumold, senior staff attorney for EFF, wrote, "No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."
Ghazarian will attend a hearing on the DOJ's request on August 18.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Decrying it as "investigatory overreach" and a "clear abuse of government authority," web hosting provider DreamHost is challenging a request it received from the Justice Department for information about visitors to a client's site used to organize protests against President Donald Trump on his Inauguration Day.
In a blog post titled "We Fight for the Users," the DreamHost wrote on Monday evening that the DOJ had demanded personal information of more than 1.3 million people who visited disruptj20.org, where they could find information about where anti-Trump events were taking place on January 20.
"No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."--Mark Rumold, Electronic Frontier Foundation
In a July 12 search warrant the DOJ said it was looking for information about violations of riot laws in Washington, D.C., by requesting "names, addresses, telephone numbers and other identifiers, e-mail addresses, business information, the length of service (including start date), means and source of payment for services (including any credit card or bank account number), and information about any domain name registration."
The company said the overly-broad request "chills free association and the right of free speech afforded by the Constitution," and the information the DOJ is attempting to collect "could be used to identify any individuals who used this site to exercise and express political speech...That should be enough to set alarm bells off in anyone's mind."
DreamHost's general counsel, Chris Ghazarian, has filed a legal argument (pdf) against the DOJ's request:
In essence, the Search Warrant not only aims to identify the political dissidents of the current administration, but attempts to identify and understand what content each of these dissidents viewed on the website. The Search Warrant...fails to identify with the required particularity what will be seized by the government. It also fails to provide DreamHost with any assurance that the government will return or destroy the large portion of the information irrelevant to the government's criminal case or cases.
DreamHost said it is also working closely with the non-profit civil liberties group Electronic Frontier Foundation. In a blog post, Mark Rumold, senior staff attorney for EFF, wrote, "No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."
Ghazarian will attend a hearing on the DOJ's request on August 18.
Decrying it as "investigatory overreach" and a "clear abuse of government authority," web hosting provider DreamHost is challenging a request it received from the Justice Department for information about visitors to a client's site used to organize protests against President Donald Trump on his Inauguration Day.
In a blog post titled "We Fight for the Users," the DreamHost wrote on Monday evening that the DOJ had demanded personal information of more than 1.3 million people who visited disruptj20.org, where they could find information about where anti-Trump events were taking place on January 20.
"No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."--Mark Rumold, Electronic Frontier Foundation
In a July 12 search warrant the DOJ said it was looking for information about violations of riot laws in Washington, D.C., by requesting "names, addresses, telephone numbers and other identifiers, e-mail addresses, business information, the length of service (including start date), means and source of payment for services (including any credit card or bank account number), and information about any domain name registration."
The company said the overly-broad request "chills free association and the right of free speech afforded by the Constitution," and the information the DOJ is attempting to collect "could be used to identify any individuals who used this site to exercise and express political speech...That should be enough to set alarm bells off in anyone's mind."
DreamHost's general counsel, Chris Ghazarian, has filed a legal argument (pdf) against the DOJ's request:
In essence, the Search Warrant not only aims to identify the political dissidents of the current administration, but attempts to identify and understand what content each of these dissidents viewed on the website. The Search Warrant...fails to identify with the required particularity what will be seized by the government. It also fails to provide DreamHost with any assurance that the government will return or destroy the large portion of the information irrelevant to the government's criminal case or cases.
DreamHost said it is also working closely with the non-profit civil liberties group Electronic Frontier Foundation. In a blog post, Mark Rumold, senior staff attorney for EFF, wrote, "No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this."
Ghazarian will attend a hearing on the DOJ's request on August 18.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.