

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"We hope this letter will serve as an opportunity to respond to reports suggesting that you have failed to exercise adequate independence as FCC Chairman and that may have resulted in the agency giving unusual and possibly preferential treatment to Sinclair," three Democratic lawmakers wrote to Chairman Ajit Pai.
As the New York Times published a scathing new report detailing how Sinclair Broadcast Group "is ridding itself of regulation" on Monday, three ranking Democrats on relevant House of Representatives committees sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman about his agency's alleged "preferential treatment" of the conservative-leaning local television behemoth.
In the 12-page letter (pdf) sent to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican appointed by President Donald Trump, Reps. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Mike Doyle (D-Pa.), and Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.) rely on recent news reports to outline four ways in which the FCC, under the Trump administration, "has taken a series of swift actions that have benefitted Sinclair." The Democratic lawmakers outline reports that the FCC:
The legislators--who serve on the House Commerce Committee, the technology and communications subcommittee, and the oversight and investigations subcommittee--also presented a bulleted list of interactions between Pai and Sinclair, as well as the Trump administration and Sinclair, that they said seem to "suggest a favorable relationship."
Among these allegations are that Pai met with Sinclair's then-CEO David Smith while attending a conference for the company's general managers in November; Pai met with Smith as well as new Sinclair CEO Chris Ripley in January; Sinclair "struck a deal" with the Trump campaign, exchanging access to the then-candidate for better coverage; and former Trump official Boris Epshteyn's on-air political commentary segments, which have been called "propaganda" by critics, are sent to Sinclair stations as "must-run" programming.
"We hope this letter will serve as an opportunity to respond to reports suggesting that you have failed to exercise adequate independence as FCC Chairman and that may have resulted in the agency giving unusual and possibly preferential treatment to Sinclair," the Democrats wrote to Pai, requesting a response by August 28--the day before the final deadline for the public to file comments with the FCC regarding Sinclair's proposed merger with Tribune.
The Democratic lawmakers' allegations, which are sourced with dozens of footnotes, are further bolstered by reporting published Monday by the New York Times that details Pai's alleged "deregulatory blitz, enacting or proposing a wish list of fundamental policy changes advocated by Mr. Smith and his company."
Relying on hundreds of pages of emails and other documents that the Times accessed via the Freedom of Information Act, the article describes a "rush of regulatory actions [that] has been carefully aligned with Sinclair's business objectives," including regulatory rollback that critics say "undermines the heart of the FCC mission to protect diversity, competition and local control in broadcast media."
The Times article also outlines Pai's cozy history with the company and quotes Ripley as saying on a phone call with Sinclair investors in February: "We do expect this new FCC to tackle the ownership rules. We're very optimistic about this new FCC and the leadership of Ajit Pai."
If the Tribune merger is approved by the FCC under Pai and the Trump administration, Sinclair would add another 42 stations to its already vast reach, as the Times mapped below.

The Times report also details the histories of the company and Pai, noting other recent deregulatory actions by the FCC chairman that have provoked intense criticism: "Mr. Pai also froze a program for broadband subsidies for low-income families and began a rollback of net neutrality rules that ensured Internet traffic was equally available to all consumers, acting on regulatory issues that will reshape other multibillion-dollar businesses under his watch."
As Common Dreams has previously reported, concerns over Pai's opposition to net neutrality protections have motivated Open Internet and free speech advocates, as well as Democrat lawmakers, to sound alarms and organize nationwide protests.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As the New York Times published a scathing new report detailing how Sinclair Broadcast Group "is ridding itself of regulation" on Monday, three ranking Democrats on relevant House of Representatives committees sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman about his agency's alleged "preferential treatment" of the conservative-leaning local television behemoth.
In the 12-page letter (pdf) sent to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican appointed by President Donald Trump, Reps. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Mike Doyle (D-Pa.), and Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.) rely on recent news reports to outline four ways in which the FCC, under the Trump administration, "has taken a series of swift actions that have benefitted Sinclair." The Democratic lawmakers outline reports that the FCC:
The legislators--who serve on the House Commerce Committee, the technology and communications subcommittee, and the oversight and investigations subcommittee--also presented a bulleted list of interactions between Pai and Sinclair, as well as the Trump administration and Sinclair, that they said seem to "suggest a favorable relationship."
Among these allegations are that Pai met with Sinclair's then-CEO David Smith while attending a conference for the company's general managers in November; Pai met with Smith as well as new Sinclair CEO Chris Ripley in January; Sinclair "struck a deal" with the Trump campaign, exchanging access to the then-candidate for better coverage; and former Trump official Boris Epshteyn's on-air political commentary segments, which have been called "propaganda" by critics, are sent to Sinclair stations as "must-run" programming.
"We hope this letter will serve as an opportunity to respond to reports suggesting that you have failed to exercise adequate independence as FCC Chairman and that may have resulted in the agency giving unusual and possibly preferential treatment to Sinclair," the Democrats wrote to Pai, requesting a response by August 28--the day before the final deadline for the public to file comments with the FCC regarding Sinclair's proposed merger with Tribune.
The Democratic lawmakers' allegations, which are sourced with dozens of footnotes, are further bolstered by reporting published Monday by the New York Times that details Pai's alleged "deregulatory blitz, enacting or proposing a wish list of fundamental policy changes advocated by Mr. Smith and his company."
Relying on hundreds of pages of emails and other documents that the Times accessed via the Freedom of Information Act, the article describes a "rush of regulatory actions [that] has been carefully aligned with Sinclair's business objectives," including regulatory rollback that critics say "undermines the heart of the FCC mission to protect diversity, competition and local control in broadcast media."
The Times article also outlines Pai's cozy history with the company and quotes Ripley as saying on a phone call with Sinclair investors in February: "We do expect this new FCC to tackle the ownership rules. We're very optimistic about this new FCC and the leadership of Ajit Pai."
If the Tribune merger is approved by the FCC under Pai and the Trump administration, Sinclair would add another 42 stations to its already vast reach, as the Times mapped below.

The Times report also details the histories of the company and Pai, noting other recent deregulatory actions by the FCC chairman that have provoked intense criticism: "Mr. Pai also froze a program for broadband subsidies for low-income families and began a rollback of net neutrality rules that ensured Internet traffic was equally available to all consumers, acting on regulatory issues that will reshape other multibillion-dollar businesses under his watch."
As Common Dreams has previously reported, concerns over Pai's opposition to net neutrality protections have motivated Open Internet and free speech advocates, as well as Democrat lawmakers, to sound alarms and organize nationwide protests.
As the New York Times published a scathing new report detailing how Sinclair Broadcast Group "is ridding itself of regulation" on Monday, three ranking Democrats on relevant House of Representatives committees sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman about his agency's alleged "preferential treatment" of the conservative-leaning local television behemoth.
In the 12-page letter (pdf) sent to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican appointed by President Donald Trump, Reps. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Mike Doyle (D-Pa.), and Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.) rely on recent news reports to outline four ways in which the FCC, under the Trump administration, "has taken a series of swift actions that have benefitted Sinclair." The Democratic lawmakers outline reports that the FCC:
The legislators--who serve on the House Commerce Committee, the technology and communications subcommittee, and the oversight and investigations subcommittee--also presented a bulleted list of interactions between Pai and Sinclair, as well as the Trump administration and Sinclair, that they said seem to "suggest a favorable relationship."
Among these allegations are that Pai met with Sinclair's then-CEO David Smith while attending a conference for the company's general managers in November; Pai met with Smith as well as new Sinclair CEO Chris Ripley in January; Sinclair "struck a deal" with the Trump campaign, exchanging access to the then-candidate for better coverage; and former Trump official Boris Epshteyn's on-air political commentary segments, which have been called "propaganda" by critics, are sent to Sinclair stations as "must-run" programming.
"We hope this letter will serve as an opportunity to respond to reports suggesting that you have failed to exercise adequate independence as FCC Chairman and that may have resulted in the agency giving unusual and possibly preferential treatment to Sinclair," the Democrats wrote to Pai, requesting a response by August 28--the day before the final deadline for the public to file comments with the FCC regarding Sinclair's proposed merger with Tribune.
The Democratic lawmakers' allegations, which are sourced with dozens of footnotes, are further bolstered by reporting published Monday by the New York Times that details Pai's alleged "deregulatory blitz, enacting or proposing a wish list of fundamental policy changes advocated by Mr. Smith and his company."
Relying on hundreds of pages of emails and other documents that the Times accessed via the Freedom of Information Act, the article describes a "rush of regulatory actions [that] has been carefully aligned with Sinclair's business objectives," including regulatory rollback that critics say "undermines the heart of the FCC mission to protect diversity, competition and local control in broadcast media."
The Times article also outlines Pai's cozy history with the company and quotes Ripley as saying on a phone call with Sinclair investors in February: "We do expect this new FCC to tackle the ownership rules. We're very optimistic about this new FCC and the leadership of Ajit Pai."
If the Tribune merger is approved by the FCC under Pai and the Trump administration, Sinclair would add another 42 stations to its already vast reach, as the Times mapped below.

The Times report also details the histories of the company and Pai, noting other recent deregulatory actions by the FCC chairman that have provoked intense criticism: "Mr. Pai also froze a program for broadband subsidies for low-income families and began a rollback of net neutrality rules that ensured Internet traffic was equally available to all consumers, acting on regulatory issues that will reshape other multibillion-dollar businesses under his watch."
As Common Dreams has previously reported, concerns over Pai's opposition to net neutrality protections have motivated Open Internet and free speech advocates, as well as Democrat lawmakers, to sound alarms and organize nationwide protests.